Anton M.H.P. van den Besselaar

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation

International sensitivity index (ISI) calibration of whole blood prothrombin time (PT) monitors is too complex. We previously simplified the method by using European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA) lyophilized plasma samples with the TAS PT-NC (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and the CoaguChek Mini (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) whole blood PT monitoring systems. The TAS PT-NC required a correction derived from the line of equivalence. Monte Carlo bootstrap analysis of reducing numbers of test samples was performed with both systems. Plasma samples from patients receiving coumarin (coumarin samples), healthy subjects (normal samples), and plasma samples artificially depleted of coagulation factors were used. With the TAS PT-NC, 20 coumarin samples or 20 artificially depleted samples with 7 normal samples gave reliable ISI and international normalized ratio and satisfactory precision. With the CoaguChek Mini, 30 coumarin and 10 normal samples were required. Simplification of ISI calibration of the 2 monitoring systems is possible using fewer ECAA lyophilized plasma samples than the 80 required according to the World Health Organization guidelines for conventional PT systems and previously recommended for fresh plasma samples tested on the same 2 monitoring systems.

Reliability of international normalised ratios from two point of care test systems: comparison with conventional methods

Abstract Design Comparison of the INRs from the two systems with a “true” INR on a conventional manual test from the same sample of blood. Setting 10 European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation centres. Participants 600 patients on long term dosage of warfarin. Main outcome measures Comparable results between the different methods. Results The mean displayed INR differed by 21.3% between the two point of care test monitoring systems. The INR on one system was 15.2% higher, on average, than the true INR, but on the other system the INR was 7.1% lower. The percentage difference between the mean displayed INR and the true INR at individual centres varied considerably with both systems. Conclusions Improved international sensitivity index calibration of point of care test monitors by their manufacturers is needed, and better methods of quality control of individual instruments by their users are also needed.

Multicentre ISI assignment and calibration of the INR measuring range of a new point-of-care system designed for home monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy

The new CoaguChek XS system is designed for use in patient selftesting. It is the successor of the current CoaguChek S system. The detection principle is based on the amperometric measurement of the thrombin activity initiated by starting the coagulation cascade using a human recombinant thromboplastin. This study was performed to assign the International SEnsitivity Index (ISI) to the new test according to the WHO guidelines for thromboplastins and plasmas used to control anticoagulant therapy, and to establish the measuring range of the new system. At four study sites a total of 90 samples of normal donors and 291 samples of warfarin-, phenprocoumon- or acenocoumarol-treated patients were included in the study. The ISI value of the new test was assigned against the human recombinant reference thromboplastin rTF/95 at each site using the samples from stabilized patients in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) range between 1.5 and 4.5 only. The new point-of-care systems measuring range between 0.8 and 8 INR was calibrated against the mean INR of rTF/95 and AD149 using polynomial regression. ISIs were (CV of the slope): Site 1: ISI 0.99 (1.1%); Site 2: ISI 1.02 (2.0%); Site 3: ISI 1.03 (1.1%); Site 4: ISI 1.00 (1.4%). All regression lines calculated from patient-only data pass through the normal donor data points. All CVs of the slopes of the orthogonal regression lines are well below 3%, thus fulfilling the requirements of the WHO guidelines. The mean ISI for the new CoaguChek XS PT Test is 1.01.

A national field study of quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors.

A system for quality assessment (QA) of the CoaguChek (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitor has been developed by the European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Hitherto there has not been an adequate rapid method for CoaguChek QA. Sets of 5 certified international normalized ratio (INR) plasma samples were tested on 539 CoaguChek monitors by experienced staff at 9 Netherlands Thrombosis Centers and results compared with certified INR. A 15% or more deviation has been classified as significant deviation. Overall mean and certified INR values were similar, but 20.3% of participants showed a 15% or more deviation from the certified INR on at least 1 of the 5 QA plasma samples. Statistically significant differences in results with different lots of CoaguChek test strips were found. There is need for large scale QA of CoaguChek monitors. The importance of the 5 CoaguChek certified INR QA plasma samples being tested on a single occasion is demonstrated.

Influence of haematocrit on international normalised ratio (INR) differences between a whole blood point-of-care coagulation monitor and reference prothrombin time in plasma

The CoaguChek S system is designed for use in patient self-testing. In this system a whole blood sample without sodium citrate is applied to a test strip containing thromboplastin and iron oxide particles. The detection principle is based on fibrin formation which inhibits and finally stops the movement of the iron oxide particles. In the classic prothrombin time (PT) test, citrate plasma is mixed with thromboplastin and an excess of calcium ions. In the monitoring of vitamin K-antagonist (VKA) treatment, all results are expressed on a common scale, i.e. international normalised ratio (INR). In patients on long-term VKA treatment, INRs were determined by the CoaguChek S system and reference methods for the classic PT. Four different CoaguChek S strip lots were evaluated. The difference in INR between the reference PT and the CoaguChek S system was negatively correlated to the haematocrit of the patients. We conclude that INR differences between CoaguChek S and plasma PT may be explained in part by the haematocrit. The magnitude of the effect of haematocrit, within the reference interval of 0.37 - 0.51, on the INR difference was not greater than approximately 10% for the combined data of the four strip lots. A bias of less than 10% seems to be acceptable clinically.

Point-of-care monitoring of vitamin K-antagonists: validation of CoaguChek XS test strips with International Standard thromboplastin

Aims Many patients treated with vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) use point-of-care (POC) whole blood coagulometers for self-testing. The majority of patients in the Netherlands use one type of POC coagulometer, that is, the CoaguChek XS. Each new lot of test strips for the CoaguChek XS is validated by a group of collaborating thrombosis centres. We assessed the International Normalised Ratio (INR) differences between each of 51 new lots of test strips and the International Standard for thromboplastin rTF/95 or its successor rTF/09. Methods Each year, a particular lot of CoaguChek XS test strips was used as reference lot. The reference lot was validated by comparison to the International Standard, yielding a relationship between the reference lot INR and International Standard INR. Successive lots of test strips were compared to the reference lot by three centres using 19–29 capillary blood samples obtained from VKA-treated patients. Each patient provided two blood drops from the same finger prick, one for the reference lot strip and one for the new lot. Results The mean INR differences between each lot and the International Standard varied between −8% and +4%. The mean absolute values of the relative differences varied between 2.4% and 8.1%. There were small but clinically unimportant differences in INR between the first and second drop of blood. Conclusions Accuracy of CoaguChek XS INR determinations can be assessed by a group of collaborating centres using a limited number of capillary blood samples. As the mean INR differences with the International Standard were smaller than 10%, the lots were approved for use by the Netherlands Thrombosis Services.

Harmonisation of factor VIII:C assay results: study within the framework of the Dutch project ‘Calibration 2000’

In a Dutch project for harmonisation of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) assays, the commutability of potential calibrators for FVIII:C was assessed by means of a ‘twin‐study design’, which is in essence a multi‐centre, split‐patient sample, between‐field‐methods protocol. Commutability was defined as the degree to which a material yielded the same numerical relationships between results of measurements by a given set of measurement procedures as those between the expectations of the relationships for the same procedures applied to those types of material for which the procedures were intended. The study consisted of the simultaneous analysis of fresh frozen patient plasmas and three potential calibrators for FVIII:C by 16 Dutch laboratories forming eight couples. The state‐of‐the‐art intra‐laboratory standard deviation was used to assess the commutability of the potential calibrators. One potential calibrator was used to harmonise FVIII:C assay results in a Dutch field study. The inter‐laboratory coefficient of variation of two test samples could be reduced significantly, but no significant effect was observed with three other test samples. We recommend that at least three different sample dilutions be used in each FVIII:C assay, in agreement with previous recommendations.

Biological variation of INR in stable patients on long-term anticoagulation with warfarin

Within-individual biological variation of INR (CV(B)) was assessed in 245 selected stable warfarin-treated patients monitored by three thrombosis centers. Selection criteria were: treatment period of six months or longer before the observation period; at least six consecutive INRs within the therapeutic range of 2.0 - 3.0; interval between consecutive INR measurements of two weeks or longer; no change in warfarin dose; no changes in the patients circumstances which may influence the INR, such as intercurrent diseases, invasive procedures, starting or stopping drugs interacting with warfarin. The minimum, maximum and mean within-individual coefficient of variation CV(B) of the INR measurements in the 245 selected patients were 0.4%, 14.5%, and 9.0%, respectively Analytical performance goals for the INR measurement (imprecision) could be derived from the mean CV(B). For a therapeutic range of 2.0 - 3.0 with warfarin, the desirable and optimum imprecision of INR determination is <4.5% CV and <2.25% CV, respectively. The biological variation and analytical performance goals have been derived using classic laboratory methods but should be applicable to point-of-care testing as well.

Influence of Blood Collection Systems on the Prothrombin Time and International Sensitivity Index Determined With Human and Rabbit Thromboplastin Reagents

Three brands of blood collection tubes were studied for their influence on the prothrombin time (PT) and international sensitivity index (ISI) for 5 commercial thromboplastin reagents. With all reagents, PTs were shorter in Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson Vacutainer Systems, Plymouth, England) samples than in S-Monovette (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) or Venosafe (Terumo Europe, Leuven, Belgium) samples. ISI values were higher with Vacutainer samples than with S-Monovette or Venosafe samples. The ISI differences between the tubes were small for Thromborel-S (2.1%; Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) and Hepato Quick (1.1%; Diagnostica Stago, Asnières, France; Roche Diagnostics Nederland, Almere, the Netherlands) but greater for Neoplastin Plus (5.5%; Diagnostica Stago; Roche Diagnostics Nederland), Simplastin HTF (8.3%; bioMérieux, Durham, NC), and Innovin (8.8%; Dade Behring). The PT and ISI differences between the tubes could be explained mostly by the effect of magnesium ion contamination in the sodium citrate solutions. When PT ratios were transformed into international normalized ratios (INRs) using crossover ISI (ie, samples collected with one type of tube and ISI determined with another collection system for the PT reagent), the differences in mean INRs could be approximately 10%. For ISI calibration of reference thromboplastins, blood collection tubes should be used with minimal divalent metal ion contamination of the citrate solution.

Long-term stability and reproducibility of CoaguChek test strips

Whole-blood point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors are being used on an increasing scale for the monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy. These monitors are used with disposable test strips containing tissue factor reagent. The purpose of the present study was to assess the stability of different CoaguChek-S strip lots for a period of one year. Ten strip lots introduced successively in the Netherlands were obtained from the manufacturers representative and stored at 4-8 degrees C. Six deep-frozen pooled plasmas were analyzed for the prothrombin time and INR with the strips at six or seven occasions spread over one year. The test plasmas were recalcified immediately before application to the CoaguChek-S system. Regression analysis was performed on the clotting times obtained with each plasma. In the majority of cases (i.e.95%), no significant change was observed at the 5% significance level. A significant change was observed in only 3 cases. In addition, a ranking statistic was used as test of a monotonic relationship in the two-way analysis of variance. The results of the ranking statistic were not significant for any strip lot, indicating that the test strips were stable under these storage conditions. The reproducibility of INR measured with the CoaguChek-S was assessed. The mean within-run coefficient of variation (CV) of INR ranged from 2.58% to 3.36% (CV). The between-lot variation of the mean INR ranged from 3.2 to 4.5 % (CV). The over-all variation of single INR measurements, i.e. including between-lot and within-lot, ranged from 5.0 to 6.0 % (CV).