Anthony T. Cacace

The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention

Objective: To determine the ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention through a multi‐center, state‐wide universal newborn hearing screening project. Design: Universal newborn hearing screening was conducted at eight hospitals across New York State. All infants who did not bilaterally pass hearing screening before discharge were recalled for outpatient retesting. Inpatient screening and outpatient rescreening were done with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and/or auditory brain stem response testing. Diagnostic testing was performed with age appropriate tests, auditory brain stem response and/or visual reinforcement audiometry. Infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss were considered for hearing aids and early intervention. Ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention were investigated regarding nursery type, risk status, unilateral versus bilateral hearing loss, loss type, loss severity, and state regions. Results: The prevalence of infants diagnosed with permanent hearing loss was 2.0/1000 (85 of 43,311). Of the 85 infants with hearing loss, 61% were from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and 67% were at risk for hearing loss. Of the 36 infants fitted with hearing aids, 58% were from NICUs and 78% were at risk for hearing loss. The median age at identification and enrollment in early intervention was 3 mo. Median age at hearing aid fitting was 7.5 mo. Median ages at identification were less for infants from the well‐baby nurseries (WBNs) than for the NICU infants and for infants with severe/profound than for infants with mild/moderate hearing loss, but were similar for not‐at‐risk and at‐risk infants. Median ages at hearing aid fitting were less for well babies than for NICU infants, for not‐at‐risk infants than for at‐risk infants, and for infants with severe/profound hearing loss than for infants with mild/moderate hearing loss. However, median ages at early intervention enrollment were similar for nursery types, risk status, and severity of hearing loss. Conclusions: Early ages of hearing loss identification, hearing aid fitting, and enrollment in early intervention can be achieved for infants from NICUs and WBNs and for infants at risk and not at risk for hearing loss in a large multi‐center universal newborn hearing screening program.

Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity.

Tinnitus is most often initiated by modality specific otopathologic disturbances affecting peripheral and central auditory pathways. However, there is growing evidence indicating that the anatomical location generating tinnitus occurs at sites different from the initial pathology. Support for this notion is found in individuals where tinnitus can be triggered or modulated by inputs from other sensory modalities or sensorimotor systems (somatosensory, somatomotor, visual-motor). The use of functional imaging methods combined with psychophysics, detailed physical examinations and questionnaire-based assessments has reinforced and validated these observations. Available data suggest that tinnitus-related crossmodal interactions are more common than previously anticipated. This communication reviews these advancements and suggests that a relatively broad multimodal network of neurons is involved in generating and sustaining the tinnitus perception in some forms of the disorder. Also implicated as part of the tinnitus experience are interactions within large-scale neural networks subserving attention, cognition, and emotion. Incorporating this knowledge into contemporary psychophysiological models will help facilitate the conceptualization of this phantom perception in a more comprehensive manner.

The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: outpatient outcome measures.

Objective: To investigate outpatient outcome measures of a multi‐center, state‐wide, universal newborn hearing screening project. Design: Eight hospitals participated in a 3‐yr, funded project. Each hospital designed its own protocol using common criteria for judging whether an infant passed a hearing screening. Infants were tested in the hospital, and those either failing the in‐hospital screening or who were not tested in the hospital (missed) were asked to return 4 to 6 wk after hospital discharge for outpatient rescreening. Those infants failing the outpatient rescreening were referred for diagnostic auditory brain stem response testing. Each hospital used its own audiological equipment and criteria to determine whether a particular infant had a hearing loss. All data were collected and analyzed for individual hospitals, as well as totaled across all hospitals. Data were analyzed in terms of year of program operation, nursery type, and geographic region. Results: Seventy‐two percent of infants who failed the in‐hospital screening returned for outpatient testing. The percentage of in‐hospital fails returning for retesting was significantly higher than the percentage of in‐hospital misses returning for retesting. The percentage of infants returning for retesting increased with successive years of program operation. Some differences were noted in the percentage of infants returning for retesting among hospitals and geographic regions of the state. Some differences in outpatient outcome measures also were noted between infants originally born into the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the well‐baby nursery (WBN). The percentage of infants from the NICU who returned for retesting was slightly higher than that for infants from the WBN. The percentage of infants from the WBN passing the outpatient rescreening was higher than that for the NICU infants. The overall prevalence of hearing loss was 1.96/1000, with that in the NICU being 8/1000 and that in the WBN being 0.9/1000. Positive predictive value for permanent hearing loss based on inpatient screening was approximately 4% and based on outpatient rescreening was approximately 22%. Conclusions: Several outpatient outcome measures changed with successive years of program operation, suggesting that programs improve over time. Also, some outpatient outcome measures differ between NICU and WBN populations. The differences noted across regions of the state in the percentage of infants returning for outpatient retesting require further research to determine whether differences are due to demographic and/or procedural differences.

Human middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: vertex and temporal components ☆

We recorded middle-latency (20-70 msec) auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) to monaural and binaural clicks in 30 normal adults (ages 20-49 years) at 32 scalp locations all referred to a balanced non-cephalic reference. Our goal was to define the MLAEP components that were present at comparable latencies and comparable locations across the subject population. Group and individual data were evaluated both as topographic maps and as MLAEPs at selected electrode locations. Three major components occurred between 20 and 70 msec, two well-known peaks centered at the vertex, and one previously undefined peak focused over the posterior temporal area. Pa is a 29 msec positive peak centered at the vertex and present with both monaural and binaural stimulation. Pb is a 53 msec positive peak also centered at the vertex but seen consistently only with binaural and right ear stimulation. TP41 is a 41 msec positive peak focused over both temporal areas. TP41 has not been identified in previous MLAEP studies that concentrated on central scalp locations and/or used active reference electrode sites such as ears or mastoids. Available topographic, intracranial, pharmacologic, and lesion studies indicate that Pa, Pb and TP41 are of neural origin. Whether Pa and/or Pb are produced in Heschls gyrus, primary auditory cortex, remains unclear. TP41 is probably produced by auditory cortex on the posterior lateral surface of the temporal lobe. It should prove of considerable value in experimental and clinical evaluation of higher level auditory function in particular and of cortical function in general.

Modality Specificity as a Criterion for Diagnosing Central Auditory Processing Disorders

A central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is an auditory perceptual dysfunction that cannot be explained on the basis of peripheral hearing loss. As a concept, CAPD has not been completely va...

Auditory dysfunction in Friedreich ataxia Result of spiral ganglion degeneration

We performed behavioral audiometric tests and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in four patients with Friedreich ataxia. None of the patients had symptomatic hearing difficulties. Results of the audiometric tests pointed to a disorder of the eighth nerve. In none of the patients could we elicit normal-appearing waves of the brainstem auditory evoked potentials. These abnormalities could be attributed to degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons. Our patients had useful and functional hearing despite very abnormal brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Cutaneous-evoked tinnitus. I. Phenomenology, psychophysics and functional imaging.

Complete and acute unilateral deafferentation of the auditory periphery (auditory and vestibular afferents) can induce changes in the central nervous system that may result in unique forms of tinnitus. These tinnitus perceptions can be controlled (turned on and off) or modulated (changed in pitch or loudness) by performing certain overt behaviors in other sensory/motor systems. Clinical reports from our laboratory and several other independent sources indicate that static change in eye gaze, from a neutral head-referenced position, is one such behavior that can evoke, modulate and/or suppress these phantom auditory events. This report deals with a new clinical entity and a form of tinnitus that can be evoked directly by cutaneous stimulation of the upper hand and fingertip regions. In 2 adults, cutaneous-evoked tinnitus was reported following neurosurgery for space-occupying lesions at the base of the skull and posterior craniofossa, where hearing and vestibular functions were lost completely and acutely in one ear (unilateral deafferentation) and facial nerve paralysis (unilateral deefferentation) was present either immediately following neurosurgery or had occurred as a delayed-onset event. Herein, we focus on the phenomenology of this discovery, provide perceptual correlates using contemporary psychophysical methods and document in one individual cutaneous-evoked tinnitus-related neural activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging. In a companion paper, neuroanatomical and physiological interactions between auditory and somatosensory systems, possible mechanistic accounts and relevant functional neuroimaging studies are reviewed.

Swallowing disorders in a population of children with cerebral palsy

One of the disabilities in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) is dysphagia. To establish the prevalence of dysphagia in a population of children with CP, and to determine if any factors are related to dysphagia, we studied 56 CP patients, 5-21 years, enrolled in a primary school for the disabled. Fifteen patients (27%) had either radiographic or clinical evidence of dysphagia. These 15 patients were compared to the remaining 41 patients without dysphagia. Using data obtained from chart review and interviews with speech pathologists, several factors that contributed to dysphagia were found. These included: bite reflexes, slowness of oral intake, poor trunk control, inability to feed independently, anticonvulsant medication, coughing with meals, choking, and pneumonia. We also noted trends in the following factors: presence of tongue thrusting, presence of drooling, severity of CP, poor head control, severity of mental retardation, seizures, and speech disorders. Factors not related to the presence of dysphagia include: subject age, cause of CP, and type of CP. Early, aggressive work-up and identification in CP patients with the risk factors outlined above can reduce the associated pulmonary complications.

Temporal processing deficits in remediation-resistant reading-impaired children

There is considerable interest in whether a deficit in temporal processing underlies specific learning and language disabilities in school-aged children. This view is particularly controversial in the area of developmental reading problems. The temporal-processing hypothesis was tested in a sample of normal children, 9–11 years of age, and in a sample of age-matched children with reading impairments, by assessing temporal-order discrimination. Five different binary temporal-order tasks were evaluated in the auditory and visual sensory modalities. Other basic discrimination abilities for single auditory stimuli were also assessed, including just noticeable differences (JNDs) for frequency and intensity and a simple threshold detection task. In these tasks, the temporal dimension was the duration of the individual stimuli (20 and 200 ms). All data were obtained using forced- choice psychophysical methods, either in a single-track adaptive format or using psychometric functions. The results from these experiments showed that children with reading impairments had deficits in temporal-order discrimination, but these effects were not modality specific. These same children also had significantly elevated frequency and intensity JNDs and their performance on these tasks were not dependent on stimulus duration. No group differences were observed on the threshold detection task, and the derived measurements of temporal integration (i.e. the threshold difference between the 20- and 200-ms stimuli) were considered normal, averaging 11.7 dB. As a whole, discrimination deficits observed in the reading-impaired group only occurred with suprathreshold stimuli. The deficits were neither modality specific nor temporal (duration) specific.

New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures.

Objective: To examine differences among various test protocols on the fail rate at hospital discharge for infants in the well‐baby nursery (WBN) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) who received hearing screening through a universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project. Design: The outcomes of several screening protocols were examined. Two technologies were used: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) alone or in combination with the auditory brain stem response (ABR). The performance of test protocols in both nurseries within eight hospitals was examined over a 2‐ to 3‐yr period. In the WBN, six hospitals used a screening protocol of TEOAE technology first followed by an ABR (automated or conventional) technology screening for newborns who referred on TEOAE screening. Two hospitals used TEOAE only in the WBN. Seven hospitals used screening protocols in the NICU that used a combination of TEOAE and ABR technologies (TEOAE technology administered first or second, before or after TEOAE, or TEOAE and ABR tests on all infants). Only one hospital used TEOAE technology exclusively for hearing screening. Results: Significant differences among screening protocols were found across hospitals in the first, second, and third years of the program. The combination of TEOAE technology and ABR technology (a two‐technology screening protocol) resulted in a significantly lower fail rate at hospital discharge than the use of a single‐technology (TEOAE). Fail rates at discharge were twice as high using the one‐technology protocol versus two‐technology protocol, even when the best outcomes from program year 3 were considered exclusively. Results of two‐technology versus one‐technology protocols were similar in the NICU. Use of a second technology for screening TEOAE fails significantly reduced every hospital that used the protocols fail rate at discharge. Conclusions: A two‐technology screening protocol resulted in significantly lower fail rates at hospital discharge in both the WBN and NICU nurseries than use of a single‐technology (TEOAE) hearing screening protocol.