Anton H. Graf
University of Vienna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anton H. Graf.
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 1995
Fritz Nagele; Edgar Petru; Michael Medl; Christian Kainz; Anton H. Graf; Paul Sevelda
Objective To evaluate the prognostic importance of preoperative CA 125 levels in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I epithelial ovarian cancer in comparison with the established prognostic factors: degree of differentiation, FIGO substage, and age. Methods In a retrospective analysis, the traditional prognostic factors and CA 125 levels (cutoff value 65 U/mL) were studied in 201 patients who were treated in five centers during 1984–1993. Patients with borderline tumors or nonepithelial ovarian carcinomas were excluded, as were women in whom CA 125 had not been determined preoperatively. Results In univariate analysis (Mantel test), overall survival decreased significantly in patients positive for CA 125 (P < .001). Substage (P = .004) and histologic grade (P = .01) also significantly influenced survival prognosis. When the effects of preoperative CA 125 levels were correlated with histologic grade, all three subgroups with CA 125 levels equal to or greater than 65 U/mL were associated with a decreased survival probability (grade 1, P = .04; grade 2, P = .003; grade 3, P = .01). Multivariate analysis (Cox model) identified preoperative CA 125 as the most powerful prognostic factor for survival (P < .001), the risk of dying of disease being 6.37 times higher (95% confidence interval 2.39–16.97) in CA 125-positive patients. Although FIGO substage retained its significant influence on survival (P = .03), histologic grade and age were not prognostically important. Conclusion Randomized trials investigating the efficacy of adjuvant treatment in patients with FIGO stage I epithelial ovarian cancer should also include stratification by preoperative CA 125 levels.
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology | 2000
Anton H. Graf; Annie L.M. Cheung; Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi; Raymond R. Tubbs; Otto Dietze; Gerhard W. Hacker
Three different in situ hybridization (ISH) methods were compared for their clinical relevance and suitability in detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 in 55 cases of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix. After the initial biopsy, surgery, and/or radiation therapy, patients were followed for 5 to 8 years. A biotinylated cDNA probe for HPV 16/18 was applied to serial sections in combination with conventional streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase ISH (a widely applied routine procedure), streptavidin-Nanogold-silver ISH, and tyramide-signal amplified (TSA) streptavidin-Nanogold-gold ISH. The TSA principle is also known as catalyzed reporter deposition and is, apart from in situ PCR, probably todays most sensitive technique for detecting papillomavirus infection by microscopic means. Nearly 65.5% of the cases showed specific HPV 16/18 detection with TSA ISH, whereas 43.6% were positive with streptavidin-Nanogold-silver-ISH, and only 40.0% with peroxidase-based ISH. Statistical analyses comparing early and advanced stages in both HPV-positive and -negative groups revealed a significantly better outcome for early disease patients; statistical significance was most pronounced with TSA ISH. In a subgroup of patients who had received radiation therapy without prior surgery (n = 35), those with advanced disease were significantly less likely to have HPV 16/18 infection than those with early disease. A significantly better overall survival was observed in those women with HPV 16/18–positive carcinomas who had undergone surgery before radiation therapy (seen with all three methods). We conclude that TSA, in addition to being the most sensitive HPV in situ method applied in this study, gave the most significant and clinically relevant statistical results.
Human Reproduction | 1997
D. Spitzer; Horst Steiner; Anton H. Graf; M. Zajc; A. Staudach
Prenatal Diagnosis | 1995
Horst Steiner; D. Spitzer; Peter H. Weiss‐Wichert; Anton H. Graf; A. Staudach
Cancer | 2000
Lukas Hefler; A. Rosen; Anton H. Graf; M. Lahousen; Matthias Klein; Sepp Leodolter; Alexander Reinthaller; Christian Kainz; Clemens Tempfer
Obstetrics & Gynecology | 1995
Horst Steiner; H. Schaffer; D. Spitzer; Michael Batka; Anton H. Graf; A. Staudach
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde | 1993
H. Steiner; A. Staudach; D. Spitzer; Anton H. Graf; Wienerroither H
Human Reproduction | 1995
M. Klein; Anton H. Graf; W. Hütter; G.W. Hacker; A. Beck; A. Staudach; Herbert Kiss; Ch. Egarter; Peter Husslein
Human Reproduction | 1997
Herbert Kiss; M. Klein; Ch. Egarter; Anton H. Graf; G.W. Hacker; W. Hütter; Klaus Czerwenka; Peter Husslein
International Journal of Cancer | 1994
A. Rosen; Anton H. Graf; M. Klein; Michael Lahousen; N. Vavra; Angelika Reiner; Gerhard W. Hacker