Anneleen Pauly

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and T. turgidum L. ssp. durum) kernel hardness: I. Current view on the role of puroindolines and polar lipids

Wheat hardness has major consequences for the entire wheat supply chain from breeders and millers over manufacturers to, finally, consumers of wheat-based products. Indeed, differences in hardness among Triticum aestivum L. or between T. aestivum L. and T. turgidum L. ssp. durum wheat cultivars determine not only their milling properties, but also the properties of flour or semolina endosperm particles, their preferential use in cereal-based applications, and the quality of the latter. Although the mechanism causing differences in wheat hardness has been subject of research more than once, it is still not completely understood. It is widely accepted that differences in wheat hardness originate from differences in the interaction between the starch granules and the endosperm protein matrix in the kernel. This interaction seems impacted by the presence of either puroindoline a and/or b, polar lipids on the starch granule surface, or by a combination of both. We focus here on wheat hardness and its relation to the presence of puroindolines and polar lipids. More in particular, the structure, properties, and genetics of puroindolines and their interactions with polar lipids are critically discussed as is their possible role in wheat hardness. We also address future research needs as well as the presence of puroindoline-type proteins in other cereals.

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. and T. turgidum L. ssp. durum) Kernel Hardness: II. Implications for End-Product Quality and Role of Puroindolines Therein

 Wheat kernel hardness is a major quality characteristic used in classifying wheat cultivars. Differences in endosperm texture among Triticum aestivum L. or between T. aestivum and T. turgidum L. ssp. durum cultivars profoundly affect their milling behavior, the properties of the obtained flour or semolina particles, as well as the quality of products made thereof. It is now widely accepted that the presence, sequence polymorphism, or absence of the basic and cysteine-rich puroindolines a and b are responsible for differences in endosperm texture. These proteins show features in vitro, including foaming and lipid-binding properties, which provide them with a potential impact in the production of wheat-based food products, where they may improve gas cell stabilization or modulate interactions between starch, proteins, and/or lipids. We here summarize the impact of wheat hardness on milling properties and bread, cookie, cake, and pasta quality and discuss the role of puroindolines therein.

Proteins of Amaranth (Amaranthus spp.), Buckwheat (Fagopyrum spp.), and Quinoa (Chenopodium spp.): A Food Science and Technology Perspective

There is currently much interest in the use of pseudocereals for developing nutritious food products. Amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa are the 3 major pseudocereals in terms of world production. They contain high levels of starch, proteins, dietary fiber, minerals, vitamins, and other bioactives. Their proteins have well-balanced amino acid compositions, are more sustainable than those from animal sources, and can be consumed by patients suffering from celiac disease. While pseudocereal proteins mainly consist of albumins and globulins, the predominant cereal proteins are prolamins and glutelins. We here discuss the structural properties, denaturation and aggregation behaviors, and solubility, as well as the foaming, emulsifying, and gelling properties of amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa proteins. In addition, the technological impact of incorporating amaranth, buckwheat, and quinoa in bread, pasta, noodles, and cookies and strategies to affect the functionality of pseudocereal flour proteins are discussed. Literature concerning pseudocereal proteins is often inconsistent and contradictory, particularly in the methods used to obtain globulins and glutelins. Also, most studies on protein denaturation and techno-functional properties have focused on isolates obtained by alkaline extraction and subsequent isoelectric precipitation at acidic pH, even if the outcome of such studies is not necessarily relevant for understanding the role of the native proteins in food processing. Finally, even though establishing in-depth structure-function relationships seems challenging, it would undoubtedly be of major help in the design of tailor-made pseudocereal foods.

Lipases as Processing Aids in the Separation of Wheat Flour into Gluten and Starch: Impact on the Lipid Population, Gluten Agglomeration, and Yield

Three lipases with different hydrolysis specificities were tested in a laboratory-scale dough-batter wheat flour separation process in two concentrations. Lipolase specifically hydrolyzed nonpolar flour lipids. At the highest concentration tested, it significantly improved gluten agglomeration and yield, also when combined with a xylanase with hydrolysis specificity toward water-extractable arabinoxylan. We hypothesize that its action is due to the release of adequate levels of free fatty acids, which, because at least a part of them is dissociated, act as anionic surfactants. Lipolase at the lowest concentration, Lecitase Ultra, hydrolyzing both nonpolar and polar lipids, and YieldMAX, which specifically hydrolyzed phospholipids, had no or a negative impact on gluten agglomeration and yield. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that lipases with hydrolysis specificity toward nonpolar lipids can be used as processing aids in wheat flour separation in the absence or presence of added xylanases to maximize gluten agglomeration and yield.

Incubation of Isolated Wheat Starch with Proteolytic or Lipolytic Enzymes and Different Extraction Media Reveals a Tight Interaction Between Puroindolines and Lipids at Its Granule Surface

ABSTRACT Differences in hardness of wheat cultivars have been related to differences in interactions between the starch granule surface and the gluten protein matrix that are mediated by the proteins puroindoline (PIN) A and B. We examined whether or not PINs and (polar) lipids are associated at the starch granule surface, and, if so, how they interact with the starch granule surface itself. Starch was isolated from a soft wheat cultivar containing both wild-type PINs and incubated with peptidases or lipases, or in extraction media (typically used for defatting). Protein, PIN, and lipid levels revealed that PINs and lipids are tightly associated together at the starch granule surface. Our results imply that PINs need lipids for binding to the granule surface but not vice versa.

Impact of Puroindolines on Semisweet Biscuit Quality: A Fractionation–Reconstitution Approach

ABSTRACT Puroindoline (PIN) proteins are a factor determining wheat kernel endosperm texture. Biscuits are preferably made from flour from soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Such wheat contains relatively high levels of wild-type PINs, the impact of which on biscuit quality is unclear. We here studied the impact of PINs on biscuit texture using model flour samples reconstituted from starch and gluten fractions with varying PIN levels. These were obtained by fractionating flour from soft or durum wheat containing either wild-type or no PINs, respectively. This approach allowed largely retaining the interaction between PINs and either starch or gluten, such as it exists in flour. High PIN levels enhanced air incorporation during dough preparation, increased dough (lateral) expansion, and yielded larger biscuits with higher porosity, which was mainly because of the larger pores. Biscuit fracture stress negatively correlated with PIN level. Porosity contributed to biscuit mechanical properties, but PINs also ...

Modification of the Secondary Binding Site of Xylanases Illustrates the Impact of Substrate Selectivity on Bread Making

To investigate the importance of substrate selectivity for xylanase functionality in bread making, the secondary binding site (SBS) of xylanases from Bacillus subtilis (XBS) and Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis was modified. This resulted in two xylanases with increased relative activity toward water-unextractable wheat arabinoxylan (WU-AX) compared to water-extractable wheat arabinoxylan, i.e., an increased substrate selectivity, without changing other biochemical properties. Addition of both modified xylanases in bread making resulted in increased loaf volumes compared to the wild types when using weak flour. Moreover, maximal volume increase was reached at a lower dosage of the mutant compared to wild-type XBS. The modified xylanases were able to solubilize more WU-AX and decreased the average degree of polymerization of soluble arabinoxylan in dough more during fermentation. This possibly allowed for additional water release, which might be responsible for increased loaf volumes. Altered SBS functionality and, as a result, enhanced substrate selectivity most probably caused these differences.

Relating the composition and air/water interfacial properties of wheat, rye, barley, and oat dough liquor

Gas cell stabilization in dough by its aqueous phase constituents is arguably more important in non-wheat than in wheat dough due to weaker protein networks in the former. Dough liquor (DL), a model for the dough aqueous phase, was isolated from fermented wheat, rye, barley, and oat doughs by ultracentrifugation. DL composition (protein, lipid, arabinoxylan, β-glucan) and air/water interfacial functionality [foaming, viscosity, surface tension, surface dilatational modulus (E)] were related to bread quality. Poor foaming and low E of wheat DL were ascribed to lipids and proteins co-occurring at the interface. Nonetheless, the presence of a gluten network resulted in high-quality wheaten breads. Homogeneous and heterogeneous crumb structures of rye and barley breads, respectively, were attributed to high and low E values of their respective DLs. High lipid content and low surface tension of oat DL indicated a lipid-dominated interface, which may explain the heterogeneous crumb structure of oat breads.