Anthony J. Billittier

The influence of demographic factors on seatbelt use by adults injured in motor vehicle crashes

This study determined demographic factors associated with reported seatbelt use among injured adults admitted to a trauma center. A retrospective chart review was conducted including all patients admitted to a trauma center for injuries from motor vehicle crashes (MVC). E-codes (i.e. ICD-9 external cause of injury codes) were used to identify all patients injured in a MVC between January 1995 and December 1997. Age, sex, race, residence zip code (i.e. a proxy for income based on geographic location of residence), position in the vehicle, and seatbelt use were obtained from the trauma registry. Forward logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of seatbelt use. Complete data was available for 1366 (82%) patients. Seatbelt use was reported for 45% of patients under age of 25 years, 52% of those 25-60 years, and 68% of those over 60 years. Overall, seatbelt use was reported for 45% of men and 63% of women, as well as for 56% of Caucasians (i.e. Whites) and 34% of African Americans. In addition, seatbelt use was reported for 33% of those earning less than

Is Total Out-of-hospital Time a Significant Predictor of Trauma Patient Mortality?

20,000 per year and 55% of those earning over

Assessment of emergency department health care professionals' behaviors regarding HIV testing and referral for patients with STDs.

20,000. Finally, seatbelt use was reported for 57% of drivers and 43% of passengers. Logistic regression revealed that age, female gender, Caucasian race, natural log of income, and driver were all significant predictors of reported seatbelt use. These results show that seatbelt use was more likely to be reported for older persons, women, Caucasians, individuals with greater incomes, and drivers. Seatbelt use should be encouraged for everyone; however, young people, men, African Americans, individuals with lower incomes, and passengers should be targeted specifically.

The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE To determine if there is an association between total out-of-hospital time and trauma patient mortality. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of a convenience sample of consecutive medical records for all admitted patients transported by helicopter or ambulance from the scene of injury to the regional trauma center. Descriptive and univariate analyses were conducted to determine which variables were associated with patient mortality and total out-of-hospital time. Multiple predictors logistic regression was used to determine if total out-of-hospital time was associated with trauma patient outcome, while controlling for the variables associated with trauma patient mortality. RESULTS Of the 2,925 patients who were transported from the scene, 1,877 met the inclusion criteria. Six percent (116) did not survive. The multiple predictors model included CUPS (critical, unstable, potentially unstable, stable) status, patient age, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and total out-of-hospital time as predictors of mortality. Total out-of-hospital time (odds ratio 0.987; p = 0.092) was the only variable not found to be a significant predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS Provider-assigned CUPS status, patient age, Injury Severity Score, and Revised Trauma Score all were significant predictors of trauma patient mortality. Total out-of-hospital time was not associated with mortality.

Out-of-hospital do-not-resuscitate orders by primary care physicians.

The objective of this study was to evaluate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling, testing, and referral practices of emergency department health care professionals (i.e., medical doctors [MD], physician assistants [PA], nurse practitioners [NP], and registered nurses [RN]) for patients presenting with other sexually transmitted diseases (STD). All health care professionals from 10 emergency departments in a northeastern county were asked to complete an anonymous survey. The surveys were returned by 154 (41%) health care professionals (RN = 99, NP = 5, PA = 7, MD = 39, other = 4). The average years in practice were 11. Only 7% of respondents were certified to provide state mandated HIV pretest counseling (certification not required for MD). Respondents reported caring for an average of 13 patients per week with suspected STD. Fifty-five percent of respondents reported that they always or usually warn STD patients of their HIV risk, yet only 10% always or usually encouraged these patients to consent to HIV testing in their emergency department (RN = 7%, NP = 25%, PA = 0%, MD = 16%). Reasons for not offering HIV testing in their emergency department were follow-up concerns (51%), not certified to provide pretest/posttest counseling (45%), and too time consuming (19%). Twenty-seven percent of respondents indicated HIV testing was not available in their emergency department despite all hospital laboratories reporting HIV testing capability. Ninety-three percent of respondents were aware that confidential testing sites were available, but only 35% always or usually referred patients not tested in the emergency department elsewhere for testing. Emergency department health care professionals frequently fail to provide HIV counseling, testing, and/or referral for patients with suspected STD.

Automated external defibrillator (AED) utilization rates and reasons fire and police first responders did not apply AEDS

OBJECTIVES To compare the incidences and severities of pain experienced by healthy volunteers undergoing spinal immobilization in the neutral position with and without occipital padding. To compare the incidence of pain when immobilized in the neutral position with the incidence in a nonneutral position. METHODS Thirty-nine healthy volunteers over the age of 18 years who had no acute pain or illness, were not pregnant, and had no history of back problems or surgery voluntarily participated in a prospective, randomized, crossover study conducted in a clinical laboratory setting. Appropriately sized rigid cervical collars were applied to the subjects, who were then immobilized on wooden backboards with their cervical spines maintained in the neutral position using towels (padded) or plywood (unpadded) under their occiputs. The subjects were secured to the board with straps, soft head blocks, and tape for 15 minutes to simulate a typical ambulance transport time. The straps, head blocks, and tape were removed, and the subjects remained on the board for an additional 45 minutes to simulate a typical emergency department experience. The subjects were then asked to identify the location(s) of any pain on anterior and posterior body outlines and to indicate the corresponding severity of pain on a 10-cm visual analog scale. The subjects were also asked questions about movement, respiratory symptoms, and strap discomfort in an attempt to distract them from the true focus of the study (i.e., pain). A similar survey was given to each participant to complete 24 hours later. The same subjects were immobilized with the alternate occipital material a minimum of two weeks later utilizing the same procedure. They again completed both surveys. RESULTS Pain was reported by 76.9% of the subjects following removal from the backboard for the unpadded trial and 69.2% of the subjects following the padded trial (p < 0.45). Twenty-three percent (23.1%) of the subjects reported neck pain after the unpadded trial, while 38.5% reported neck pain after the padded trial (p < 0.07). Occipital pain was reported by 35.9% in the unpadded trial and 25.6% in the padded trial (p < 0.29). Twenty-four hours later, pain was reported by 17.9% of the subjects following the unpadded trial and 23.1% of the subjects following the padded trial (p < 0.63). Eight percent (7.7%) reported neck pain 24 hours after the and unpadded trial and 12.8% after the padded trial (p < 0.5). Occipital pain was reported by 7.7% of the subjects 24 hours after the unpadded trial and 2.6% after the padded trial (p < 0.63). This study had a power of 0.90 to detect a difference of 30% between the trials. The authors found a significantly lower incidence of pain (p < 0.01) and occipital pain (p < 0.01) in their unpadded trial compared with that reported by Chan et al., who used neither padding nor neutral positioning to immobilize subjects. CONCLUSIONS Pain is frequently reported by healthy volunteers following spinal immobilization. Occipital padding does not appear to significantly decrease the incidence or severity of pain. Alignment of the cervical spine in the neutral position may reduce the incidence of pain, but further studies should be conducted to substantiate this observation.

Ambulance, fire, and police dispatch times compared with the atomic clock.

The objective of this study was to determine the knowledge, utilization, and experience of primary care physicians (PCPs) with nonhospital do-not-resuscitate (NH-DNR) orders. An anonymous survey was sent to all PCPs in a single northeastern county. Up to two surveys were mailed to each PCP. Descriptive statistics were used to report provider responses. The main variable of interest was issuance of NH-DNR orders. Surveys were mailed to 820 PCPs; 348 (42%) were returned. Respondents had practiced an average 17 +/- 11 years, and cared for an average of 720 patients per month, 7 of whom were terminally ill. Seventy percent issued NH-DNR orders. Twenty-five percent reported resuscitation had been attempted for at least one patient with a NH-DNR order; 64% reported this had happened more than once. Of respondents who had a NH-DNR order ignored, 14% had instructed family members to call police, fire, or EMS following death of the patient. Of the PCPs who did not issue NH-DNR orders, 71% reported not caring for any appropriate patients, yet 41% reported caring for at least 1 terminally ill patient per month. Seventy-nine percent disagreed that intubation and mechanical ventilation were appropriate treatment for DNR patients in severe respiratory distress, and 71% disagreed that cardioversion was appropriate treatment for an unconscious DNR patient with unstable ventricular tachycardia. In conclusion, a majority of respondents issued NH-DNR orders and one quarter reported these orders had not been followed. A majority felt intubation, mechanical ventilation, and cardioversion should not be performed for noncardiac arrest DNR patients with an indication, but not in cardiac arrest.

The time first-response fire fighters have to initiate care in a midsize city

Objectives. To determine the rate at which fire and police first responders (FRs) apply automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and to ascertain reasons for not applying them. Methods. Twenty-one emergency medical services (EMS) systems whose FRs had been supplied with AEDs by a philanthropic foundation provided data for all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Data including the incidence of AED application and explanations for not applying AEDs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 2,456 OHCAs were reported. AED application information was available for 2,439 patients and revealed that FRs had not applied AEDs to 1,025 patients (42%). Fire FRs were more likely than police FRs to have applied AEDs (relative risk 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.65-2.12). Reasons for not applying AEDs were listed for 664 (65%) of the OHCA patients to whom AEDs had not been applied. The predominant reason the FRs did not apply an AED was that the transporting ambulance defibrillator had already been applied (74%). However, when response times for FRs and the transporting ambulances were compared for these OHCA patients, it was found that the transporting ambulances arrived after the FRs 23% the time, simultaneously with the FRs 45% of the time, and before the FRs only 32% of the time. Conclusion. Fire and police FRs did not apply AEDs to a significant number of OHCA patients. Use of the transport ambulance defibrillator was the primary reason given for not applying the FR AED. Given low AED application rates by FRs, future studies are needed to determine the characteristics of communities in which equipping FRs with AEDs is the most beneficial deployment strategy, and how to increase AED application by FRs in communities with FR AED programs.

A S URVEY OF F IRST-RESPONDER F IREFIGHTERS ' A TTITUDES , O PINIONS, AND C ONCERNS ABOUT T HEIR A UTOMATED E XTERNAL D EFIBRILLATOR P ROGRAM

Objectives. To quantify any differences between the times used by public safety answering points (PSAPs) in a multijurisdictional county compared with the atomic clock and to determine whether there was consistency in any time differences. Methods. All 25 ambulance, fire, and police PSAPs were contacted by telephone. The current time in hours, minutes, and seconds on the dispatch centers timepiece was -requested. The atomic clock time was simultaneously recorded. Time differences between the reported and atomic clock times were calculated and the absolute values were used to calculate the mean difference. The procedure was repeated one week later. Consistency in time deviation was evaluated by subtracting the time differences between weeks 1 and 2 for each center. Results. All 25 centers were contacted and three declined to participate. Time differences ranged from −551 to 117 seconds (mean difference: 61.2 ± 120.3) for week 1 and −103 to 79 seconds (mean difference: 36.9 ± 33.4) for week 2. Time deviations between weeks 1 and 2 were: 0 seconds for one center, 1 to 30 seconds for 12 centers, 31 to 60 seconds for four centers, and more than 60 seconds for five centers. Conclusions. The maximum time difference between dispatch center and atomic clock times was 551 seconds. This difference may be clinically significant for time-dependent research, quality improvement tasks, or medical legal reviews when multiple PSAPs are involved. Lack of consistency in time deviation over one week suggests systematic adjustment for these differences may not be possible.

Paramedic Intubation: Patient Position Might Matter

The objective of this study was to determine whether simultaneously dispatched first-response firefighters (fire) arrive before transporting EMS providers (ambulance) and the amount of time fire has on scene to initiate care. Fire and ambulance dispatch records were obtained for all 9-1-1 responses from four 1-month intervals. Only incidents to which both agencies had been simultaneously dispatched were included. Response time for each agency was determined by subtracting the time of dispatch from the time of arrival. The difference between fire and ambulance response time was the time fire had to initiate care. Both agencies were simultaneously dispatched to 4752 incidents. Average response time for all incidents was 4.0 +/- 2.6 min for fire and 5.3 +/- 2.0 min for ambulance. Fire had 1.3 +/- 3.2 min on average to initiate care. Fire arrived before ambulance for 69% (3262) of requests and for these calls had 2.8 +/- 1.7 min on average to initiate care. Utilization of densely staged first-response fire apparatus in a midsize city may be appropriate because firefighters frequently arrive before ambulances and may have adequate time to initiate lifesaving interventions.