Anne Leis

Should noncurative resection of the primary tumour be performed in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE Surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (crc) remains controversial. This review compares survival in patients with advanced crc who underwent surgical resection of the primary tumour with that in patients not undergoing resection, and determines rates of post-operative mortality and nonfatal complications, the primary tumour complication rate, the non-resection surgical procedures rate, and quality of life (qol). METHODS Reports in the central, medline, and embase databases were searched for relevant studies, which were selected using pre-specified eligibility criteria. The search was also restricted to publication dates from 1980 onward, the English language, and studies involving human subjects. Screening, evaluation of relevant articles, and data abstraction were performed in duplicate, and agreement between the abstractors was assessed. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were collected and synthesized per protocol. RESULTS From among the 3379 reports located, fifteen retrospective observational studies were selected. Of the 12,416 patients in the selected studies, 8620 (69%) underwent surgery. Median survival was 15.2 months (range: 10-30.7 months) in the resection group and 11.4 months (range: 3-22 months) in the non-resection group. Hazard ratio for survival was 0.69 [95% confidence interval (ci): 0.61 to 0.79] favouring surgical resection. Mean rates of postoperative mortality and nonfatal complications were 4.9% (95% ci: 0% to 9.7%) and 25.9% (95%ci: 20.1% to 31.6%) respectively. The mean primary tumour complication rate was 29.7% (95% ci: 18.5% to 41.0%), and the non-resection surgical procedures rate in the non-resection group was 27.6% (95 ci: 15.4% to 39.9%). No study provided qol data. CONCLUSIONS Although this review supports primary tumour resection in advanced crc, the results have significant biases. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

Survival impact of surgical resection of primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer: Results from a large population‐based cohort study

Currently, there is very low‐quality evidence available regarding benefit of surgical resection of the primary tumor (SRPT), in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). In the absence of randomization, the reported benefit may reflect selection of younger and healthier patients with good performance status. A large population‐based cohort study was undertaken to determine the survival benefit of SRPT in advanced CRC by eliminating various biases reported in the literature.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and supportive care in cancer: a synopsis of research perspectives and contributions by an interdisciplinary team

Goals of workThe purpose of this short review is to provide a commonly accepted definition of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), to illustrate the widespread use of CAM by people affected by cancer around the world, and to highlight the research contributions of the Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CCAM) research team and its colleagues.MethodsBased on research conducted by CCAM and several European colleagues, a collection of articles was compiled, reviewed, and edited.Main resultsCAM modalities play a role in supportive care and cancer. Because of the high CAM utilization, it is critical to help cancer patients make safe, informed, evidence-based decisions for their care. In addition, advances in research methodology, outcomes, and measurement in CAM studies are suggested to better account for individual and collective experiences.ConclusionThis special issue provides clinicians with a summary of information about CAM and perspectives for better responding to cancer patient’s needs.

From Studying Patient Treatment to Studying Patient Care: Arriving at Methodologic Crossroads

Cancer care is multifactorial and patient centered. It can be described as a complex package of interventions, delivered at different times and places with different intentions, which interacts and cannot be evaluated in isolation. The authors discuss the evolving nature of cancer care and address the challenges faced by biomedical research methodology when applied to cancer care. In addition, they identify new research directions to meet these challenges. These include qualitative research, mixed methods research, and approaches based on systems thinking.

Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Canadian Province Experience

BACKGROUND Surgical resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. Survival benefit reported in the literature has been attributed to the selection of younger and healthier patients with good performance status. We have recently reported that resection of the primary tumor improved survival of patients with stage IV CRC. In this study we examined survival benefit of surgery in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic primary tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cohort of patients with stage IV CRC and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic primary tumor, who were diagnosed during the period of 1992 to 2005, in the province of Saskatchewan Canada, was evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic importance of resection of primary tumor. A test for interaction was performed for resection of primary tumor and other important clinicopathological variables. RESULTS A total of 834 patients with a median age of 70 years (range, 22-93) and male:female ratio of 58:42 were identified. Among them 521 (63%) patients underwent surgery and 361 (43.3%) received chemotherapy. Patients who underwent surgery and received any chemotherapy had a median overall survival of 19.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9-22.6) compared with 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.9-10.0) if they did not have surgery (P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.53), surgical resection of the primary tumor (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.39-0.57), metastasectomy (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38-0.62), and second-line chemotherapy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92) were correlated with superior survival. A test for interaction between ≥ 1 metastatic sites and surgery was significant, which suggests a larger benefit of surgery in patients with stage IVA disease. CONCLUSION Results of this large population-based cohort study suggest that resection of the primary tumor in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with stage IV CRC improved survival independent of other prognostic variables. The benefit was more pronounced in stage IVA disease.

Research utilization and evidence-based practice among Saskatchewan massage therapists

Abstract While massage therapy (MT) is an increasingly used health care service with a growing evidence base, there is insufficient information about the extent to which MT practice is evidence-based. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive view of Saskatchewan MT’s research utilization to inform the development of evidence-based massage therapy practice. The main objectives of the study were to describe MT’s perceptions of research, their appraised self-efficacy in research literacy and to identify the characteristic of practitioners who use research. Using a survey design all 815 registered members of the Massage Therapist Association of Saskatchewan were invited to complete a mail-out questionnaire. A total of 333 questionnaires were completed and returned for a 41% response rate. Univariate and logistic regression analysis was conducted using SPSS 17.0. While overall perceptions of research were positive, self-efficacy in research literacy was low and research utilization was limited. Characteristics associated with research use included referring to online research databases and peer-reviewed journals, belief that practice should be based on research, and 20 or greater hours per week of practice. Provincial regulatory status may be the first step to quality service delivery and research literacy training and support is needed for practitioners.

CAM and Pediatric Oncology: Where Are All the Best Cases?

Background. Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by children with cancer is high; however, pediatric best cases are rare. Objectives. To investigate whether best cases exist in pediatric oncology using a three-phase approach and to compare our methods with other such programs. Methods. In phase I, Childrens Oncology Group (COG) oncologists were approached via email and asked to recall patients who were (i) under 18 when diagnosed with cancer, (ii) diagnosed between 1990 and 2006, (iii) had unexpectedly positive clinical outcome, and (iv) reported using CAM during or after cancer treatment. Phase II involved partnering with CAM research networks; patients who were self-identified as best cases were asked to submit reports completed in conjunction with their oncologists. Phase III extended this partnership to 200 CAM associations and training organizations. Results. In phase I, ten cases from three COG sites were submitted, and most involved use of traditional Chinese medicine to improve quality of life. Phases II and III did not yield further cases. Conclusion. Identification of best cases has been suggested as an important step in guiding CAM research. The CARE Best Case Series Program had limited success in identifying pediatric cases despite the three approaches we used.

Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Confirmatory Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Observational studies have suggested that patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumor (SRPT) have better survival. Yet the results are not confirmed in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Lack of randomization and failure to control prognostic variables such as performance status are major critiques to the findings of the observational studies. We previously have shown that SRPT, independent of chemotherapy and performance status, improves survival of stage IV CRC patients. The current study aims to validate our findings in patients with stage IV CRC who were diagnosed during the period of modern chemotherapy. Methods: A cohort of 569 patients with stage IV CRC diagnosed during 2006-2010 in the province of Saskatchewan was evaluated. Cox regression model was used for the adjustment of prognostic variables. Results: Median age was 69 years (59-95) and M: F was 1.4:1. Fifty-seven percent received chemotherapy, 91.4% received FOLFIRI or FOLFOX & 67% received a biologic agent. Median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SRPT and received chemotherapy was 27 months compared with 14 months of the non-resection group (p<0.0001). Median OS of patients who received all active agents and had SRPT was 39 months (95%CI: 25.1-52.9). On multivariate analysis, SRPT, hazard ratio (HR):0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56), use of chemotherapy, HR: 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26-0.43), metastasectomy, HR: 0.43 (95%CI: 0.31-0.58), second line therapy, HR: 0.50 (95%CI: 0.35-0.70), and third line therapy, HR: 0.58 (95%CI: 0.41-0.83) were correlated with superior survival. Conclusions: This study confirms our findings and supports a favorable association between SRPT and survival in patients with stage IV CRC who are treated with modern therapy.

Evaluating supportive cancer care: are we missing an opportunity?

IntroductionCancer care can be described as a system or complex network of interventions delivered at various times and places with different intentions.Cancer care as a systemCancer care can include medical treatments, psychosocial care, complementary and alternative medicine, self-care, as well as the process of healing and the context in which care is delivered.Evaluating cancer careWhereas evaluating individual cancer treatments can be difficult, evaluating cancer care is even more challenging and requires a research framework that relies on methodologies capable of addressing its holistic, individualized, and complex nature.In summaryWe suggest that research frameworks focused on studying complex or whole systems are a promising evaluation approach and an opportunity for further exploration.

Canadian integrative oncology research priorities: results of a consensus-building process

BACKGROUND In Canada, many diverse models of integrative oncology care have emerged in response to the growing number of cancer patients who combine complementary therapies with their conventional medical treatments. The increasing interest in integrative oncology emphasizes the need to engage stakeholders and to work toward consensus on research priorities and a collaborative research agenda. The Integrative Canadian Oncology Research Initiative initiated a consensus-building process to meet that need and to develop an action plan that will implement a Canadian research agenda. METHODS A two-day consensus workshop was held after completion of a Delphi survey and stakeholder interviews. RESULTS FIVE INTERRELATED PRIORITY RESEARCH AREAS WERE IDENTIFIED AS THE FOUNDATION FOR A CANADIAN RESEARCH AGENDA: EffectivenessSafetyResource and health services utilizationKnowledge translationDeveloping integrative oncology models Research is needed within each priority area from a range of different perspectives (for example, patient, practitioner, health system) and in a way that reflects a continuum of integration from the addition of a single complementary intervention within conventional cancer care to systemic change. Strategies to implement a Canadian integrative oncology research agenda were identified, and working groups are actively developing projects in line with those strategic areas. Of note is the intention to develop a national network for integrative oncology research and knowledge translation. CONCLUSIONS The identified research priorities reflect the needs and perspectives of a spectrum of integrative oncology stakeholders. Ongoing stakeholder consultation, including engagement from new stakeholders, is needed to ensure appropriate uptake and implementation of a Canadian research agenda.