Anthony Korner

Is self disturbance the core of borderline personality disorder? An outcome study of borderline personality factors

Object: To determine which constellation of clinical features constitutes the core of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Method: The criterion of endurance was used to identify the constellation of features which are most basic, or core, in borderline personality disorder. Two sets of constellations of DSM-III features were tested, each consisting of three groupings. The first set of constellations was constructed according to Clarkins factor analysis; the second was theoretically derived. Broadly speaking, the three groupings concerned ‘self’, ‘emotional regulation’, and ‘impulse’. Changes of these constellations were charted over one year in a comparison of the effect of treatment by the Conversational Model (n = 29) with treatment as usual (n = 31). In addition, measures of typical depression (Zung) were scored before and after the treatment period. The changes in the constellations were considered in relation to authoritative opinion. Results: The changes in the two sets of constellations were similar. In the treatment as usual (TAU) group, ‘self’ endured unchanged, while ‘emotional regulation’ and ‘impulse’ improved. In the Conversational Model cohort, ‘self’ improved, ‘emotional regulation’ improved more greatly than the TAU group, while ‘impulse’ improved but not more than the treatment as usual group. Depression scores were not particularly associated with any grouping. Conclusions: A group of features including self/identity disturbance, emptiness and fear of abandonment may be at the core of BPD. Correlations between the three groupings and Zung scores favoured the view that the core affect is not typical depression. Rather, the central state may be ‘painful incoherence’. It is suggested that the findings have implications for the refinement and elaboration of treatment methods in borderline personality disorder.

The Beneficial Effect on Family Life in Treating Borderline Personality

Abstract The harmful effect of borderline patients on their families is an important but relatively neglected aspect of outcome studies. This study concerns changes in perceived quality of relationships with partners and children of 24 patients suffering Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) after 12 months of treatment with the Conversational Model (CM). They were compared to 21 parents with BPD receiving “Treatment as Usual” (TAU) from their referring clinicians for the same period. Both groups developed naturalistically giving the study a quasi–experimental design. The Social Adjustment Scale (SAS–SR) was administered on intake and again after 12 months. The subscales dealing with relationships with children, with partners and with the family unit were scored and compared between groups. It was found that the perceived relationships with children and partners improved significantly for the CM group but not for the TAU group.

Formulation, conversation and therapeutic engagement

Objectives: The aim of this study was to review psychodynamic formulation with respect to the language used and the evidence it provides about variations of clinical purpose. Method: The purpose of the psychodynamic formulation is considered in training and clinical contexts. Three formulations are presented: two written from alternative theoretical perspectives and one designed to be spoken to the patient. Linguistic comparisons are made using these examples, emphasizing differences in grammatical complexity, lexical density (‘wordiness’) and other qualities. Results: The essential purpose of psychodynamic formulation is to develop an understanding that can be shared in the service of effective care. Significant differences were found between written and spoken versions with greater grammatical complexity and lower lexical density in the spoken form. An intrapsychic theoretical model was more grammatically complex and ‘noun-based’ compared to an inter-subjective model. Other differences are also described, including the tendency for the intrapsychic account to efface the sense of personal agency. This contributes to the impression of a subject under the influence of ‘unseen’ forces. Conclusions: The communicability of psychodynamic formulation is essential to its utility in clinical practice.

Conversational model psychotherapy

Objectives: To briefly outline historical development, theoretical orientation, evidence and areas of application for Conversational Model Psychotherapy. Conclusions: Conversational Model Therapy remains an important evidence-based option in fostering recovery and growth for many patients with traumatic disruptions and restrictions of self. It is one of an emerging group of relational psychotherapies, broadly reflecting a change from a one person to a two person (intersubjective) psychological paradigm in psychotherapy.