Anne Nohl
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anne Nohl.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2016
Kimberly A. Harris; Sara N. Horst; Anne Nohl; Kim Annis; Caroline Duley; Dawn B. Beaulieu; Leyla J. Ghazi; David A. Schwartz
Background:Ustekinumab is a new biologic therapy targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin -23. It is currently approved for the treatment of psoriasis, but clinical trials have shown that it can induce and maintain remission in Crohns disease (CD). We aim to evaluate effectiveness of ustekinumab in the treatment of CD. Methods:A retrospective chart review was performed including patients (pts) from 2 academic medical centers with complicated, refractory CD started on ustekinumab between June 2011 and June 2014. Pts were treated based on a novel subcutaneous dosing schedule designed to simulate the intravenous load used in clinical trials. Results:Forty-five pts were treated with ustekinumab during this study period. Of the pts who had clinical parameters available before and after medication start, 46% achieved clinical response (Harvey–Bradshaw index decrease ≥3) and 35% achieved clinical remission (Harvey–Bradshaw index ⩽3). Short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire scores increased significantly (46 [20, 68] to 55 [32, 70], P < 0.05). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate decreased significantly (20 [3, 54] to 12 [0, 42] mm/h, P < 0.05). C-reactive protein decreased significantly (4.9 [0.3, 111] to 3.3 [0.2, 226] mg/L, P < 0.05). Seventy-six percent of patients demonstrated an endoscopic response and 24% achieved complete endoscopic remission. Twelve patients (26%) were hospitalized for IBD-related issues. Four pts had infection-related complications. Six pts (13%) underwent surgery for IBD-related issues. Three pts stopped ustekinumab, 1 for pt preference and 2 for the lack of response. Conclusions:Using a novel subcutaneous dosing schedule, ustekinumab was successful in improving clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic markers of disease activity in patients with severe, refractory CD.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2015
Dawn M. Wiese; Dawn B. Beaulieu; James C. Slaughter; Sara N. Horst; Julie Wagnon; Caroline Duley; Kim Annis; Anne Nohl; Alan J. Herline; Roberta L. Muldoon; Tim Geiger; Paul E. Wise; David A. Schwartz
Background:Perianal disease is a manifestation of Crohns disease (CD) that has poor long-term treatment outcomes. The aim was to determine if rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)–guided therapy with adalimumab (ADA) can improve outcomes for patients with perianal fistulizing CD. Methods:This is a randomized prospective study comparing serial EUS guidance of fistula treatment versus standard of care in fistulizing perianal CD. At enrollment, all patients underwent a rectal EUS and an EUA with seton placement and/or I&D. Treatment was maximized with immunomodulators, antibiotics, and ADA induction. Surgical interventions were determined by the surgeons discretion in the control group and assisted by every 12th week EUS in the intervention group. Primary and secondary endpoints where complete drainage cessation at week 48 was fistula status per EUS, respectively. Results:Twenty patients were enrolled: 11 control and 9 EUS guidance. At 24 weeks, 7/9 (78%) in EUS group and 3/11 (27%) in control group had drainage cessation (P = 0.04). This significant difference was lost at week 48 (P = 0.44). Three patients in the EUS and 1 in the control group had additional surgical intervention. Those in the EUS group had more rapid escalation of ADA dosing (P = 0.003). There was no difference in the change in PDAI at week 48 versus baseline (P = 0.81). Conclusions:Rectal EUS-guided ADA therapy for CD perianal fistulas showed an initial benefit at 24 weeks, which was lost at week 48. This is likely due to small sample size and higher fistula closure in the controls. However, the faster rate of fistula resolution is a clinically significant finding.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2015
Scott A. Merkley; Dawn B. Beaulieu; Sara N. Horst; Caroline Duley; Kim Annis; Anne Nohl; David A. Schwartz
Background:Managing patients with IBD who are refractory or have contraindications to standard therapies is challenging. Many will lose response, become intolerant to treatment, or develop infections with contraindication for immunosuppression. Therefore, alternative therapies, such as the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), could be used to manage patients in these difficult cases. Methods:Data were extracted retrospectively from the electronic medical records at Vanderbilt University on patients with IBD who received IVIg (February 2011–June 2013). Patients were treated with IVIg 0.4 g·kg−1·d−1 for 3 consecutive days and then 0.4 g/kg once monthly. The dose was increased to 0.4 g/kg biweekly for loss of response or partial response. Clinical response was defined as decreasing the Harvey–Bradshaw Index ≥3 points or improvement in C-reactive protein >25%. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey–Bradshaw Index score <5, no hospitalizations or surgeries after IVIg, or symptom resolution. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results:Twenty-four patients with IBD received IVIg. Seventeen patients received IVIg for failure of standard treatment. Six patients received IVIg during active infection. Two patients had histoplasmosis, 1 patient had tuberculosis, and 2 patients had pulmonary fungal infections. One patient with ulcerative colitis was given IVIg for recurrent Clostridium difficile. Nine patients required dose escalation after median 153 days (30–360). Ninteen patients (79%) had a response or remission. Sixteen (67%) had a response and 3 (12.5%) obtained remission with IVIg. C-reactive protein decreased significantly after treatment (19 mg/dL [0.1–77] to 7.5 [0.2–20]), P < 0.05. Harvey–Bradshaw Index scores improved (8 [0–19] to 6 [0–17]), P = not significant. Of note, 62.5% had endoscopic improvement after treatment. Conclusions:IVIg is safe and effective in the short-term management of patients with IBD when standard therapies are contraindicated.
Gastroenterology | 2013
Indrani Ray; Renee A. Stiles; Henry Domenico; David A. Schwartz; Dawn B. Beaulieu; Sara N. Horst; Julianne H. Wagnon; Caroline Duley; Anne Nohl; Lawrence S. Gaines
Background: There are over 700,000 Americans affected by Crohns disease (CD). A number of previous studies have looked at the cost of treating CD but they have focused primarily on inpatient costs. This study examines the cost of CD treatment in an outpatient setting and the economic burden of the comorbidity of depression among CD patients at a US academic medical center. Method: This is a retrospective study examining hospital cost data of all new patients with CD based on ICD-9 coding seen in an academic medical centers Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center from November 2010-November 2011. Chart review confirmed that billing was only for CDrelated issues. Cost data represent the actual cost to the institution of providing the service and was obtained from the institutions cost accounting database. The presence of depression was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), a self-report instrument used as part of the regular clinical practice in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Center. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between patients PHQ-9 score and cost, adjusting for age, race, and gender, as well as an interaction between gender and severity of depression. Results: 650 patients (377 female [58%]) were included in the study. The average age of the patients is 39.7 years [(malesM.39.4 (SD. 15.85) femalesM39.9,( SD. 15.85)]. The average PHQ9 score is 6.80. Females had a higher average PHQ-9 score of 7.80 (SD. 6.40 ) vs. males-
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2015
Sara N. Horst; Andrew Chao; Michael J. Rosen; Anne Nohl; Caroline Duley; Julianne H. Wagnon; Dawn B. Beaulieu; Warren D. Taylor; Lawrence S. Gaines; David A. Schwartz
Gastroenterology | 2017
Ann Honor; Lawrence S. Gaines; James C. Slaughter; Caroline Duley; Kim Annis; Anne Nohl; Dawn M. Wiese; Dawn B. Beaulieu; David A. Schwartz; Sara N. Horst
Gastroenterology | 2017
Shabnam Sarker; Michelle E. Law; Sara N. Horst; Anne Nohl; Caroline Duley; Kim Annis; Dawn M. Wiese; David A. Schwartz; Dawn B. Beaulieu
Gastroenterology | 2016
Robin L. Dalal; Carmen Tuchman; Amy K. Motley; Anne Nohl; Kim Annis; Caroline Duley; Dawn M. Wiese; Dawn B. Beaulieu; David A. Schwartz; Sara N. Horst
Gastroenterology | 2015
Alexis P. Calloway; Meera R. Wright; Kim Annis; Caroline Duley; Anne Nohl; James C. Slaughter; Dawn B. Beaulieu; David A. Schwartz; Sara N. Horst
Gastroenterology | 2014
Scott A. Merkley; Sara N. Horst; Dawn B. Beaulieu; Caroline Duley; Kim Annis; Anne Nohl; David A. Schwartz