Anne Korhonen

Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review

Aim To conduct an integrative review and synthesize current primary studies of professional ethics in nursing. Background Professional ethics is a familiar concept in nursing and provides an ethical code for nursing practice. However, little is known about how professional ethics has been defined and studied in nursing science. Design and data sources Systematic literature searches from 1948–February 2013, using the CINAHL, PubMed and Scopus electronic databases to look at previously published peer-reviewed studies. Review method A modified version of Coopers five-stage integrative review was used to review and synthesize current knowledge. Results Fourteen papers were included in this research. According to our synthesis, professional ethics is described as an intra-professional approach to care ethics and professionals commit to it voluntarily. Professional ethics consist of values, duties, rights and responsibilities, regulated by national legislation and international agreements and detailed in professional codes. Professional ethics is well established in nursing, but is constantly changing due to internal and external factors affecting the profession. Conclusion Despite the obvious importance of professional ethics, it has not been studied much in nursing science. Greater knowledge of professional ethics is needed to understand and support nurses’ moral decision-making and to respond to the challenges of current changes in health care and society.

Nurses’ perceptions of the use of restraint in pediatric somatic care

Background: The interest in the children’s role in pediatric care is connected to children’s health-related autonomy and informed consent in care. Despite the strong history of children’s rights, nurses’ role in the everyday nursing phenomenon, that is, restraint in somatic pediatric care, is still relatively seldom reported. Aim: The aim of this study is to describe nurses’ perceptions of the use of restraint in somatic pediatric care. The ultimate aim is to deepen the understanding of the phenomenon of restraint, whose previous study has been fragmented. Methods: Qualitative approach was selected because of the lack of previous information. Due to the sensitivity of the research question, individual interviewees were selected among voluntary nurses (n = 8). All participants were registered nurses with general work experience as nurses of 5–16 years on average and specifically 1.5–10 years in pediatric nursing. Inductive content analysis was used for aiming to produce a synthesis of the research phenomenon. Ethical considerations: The research received organizational approval by the university hospital, and informed consent and confidentiality were ensured. Results: Restraint in pediatric nursing was process-like, but occurred without advanced planning. The restraint-related process included five categories: (a) identification of the situations where restraint may occur, (b) finding preventive methods, (c) identification of different forms of restraint, (d) rationing the use of restraint, and (e) post-restraint acts. Restraint was seen as a part of pediatric nursing which occurred daily and involved several professionals. According to the nurses’ illustrations, restraint means doing things even when a child is not agreeable. Conclusion: Restraint is part of somatic pediatric nursing, described as the last, but in some cases, the only resort for carrying out care or treatment. Restraint is not a goal in itself, but an instrumental tool and procedure in carrying out care. In the future, more information about nurses’ role and the use of restraint in pediatric nursing is still needed.

A multicentred clinical improvement project among preterm population evaluation of current practices.

Sepsis, a potentially life-threatening infection, is a common complication related to the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) in the preterm infant population. Best practice guidelines include successful strategies to prevent infections. Central venous catheter use is a fairly recent intervention in Finnish neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). As part of a quality improvement project to evaluate catheter-related care practices, 4 NICUs collaborated in a multicenter, multiprofessional study aimed at decreasing the incidence of catheter-related sepsis among a population of preterm infants. This article describes the initial phase that evaluated current protocols and practices. The findings were that current protocols need revision to include more detailed and accurately focused instructions on infection prevention associated with CVC. Many challenges in performing certain procedures with catheters were found. Precis CVC protocols and practices in 4 Finnish NICUs were reviewed for infection control measures.

The development of ethical guidelines for nurses’ collegiality using the Delphi method

Background: Nurses’ collegiality is topical because patient care is complicated, requiring shared knowledge and working methods. Nurses’ collaboration has been supported by a number of different working models, but there has been less focus on ethics. Aim: This study aimed to develop nurses’ collegiality guidelines using the Delphi method. Method: Two online panels of Finnish experts, with 35 and 40 members, used the four-step Delphi method in December 2013 and January 2014. They reformulated the items of nurses’ collegiality identified by the literature and rated based on validity and importance. Content analysis and descriptive statistical methods were used to analyze the data, and the nurses’ collegiality guidelines were formulated. Ethical considerations: Organizational approval was received, and an informed consent was obtained from all participants. Information about the voluntary nature of participation was provided. Results: During the first Delphi panel round, a number of items were reformulated and added, resulting in 32 reformulated items. As a result of the second round, 8 of the 32 items scored an agreement rate of more than 75%, with the most rated item being collegiality means that professionals respect each other. The item with second highest rating was collegiality has a common objective: what is best for patients, followed by the third highest which was professional ethics is the basis of collegiality. Conclusion: Nurses’ collegiality and its content are well recognized in clinical practice but seldom studied. Collegiality can be supported by guidelines, and nurses working in clinical practice, together with teachers and managers, have shared responsibilities to support and develop it. More research in different nursing environments is needed to improve understanding of the content and practice of nursing collegiality.

PO19 - Developing a pain scale for infants in collaboration with clinical staff in the neonatal intensive care unit.

UNLABELLED Theme: Multidisciplinary team working. BACKGROUND Pain assessment is unsystematic and only few nurses use pain scales in clinical practice. Poor compliance may indicate that scales are often inaccurate to assess specific behavior in vulnerable children. AIMS The aim was to develop a feasible and sensitive enough pain assessment tool for neonates in close collaboration with clinical staff in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). METHODS The development process of scale lasted for several years and it included many sessions of discussion and putting into practice the scale to test its adequacy. RESULTS A multidimensional pain assessment scale called NIAPAS (the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale) was developed. The scale was easy to administer and it allowed nurses to recognize any indications of neonates pain. DISCUSSION The development of a scale requires a long-term co-operation and multidisciplinary team working. CONCLUSIONS The NIAPAS is recommendable to assess acute pain in preterm and full-term infants.

Nurses’ perspectives on the suffering of preterm infants

The concept of suffering is discussed among those who are cognitively aware and verbally capable to express their suffering. Due to immaturity, preterm infants’ abilities to express suffering are limited. Relieving suffering is an ethical and juridical demand of good nursing care. The purpose of this study is to describe nurses’ perceptions of the suffering of preterm infants. A descriptive qualitative approach was selected. Data were collected from essays written by nurses (n = 19) working in the neonatal intensive care unit. Inductive content analysis guided by the research question was performed. The nurses described individually determined suffering of the preterm infants according to four categories: suffering ruled by maturation, existence of suffering, individual threshold of suffering and interpreting the cues of suffering. Suffering of preterm infants is manifested by population-specific features, emphasising the need to develop sensitive interventions for relieving their suffering.