Annika K Lindström

LRIG1 and squamous epithelial uterine cervical cancer: correlation to prognosis, other tumor markers, sex steroid hormones, and smoking

The aim is to evaluate LRIG1 as a prognosis predictor and correlations to cofactors in squamous cell cervical cancer. LRIG1 expression was studied in 128 cervical carcinomas and was compared with expression of nine other tumor markers. Smoking history was registered and pretreatment serum estradiol and progesterone levels were evaluated in 79 women. At clinical stage IB, 58% of the tumors showed LRIG1 expression, but there was a decline by increasing stage (33% in stage IV). Ninety percent of women with stage IB cancer and LRIG1 positivity survived, as compared to 64% without expression (P = 0.02). LRIG1 expression did not predict prognosis in advanced stages, but in stage IIA there was a marked relative difference, with 75% survival in tumors expressing LRIG1, as compared to 43% in those without. No correlation was found between LRIG1 and the other nine tumor markers studied. A high serum progesterone and smoking correlated to absent LRIG1 expression. We conclude that LRIG1 appears to be a significant prognosis predictor in early-stage cervical cancer, independent of the other tumor markers that were studied. Diminished expression in advanced stages and the inverse correlation to serum progesterone and smoking indicates that LRIG1 is a tumor suppressor in cervix.

LRIG2 in contrast to LRIG1 predicts poor survival in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Abstract Background. The human leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains (LRIG) protein family comprises LRIG1, 2, and 3. LRIG1 negatively regulates growth factor signaling and is a proposed tumor suppressor. In early stage uterine cervical carcinoma, expression of LRIG1 is associated with good survival. Less is known about the function and expression of LRIG2; it has not been studied in cervical carcinoma, previously. Materials and methods. LRIG2 expression was studied by immunohistochemistry in 129 uterine cervical squamous cell carcinomas and 36 uterine cervical adenocarcinomas. Possible associations between LRIG2 immunoreactivity and patient survival were evaluated. Results. In early-stage squamous cell carcinoma (stages IB–IIB), high expression of LRIG2 was associated with poor survival (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, p=0.02). The 10-year survival rate for patients with high expression of LRIG2 was 60%, compared to 87% in patients with low expression (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.64). In multivariate analysis including the previously studied tumor suppressor LRIG1 and clinical stage, LRIG2 emerged as an independent prognostic factor (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.50). For patients with both high expression of LRIG2 and low expression of LRIG1, the 10-year survival rate was only 26% compared to 66% for the remaining study population. There was no correlation between LRIG2 expression and prognosis in the limited adenocarcinoma series. Discussion and conclusion. LRIG2 appears to be a significant predictor of poor prognosis in early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A combination of high LRIG2 expression and low LRIG1 expression identified women with a very poor prognosis.

Correlation between LRIG1 and LRIG2 expressions and expression of 11 tumor markers, with special reference to tumor suppressors, in CIN and normal cervical epithelium

OBJECTIVE Novel biological markers LRIG1 and LRIG2 have been associated with favorable as well as poor prognosis, respectively, in different cancer types, including cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate possible interactions between these proteins and other tumor markers, and as diagnostic adjuncts in CIN. METHODS Cervical biopsies from 171 women, with normal epithelium, and low-grade and high-grade CIN were stained for LRIG1 and LRIG2, and 11 additional tumor markers. The tumor markers were chosen to be relevant in cervical neoplasms. Staining was evaluated semiquantitatively. RESULTS Expression of LRIG1 and LRIG2 was found to correlate with increasing CIN grade, as well as with expression of tumor suppressor FHIT, independent of histological grade. In addition, tumor promoter LRIG2 expression correlated negatively with expression of tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein and positively with IL-10. The latter correlation did not however remain after adjustment for CIN grade. p53 and p16 expressions correlated positively with LRIG1 expression in univariate analyses, but significance did not hold after adjustment for CIN grade. CONCLUSION LRIG1 and LRIG2 expressions were seen in precancerous cervical epithelium and found to increase with increasing grade. There was an association between expression of these glycoproteins and FHIT tumor suppressor protein, independently of histological grade.

Immunohistochemical LRIG3 expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive squamous cell cervical cancer: association with expression of tumor markers, hormones, high-risk HPV-infection, smoking and patient outcome

The novel biomarker LRIG3 is a member of the LRIG family (LRIG1-3). While LRIG1 has been associated with favorable prognosis and LRIG2 with poor prognosis in invasive cervical cancer, little is known about the role of LRIG3. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of LRIG3 in invasive cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) for possible correlation with other tumor markers, to hormones and smoking, as a diagnostic adjunct in CIN, and prognostic value in invasive cancer. Cervical biopsies from 129 patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma and 170 biopsies showing low grade and high grade CIN, or normal epithelium were stained for LRIG3 and 17 additional tumor markers. Among other variables the following were included: smoking habits, hormonal contraceptive use, serum progesterone, serum estradiol, high-risk HPV-infection, menopausal status and ten-year survival. In CIN, high expression of the tumor suppressors retinoblastoma protein, p53, and p16, and Ecadherin (cell-cell interaction), or low expression of CK10, correlated to LRIG3 expression. In addition, progestogenic contraceptive use correlated to high expression of LRIG3. In invasive cancer there was a correlation between expression of the major tumor promoter c-myc and high LRIG3 expression. High LRIG3 expression correlated significantly to presence of high-risk HPV infection in patients with normal epithelium and CIN. There was no correlation between LRIG3 expression and 10-year survival in patients with invasive cell cervical cancer. LRIG3 expression is associated with a number of molecular events in CIN. Expression also correlates to hormonal contraceptive use. The results on expression of other tumor markers suggest that LRIG3 is influenced by or influences a pattern of tumor markers in cancer and precancerous cells. Further studies are needed to elucidate if LRIG3 expression might be clinically useful.

Diagnostic, endocrinological, behavioral, and DNA ploidy differences between squamous cell and adenomatous carcinoma of the cervix uteri.

The objective of this study was to compare behavioral and hormonal risk factors, and cancer characteristics in squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the cervix uteri. The study included 45 women with adenocarcinoma and 190 consecutive women with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri diagnosed between 1984 and 1990. In addition to routine diagnostic procedures, DNA from biopsies was analyzed with flow cytometry to identify the S-phase fraction as a measure of cancer growth. Serum progesterone and estradiol were measured, and ever hormonal use and smoking were recorded. Ten-year mortality was estimated. There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis. Women with adenocarcinoma, compared with those with squamous epithelial carcinoma, had a significantly shorter duration of ever contraceptive use, were less likely to smoke (nonsignificant), had a lower cancer stage, were less likely to have an S-phase fraction of more than 16%. and had a higher progesterone value (if premenopausal). The results suggest that there are some different risk factors in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri.