Anthony V. Proto

Computed tomography of the mediastinum. Normal anatomy and indications for the use of CT.

Correlative CT studies of a cadaver and a statistical analysis of all thoracic scans performed in the first year of operation of a delta-Scan 50 were undertaken in order to better understand normal mediastinal anatomy as displayed by computed tomography. Several levels are illustrated, and the results of the analysis are reported. The authors propose a list of indications for which CT of the mediastinum seems to be helpful.Correlative CT studies of a cadaver and a statistical analysis of all thoracic scans performed in the first year of operation of a delta-Scan 50 were undertaken in order to better understand normal mediastinal anatomy as displayed by computed tomography. Several levels are illustrated, and the results of the analysis are reported. The authors propose a list of indications for which CT of the mediastinum seems to be helpful.

Radiology Editorial Board

Richard L. Baron, MD, Pittsburgh, Pa (1991) Gary J. Becker, MD, Miami, Fla (1987) Joseph Bonn, MD, Philadelphia, Pa (1992) Paul A. Bottomley, PhD, Baltimore, Md (1991) Lawrence E. Crooks, PhD, South San Francisco, Calif (1990) Eduard E. de Lange, MD, Charlottesville, Va (1993) Stephen S. Gebarski, MD, Ann Arbor, Mich (1991) Jud W. Gurney, MD, Omaha, Neb (1991) Clifford R. Jack, Jr, MD, Rochester, Minn (1991) R. Brooke Jeffrey, MD, Stanford, Calif (1992) John R. Mathieson, MD, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (1994) William D. Middleton, MD, St Louis, Mo (1992) Donald G. Mitchell, MD, Philadelphia, Pa (1991) Rendon C. Nelson, MD, Durham, NC (1991) Stephen E. Rubesin, MD, Philadelphia, Pa (1991) George A. Taylor, MD, Boston, Mass (1990) David M. Williams, MD, Ann Arbor, Mich (1991)

Manuscript Reviewers - A Note of Thanks

At Radiology, we are most fortunate to have the assistance of a host of reviewers who help guide the quality of the manuscripts published in the Journal. We take this opportunity to recognize these individuals and to thank them for both their expertise and the substantial amount of time they have devoted to the review process. The individuals listed below are those who were assigned manuscripts to review and who also returned those reviews during the period July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2002.