Annette Scierka

Nicotine discrimination in male and female smokers

Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine were evaluated in humans using formal behavioral drug discrimination procedures. Male and female smokers (n=9 each) were trained on day 1 to reliably discriminate 0 versus 12 µg/kg nicotine administered by measured-dose nasal spray. All subjects were able to reach criterion performance (at least 80% correct). Generalization of responding across nicotine doses of 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 µg/kg (approximately 0–0.8 mg for typical subject) was then examined on day 2. Nicotine-appropriate responding was linearly related to dose, and subjects were able to distinguish the smallest dose (2 µg/kg) from placebo. Although there were no differences between males and females in behavioral discrimination, subjective effects were correlated with nicotine discrimination in females but not in males. These findings indicate that humans are able to discriminate among low doses of nicotine per se, that males and females may differ in the stimuli used to discriminate nicotine, and that drug discrimination procedures may be more sensitive than traditional subjective effects measures in distinguishing among low doses of nicotine.

Subjective and cardiovascular responses to nicotine combined with alcohol in male and female smokers

Nicotine and alcohol are often consumed concurrently by smokers. Each drug alone produces significant subjective and cardiovascular responses, but the effects of the two drugs in combination have rarely been examined. Smokers who were moderate alcohol drinkers (n = 18, 9 males and 9 females) participated in four sessions, involving acute administration of nicotine/placebo and alcohol/no alcohol. Subjects abstained overnight from tobacco and alcohol prior to each session. Nicotine (20 µg/kg per presentation) or placebo was administered by measured-dose nasal spray every 30 min for 2 h following consumption of diet tonic water with or without alcohol (0.5 g/kg). Subjective (visual analog scales, Profile of Mood States, Addiction Research Center Inventory) and cardiovascular (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) responses were assessed after each nicotine/placebo administration. Nicotine increased head rush, dizzy, and most stimulant effects (i.e. jittery, tension, and arousal and decreased fatigue and relaxed), while alcohol increased intoxication, head rush, dizzy, and jittery, with no other stimulant effects. Nicotine and alcohol generally produced additive subjective and cardiovascular effects when consumed together, although nicotine attenuated sedating and intoxicating effects of alcohol alone. Furthermore, there were several interaction effects on subjective measures involving gender. Nicotine plus alcohol tended to attenuate some subjective effects due to one drug or the other alone in men but enhanced the effects of either alone in women. These findings indicate that nicotine and alcohol generally have additive subjective and cardiovascular effects, but that men and women differentially respond on some subjective measures to the combination of alcohol and nicotine.

Subjective and cardiovascular responses to nicotine combined with caffeine during rest and casual activity

Although nicotine and caffeine have separately been shown to acutely increase subjective arousal, their combined effects are unclear. Furthermore, their effects during casual physical activity, the condition under which individuals usually experience nicotine and caffeine, are unknown. Smokers who were regular coffee drinkers (n=19, 9 males, 10 females) participated in eight morning sessions, involving nicotine/placebo, caffeine/no caffeine, and rest/physical activity (i.e. 2×2×2 within-subjects design). Nicotine (15 µg/kg) or placebo was given via measured-dose nasal spray intermittently after consumption of decaf coffee with or without added caffeine (5 mg/kg), followed by subjective [Profile of Mood States (POMS), Stress-Arousal Checklist, visual analog scales] and cardiovascular (heart rate, blood pressure) measures. Casual physical activity was standardized by low-intensity bicycle riding while sitting comfortably. Results indicated significant subjective and cardiovascular effects of nicotine and caffeine individually, with the combination of nicotine and caffeine generally producing additive or greater than additive effects for each measure. However, activity mediated some of the subjective effects of nicotine, as nicotine appeared to be “stimulating” during rest but not during activity. There were no differences between males and females. These findings suggest that nicotine per se and caffeine generally have additive subjective and cardiovascular effects, and that nicotine may influence subjective stimulation differentially depending on whether a smoker is resting or engaged in casual activity.

Acute tolerance to nicotine in smokers: Lack of dissipation within 2 hours.

Greater understanding of development and dissipation of acute tolerance to nicotine may help explain temporal patterns of nicotine self-administration in smokers. The time course of dissipation of acute tolerance to nicotine was examined in 16 smokers (8M, 8F) participating in four sessions differing on pretreatment exposure or time interval prior to nicotine (20 µg/kg) challenge: placebo 30 min before, or nicotine (20 µg/kg) 30, 60, or 120 min before challenge. Nicotine and placebo were administered by measured-dose nasal spray. The measurement battery consisted of subjective, cardiovascular, thermal pain detection, and behavioral performance measures. Results demonstrated significant acute tolerance (i.e. smaller responses to nicotine challenge following nicotine versus placebo pretreatment) for most subjective measures and for heart rate. Acute tolerance dissipated with lengthening inter-dose interval for two subjective measures, dose strength and arousal, but there was no tolerance dissipation for other measures. In contrast, nicotine pretreatment resulted in acute sensitization of finger temperature (vasoconstriction) response, which dissipated with lengthening interval. No acute tolerance was observed for thermal pain detection or performance measures. These findings demonstrate that acute tolerance develops quickly to some subjective and cardiovascular effects of nicotine. However, acute tolerance to most effects did not dissipate over 2 h, suggesting that, following acute tolerance development during initial exposure, most smokers generally obtain similar magnitude of effects from each subsequent nicotine exposure (i.e. cigarettes smoked later in the day).

A brief technical communication: Detection of fentanyl in urine

A reliable and sensitive method to analyze fentanyl in urine was developed using radioimmunoassay (RIA). Fentanyl, a highly lipophilic drug (pKa 7.7), has become a common drug of abuse. We evaluated three analytical techniques to detect fentanyl in urine. This paper reports the best of the three - a modified solvent extraction combined with a fentanyl RIA.

A Method to increase recovery of fentanyl from urine

Fentanyl, a highly lipophilic drug (pk(a) 7.7), is a common drug of abuse. The current standard techniques to detect fentanyl in urine have low recovery rates and poor sensitivity. We report a modified solvent extraction technique that can recover between 63 and 86% of the drug with a detection limit of 0.2 ng/10 ml of urine. In addition, we report the duration of urinary fentanyl excretion in 11 adolescent patients administered either low (less than 10 mg/kg) or high (20-40 mg/kg) doses of fentanyl as part of anesthesia. The mean duration of urinary fentanyl excretion was similar in the two groups, with duration ranging from 1 to 5 days, and urine fentanyl concentration ranging from 0.1 ng to 10.3 ng/10 ml of urine.