Anthony A. Holmes

Sapien 3 versus Sapien XT prosthetic valves in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES The S3 prosthetic valve was introduced to overcome several issues with its predecessor, the SXT, in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), however, the clinical outcomes of this new model are not clearly defined. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes in Sapien 3 (S3) and Sapien XT (SXT) recipients. METHODS A literature search through PUBMED and EMBASE was conducted. Articles that included at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest were included in the meta-analysis: moderate to severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), major vascular complications (MVC), cerebrovascular events (stroke and transient ischemic attack) (CVE), failure rate of device implantation, life-threatening, disabling or major bleeding, need for post-dilation and early all-cause-mortality. RESULTS A total of 9 observational cohort studies were included. S3 was implanted in 945 and SXT in 1553 patients. S3 was associated with a lower incidence of moderate to severe PVR (1.6% vs 6.9%, p<0.0001), lower MVC (5.1% vs 8.9%, p=0.01) and less serious bleeding (8.1% vs 15.2%, p=0.003) compared to the SXT. Device deployment failure rate was lower in the S3 (1.2% vs 5.9%, p=0.004) and the S3 required less post-dilation (16.9% vs 26.9%, p=0.05). Rates of CVE, perioperative mortality and PPI were similar between the two valves. CONCLUSIONS Implantation of the S3 prosthetic valve results in lower rates of moderate to severe PVR, MVC, post-dilation and serious bleeding however it does not improve on the SXT in terms of CVE, PPI and early mortality.

Outcomes in patients with various forms of aortic stenosis including those with low-flow low-gradient normal and low ejection fraction.

Low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal ejection fraction (LFLGNEF AS) is a newly characterized poorly understood entity within the AS spectrum. Whether LFLGNEF AS has a worse prognosis than typical AS remains controversial. We retrospectively identified 4,546 individual patients with any type of AS on echocardiogram from 2003 through 2013 and categorized them into 5 cohorts: (1) mild AS, (2) moderate AS, (3) severe AS, (4) LFLGNEF AS (ejection fraction≥55%), and (5) low-flow low-gradient low ejection fraction AS (LFLGLEF AS; ejection fraction<55%). Survival analysis was used to compare outcomes of LFLGNEF AS with those of the other cohorts. AS was classified as mild in 591 patients, moderate in 2,358, severe in 500, LFLGNEF in 776, and LFLGLEF in 318. The study group had a mean age of 80.5 years, 61% were women, and the patients were followed for 2.26±1.16 years. Among subjects managed without valve replacement, total mortality for the LFLGNEF AS group was lower compared with that in both the severe AS and the LFLGLEF AS groups (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). The prognosis for LFLGNEF AS was worse, however, compared with those with mild and moderate AS (p<0.001, both). In conclusion, no survival differences were found among AS types among those who received valve replacement. The survival rate in LFLGNEF is better than that in severe AS or LFLGLEF but is worse than that in mild or moderate AS. Valve replacement seems reasonable to pursue in select patients.

Non-invasive assessment of low risk acute chest pain in the emergency department: A comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies

BACKGROUND The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), stress echocardiography (SE) and radionuclide single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for the assessment of chest pain in emergency department (ED) setting. METHODS A systematic review of Medline, Cochrane and Embase was undertaken for prospective clinical studies assessing the diagnostic efficacy of CCTA, SE or SPECT, as compared to intracoronary angiography (ICA) or the later presence of major adverse clinical outcomes (MACE), in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain. Standard approach and bivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS Thirty-seven studies (15 CCTA, 9 SE, 13 SPECT) comprising a total of 7800 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria. The respective weighted mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and total diagnostic accuracy for CCTA were: 95%, 99%, 84%, 100% and 99%, for SE were: 84%, 94%, 73%, 96% and 96%, and for SPECT were: 85%, 86%, 57%, 95% and 88%. There was no significant difference between modalities in terms of NPV. Bivariate analysis revealed that CCTA had statistically greater sensitivity, specificity, PPV and overall diagnostic accuracy when compared to SE and SPECT. CONCLUSIONS All three modalities, when employed by an experienced clinician, are highly accurate. Each has its own strengths and limitations making each well suited for different patient groups. CCTA has higher accuracy than SE and SPECT, but it has many drawbacks, most importantly its lack of physiologic data.

Iatrogenic Ventricular Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND Ventricular septal defects (VSD) are rarely reported as a complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to characterise the patients, clinical management, and outcomes regarding this rare phenomenon. METHODS Relevant articles were identified by a systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January, 2002 to September, 2015. RESULTS A total of 18 case reports, including 20 patients, were identified. The median age was 83 years and six were male. Twelve were performed by trans-femoral approach. Pre-dilation was performed in 12 patients and post-dilation in four. Balloon expandable valves were used in the majority (85%) of cases. The clinical presentation varied from asymptomatic to progressive heart failure. The timing of the diagnosis also varied significantly from immediately post valve implantation to one year afterwards. There were two cases of Gerbode-type defect while the rest were inter-ventricular defects. The location was mostly membranous or perimembranous (79%) and adjacent to the valve landing zone. A total of seven interventions (one open surgery and six percutaneous closure) were performed. Four patients died during the same hospital admission. Sixteen survived past discharge (range 12 days to two years). CONCLUSIONS Ventricular septal defects post-TAVR were seen more with balloon expandable valves and with pre-dilation or post-dilation. Percutaneous treatment of the VSD was preferred over open cardiac surgery given the high surgical risk in this patient population. Some, but not all, patients survived TAVR and VSD and had a good prognosis for both patient groups with or without VSD closure.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery have increased risk for aortic valve replacement. Whether surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) offers better outcomes in this population is unclear. We aimed to assess outcomes of TAVR and SAVR in patients with previous CABG. METHODS A systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library was conducted. Studies that reported clinical outcomes (perioperative or mid-term all-cause-mortality, cardiovascular mortality, pacemaker implantation, hospital duration and stroke) were included. Random-effect modeling was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Five cohort studies including a total of 872 patients (423 in TAVR, 449 in SAVR) were analyzed. STS scores were comparable between the two groups. No difference in all-cause-mortality, cardiovascular mortality and stroke at 30days, 1year and total follow-up period was seen between the two groups. TAVR patients had higher pacemaker implantation rates (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.66-6.38, p<0.001, I(2)=21%) and shorter hospital stay (-2.63days, 95% CI -5.20 to -0.04, p=0.05, I(2)=43%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with previous CABG who underwent TAVR had similar perioperative and long-term survival while experiencing more pacemaker implantations and shorter hospital stay compared to those who had SAVR making TAVR a safe and efficacious alternative to SAVR.

Atrial fibrillation inducibility during cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter ablation for the prediction of clinical atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL) are two separate entities that coexist in a significant percentage of patients. METHODS We sought to investigate whether AF inducibility during CTI AFL ablation predicted the occurrence of AF at follow up after AFL ablation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS A total of 154 patients (male: 72%, age: 61±13) with AFL and without history of AF were included. All patients underwent successful CTI dependent AFL ablation demonstrated by bidirectional block. During ablation, AF was seen or induced in 28 (18%) patients. After a mean follow up of 34±24months a total of 50 patients (32%) were noted with clinically manifest AF. From the patients who had inducible AF during AFL ablation, 50% developed post-procedural AF. From those in whom AF could not be induced, only 29% were documented with AF after ablation. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that only age and AF inducibility during AFL ablation were predictors of AF. Univariate analysis (age p=0.038 and inducible AF p=0.032 with odds ratio of 1.030 [95% CI (1.002-1.059)] and 2.500 [95% CI (1.084-5.765)], respectively) and multivariate analyses (age p=0.011 and inducible AF p=0.016 with adjusted odds ratio of 1.043 [95% CI (1.010-1.077)] and 3.293 [95% CI (1.250-8.676)], respectively). CONCLUSION AF inducibility in patients undergoing CTI AFL without history of AF is a strong predictor of AF occurrence in the future. Appropriate cardiology follow-up must be encouraged in this high-risk population as stroke prevention strategies can be appropriately introduced in a timely matter especially in patients with elevated CHA2DS2-VASc scores (≥2).

Impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on left atrial appendage flow velocities

Left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity has not been extensively studied in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of TAVI on LAA flow velocity.

SYSTOLIC STRAIN DYSFUNCTION PATTERNS IN LOW FLOW VERSUS HIGH FLOW SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION

We hypothesize subclinical strain dysfunction is the cause of the paradoxical Low Flow (LF) state, defined as an indexed stroke volume (SVi) ≤35ml/m2, in some patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction (AS). To test this hypothesis we performed an in depth strain analysis in