Ansgar Espeland

Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Characteristic Findings on Traditional and Advanced Imaging

SUMMARY: CNS lymphoma consists of 2 major subtypes: secondary CNS involvement by systemic lymphoma and PCNSL. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging is the method of choice for detecting CNS lymphoma. In leptomeningeal CNS lymphoma, representing two-thirds of secondary CNS lymphomas, imaging typically shows leptomeningeal, subependymal, dural, or cranial nerve enhancement. Single or multiple periventricular and/or superficial contrast-enhancing lesions are characteristic of parenchymal CNS lymphoma, representing one-third of secondary CNS lymphomas and almost 100% of PCNSLs. New CT and MR imaging techniques and metabolic imaging have demonstrated characteristic findings in CNS lymphoma, aiding in its differentiation from other CNS lesions. Advanced imaging techniques may, in the future, substantially improve the diagnostic accuracy of imaging, ultimately facilitating a noninvasive method of diagnosis. Furthermore, these imaging techniques may play a pivotal role in planning targeted therapies, prognostication, and monitoring treatment response.

CT and MR Imaging Features of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in Norway, 1989–2003

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studying imaging findings of non–acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), we hypothesized that the imaging presentation has changed with the increasing incidence of PCNSL and is related to clinical factors (eg, time to diagnosis and the patients being diagnosed alive or at postmortem examination). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chart and histologic reviews of patients recorded as having PCNSL during 1989–2003 in the Norwegian Cancer Registry identified 98 patients with non-AIDS PCNSL; 75 had available imaging. CT and MR images from the first diagnostic work-up after onset of symptoms but before histologic diagnosis were reviewed. RESULTS: CT and/or MR imaging in the 75 patients revealed no lesion in 10 (13%), a single focal lesion in 34 (45%), multiple focal lesions in 26 (35%), and disseminated lesions in 5 (7%) patients. All together, we identified 103 focal lesions (single/multiple): 63% in white matter, 56% abutting the ventricular surface, and 43% in the frontal lobes); 100% (102/102 lesions evaluated with contrast) showed contrast enhancement. The median time from imaging to diagnosis for patients with no, single, multiple, or disseminated lesions was 32, 3, 5, and 3 weeks, respectively (P = .01). Patients with no or disseminated lesions were more often diagnosed at postmortem examination (P = .06). Imaging findings were practically unchanged during the consecutive 5-year periods. CONCLUSIONS: White matter periventricular contrast-enhancing single or multiple focal lesions were typical of non-AIDS PCNSL. No or disseminated lesions heightened the risk of delayed or postmortem diagnosis. Although the incidence of non-AIDS PCNSL has increased, its presentation at imaging remains unchanged.

Increasing incidence and continued dismal outcome of primary central nervous system lymphoma in Norway 1989-2003 : time trends in a 15-year national survey.

The incidence of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) appears to be increasing in some countries, whereas it is stable in others. Many reports the last decades have suggested that there have been improvements in the treatment of PCNSL. The objective of this study was to analyze time trends in the incidence, clinical features, histologic diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of nonacquired immunodeficiency syndrome (non‐AIDS) PCNSL in Norway from 1989 to 2003.

Patients' views on importance and usefulness of plain radiography for low back pain.

Study Design. Quantitative and qualitative cross-sectional interview study. Objectives. To investigate how patients who are referred for plain radiography because of low back pain perceive the importance and usefulness of the examination. Summary of Background Data. Up to 50% of plain radiography examinations for low back pain may be unnecessary based on clinical criteria. However, many patients have great confidence in these examinations. A further exploration of the patients’ views may indicate how their needs can be met without unnecessary use of radiography. Methods. Ninety-nine patients (65 women, 34 men) 14–91 years of age who were referred from Norwegian general practitioners for plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine were asked to rate the examination as slightly/fairly or very important (93 responded). Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate differences in rating according to age, gender, clinical history, and clinical appropriateness of the examination, as determined by comparing information in the referral form with Norwegian (NR) and British (BR) recommendations for use of radiography. Each of the 99 patients also underwent a semistructured interview that was based on questions about importance, usefulness, and reasons for the radiography referral. Answers were categorized and described using a qualitative method (template analysis). Results. Seventy-two percent (68 of 93) of patients rated radiography as very important. The proportion was higher for men than women (85%vs. 65%, P = 0.04), higher for those with worsening than those with improving/unchanged symptoms (86%vs. 65%, P = 0.03), and higher for inappropriately than appropriately referred patients (NR: 76%vs. 61%, P = 0.17; BR: 81%vs. 56%, P = 0.01). The qualitative analysis showed that the patients related their views on the importance and usefulness of receiving radiography to seven different issues: symptoms and clinical history, information and advice (especially from health care providers), need for emotional support from the physician, need for certainty and reassurance, need for symptom explanation and diagnosis, reliability of radiography compared with clinical evaluation, and expected practical consequences of the radiologic examination. Conclusions. The finding that inappropriately referred patients tended to rate their radiography referral as more important than appropriately referred patients indicates that the patient’s view may be a substantial barrier to appropriate use of radiography. The study identified seven issues underlying the patients’ views on importance and usefulness of receiving radiography. Strategies to prevent unnecessary use of plain radiography for low back pain that address these issues are suggested.

Diagnostic delay in primary central nervous system lymphoma.

This study investigates delay in diagnosing primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), which has a variable clinical and radiological presentation. Early diagnosis and treatment may improve survival and cause less sequela in PCNSL. Medical records of all new cases of PCNSL morphologically verified while alive or by autopsy in Norway in 1989–1998 were reviewed (n = 74). The time from initial symptom to final morphological diagnosis of PCNSL had a median (mean, range) of 70 (106, 22–330) days in 16 AIDS patients and 75 (157, 8–1285) days in 58 non-AIDS patients. Among non-AIDS patients, the time to diagnosis was longer in patients with no tumour in the first neuroimaging report after initial symptom (p = 0.001). Median (mean, range) time from initial symptom to neuroimaging was 14 (25, 1–60) days in AIDS patients and 21 (88, 1–1095) days in non-AIDS patients. In the non-AIDS group, those presenting with personality change or visual disturbance had more delayed imaging than the others. The time from first neuroimaging examination to final diagnosis in non-AIDS patients had a median (mean, range) of 28 (69, 1–845) days, and was longer when no tumour was indicated in the imaging report (p = 0.005) and if first biopsy did not confirm the diagnosis (p = 0.02). All AIDS patients had their diagnosis of PCNSL first established by autopsy. The time from first neuroimaging to autopsy had a median (mean, range) of 48 (81, 10–270) days. There is a considerable delay in the diagnosis of PCNSL and strategies for earlier diagnosis are thus needed. Physicians should consider early neuroimaging in patients with personality changes or visual disturbance, early renewed imaging in patients with persistent neurological symptoms but no tumour on initial imaging, and early/repeated biopsy of focal brain lesions in both AIDS patients and non-AIDS patients.

Clinicians’ justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role?

ObjectiveTo explore clinicians’ knowledge and consideration of radiation, in relation to their referral practice and use of referral guidelines for imaging.MethodsA questionnaire was handed out to 213 clinicians in Norway; all responded: 77 general practitioners, 71 hospital physicians and 65 non-physicians (55 manual physiotherapists, 10 chiropractors). Questions concerned weighting of radiation dose, guideline use, referrals unlikely to affect treatment, doses from imaging procedures, ranking of imaging as radiation source, and deterministic and stochastic effects. For radiation knowledge, a total score was aggregated.ResultsThe mean radiation knowledge score was 30.4/71. Most respondents underestimated doses from high-dose imaging, e.g., barium enema (94.7%), chest CT (57.7%) and abdominal CT (52.7%). Limited radiation knowledge was not compensated by using guidelines. Only 20% of physicians and 72% of non-physicians used referral guidelines. Non-physicians weighted radiation dose as being more important than physicians when referring; they also reported fewer referrals as being unlikely to affect treatment. Such referrals and not using guidelines were related to lower weighting of radiation dose but not to radiation knowledge.ConclusionLimited radiation knowledge and guideline use indicate suboptimal justification of referrals. When justifying imaging, weighting of radiation dose may play a larger role than detailed radiation knowledge.

AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma: a Norwegian national survey 1989–2003

BackgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a frequent complication in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The objective of this survey was to investigate incidence, clinical features, radiological findings, histologic diagnosis, treatment and outcome for all patients with histologically verified AIDS-related PCNSL diagnosed in Norway in 1989–2003.MethodsWe identified the patients by chart review of all cases recorded as PCNSL in The Norwegian Cancer Registry (by law recording all cases of cancer in Norway) and all cases recorded as AIDS-related PCNSL in the autopsy registry at a hospital having 67% autopsy rate and treating 59% of AIDS patients in Norway, from 1989 to 2003. Histologic material and radiological images were reviewed. We used person-time techniques to calculate incidence rates of PCNSL among AIDS patients based on recordings on AIDS at the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases (by law recording all cases of AIDS in Norway).ResultsTwenty-nine patients had histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed AIDS-related PCNSL in Norway from 1989–2003. Only 2 patients had this diagnosis established while alive. AIDS patients had 5.5% lifetime risk of PCNSL. Their absolute incidence rate of PCNSL per 100 person-years was 1.7 (95%CI: 1.1–2.4) and decreased during the consecutive 5-year periods from 3.6, to 2.5, and to 0.4 (p < 0.001). Median survival from initial symptom of PCNSL was 2.3 months, but one patient was still alive 4 years after completed radiotherapy.ConclusionThis is the first national survey to confirm decreasing incidence of AIDS-related PCNSL. Despite dismal survival in most patients, the possibility of long term survival should prompt more aggressive diagnostics in suspected PCNSL.

Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study

Objective: To examine the yield of radiographic abnormalities in a population based set of perinatal deaths, the diagnostic value of whole body postmortem radiographs in the same set, and previous factors that may increase the proportion of useful examinations. Design: Retrospective population based study. Setting: A region of Norway. Patients: All infants from a well defined geographical area who were stillborn or had died soon after birth over an 11 year period (n=542), who had routinely undergone whole body radiography and autopsy. Main outcome measures: (a) Proportion of cases with abnormal radiographic findings. (b) Proportion of abnormal radiographs providing new information that was useful for postmortem diagnosis. Results: Radiographs were abnormal in 162/542 cases (30%). These provided new information about, but did not help to confirm, the pathological process leading to death in 14/162 (8.6%), may have helped to confirm, but not establish, the cause(s) of death in 1/162 (0.6%), and were of vital importance for establishing the cause(s) of death in 5/162 (3.1%). Among infants with external malformations, the proportion of useful radiographs was 12/100 (12%), and among the remainder it was 8/436 (1.8%), a difference of 10.2% (95% confidence interval 3.7% to 16.7%; data missing for six cases). Conclusions: The diagnostic value of postmortem radiography in this population based set was low. However, radiographic findings were of vital importance for establishing the cause(s) of death in 5/542 cases (0.9%).

Standard 1.5-T MRI of endometrial carcinomas: modest agreement between radiologists

AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interobserver agreement for the detection of deep myometrial invasion, cervical stroma invasion and lymph node metastases in endometrial carcinoma patients in relation to surgical staging.MethodsFifty-seven patients with histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma were prospectively included in a study of preoperative 1.5-T MRI. Four radiologists, blinded to patient data, independently reviewed the images for the presence of deep myometrial invasion, cervical stroma invasion and lymph node metastases. Kappa coefficients for interobserver agreement and diagnostic performances for each observer were calculated using final surgical staging results (FIGO 09) as reference standard.ResultsOverall agreement among all observers was moderate for cervical stroma invasion (κ = 0.50 [95% CI 0.27–0.73]) and lymph node metastases (κ = 0.56 [0.09–0.80]) and fair for deep myometrial invasion (κ = 0.39 [0.26–0.55]). Sensitivity (specificity) values for the four observers were 72–92% (44–63%) for deep myometrial invasion, 38–63% (82–94%) for cervical stroma invasion and 25–38% (90–100%) for lymph node metastases.ConclusionsConventional MRI showed only modest interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy for detection of deep myometrial invasion, cervical stroma invasion and lymph node metastases. Improved methods are needed for preoperative imaging in the staging of endometrial carcinomas.Key Points• MRI is an important tool for preoperative endometrial cancer staging. • Staging agreement based on pelvic MRI was modest among different observers. • Preoperative MRI alone was suboptimal in identifying high-risk patients. • Improved imaging and biomarkers may refine preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer.

Plain Radiography of the Lumbosacral Spine An audit of referrals from general practitioners

Purpose: To evaluate how referrals from Norwegian general practitioners for plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine conform to clinical recommendations, and whether non-conforming referrals yield important findings. Material and Methods: The clinical information reported in referral letters of 323 patients was compared with recommendations given in a Norwegian and in a British “guide”. Additional clinical data were obtained by interviewing 100 of the patients. Using all available information, a new comparison was performed. Radiological findings were obtained from the routine reports. Results: of the 323 referrals, 24% (37%) conformed to the Norwegian (British) “guide”, 34% (46%) did not conform, and 42% (18%) were considered uncertain, mainly because of lack of pertinent information in the referral letters. A total of 182 examinations were in disagreement with one or both “guides”. Only 4 of these examinations revealed potentially important findings (osteoporotic fractures in 2 patients, uncertain sacroiliac joint arthritis in 1 patient, and “probably benign” sclerotic densities in 1 patient). In the interview group, the proportion of non-conforming referrals was 40% (48%) based on the referral letters, and 31% (30%) when the interview data were taken into account. Conclusion: A great proportion of referrals for plain radiography of the lumbosacral spine do not conform to recent clinical recommendations. Referrals outside the advised criteria yield few relevant findings and could probably be cancelled. They require at least supplementary information to justify radiography.