Antoine Barthélemy
Université catholique de Louvain
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Antoine Barthélemy.
Climate Dynamics | 2018
Petteri Uotila; Hugues Goosse; Keith Haines; Matthieu Chevallier; Antoine Barthélemy; C. Bricaud; James A. Carton; Neven S. Fučkar; Gilles Garric; Doroteaciro Iovino; Frank Kauker; Meri Korhonen; Vidar S. Lien; Marika Marnela; François Massonnet; Davi Mignac; K. Andrew Peterson; Remon Sadikni; Li Shi; Steffen Tietsche; Takahiro Toyoda; Jiping Xie; Zhaoru Zhang
Global and regional ocean and sea ice reanalysis products (ORAs) are increasingly used in polar research, but their quality remains to be systematically assessed. To address this, the Polar ORA Intercomparison Project (Polar ORA-IP) has been established following on from the ORA-IP project. Several aspects of ten selected ORAs in the Arctic and Antarctic were addressed by concentrating on comparing their mean states in terms of snow, sea ice, ocean transports and hydrography. Most polar diagnostics were carried out for the first time in such an extensive set of ORAs. For the multi-ORA mean state, we found that deviations from observations were typically smaller than individual ORA anomalies, often attributed to offsetting biases of individual ORAs. The ORA ensemble mean therefore appears to be a useful product and while knowing its main deficiencies and recognising its restrictions, it can be used to gain useful information on the physical state of the polar marine environment.
Climate Dynamics | 2017
Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth; Antoine Barthélemy; Matthieu Chevallier; R. Cullather; Neven S. Fučkar; François Massonnet; P. Posey; Wanqui Wang; Jinlun Zhang; Constantin Ardilouze; Cecilia M. Bitz; Guillaume Vernieres; A. Wallcraft; Muyin Wang
Dynamical model forecasts in the Sea Ice Outlook (SIO) of September Arctic sea-ice extent over the last decade have shown lower skill than that found in both idealized model experiments and hindcasts of previous decades. Additionally, it is unclear how different model physics, initial conditions or forecast post-processing (bias correction) techniques contribute to SIO forecast uncertainty. In this work, we have produced a seasonal forecast of 2015 Arctic summer sea ice using SIO dynamical models initialized with identical sea-ice thickness in the central Arctic. Our goals are to calculate the relative contribution of model uncertainty and irreducible error growth to forecast uncertainty and assess the importance of post-processing, and to contrast pan-Arctic forecast uncertainty with regional forecast uncertainty. We find that prior to forecast post-processing, model uncertainty is the main contributor to forecast uncertainty, whereas after forecast post-processing forecast uncertainty is reduced overall, model uncertainty is reduced by an order of magnitude, and irreducible error growth becomes the main contributor to forecast uncertainty. While all models generally agree in their post-processed forecasts of September sea-ice volume and extent, this is not the case for sea-ice concentration. Additionally, forecast uncertainty of sea-ice thickness grows at a much higher rate along Arctic coastlines relative to the central Arctic ocean. Potential ways of offering spatial forecast information based on the timescale over which the forecast signal beats the noise are also explored.
Nature Communications | 2017
Olivier Lecomte; Hugues Goosse; Thierry Fichefet; Casimir de Lavergne; Antoine Barthélemy; Violette Zunz
Several processes have been hypothesized to explain the slight overall expansion of Antarctic sea ice over the satellite observation era, including externally forced changes in local winds or in the Southern Ocean’s hydrological cycle, as well as internal climate variability. Here, we show the critical influence of an ocean–sea-ice feedback. Once initiated by an external perturbation, it may be sufficient to sustain the observed sea-ice expansion in the Ross Sea, the region with the largest and most significant expansion. We quantify the heat trapped at the base of the ocean mixed layer and demonstrate that it is of the same order of magnitude as the latent heat storage due to the long-term changes in sea-ice volume. The evidence thus suggests that the recent ice coverage increase in the Ross Sea could have been achieved through a reorganization of energy within the near-surface ice-ocean system.The mechanisms responsible for the overall expansion of Antarctic sea-ice in recent decades remain unclear. Here, using observations and model results, the authors show that ice-ocean feedbacks, triggered by an external perturbation, could be responsible for changes in sea-ice extent observed in the Ross Sea.
Climate Dynamics | 2018
Antoine Barthélemy; Hugues Goosse; Thierry Fichefet; Olivier Lecomte
Although atmospheric reanalyses are an extremely valuable tool to study the climate of polar regions, they suffer from large uncertainties in these data-poor areas. In this work, we examine how Antarctic sea ice biases in an ocean-sea ice model are related to these forcing uncertainties. Three experiments are conducted in which the NEMO-LIM model is driven by different atmospheric forcing sets. The minimum ice extent, the ice motion and the ice thickness are sensitive to the reanalysis chosen to drive the model, while the wintertime ice extent and inner pack concentrations are barely affected. The analysis of sea ice concentration budgets allows identifying the processes leading to differences between the experiments, and also indicates that large and similar errors compared to observations are present in all three cases. Our assessment of the influence of forcing inaccuracies on the simulated Antarctic sea ice allows disentangling two types of model biases: the ones that can be reduced thanks to better atmospheric forcings, and those that would require improvements of the physics of the ice or ocean model.
Ocean Modelling | 2015
Antoine Barthélemy; Thierry Fichefet; Hugues Goosse; Gurvan Madec
Geoscientific Model Development | 2015
Clément Rousset; Martin Vancoppenolle; Gurvan Madec; Thierry Fichefet; Simona Flavoni; Antoine Barthélemy; Rachid Benshila; Jérôme Chanut; Claire Levy; Sébastien Masson; Frédéric Vivier
Ocean Modelling | 2016
Antoine Barthélemy; Thierry Fichefet; Hugues Goosse
Ocean Modelling | 2016
Antoine Barthélemy; Thierry Fichefet; Hugues Goosse; Gurvan Madec
The Cryosphere | 2017
David Docquier; François Massonnet; Antoine Barthélemy; Neil F. Tandon; Olivier Lecomte; Thierry Fichefet
European geosciences union general assembly | 2012
Antoine Barthélemy; Hugues Goosse; Pierre Mathiot; Thierry Fichefet