Anouk J.M. Cornelissen

Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review

BACKGROUND The sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast is an undervalued topic in the field of autologous breast reconstruction. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the available literature on the sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions and to assess the possible benefits of sensory nerve coaptation compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to identify all eligible studies regarding the sensory recovery of all types of innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions. RESULTS The search yielded 334 hits, of which 32 studies concerning 1177 breast reconstructions were included. The amount of heterogeneity between the studies was high, which made the pooling of data difficult. The studies indicated that spontaneous reinnervation of autologous breast reconstructions occurred to a variable extent, depending on how and when it was measured. Despite these variable results, the sensory recovery of innervated flaps, however, was superior, started earlier and gradually improved over time with a higher chance of approaching normal values than non-innervated flaps. There is a lack of studies that assess the return of erogenous sensation and quality of life. CONCLUSION The current evidence shows that nerve coaptation results in superior sensory recovery of the reconstructed breast compared to spontaneous reinnervation of the flap. This review illustrates that more standardised, high-quality studies with adequate sample sizes are needed to objectively evaluate the sensory recovery of the breast after autologous breast reconstructions.

Outcomes of vascularized versus non‐vascularized lymph node transplant in animal models for lymphedema. Review of the literature

Lymph node transfer has been performed to treat lymphedema for several years. The goal of this procedure is to provide a bridge between the lymphatic system distal and proximal to the lymph node dissection. There is a lack of consensus about the necessity of an additional vascular anastomosis for the transplanted lymph nodes. A systematic literature search in Cochrane Library database CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE of animal studies using lymph node transplantation with and without additional vascularization was performed in March 2016. The strategy used for the search was: ((“Models, Animal”[Mesh]) AND ((“Lymphedema”[Mesh]) OR “Lymph Nodes”[Mesh]) OR “Lymph Node Excision”[Mesh])) AND ((vascularized lymph node transfer) OR ((non‐vascularized lymph node transfer) OR lymph node graft)). The primary outcomes were: survival of transplanted lymph node and lymphatic vessel regeneration. Sixteen studies were included. Vascularization and the use of growth factors were significantly associated with lymph node survival. Lymphatic vessels regeneration was independent from vascularization. According to the results of the current study, additional vascular anastomosis might improve the transplanted lymph node survival. Further studies in both experimental and clinical setting are needed in order to support it. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:32–36.

What does a breast feel like? A qualitative study among healthy women

BackgroundRestoring the body as normal as possible increases quality of life. Aesthetically, almost perfect breast reconstructions can be created. However, these reconstructed breasts have almost no sensation. Our hypothesis is that if we succeed in restoring sensation, this will increase quality of life. So far, little is written about the phenomenon of breast sensation, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether the quality of life increases after restored sensation. Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to determine what the importance and meaning is of breast sensation among healthy women.MethodsA qualitative, descriptive phenomenological study was performed in an academic hospital between October 2016 and March 2017. A total of 10 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in healthy women who did not undergo prior breast surgery. The sample size was based upon ‘saturation’. The interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed according to phenomenology keeping in mind the research question ‘what is the importance and meaning of sensation of the breast?’ResultsSeven interrelated themes on how sensation of the breast is experienced were found: the absent breast (1), the present breast (2), the well-functioning breast (2a), the feminine breast (2b), the sensual breast (2c), the alien breast (2d), the safe breast (2d).ConclusionsThe seven interrelated themes can form the basis to develop a quantitative research tool to evaluate quality of life after innervated breast reconstruction and can be implemented in counselling before breast reconstructive surgery in the form of shared treatment decisions.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Genetic Predisposition: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Secondary lymphedema is a complication following breast cancer therapy and constitutes the main form of lymphedema in the western world. The purpose of the current study was to provide a clear overview of the genetic predisposition and secondary lymphedema. Methods and Results: A systematic search was performed between February and June 2017 in MEDLINE and Embase. Search terms included Genes, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Lymphedema, Breast Cancer Lymphedema, Secondary Lymphedema, Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema, and Humans. Only original articles regarding the possible relationship between genetic variation and the development of secondary lymphedema in humans were included in this review. A total of 459 records were collected. After removal of duplicates, non-topic-related publications, and records not presenting original data, six full-text studies were included. Associations between genetic factors and the development of secondary lymphedema were found for variations in HGF, MET, GJC2, IL1A, IL4, IL6, IL10, IL13, VEGF-C, NFKB2, LCP-2, NRP-2, SYK, VCAM1, FOXC2, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, and RORC. Conclusions: In patients with secondary lymphedema following breast cancer therapy, genetic variations were found in 18 genes. These compelling, although preliminary, findings may suggest a possible role for genetic predisposition in the development of lymphedema following breast cancer therapy. This notion may add to the classical, more mechanistic explanation of secondary lymphedema.

Comparing the sensation of common donor site regions for autologous breast reconstruction to that of a healthy breast

INTRODUCTION Autologous breast reconstruction has become the standard care for breast cancer patients. Although excellent cosmetic results can be achieved, most reconstructed breasts fail to regain normal sensation. Nerve coaptation of the flap has been suggested to improve sensation; the effect of the donor flap native sensory threshold on the degree of sensory restoration is yet to be determined. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences in sensation between various potential donor site regions in comparison to the sensation of the healthy breast. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional study in healthy women was performed in the Maastricht University Medical Centre. Monofilaments were used to measure sensation in the breast and at different flap donor sites: deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), lateral thigh perforator (LTP), profunda artery perforator (PAP), superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) and transverse musculocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flaps. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyse statistical significance in sensation. RESULTS Fifty women with a mean age of 49 ± 2.72 years and mean BMI of 26.14 ± 0.89 kg/m2 were included in the study. The median monofilament value of the normal breasts was 2.97(2.56-3.55). The median monofilament value of each donor site and p value when compared to the healthy breast were as follows: DIEP flap, 2.62 (2.36-3.22) p < 0.01; LTP flap, 3.61 (2.83-4.08) p <0.01; PAP flap, 3.09 (2.67-3.5) p = 0.97; SGAP flap, 3.22 (2.64-3.87) p = 0.01; and TMG flap, 3.03 (2.6-3.47) p = 0.69. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant difference in sensation between the various donor site regions for breast reconstruction and the healthy breast. This may be taken into consideration for donor site selection.

Innervated full thickness grafts in distal finger amputations

Innervated full thickness graft will be presented as an option to reconstruct a fingertip defect which might result in better sensibility than standard reconstruction using a full thickness graft without innervation. Also, anastomosing the nerve stumps can decrease the chance of developing neuroma.