Anne-Françoise Fourneau

Gender differences in the presentation of dysphonia related to laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a case-control study

ObjectiveTo investigate the voice quality impairments in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) according to the gender.DesignControlled multi-center study.Materials and methods80 LPR patients (40 males and 40 females) with reflux finding score (RFS) > 7 and reflux symptom index (RSI) > 13 were included and clinically compared according to gender. To be considered as LPR patients, subjects responded to an empiric therapeutic trial based on pantoprazole intake and diet recommendations for 3 months or had positive pH/Impedance metry. Voice Handicap Index (VHI); Short Form Healthy Survey 36 (SF36), blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain and Instability (GRBASI); aerodynamic and acoustic measurements were assessed in all patients and compared with 80 healthy controls (40 males and 40 females) according to gender.ResultsThe most common reasons for the consultation were, respectively, globus sensation in males (22.5%) and dysphonia (27.5%) in female who complained more of breathing difficulties and choking episodes related to LPR than males (p = 0.024). From a quality of life standpoint, female had increased significant impact of LPR disease on vitality and mental health than male. Compared to healthy subjects, both LPR male and female patients had stronger values of G, R, B, S, I, VHI, percent jitter, percent shimmer, and soft palate index than controls. In addition, LPR female had stronger values of lowest fundamental frequency and all aerodynamic measurements than controls.ConclusionAs showed in many other laryngeal conditions, voice quality of female could be more impaired by LPR than male. Some anatomical, histological and functional factors can be suspected and need additional future researches.

Voice Quality as Therapeutic Outcome in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE To study the usefulness of voice quality as therapeutic outcome in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 80 patients with reflux finding score (RFS) > 7 and reflux symptom index (RSI) > 13 were treated with pantoprazole, diet, and lifestyle recommendations for 3 months. The therapeutic effectiveness was assessed with RSI; RFS; Voice Handicap Index; blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability (GRBASI); aerodynamic and a panel of acoustic measurements before and after treatment. A correlation analysis between symptoms, videolaryngostroboscopic signs, and acoustic measurements was conducted. RESULTS Compared to baseline, means of RSI, RFS, Voice Handicap Index, perceptual dysphonia, and roughness significantly decreased. Significant improvements of phonatory quotient, percent jitter, percent shimmer, Relative Average Perturbation, Pitch Perturbation Quotient, Phonatory F0 Range, Amplitude Perturbation Quotient, smooth Amplitude Perturbation Quotient, and Peak-to-Peak Amplitude Variation were found at the end of treatment. Studies of correlation did not identify relevant correlation between videolaryngostroboscopic signs, especially vocal folds edema, and objective voice quality evaluations. CONCLUSION Voice quality assessments can help to better understand voice disorders and can be used as indicators of the treatment effectiveness in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux-related symptoms.

Impact of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Subjective, Aerodynamic, and Acoustic Voice Assessments of Responder and Nonresponder Patients

OBJECTIVE To investigate the usefulness of voice quality assessment as a treatment outcome in responder and nonresponder patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighty clinically diagnosed LPR patients with reflux finding score (RFS) > 7 and reflux symptom index (RSI) > 13 were treated with pantoprazole, lifestyle changes, and diet recommendations for three months. RSI; RFS; Voice Handicap Index; blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability; aerodynamic and acoustic measurements were assessed at baseline and after treatment. These data were analyzed and compared with regard to the clinical evolution of patients (responder versus nonresponder). Patients who significantly improved RSI ≤ 13 and RFS ≤ 7 after treatment were considered as responder. Nonresponders were defined as patients with RSI > 13 and/or RFS > 7 at the end of treatment. Studies of correlation between the adherence to the diet regimen and the evolution of both signs and symptoms and between videolaryngostroboscopic signs; blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability; and acoustic measurements were conducted. RESULTS Significant improvements in RSI, RFS, Voice Handicap Index, perceptual voice quality (dysphonia and roughness), and some fundamental frequency and intensity perturbation cues (phonatory fundamental frequency range, percent jitter, pitch perturbation quotient, relative average perturbation, percent shimmer, smoothed amplitude perturbation quotient, amplitude perturbation quotient, and peak-to-peak amplitude variation) were mainly identified after treatment in responder patients. The clinical and voice quality improvements of nonresponder patients were lower; highlighting a similar evolution of symptoms, signs, and voice quality. The correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between the adherence to lifestyle changes and diet recommendations and the improvement of symptoms and substantial correlations between breathiness and fundamental frequency perturbation parameters. CONCLUSION Voice quality assessments can be used as indicators of the treatment effectiveness in patients with LPR. Voice quality improvement seems to be consistently associated with clinical improvement.

Impact of Chemoradiation After Supra- or Infrahyoid Cancer on Aerodynamic, Subjective, and Objective Voice Assessments: A Multicenter Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES The study aimed to investigate the impact of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on speech and voice quality according to the anatomic localization of the head and neck cancer. METHODS Thirty-four patients treated by CRT for advanced suprahyoid (N = 17) or infrahyoid (N = 17) cancer were assessed for speech function, videolaryngostroboscopy, Voice Handicap Index, blinded Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain, and Instability, acoustic measurements, and aerodynamic measurements. Quality of life was evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) questionnaire. RESULTS Patients treated for an infrahyoid tumor presented more severe values of Voice Handicap Index items, dysphonia, breathiness, asthenia, and some acoustic cues (Voice Turbulence Index, Soft Phonation Index, degree of unvoiced segments, and number of unvoiced segments) than patients treated for a suprahyoid tumor. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 communication item was better in the suprahyoid patient group. CONCLUSIONS Voice quality impairments associated with CRT are more severe in patients treated for advanced infrahyoid cancer, suggesting the need to develop specific posttherapy management of the dysphonia according to the tumor anatomical localization.