Anne E. Hammer
Research Triangle Park
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anne E. Hammer.
Neurology | 2003
David M. Simpson; J. C. McArthur; Richard K. Olney; David B. Clifford; Yuen T. So; Donald A. Ross; B. J. Baird; P. Barrett; Anne E. Hammer; R. Baker; Russell E. Bartt; S. Becker; Joseph R. Berger; Thomas Brannagan; Bruce A. Cohen; C. Dorko; Ronald J. Ellis; D. M. Feinberg; K. Goodkin; Colin D. Hall; P. Kumar; C. M. Marra; R. Pollard; Giovanni Schifitto; Alex Tselis; K. Vollmer
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine (LTG) for the treatment of pain in HIV-associated sensory neuropathies. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind study, patients with HIV-associated distal sensory polyneuropathy (DSP) received LTG or placebo during a 7-week dose escalation phase followed by a 4-week maintenance phase. Randomization was stratified according to whether or not patients were currently using neurotoxic antiretroviral therapy (ART). Results: The number of patients randomized was 92 (62 LTG, 30 placebo) in the stratum receiving neurotoxic ART and 135 (88 LTG, 47 placebo) in the stratum not receiving neurotoxic ART. Mean change from baseline in Gracely Pain Scale score for average pain was not different between LTG and placebo at the end of the maintenance phase in either stratum, but the slope of the change in Gracely Pain Scale score for average pain reflected greater improvement with LTG than with placebo in the stratum receiving neurotoxic ART (p = 0.004), as did the mean change from baseline scores on the Visual Analogue Scale for Pain Intensity and the McGill Pain Assessment Scale and patient and clinician ratings of global impression of change in pain (p ≤ 0.02). The incidence of adverse events, including rash, was similar between LTG and placebo. Conclusions: Lamotrigine was well-tolerated and effective for HIV-associated neuropathic pain in patients receiving neurotoxic antiretroviral therapy. Additional research is warranted to understand the differing response among patients receiving neurotoxic antiretroviral therapy compared with those not receiving neurotoxic antiretroviral therapy.
Neurology | 2005
Victor Biton; J. C. Sackellares; Alain Vuong; Anne E. Hammer; P.S. Barrett; John A. Messenheimer
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lamotrigine in primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy with PGTC seizures who were receiving one or two antiepileptic drugs at study entry were eligible. Patients with partial seizures were excluded on the basis of seizure history and screening EEGs. The study comprised a baseline phase, an escalation phase during which study medication was titrated to a target dose, and a 12-week maintenance phase during which doses of lamotrigine/placebo and concomitant antiepileptic drugs were maintained. Results: Of the 121 randomized patients ages 2 to 55 years, 117 (58 lamotrigine, 59 placebo) entered the escalation phase and received study medication. During the escalation and maintenance phases combined, median percent reduction in PGTC seizure frequency was 66.5% with lamotrigine compared with 34.2% with placebo (p = 0.006). The corresponding numbers for lamotrigine and placebo were 60.6% and 32.8% (p = 0.038) during the escalation phase and 81.9% and 43.0% (p = 0.006) during the maintenance phase. During the maintenance phase, 72% of lamotrigine-treated patients compared with 49% of placebo-treated patients experienced a ≥50% reduction in frequency of PGTC seizures (p = 0.014). A similar pattern of results was observed for all generalized seizures. The most common drug-related adverse events were dizziness (5% lamotrigine, 2% placebo), somnolence (5% lamotrigine, 2% placebo), and nausea (5% lamotrigine, 3% placebo). Conclusions: Adjunctive lamotrigine is effective in the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and has a favorable tolerability profile.
Neurology | 2006
David Blum; Kimford J. Meador; Victor Biton; T. Fakhoury; Bassel F. Shneker; Steve Chung; K. Mills; Anne E. Hammer; J. Isojärvi
Objective: To compare the cognitive effects of lamotrigine vs topiramate as adjunctive therapy in adults with epilepsy. Methods: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted in adults with partial seizures. Lamotrigine or topiramate was introduced as an adjunctive therapy to carbamazepine or phenytoin and titrated over 8 weeks to target doses. These drugs were maintained another 8 weeks (maintenance phase) without dosage changes. The primary endpoint was change from screening to the end of the maintenance phase in a combined analysis of standardized measures of cognition (Controlled Oral Word Association Task [COWA]; Stroop Color–Word Interference; Digit Cancellation; Lafayette Grooved Pegboard, dominant hand; Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, delayed recall; and Symbol–Digit Modalities test). Results: For the primary endpoint, cognitive performance at the end of the maintenance phase was better with lamotrigine than with topiramate (415.3 vs 315.1; p < 0.001). On the individual cognitive tests, performance was better with lamotrigine than with topiramate in mean changes from screening on the COWA (p < 0.001), Stroop Color–Word Interference (p = 0.038), and Symbol–Digit Modalities tests (p < 0.001). The treatment effect exceeded the minimum clinically important difference for the COWA and the Symbol–Digit Modalities test. Mean changes from screening in the Performance-On-Line test simulating driving skills reflected better performance with lamotrigine than with topiramate (p = 0.021). The median percentage change from baseline in seizure frequency was lower with lamotrigine than with topiramate during the escalation phase (−80% vs −100%; p = 0.028) but not during the maintenance phase (−75% vs −100%; p = 0.062). The frequencies of cognitive adverse events and of premature withdrawals related to cognitive decline were higher with topiramate than with lamotrigine (6% vs 0%; p = 0.013). Conclusion: Lamotrigine had significantly less impact than topiramate on measures of cognition when used as adjunctive therapy for partial seizures.
Epilepsy & Behavior | 2001
Keith R. Edwards; J. Chris Sackellares; Alain Vuong; Anne E. Hammer; Pamela S. Barrett
Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. The antiepileptic drug lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective treatment for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder and to enhance mood and well-being in epilepsy patients. The effects of lamotrigine monotherapy on depressive symptoms in epilepsy have not been evaluated to date in a controlled clinical trial. A recently completed double-blind epilepsy trial comparing the effects of lamotrigine monotherapy and valproate monotherapy on weight change incorporated a battery of standard mood assessments. Mean screening Beck Depression Inventory scores showed that both lamotrigine and valproate groups suffered from mild depression at baseline. Lamotrigine monotherapy was reliably associated with earlier and larger improvements than valproate in mood assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States. Considered in the context of other data showing lamotrigines antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression, these results suggest that lamotrigine improves mood in mildly depressed patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine may be particularly useful in treating epilepsy patients with comorbid depression, the most common psychiatric illness in epilepsy.
Neurology | 2000
Orrin Devinsky; Alain Vuong; Anne E. Hammer; Pamela S. Barrett
Article abstract A side effect associated with the use of some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is change in body weight. To evaluate the effect of lamotrigine on body weight in adult patients with epilepsy, we conducted a retrospective review of data from 463 patients treated with lamotrigine in 32 clinical trials. Mean daily dose was 259 (±155) mg and duration of therapy was 318 (±87) days. The mean change in body weight was 0.5 (±5) kg. Lamotrigine was associated with stable body weight in patients with epilepsy.
Epilepsia | 2009
David M. Labiner; Alan B. Ettinger; Toufic Fakhoury; Steve Chung; Bassel F. Shneker; William O. Tatum; J. Mitchell Miller; Alain Vuong; Anne E. Hammer; John A. Messenheimer
Purpose: To assess anger/hostility during treatment with lamotrigine adjunctive therapy versus levetiracetam adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.
Drugs & Aging | 2001
Luigi Giorgi; Gema Gomez; Fiona O’Neill; Anne E. Hammer; Marcus Risner
AbstractObjective: To determine the tolerability of lamotrigine in elderly patients with epilepsy. Design: Pooled data from 13 lamotrigine clinical trials. Setting: Multicentre clinical trials conducted in primary care and neurology practices. Participants: 208 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) were identified: 146 lamotrigine-treated patients, 53 carbamazepine-treated patients and 9 phenytointreated patients. Interventions: Extent of exposure, incidence of drug-related adverse events, serious adverse events and study withdrawals were examined. Results: The median duration of exposure for lamotrigine monotherapy and addon therapy was 24.1 and 47.4 weeks, respectively. The median daily dosage of lamotrigine was 100mg for monotherapy (range 75 to 500mg) and 300mg for add-on therapy (range 25 to 700mg). Overall, the incidence of drug-related adverse events was lower for lamotrigine than comparator drugs: 49% (72/146) for lamotrigine compared with 72% (38/53) for carbamazepine (p = 0.006), and 89% (8/9) for phenytoin (p = 0.035) although patient numbers in each treatment group were not comparable. Patients receiving lamotrigine reported incidences of somnolence (p = 0.012), rash (p = 0.034), and headache (nonsignificant) that were one-half the incidence reported with carbamazepine monotherapy. Rash was the most common reason for study withdrawal: 4% (6/146) lamotrigine, 17% (9/53) carbamazepine and 0% phenytoin. Seven (5%, 7/146) lamotrigine-treated patients, 4 (8%, 4/53) carbamazepine-treated patients and 1 (11%, 1/9) phenytointreated patient experienced drug-related serious adverse events. Conclusion: Lamotrigine, used in the currently prescribed adult dosage regimen, was well tolerated in elderly patients with epilepsy.
Epilepsy & Behavior | 2004
George L. Morris; Anne E. Hammer; Robert P. Kustra; John A. Messenheimer
This open-label study was designed to evaluate lamotrigine monotherapy as a possible alternative in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy who previously failed treatment with valproate. Patients (n=63) were transitioned from valproate to lamotrigine during an 8-week escalation phase followed by 24 weeks of lamotrigine monotherapy. On Week 24 of the treatment phase, investigators judged that 50 and 67% of patients completing the study had shown mild, moderate, or marked improvement in adverse events and global clinical status, respectively, and 76% of patients rated lamotrigine as somewhat better (13%) or much better (63%) than valproate. The majority of patients completing the study experienced no deterioration of seizure control when switching from valproate to lamotrigine. These results support additional research on lamotrigine in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.
Drugs | 2008
J. Mitchell Miller; Robert P. Kustra; Alain Vuong; Anne E. Hammer; John A. Messenheimer
Occurring in up to 80% of patients with epilepsy, depression in epilepsy may manifest as (i) major depressive disorder, meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition (DSM-IV) diagnostic criteria; (ii) atypical depression or dysthymia; or (iii) a dysthymic-like disorder with intermittent symptoms that can be milder than those of major depression. Depressive symptoms impair patients’ health-related quality of life and may affect the clinical course of epilepsy. Depressive symptoms in epilepsy have been attributed to several causes, including endocrine and/or metabolic effects of seizures; the psychological response to epilepsy and its associated mental, physical and social challenges; common pathogenic mechanisms between depression and epilepsy; and the adverse effects of certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), particularly GABAergic agents, such as vigabatrin, tiagabine, topiramate and phenobarbital. Whereas some AEDs impair mood, others appear to improve aspects of mood or are mood neutral. Demonstrable antidepressant efficacy of AEDs used to manage seizures could have a significant impact on the care of patients with epilepsy. The AED lamotrigine has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. In randomized, double-blind, clinical trials in patients with epilepsy, depressive symptoms improved more with lamotrigine monotherapy than valproate monotherapy and more with lamotrigine adjunctive therapy than placebo. Results of open-label studies of lamotrigine monotherapy and adjunctive therapy are consistent with the results of double-blind clinical trials. Lamotrigine-associated improvement in depressive symptoms is independent of its anticonvulsant efficacy. In prospective assessments, gabapentin, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine each exhibited potentially beneficial effects on depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy. However, evidence for the efficacy of gabapentin, levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine in the treatment of depressive symptoms in epilepsy is inconclusive at present because the effects of each agent have only been reported in single studies of an open-label design and with small sample sizes.
Epilepsy & Behavior | 2007
Alan B. Ettinger; Robert P. Kustra; Anne E. Hammer
In this investigation, the effects of lamotrigine versus placebo on depressive symptoms in patients with epilepsy were prospectively assessed. This investigation was a secondary analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in which adult patients received adjunctive lamotrigine (n=32) or placebo (n=38) for a 7-week dose escalation phase, followed by a 12-week maintenance phase, for primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures. Mood symptoms were assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, second edition (BDI-II), the Profile of Mood States (POMS), and the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale-Self-Report (CDRS). Mean (SD) BDI-II scores at screening reflected mild depressive symptoms and were similar between groups (lamotrigine 18.3 (12.1), placebo 16.8 (12.0)). At the end of the maintenance phase, mean (SD) improvement from baseline was greater with lamotrigine than placebo with respect to BDI-II score (lamotrigine 8.9 (7.6), placebo 1.7 (8.5), P=0.01) and POMS total score (lamotrigine 32.0 (30.4), placebo 6.5 (32.3), P=0.03) and numerically greater with lamotrigine than placebo for CDRS score (lamotrigine 7.3 (7.8), placebo 4.1 (13.9), P=0.50). Among the subset of patients with at least mild depression (BDI-II score10), mean improvement from baseline was numerically, but not statistically significantly, greater with lamotrigine (11.5, n=13) than placebo (3.1, n=18) (P=0.054). Median percentage reductions in seizure frequency were significantly greater with lamotrigine than placebo during the escalation phase, the maintenance phase, and the escalation and maintenance phases combined for PGTC seizures and all generalized seizures. However, improvement in seizure frequency was not correlated with improvement in mood (r=0.1, P=ns). Compared with placebo, lamotrigine improved mood symptoms independently of seizure reduction in patients with generalized seizures. Lamotrigine may be useful in treating patients with epilepsy and comorbid depressive symptoms.