Anne Petas Swane Lund Krarup

Randomised clinical trial: the efficacy of a transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist AZD1386 in human oesophageal pain

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1113–1122

Descending Inhibitory Pain Modulation Is Impaired in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Pain is a prominent symptom in chronic pancreatitis (CP), but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. We investigated the role of descending pain modulation from supraspinal structures as well as central nervous system sensitization in patients with pain from CP. METHODS Twenty-five patients with CP and 15 healthy volunteers were included. Descending pain modulation was investigated by diffuse noxious inhibitory control (a descending inhibitory response after conditioning stimulation). Central pain processing was investigated as the perceptual responses to multimodal (electrical, thermal, and mechanical) stimulations of the rectosigmoid and evoked brain potentials after electrical stimulation of the rectosigmoid. RESULTS Compared with healthy volunteers, the efficacy of diffuse noxious inhibitory control was reduced in patients with CP (13% +/- 21% vs 39% +/- 22%, respectively; F = 3.8; P = .01); central sensitization was indicated by remote hyperalgesia in the rectosigmoid to electrical stimulation (21 +/- 15 mA vs 27 +/- 15 mA; F = 6.2; P = .02) and heat stimulation (51 degrees C +/- 5 degrees C vs 53 degrees C +/- 4 degrees C; F = 5.9; P = .02). Compared with controls, patients with CP had increased latency of the early P1 peak to rectosigmoid stimulation (85 +/- 21 ms vs 108 +/- 28 ms, respectively; P = .02), possibly reflecting reorganization of central pain pathways. CONCLUSIONS Patients with CP have impairments in inhibitory pain modulation and evidence of central sensitization. Treatment of their pain therefore should focus not only on the pancreas, but also on descending pain modulation from supraspinal structures and central nervous system sensitization.

Pain in chronic pancreatitis: the role of neuropathic pain mechanisms

Pain mechanisms in patients with chronic pancreatitis are incompletely understood and probably multifactorial. Recently, evidence from experimental human pain research has indicated that in many of these patients pain processing in the central nervous system is abnormal and mimics that seen in neuropathic pain disorders. The current review focuses on several lines of evidence supporting this hypothesis. Hence, the spontaneous and postprandial pain in chronic pancreatitis may reflect the characteristic pain features seen in patients with neuropathic pain. Biochemical and histopathological findings in tissues from patients with chronic pancreatitis are similar to those observed in patients with other nerve fibre lesions. Experimental studies have shown that patients with chronic pancreatitis show signs of spinal hyper-excitability counter-balanced by segmental and descending inhibition. Changes in the brain with cortical reorganisation to gut stimulation and increased activity in specific electroencephalographic features characteristic for neuropathic pain are also seen in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Finally, principles involved in the treatment of pancreatic pain have many similarities with those recommended in neuropathic pain disorders. In conclusion, a mechanism-based understanding of pain in chronic pancreatitis may have important implications for the treatment.

Acid hypersensitivity in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis

Abstract Objective. Painful symptoms are prevalent in patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis but experimental data are sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the pain response to experimental oesophageal stimulation in 14 patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis and 15 healthy volunteers. Material and methods. A multimodal probe was placed in the oesophagus. The participants were subjected to mechanical, thermal and electrical pain stimuli followed by perfusion with 0.1 M HCl. Pain scores, referred pain areas and evoked brain potentials to electrical stimulation of the oesophagus were recorded. Results. Patients tolerated significantly less acid perfused in the oesophagus (median 123 versus 200 ml; P = 0.02) and felt the burning sensation evoked by the acid earlier (median 2.0 versus 5.0 min; P = 0.01). Eight patients had coexisting gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Six patients had pure eosinophilic oesophagitis, and this group felt the acid earlier than those with concomitant reflux or the healthy volunteers (median 0.8 versus 2.0 and 5.0 min; P = 0.03). There were no differences between patients and controls in the responses to mechanical or thermal stimulation (P > 0.4). Furthermore, no differences were found for the proxies of central nervous system sensitization (response to electrical stimulations, referred pain areas or evoked brain potentials; P > 0.1). Conclusions. Patients with eosinophilic oesophagitis are hypersensitive to acid perfused in the oesophagus, and pathophysiologic findings are likely confined to the peripheral tissue. Reflux from physiological acid may play a role in the symptoms of eosinophilic oesophagitis.

Viscero-somatic reflexes in referred pain areas evoked by capsaicin stimulation of the human gut

The interaction between visceral pain and the sympathetic nervous system is only sparsely investigated in quantitative human studies. Referred visceral pain can be evoked experimentally by application of substances such as capsaicin (the pungent substance of chilli pepper) to the gut. The aim of the present study was to induce referred visceral pain from the small and large intestine in 32 volunteers via the stomal opening in patients with ileo‐ or colostomy and quantify the viscero‐somatic reflex responses in these referred pain areas by thermography and laser doppler flowmetry.

Proximal and distal esophageal sensitivity is decreased in patients with Barrett’s esophagus

AIM To investigate sensations to multimodal pain stimulation in the metaplastic and normal parts of the esophagus in patients with Barretts esophagus (BE). METHODS Fifteen patients with BE and 15 age-matched healthy volunteers were subjected to mechanical, thermal and electrical pain stimuli of the esophagus. Both the metaplastic part and the normal part (4 and 14 cm, respectively, above the esophago-gastric junction) were examined. At sensory thresholds the stimulation intensity, referred pain areas, and evoked brain potentials were recorded. RESULTS Patients were hyposensitive to heat stimulation both in the metaplastic part [median stimulation time to reach the pain detection threshold: 15 (12-34) s vs 14 (6-23) s in controls; F = 4.5, P = 0.04] and the normal part of the esophagus [median 17 (6-32) s vs 13 (8-20) s in controls; F = 6.2, P = 0.02]. Furthermore, patients were hyposensitive in the metaplastic part of the esophagus to mechanical distension [median volume at moderate pain: 50 (20-50) mL vs 33 (13-50) mL in controls; F = 5.7, P = 0.02]. No indication of central nervous system abnormalities was present, as responses were comparable between groups to electrical pain stimuli in the metaplastic part [median current evoking moderate pain: 13 (6-26) mA vs 12 (9-24) mA in controls; F = 0.1, P = 0.7], and in the normal part of the esophagus [median current evoking moderate pain: 9 (6-16) mA, vs 11 (5-11) mA in controls; F = 3.4, P = 0.07]. Furthermore, no differences were seen for the referred pain areas (P-values all > 0.3) or latencies and amplitudes for the evoked brain potentials (P-values all > 0.1). CONCLUSION Patients with BE are hyposensitive both in the metaplastic and normal part of esophagus likely as a result of abnormalities affecting peripheral nerve pathways.

Is electrical brain activity a reliable biomarker for opioid analgesia in the gut

The effects of morphine on brain potentials after experimental gut pain have never been investigated. This study explored whether multi-channel-evoked brain potentials (EP) and corresponding dipole sources in the brain would reflect the effects of morphine on experimental oesophageal pain. In a crossover study, the effects of oral morphine (30 mg) or corresponding placebo on pain from electrical oesophageal stimulation were tested in 12 healthy male volunteers. The electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was monitored with 64 surface recordings. Pain was assessed by subjective scores on a visual analogue scale, amplitude and latency of the vertex-EP as well as on multi-channel recordings of EPs. Finally, electrical brain sources after pain stimuli were modelled from the EEG data. Morphine attenuated subjective pain scores (p = 0.008). The amplitude of the P2 peak (230 msec. post-stimulus) in the vertex EPs was unaltered after treatment with morphine, whereas after placebo treatment, it decreased (p = 0.03). However, the overall topography changed and the source of P1 (100 msec. post-stimulus), possibly originating from areas near the cingulate gyrus, changed localization in an upward, posterior direction (p = 0.04). The length of the vector describing this shift correlated inversely with the magnitude of the subjective pain relief (r = -0.7; p = 0.02). With the potential of becoming a useful biomarker in analgesic trials, the localization of the dipole sources reflected the analgesic action of morphine after pain stimuli of the gut. Even though further evaluation of the method is necessary, it has the potential to be a valid objective biomarker for opioid analgesia.

Distensibility testing of the esophagus

The following contains commentaries on distensibility testing using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP); the use of the distention test of the esophageal body in the clinic diagnosis of noncardiac chest pain; the functional lumen imaging in gastroesophageal reflux disease‐impaired esophagogastric junction; a multimodal pain model for the esophagus; the rationale for distensibility testing; and further developments in standardized distension protocols.

The neurophysiology of the esophagus.

This paper reports on the neurophysiology of the esophagus, including on the uneven distribution of innervation in the esophagus, reflected by the increased sensitivity and perception of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) events in the proximal rather than distal esophagus; the role of the enteric nervous system (ENS) in swallowing; the role of the physiological stress‐responsive systems, including the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis in mediating esophageal pain; the advances in understanding pain mechanisms and brain structure provided by technological imaging advances; investigations into the efficacy of the descending‐pain control system, including diffuse noxious inhibitory control (DNIC); the role of abnormal nervous signaling in afferent pathways in the pathogenesis of Barretts esophagus (BE); and the contribution of the esophageal mucosa to reflux symptoms.

Gastrointestinal sensitivity and gastroesophageal reflux disease

This paper reports on gastrointestinal sensitivity, including on the role of refluxate volume on the perception of reflux symptoms; experimental pain models that mimic mechanisms and symptoms of pain associated with esophageal diseases; the potential role of the acid receptor TRPV1 in the genesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms; and roles for ATP and the purine and pyrimidine receptor subfamilies P1, P2X, and P2Y in the pathogenesis of GERD symptoms.