Anne Thilander-Klang

Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD.

OBJECTIVES This study evaluates two methods for calculating effective dose, CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-area product (DAP) for a cone beam CT (CBCT) device: 3D Accuitomo at field size 30x40 mm and 3D Accuitomo FPD at field sizes 40x40 mm and 60x60 mm. Furthermore, the effective dose of three commonly used examinations in dental radiology was determined. METHODS CTDI(100) measurements were performed in a CT head dose phantom with a pencil ionization chamber connected to an electrometer. The rotation centre was placed in the centre of the phantom and also, to simulate a patient examination, in the upper left cuspid region. The DAP value was determined with a plane-parallel transmission ionization chamber connected to an electrometer. A conversion factor of 0.08 mSv per Gy cm(2) was used to determine the effective dose from DAP values. Based on data from 90 patient examinations, DAP and effective dose were determined. RESULTS CTDI(100) measurements showed an asymmetric dose distribution in the phantom when simulating a patient examination. Hence a correct value of CTDI(w) could not be calculated. The DAP value increased with higher tube current and tube voltage values. The DAP value was also proportional to the field size. The effective dose was found to be 11-77 microSv for the specific examinations. CONCLUSIONS DAP measurement was found to be the best method for determining effective dose for the Accuitomo. Determination of specific conversion factors in dental radiology must, however, be further developed.

Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view.

AIMS To evaluate subjective image quality for two diagnostic tasks, periapical diagnosis and implant planning, for cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using different exposure parameters and fields of view (FOVs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Examinations were performed in posterior part of the jaws on a skull phantom with 3D Accuitomo (FOV 3 cm×4 cm) and 3D Accuitomo FPD (FOVs 4 cm×4 cm and 6 cm×6 cm). All combinations of 60, 65, 70, 75, 80 kV and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mA with a rotation of 180° and 360° were used. Dose-area product (DAP) value was determined for each combination. The images were presented, displaying the object in axial, cross-sectional and sagittal views, without scanning data in a random order for each FOV and jaw. Seven observers assessed image quality on a six-point rating scale. RESULTS Intra-observer agreement was good (κw=0.76) and inter-observer agreement moderate (κw=0.52). Stepwise logistic regression showed kV, mA and diagnostic task to be the most important variables. Periapical diagnosis, regardless jaw, required higher exposure parameters compared to implant planning. Implant planning in the lower jaw required higher exposure parameters compared to upper jaw. Overall ranking of FOVs gave 4 cm×4 cm, 6 cm×6 cm followed by 3 cm×4 cm. CONCLUSIONS This study has shown that exposure parameters should be adjusted according to diagnostic task. For this particular CBCT brand a rotation of 180° gave good subjective image quality, hence a substantial dose reduction can be achieved without loss of diagnostic information.

Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology

A wide variety of X-ray equipment is used today in dental radiology, including intra-oral, orthopantomographic, cephalometric, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and computed tomography (CT). This raises the question of how the radiation risks resulting from different kinds of examinations should be compared. The risk to the patient is usually expressed in terms of effective dose. However, it is difficult to determine its reliability, and it is difficult to make comparisons, especially when different modalities are used. The classification of the new CBCT units is also problematic as they are sometimes classified as CT units. This will lead to problems in choosing the best dosimetric method, especially when the examination geometry resembles more on an ordinary orthopantomographic examination, as the axis of rotation is not at the centre of the patient, and small radiation field sizes are used. The purpose of this study was to present different methods for the estimation of the effective dose from the equipment currently used in dental radiology, and to discuss their limitations. The methods are compared based on commonly used measurable and computable dose quantities, and their reliability in the estimation of the effective dose.

Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.

Different types of X-ray equipment are used in dental radiology, such as intra-oral, panoramic, cephalometric, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) units. Digital receptors have replaced film and screen-film systems and other technical developments have been made. The radiation doses arising from different types of examination are sparsely documented and often expressed in different radiation quantities. In order to allow the comparison of radiation doses using conventional techniques, i.e. intra-oral, panoramic and cephalometric units, with those obtained using, CBCT or MSCT techniques, the same quantities and units of dose must be used. Dose determination should be straightforward and reproducible, and data should be stored for each image and clinical examination. It is shown here that air kerma-area product (P(KA)) values can be used to monitor the radiation doses used in all types of dental examinations including CBCT and MSCT. However, for the CBCT and MSCT techniques, the methods for the estimation of dose must be more thoroughly investigated. The values recorded can be used to determine the diagnostic standard doses and to set diagnostic reference levels for each type of clinical examination and equipment used. It should also be possible to use these values for the estimation and documentation of organ or effective doses.

Effect of tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT (MDCT) images in order to identify the minimum radiation dose required to reproduce acceptable levels of different diagnostic image qualities. Original digital scanning data (raw data) were selected retrospectively from routine MDCT brain examinations of 25 paediatric patients. All examinations had been performed using axial scanning on an eight-slice MDCT (LightSpeed Ultra, GE Healthcare). Their ages ranged from newborn to 15 years. Quantum noise was added artificially to the raw data representing dose reductions equivalent to steps of 20 mA. Patient identification information was removed. Three experienced radiologists blindly and randomly assessed the resulting images from two different levels of the brain with regard to reproduction of structures and overall image quality. Final data were evaluated using the non-parametric statistical approach of inter-scale concordance. The minimum value of tube current-time product (mAs) required to reproduce an image of sufficient diagnostic quality was established in relation to the age of the patient. The corresponding CT dose index values by volume (CTDI(vol) (mGy)) were also established. In conclusion, acceptable reproduction of low-contrast structures was possible at CTDI(vol) values down to 20 mGy (patients 1-5 years old). For acceptable reproduction of high-contrast structures, CTDI(vol) values down to 10 mGy were considered possible (patients 1-5 years old). The original image quality for patients under 6 months of age (15 mGy) was found to be inadequate for acceptable reproduction of low-contrast structures.

Evaluation of image-enhanced paediatric computed tomography brain examinations

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of reducing the radiation dose to paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) brain examination by using image-enhancing software. Artificial noise was added to the raw data collected from 20 patients aged between 1 and 10 y to simulate tube current reductions of 20, 40 and 60 mA. All images were created in duplicate; one set of images remained unprocessed whereas the other was processed with image-enhancing software. Three paediatric radiologists assessed the image quality based on their ability to visualise the high- and low-contrast structures and their overall impression of the diagnostic value of the image. For patients aged 6-10 y, it was found that dose reductions from 27 mGy (CTDI(vol)) to 23 mGy (15 %) in the upper brain and from 32 to 28 mGy (13 %) in the lower brain were possible for standard diagnostic CT examinations when using the image-enhancing filter. For patients 1-5 y, the results for standard diagnostics in the upper brain were inconclusive, for the lower brain no dose reductions were found possible.

Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.

OBJECTIVE During dental radiography, the salivary and thyroid glands are at radiation risk. In 2007, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) updated the methodology for determining the effective dose, and the salivary glands were assigned tissue-specific weighting factors for the first time. The aims of this study were to determine the absorbed dose to the organs and to calculate, applying the ICRP publication 103 tissue-weighting factors, the effective doses delivered during digital intraoral and panoramic radiography. METHODS Thermoluminescent dosemeter measurements were performed on an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. The organ-absorbed doses were measured at 30 locations, representing different radiosensitive organs in the head and neck, and the effective dose was calculated according to the ICRP recommendations. RESULTS The salivary glands and the oral mucosa received the highest absorbed doses from both intraoral and panoramic radiography. The effective dose from a full-mouth intraoral examination was 15 μSv and for panoramic radiography, the effective dose was in the range of 19-75 μSv, depending on the panoramic equipment used. CONCLUSION The effective dose from a full-mouth intraoral examination is lower and that from panoramic radiography is higher than previously reported. Clinicians should be aware of the higher effective dose delivered during panoramic radiography and the risk-benefit profile of this technique must be assessed for the individual patient. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The effective dose of radiation from panoramic radiography is higher than previously reported and there is large variability in the delivered radiation dosage among the different types of equipment used.

Adrenal lesions: variability in attenuation over time, between scanners, and between observers

Background Measurements of attenuation (in Hounsfield units [HU]) and contrast wash-out are widely used to characterize adrenal lesions as benign or indeterminate/malignant at computed tomography (CT). Clinical experience suggests that such measurements of adrenal lesions may vary over time and between observers, making evaluation difficult. Purpose To investigate the change over time of adrenal lesion size, attenuation, and contrast wash-out at CT, to determine inter-observer variability, and to analyze other factors underlying the variability. Material and Methods In a cohort of patients, with or without malignant disease, undergoing CT, adrenal lesions were prospectively analyzed. Lesions with growth >20% or >5 mm over 6 months were excluded. Non-enhanced attenuation and contrast medium wash-out over 2-year follow-up were analyzed. An inter-observer analysis with five observers and a phantom study of eight different CT scanners were performed to assess measurement variability. Results Mean adrenal lesion non-enhanced attenuation values decreased by 0.5 HU/year during follow-up. Using 10 HU or 40% relative wash-out as threshold values for benign versus indeterminate lesions, 27 (20%) and 39 (29%) of 136 lesions, respectively, would be reclassified at some occasion during follow-up. In the observer analysis 37 of 40 lesions demonstrated agreement between all observers, using established threshold values. The phantom study showed an intra-scanner variability of 1–3 HU, but an inter-scanner variability of up to 8 HU for water. Conclusion The clinically widespread use of specific attenuation threshold values for characterizing adrenal lesions must be used with great caution, considering that multiple factors, related to patient, equipment, scanning technique, and observer influence the outcome.

Evaluation of subjective assessment of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of computed tomography.

The purpose of the present work was to investigate the reliability of subjective assessments of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of computed tomography (CT). Axial CT images of a low-contrast phantom were acquired on an 8-slice multi-detector CT scanner at nine tube current settings ranging from 75 to 440 mA. Five medical physicists assessed the visibility of the low-contrast details in two sessions. In the first session, containing 54 images, the visibility was rated on an absolute scale by determining the number of visible details in each contrast group in each image. In the second session, 180 image pairs were presented to the observers with the task of determining if the two images had been acquired under identical conditions or not. In the absolute session, both the intra- and inter-observer variabilities were high. In the relative session, the variability was smaller, but an exposure difference of 50 % was needed for all observers to correctly identify a change in all cases. In conclusion, the present study indicates that subjective assessments of the low-contrast visibility in constancy control of CT are not reliable.

ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL IMAGE QUALITY IN PAEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL CT EXAMINATIONS: DEPENDENCY ON THE LEVEL OF ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION (ASiR) AND THE TYPE OF CONVOLUTION KERNEL.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different combinations of convolution kernel and the level of Adaptive Statistical iterative Reconstruction (ASiR™) on diagnostic image quality as well as visualisation of anatomical structures in paediatric abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations. Thirty-five paediatric patients with abdominal pain with non-specified pathology undergoing abdominal CT were included in the study. Transaxial stacks of 5-mm-thick images were retrospectively reconstructed at various ASiR levels, in combination with three convolution kernels. Four paediatric radiologists rated the diagnostic image quality and the delineation of six anatomical structures in a blinded randomised visual grading study. Image quality at a given ASiR level was found to be dependent on the kernel, and a more edge-enhancing kernel benefitted from a higher ASiR level. An ASiR level of 70 % together with the Soft™ or Standard™ kernel was suggested to be the optimal combination for paediatric abdominal CT examinations.