Annie Lintzenich Andrews
Medical University of South Carolina
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Annie Lintzenich Andrews.
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2012
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Ronald J. Teufel; William T. Basco
OBJECTIVE To determine what proportion of patients who are seen in an emergency department (ED) for asthma receive inhaled corticosteroids or attend follow-up appointments. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study of 2007-2009 South Carolina Medicaid data. Enrollees aged 2-18 years who had an ED visit for asthma were included. Patients admitted for asthma or with an inhaled corticosteroid claim in the 2 months before the month of the ED visit were excluded. Covariates were sex, race, age, rural residence, and asthma severity. Outcome measures were a prescription for an inhaled corticosteroid filled within the 2 months after the ED visit and attendance at a follow-up appointment within the 2 months after the ED visit. RESULTS A total of 3435 patients were included. Out of the study cohort, 57% were male, 76% were of a minority race/ethnicity, 69% lived in an urban areas, 18% had inhaled corticosteroid use, and 12% completed follow-up. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that patients with severe asthma were more likely to receive an inhaled corticosteroid (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 2.3-3.7) and attend a follow-up appointment (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.6). Patients aged 2-6 years and those aged >12 years were less likely to attend follow-up (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90 and OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83, respectively) (all models P < .0001). CONCLUSION Children with asthma seen in the ED have low rates of inhaled corticosteroid use and outpatient follow-up. This indicates a need for further interventions to increase the use of inhaled corticosteroids in response to ED visits.
Academic Emergency Medicine | 2012
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Kelli A. Wong; Daniel Heine; W. Scott Russell
OBJECTIVES The objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone versus prednisone for the treatment of pediatric asthma exacerbations in the emergency department (ED). METHODS This was a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analysis model to compare two oral steroid options for pediatric asthma patients: 5 days of oral prednisone and 2 days of oral dexamethasone (with two dispensing possibilities: either a prescription for the second dose or the second dose dispensed at the time of ED discharge). Using estimates from published studies for rates of prescription filling, compliance, and steroid efficacy, the projected rates of ED relapse visits, hospitalizations within 7 to 10 days of the sentinel ED visit, direct costs, and indirect costs between the two arms were compared. RESULTS The rate of return to the ED per 100 patients within 7 to 10 days of the sentinel ED visit for the prednisone arm was 12, for the dexamethasone/prescription arm was 10, and for the dexamethasone/dispense arm was 8. Rates of hospitalization per 100 patients were 2.8, 2.4, and 1.9, respectively. Direct costs per 100 patients for each arm were
Medicare & Medicaid Research Review | 2013
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Annie N. Simpson; William T. Basco; Ronald J. Teufel
20,500,
Hospital pediatrics | 2015
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Nils Shirley; Elizabeth Ojukwu; Michelle Robinson; Michelle Torok; Karen M. Wilson
17,200, and
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2015
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Annie N. Simpson; Daniel Heine; Ronald J. Teufel
13,900, respectively. Including indirect costs related to missed parental work, total costs per 100 patients were
Journal of Asthma | 2014
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; W. Scott Russell; M. Olivia Titus; Jennifer Braden; Carolyn R. Word; Christina Cochran; Sarah Adams; James R. Roberts
22,000,
Clinical Pediatrics | 2013
Kelli W. Williams; Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Daniel Heine; W. Scott Russell; M. Olivia Titus
18,500, and
The Journal of Pediatrics | 2012
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Ronald J. Teufel; William T. Basco; Kit N. Simpson
15,000, respectively. Total cost savings per 100 patients for the dexamethasone/prescription arm compared to the prednisone arm was
Sexually Transmitted Diseases | 2014
Gweneth B. Lazenby; Elizabeth Ramsey Unal; Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Kit N. Simpson
3,500 and for the dexamethasone/dispense arm compared to the prednisone arm was
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2012
Annie Lintzenich Andrews; Gweneth B. Lazenby; Elizabeth Ramsey Unal; Kit N. Simpson
7,000. CONCLUSIONS This decision analysis model illustrates that use of 2 days of dexamethasone instead of 5 days of prednisone at the time of ED visit for asthma leads to a decreased number of ED visits and hospital admissions within 7 to 10 days of the sentinel ED visit and provides cost savings.