Anthony Frempong-Boadu

Swallowing and speech dysfunction in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, objective preoperative and postoperative assessment.

Swallowing difficulties and dysphonia may occur in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The etiology and incidence of these abnormalities, however, are not well defined. In view of this, we performed a prospective, objective analysis of swallowing function and vocal cord approximation in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Twenty-three consecutive patients (22 male and one female, mean age 59 years) undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion had standardized modified barium swallow study and videolaryngoendoscopy performed preoperatively and again at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. Eleven patients (48%) had radiographic evidence of preoperative swallowing abnormalities. The majority of these patients had myelopathic rather than radicular findings (p = 0.03). None, however, had symptoms of swallowing dysfunction. Among these patients, one had worse function postoperatively, three had improvement, and function remained unchanged in seven. The preoperative swallowing assessment was normal in 12 patients (52%). Postoperative radiographic swallowing abnormalities were demonstrated in eight of these patients (67%). Preoperative vocal cord movement was normal in all patients. Postoperatively, vocal cord paresis was detected in two patients. The paresis was transient in one and permanent in the other. Age, previous medical history, operation duration, and spinal level decompressed were not significantly associated with the incidence of swallowing dysfunction. There was, however, a tendency for patients undergoing multilevel surgery to demonstrate an increased incidence of swallowing abnormalities on postoperative radiographic studies. In addition, soft tissue swelling was more frequent in patients whose swallowing function was worse postoperatively (p = 0.007). Postoperative voice and swallowing dysfunction are common complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, although in the majority of patients these abnormalities are not symptomatic. Patients undergoing multilevel procedures are at an increased risk for these complications, in part because of soft tissue swelling in the neck.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients.

OBJECTIVEThe advantage of anterior column support and fusion in addition to pedicle fixation in patients with degenerative spinal disorders has become increasingly clear. With the increase in popularity of this treatment, a variety of techniques have been used to achieve the goal of anterior column support, fusion, and segmental instrumentation. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion has been used since the late 1940s in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine. We evaluated a modification to posterior lumbar interbody fusion called transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODSA retrospective analysis was performed on 24 patients (9 women, 15 men) who underwent TLIF. The approach involved a unilateral laminectomy and inferior facetectomy at the level of fusion. The interbody fusion was achieved from this unilateral approach by performing discectomy, arthrodesis, and insertion of one or two titanium cages packed with autologous bone. The average age of the patients in this study was 42.6 ± 12.5 years. Five patients were smokers. Five cases were related to workmen’s compensation. Seventeen patients’ original symptoms were a combination of low back pain and radiculopathy. Ten patients had had a previous spine operation. RESULTSEleven patients had L4–S1 TLIFs. The rest of the patients had a single-level TLIF (L2–S1). Average intensive care unit and floor days were 1.1 ± 1.0 and 5.8 ± 2.2 days, respectively. The number of days to ambulation was 2.8 ± 1.6 days. There were a total of six self-limited complications in 24 patients (including one transient neurological complication). The average follow-up time was 16.9 ± 9.1 months. Twenty-two patients had solid fusions. A modified Prolo scale (4 worst, 20 best) was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. The average score was 16.1 ± 4.1. CONCLUSIONTLIF is a reliable and safe technique for interbody support that can be performed with excellent clinical outcome. In the authors’ experience, TLIF offers excellent exposure with minimal risk. This applies particularly in cases of repeat spine surgery, in which the presence of scar tissue makes traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques difficult or impossible. In addition, TLIF seems to be a viable alternative to anteroposterior circumferential fusion and/or anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Intraoperative Iso-C C-Arm Navigation in Craniospinal Surgery: The First 60 Cases

OBJECTIVE:The intraoperative Iso-C C-arm (Siremobil Iso-C 3D; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) provides a unique ability to acquire and view multi-planar three-dimensional images of intraoperative anatomy. Registration for intraoperative surgical navigation may be automated, thus simplifying the operative workflow. METHODS:Iso-C C-arm intraoperative fluoroscopy acquires 100 images, each of which must be 1.8 degrees in a circumferential fashion about an “isocentric” point in space. The system generates a high-resolution isotropic three-dimensional data set that is available immediately after the 90-second C-arm rotation. The data set is ported to the image-guided workstation, registration is immediate and automated, and the surgeon can navigate with millimetric accuracy. The authors prospectively examined data from the initial 60 patients examined with the Iso-C, among whom were cases of anterior and posterior spinal instrumentation from the occiput to the sacrum. Percutaneous and minimally invasive spinal and cranial procedures were also included. RESULTS:Automated registration for image-guided navigation was attainable for anterior and posterior cases from the cranial base and entire spine. In most cases, intraoperative postprocedural imaging with the Iso-C mitigated the need for postoperative imaging. CONCLUSION:Intraoperative Iso-C three-dimensional scanning allows real-time feedback during cranial base and spinal surgery and during procedures involving instrumentation. In most cases, it obviates the need for postoperative computed tomography. Its usefulness is in its simplicity, and it can be easily adapted to the operating room workflow. When coupled with intraoperative navigation, this new technology facilitates complex neurosurgical procedures by improving the accuracy, safety, and time of surgery.

Decreased risk of wound infection after posterior cervical fusion with routine local application of vancomycin powder.

Study Design. A retrospective cohort study. Objective. To assess the ability of local vancomycin powder to prevent wound infection after posterior cervical fusion. Summary of Background Data. Wound infections are a significant source of morbidity and cost associated with spine surgery. Intraoperative application of vancomycin powder to the wound edges has been shown to lower the infection risk after posterior instrumented thoracolumbar fusion. There is little data on the efficacy and safety of local vancomycin powder in cervical spine surgery. Methods. All cases of posterior cervical fusion by a single surgeon were reviewed from 2007 to 2011. Routine application of 1 gram of vancomycin powder was started in August 2009. Baseline characteristics, operative details, and rates of wound infection and pseudarthrosis were compared between untreated patients and those who received vancomycin powder. Results. A total 171 patients underwent posterior cervical fusion between 2007 and 2011. Baseline and operative variables were similar between untreated patients (n = 92) and those who received vancomycin powder (n = 79). Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year (range, 1.1–5.7 yr). The infection rate fell from 10.9% to 2.5% (P = 0.0384) following the introduction of vancomycin powder. The untreated and treated groups had similar rates of pseudarthrosis (5.4% vs. 5.1%). No complications attributable to vancomycin powder were identified. Conclusion. Routine local application of vancomycin powder is a low-cost effective strategy for preventing wound infection after posterior cervical fusion. Further studies are needed to optimize dosing, assess long-term safety, and evaluate use in other spinal operations. Level of Evidence: 2

Lumbar laminectomy and fusion with routine local application of vancomycin powder: decreased infection rate in instrumented and non-instrumented cases.

OBJECTIVE Wound infections are one of the most common and potentially devastating complications of spinal surgery. Intra-wound application of vancomycin powder has been shown to lower the infection risk following posterior instrumented fusion, but little evidence supports use in other spinal operations. The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy of vancomycin powder for lumbar laminectomy and fusion, both instrumented and non-instrumented. METHODS All cases of lumbar laminectomy and posterior fusion (with or without pedicle screw fixation) by a single surgeon were reviewed from 2007 to 2011. Routine application of 1g vancomycin powder was started in August 2009. Baseline characteristics and operative data were compared between untreated patients and those who received vancomycin powder. Rates of wound infection were compared for all fusions, and then separately for instrumented and non-instrumented cases. RESULTS 253 patients underwent lumbar laminectomy and fusion between 2007 and 2011. Baseline and operative variables were similar between untreated patients (n=97) and those who received vancomycin powder (n=156). Patients were followed for at least one year. The infection rate fell significantly following introduction of vancomycin powder (from 11% to 0%, p=0.000018). Subgroup analysis revealed significant infection reduction for both instrumented cases (from 12% to 0%, p=0.000806) and non-instrumented cases (from 10% to 0%, p=0.0496). No complications attributable to vancomycin powder were identified. CONCLUSION Local vancomycin powder appears to lower the risk of wound infection following lumbar laminectomy and fusion, both instrumented and non-instrumented. Further studies are needed to optimize dosing of vancomycin powder, assess long-term safety and efficacy, and evaluate use in other spinal operations.

Evaluation of preoperative administration of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor rofecoxib for the treatment of postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery.

OBJECTIVE A combination of analgesics with different mechanisms of action may improve postoperative pain control and reduce the incidence of side effects. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of preoperative administration of rofecoxib (Vioxx; Merck & Co., Inc., Somerset, NJ) in reducing pain and opioid requirements after single-level lumbar microdiscectomy. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on 61 consenting patients who were considered American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II and who were scheduled for elective single-level lumbar microdiscectomy. Patients received either two doses of rofecoxib 50 mg or a placebo preoperatively. The outcome measures included morphine use in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), discharge times, and side effect profile. Data were analyzed by use of independent sample t tests for continuous variables or &khgr;2 tests for categorical variables. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The two groups were comparable with respect to patient characteristics, intraoperative opioid and hypnotic consumption, and duration of surgery. Patients in the rofecoxib group required significantly less morphine postoperatively. Significantly more patients in the placebo group reported pain scores greater than 7 at admission to the PACU. Time to first request for analgesia was shorter in the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences between groups in the incidence of nausea, time to discharge from the PACU, or hospital stay. CONCLUSION Preoperative rofecoxib is effective in reducing postoperative narcotic consumption in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. The use of rofecoxib does not shorten PACU length of stay or hospital discharge time. These outcome measures depend on multiple administrative factors.

Outcome comparison of atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular screws and screw-rod constructs: meta-analysis and review of literature.

Study Design: Literature review and meta-analysis. Objective: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with transarticular screws (TASs) and screw-rod constructs (SRCs) for posterior atlantoaxial fusion. Background: Modern techniques for C1–C2 fusions include Magerl and Seeman’s TAS and SRC using C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pars/pedicle screws as described by Goel and Laheri and later modified by Harms and Melcher. Materials and Methods: Online databases were searched for English-language articles between 1986 and April 2011 describing posterior atlantoaxial instrumentation with C1–C2 TAS or SRC. Forty-five studies (2073 patients) treated with TAS and 24 studies (1073 patients) treated with SRC fulfilled inclusion criteria. Standard and formal meta-analysis techniques were used to compare the outcomes. Results: All studies provided class III evidence. There were no differences in 30-day mortality (0.8% vs. 0.6%) or neurological injury (0.2% vs. 0%). There was a higher incidence of vertebral artery injury [4.1% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8%–5.4%) vs. 2.0% (95% CI, 1.1%–3.4%); P=0.02] and malpositioned screws [7.1% (95% CI, 5.7%–8.8%) vs. 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1%–4.1%); P<0.001] and a slightly lower rate of fusion with the TAS technique [97.5% (95% CI, 95.9%–98.5%) vs. 94.6% (95% CI, 92.6%–96.1%); P<0.001]. Conclusions: TAS and SRC are safe and effective treatment options for C1–C2 instability but require a thorough knowledge of atlantoaxial anatomy for successful insertion of screws. Slightly higher rates of fusion and less risk of injury to the vertebral artery during screw placement were observed with the SRC technique. However, differences in graft material and techniques were noted. Prospective, randomized studies with validated radiographic and clinical outcome metrics are necessary for proper comparison of these techniques.

Low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis 24 to 36 hours after degenerative spine surgery: risk of hemorrhage and venous thromboembolism.

Study Design. Retrospective review. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) started 24 to 36 hours after degenerative spine surgery. Summary of Background Data. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant postoperative complication best averted with dual mechanical/pharmacological prophylaxis. Pharmacological prophylaxis is widely used in patients with spinal cord injury, but there is no consensus on its role in degenerative spine surgery, particularly after laminectomy with the concurrent risk of epidural hematoma. The literature suggests a small but potentially devastating hemorrhage risk when LMWH is started within 24 hours of spine surgery. An intermediate strategy is delayed LMWH initiation to minimize hemorrhage risk and retain benefits of dual prophylaxis. Methods. Operative reports of the senior author were retrospectively reviewed for all cases of cervical and lumbar laminectomy from 2007 to 2011. Single-level decompressions without fusion and all nondegenerative cases were excluded. Baseline and operative details were recorded. Mechanical prophylaxis was used throughout admission, and prophylactic LMWH was started postoperative day 1 at 10 PM. All cases of postoperative hemorrhage (epidural hematoma, superficial hematoma, persistent wound drainage), deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism were noted. Results. A total of 367 patients underwent multilevel laminectomy or laminectomy and fusion for degenerative disease. VTE risk factors (age >60 yr, smoking, obesity) were common. No patients receiving LMWH 24 to 36 hours after surgery developed postoperative hemorrhage (95% confidence interval: 0–0.8%). Nearly half of the study population underwent lower extremity ultrasonography or chest computed tomography, and acute VTE was diagnosed in 14 patients (3.8%; 95% confidence interval: 2.1–6.3). Conclusion. LMWH prophylaxis seems to carry a very low hemorrhage risk when started 24 to 36 hours after spine surgery. Larger, prospective studies are needed to assess the safety of early delayed LMWH administration more definitively. Even with aggressive prophylaxis, patients undergoing fusion or multilevel laminectomy for degenerative disease are at significant risk for VTE.

C2 nerve root sectioning in posterior C1-2 instrumented fusions.

OBJECTIVE To analyze qualitatively C2 nerve dysfunction after its transection in C1-2 posterolateral instrumented fusions. METHODS From 2002-2010, 20 consecutive patients underwent posterolateral instrumented fusions using C1 lateral mass and C2 pars or pedicle screws, mainly for type 2 dens fractures. Screws were placed under lateral fluoroscopic guidance using standard techniques. Bilateral C2 nerve roots were coagulated and transected in all patients. Mean follow-up was 30.7 months and consisted of clinical and radiographic examinations, telephone interviews, and mailed visual analogue scale (VAS) questionnaires assessing C2 nerve dysfunction. RESULTS One patient was lost to follow-up after the initial postoperative visit. Fusion was evident in all patients with 12 months of follow-up and two of three patients with <12 months of follow-up. There were no instances of unintended neurologic deficits, vascular injury, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, or hardware malfunction or malposition. By the 2-week or 6-week office visit, 4 of 20 patients complained of sensory disturbance, and 2 had paresthesias in the C2 distribution. After longer follow-up, one additional patient developed mild sensory symptoms. Quality of life was adversely affected in only one patient. No patient developed neuropathic pain at any time after C2 sectioning. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first series to describe C2 nerve function after posterior atlantoaxial instrumented fusion in adults of all ages. Sacrifice of the C2 nerve root increases fusion surface, allows for better preparation and decortication of the atlantoaxial joint, improves visualization for screw placement, and decreases blood loss and operative time without major clinical consequences.

Atlantoaxial Fusion with Screw-Rod Constructs: Meta-Analysis and Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE To review published series describing C1-2 posterior instrumented fusions and summarize clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients treated with screw-rod constructs (SRC). METHODS Online databases were searched for English-language articles published between 1991 and April 2011 describing posterior atlantoaxial instrumentation with C1-2 SRC. There were 24 studies including 1073 patients treated with SRC that fulfilled inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis techniques were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS All studies provided class III evidence. The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 0.6%, and neurologic injury occurred in two patients with vertebral artery injury (VAI) from screw malpositions (0.2%). The incidence of clinically significant screw malpositions was 2.4% (confidence interval [CI], 1.1%-4.1%), the incidence of VAI was 2.0% (CI, 1.1%-3.4%), and the rate of fusion with the SRC technique was 97.5% (CI, 95.9%-98.5%). CONCLUSIONS SRC is a safe and effective treatment option for C1-2 instability. The low but nonzero incidence of screw malposition and VAI emphasizes the necessity of having a thorough knowledge of atlantoaxial anatomy for successful insertion of screws.