Antonella Ravogli

Lack of placebo effect on ambulatory blood pressure.

Several studies have reported that, at variance with clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure is not reduced by treatment with placebo. However, this evidence has usually been obtained in small groups of subjects and no data are available from a larger sample of patients. To address this issue we have analyzed data from 116 outpatients involved in placebo-controlled studies on antihypertensive treatment. The patients were studied before and at the end of a 6- to 8-week period of placebo. In all patients, blood pressure was measured by sphygmomanometry and over the 24 h by automatic ambulatory monitoring. Administration of placebo was accompanied by a significant reduction in systolic and diastolic clinic blood pressure (-5.3 +/- 1.1 and -4.4 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, respectively; P < .01), but not in 24-h, daytime and nighttime blood pressure. Hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressure profiles were virtually superimposable in the two different periods, except for the first 4 h, in which systolic blood pressure was slightly but significantly lower during than before placebo (149.5 +/- 1.2 v 146.4 +/- 1.2 mm Hg; P < .05). These results provide a large database indicating that 24-h average blood pressure is not reduced by placebo, thus it is not necessary to include a placebo control group in antihypertensive drug studies in which ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is employed. A small placebo effect occurs, however, in the first hours of ambulatory monitoring. This may lead to a slight overestimation of the peak blood pressure effect of a drug and an underestimation of its trough-to-peak ratio if placebo correction of the data is not made or if the first part of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is not excluded from data analysis.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment: additional information from a large data base.

Aims of our study were i) to compare in a large number of hypertensive subjects the relative effect of antihypertensive treatment on clinic (C) blood pressure (BP) and various ambulatory (A) BP components, and ii) to determine whether antihypertensive treatment affects BP variability. In 266 mild essential hypertensive outpatients (age: 18-78 years) CBP (trough measurements) and ABP (Spacelabs 90202 or 90207) were measured after 3 to 4 weeks of wash-out and after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment with an ACE-inhibitor (n = 135) or a calcium-antagonist (n = 131). ABP recordings were analyzed to obtain average 24 h, day-time (6 a.m. to midnight) and night-time (midnight to 6 a.m.) systolic and diastolic BP values and standard deviations (BP variabilities). Treatment reduced both CBP and ABP. Treatment-induced changes in CBP showed a poor correlation with those in 24h, day- and night-time BP (r never > 0.23) and the correlation was poor also when trough ABP (mean of last 2 h) was considered. Twenty-four hour, day- and night-time BP were similarly reduced by treatment with a direct relationship between the initial BP values and the subsequent BP falls. BP standard deviations were also reduced by treatment in relation to the pretreatment values but the overall reduction was small, limited to the day-time and proportional or less than proportional to the reduction in mean values, with no changes or an increase in variation coefficients. The effects of ACE-inhibitor and calcium-antagonist treatments were superimposable. Our results from a large data base show that antihypertensive treatment effectively reduces all ABP components. The reduction cannot be predicted by the concomitant fall in CBP but it relates to the initial ABP values. Treatment has a limited effect on BP variability, this being the case both for ACE-inhibitors and calcium-antagonists.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension

Objectives: This study compared clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurement and the reproducibility of these measurements in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Patients: Eighty-seven patients aged ≥60 years with ISH on clinic measurement were followed in the placebo run-in phase of the Syst-Eur trial. Methods: Clinic blood pressure was defined as the mean of two blood pressure readings on each of three clinic visits (six readings in total). Ambulatory blood pressure was measured over 24 h using non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitors. Results: Daytime ambulatory systolic pressure was, on average, 21 mmHg lower than the clinic blood pressure, whereas diastolic pressure was, on average, similar with both techniques of measurement. In the 42 patients who had repeat measurements, clinic blood pressure levels and the amplitude of the diurnal blood pressure profile (fitted by Fourier analysis) were equally reproducible. However, both were less reproducible than ambulatory blood pressure levels. The repeatability coefficients, expressed as per cent of near maximum variation (four times the standard deviation of a given measurement), were 52% and 45% for the clinic systolic and diastolic pressures, 56% and 42% for the amplitude of the diurnal profile, and 29% and 26% for mean 24-h pressures. Conclusions: In older patients with ISH, clinic and ambulatory systolic blood pressure measurements may differ largely: the prognostic significance of this difference remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, in these patients the level of pressure is more reproducible by daytime ambulatory blood pressure measurement than by clinic measurement.

Prognostic Value of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has both advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. The structural and functional organ abnormalities associated with hypertension are more closely correlated to 24-h blood pressure mean values than to clinic or other conventional sphygmomanometric blood pressures. Furthermore, an additional relationship can be seen between the incidence and severity of these abnormalities and the magnitude of day and night blood pressure changes or 24-h blood pressure variability. However, controlled prospective studies are still required to demonstrate that ambulatory blood pressure data are superior or add to the prognostic value of clinic blood pressure. Moreover, ambulatory blood pressure normalcy has not yet been properly defined. This suggests caution in the practical use of this technique, which should be limited to special groups of subjects (those with a possible alerting reaction to conventional blood pressure assessments, in whom home blood pressure measurements are unreliable) and should only be used by clinicians with expertise in the field.

Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of once-a-day trandolapril by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of trandolapril on 24-hour blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, 42 patients were randomized to receive 2 mg of trandolapril once daily and 20 to receive placebo in a double-blind fashion for 6 weeks. This was followed by a second washout period of 4 weeks. At the end of each period, clinic blood pressure was assessed at 24 hours after the last dose and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure was measured noninvasively, taking blood pressure readings every 15 minutes during the day and every 20 minutes during the night. Two patients were dropped out before any blood pressure evaluation under treatment. Analysis of ambulatory blood pressure was performed in 48 patients who met the criteria for the minimal number of ambulatory blood pressure data (2 values per hour during the day and 1 value per hour in the night). In the trandolapril-treated group (n = 41) clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 159.8 +/- 2.0/102.4 +/- 0.8, 146.8 +/- 2.3/94.8 +/- 1.1, and 155.7 +/- 2.0/99.2 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the pretreatment, treatment, and post-treatment periods, respectively. The corresponding values for 24-hour mean blood pressure (n = 31) were 139.5 +/- 1.9/91.2 +/- 1.5, 131.0 +/- 2.0/84.3 +/- 1.2, and 139.7 +/- 1.8/90.9 +/- 1.1 mmHg. The differences between the lower treatment, versus the higher pre- and post-treatment, values were all statistically significant (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty-four hour blood pressure monitoring in the Syst-Eur trial

This article describes the objectives and protocol of a study on ambulatory blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. This study constitutes an optional side-project to the Syst-Eur trial.The multicentre Syst-Eur trial investigates whether antihypertensive treatment of elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension will influence the incidence of stroke. Secondary endpoints include cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction.The main objective of the side-project is to investigate whether ambulatory blood pressure monitoring will improve the prediction of cardiovascular complications based on blood pressure measurement in the clinic. The side-project also provides the opportunity to evaluate the diurnal profile of blood pressure in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension randomized to placebo or active antihypertensive treatment.

Evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of celiprolol by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has gained popularity because it is not subject to those limitations associated with traditional sphygmomanometry (inaccuracy of blood pressure readings, low number of readings, and failure to represent daytime blood pressure readings). In the present study, we provide evidence that the 24-hour mean blood pressure obtained through intraarterial blood pressure measurements in ambulatory patients provides a more accurate diagnosis (and perhaps a prognosis) of hypertension than that provided by cuff-obtained casual blood pressure measurement. Furthermore, despite a reduction in the amount and in the accuracy of the information obtained, blood pressure data provided by noninvasive blood pressure monitoring are also more accurate diagnostically than cuff-obtained casual blood pressure measurements. In 15 essential hypertensive patients in whom celiprolol, 400 mg once daily, was compared with placebo in a randomized double-blind crossover study, the use of noninvasive 24-hour automatic blood pressure monitoring showed that in responsive patients, celiprolol induced a sustained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure throughout the 24 hours. The blood pressure reduction was also apparent during the night, despite the concomitant occurrence of a slight tachycardia. These findings demonstrate that once-daily administration of celiprolol provides an effective lowering of the 24-hour blood pressure profile. This dosing schedule can therefore be regarded as appropriate for antihypertensive therapy.

Changes in 24 Hour Blood Pressure and in Cardiac and Vascular Structure in Normotensive Subjects with Parental Hypertension

Subjects with family history of hypertension represent a suitable model to investigate the mechanisms responsible for early cardiovascular structural and functional changes occurring in essential hypertension. In our study we have addressed the factors involved in determining the mild elevation in office blood pressure frequently observed in normotensive subjects with hypertensive parents. In 15 normotensive subjects with both parents hypertensive (FH++) and in 15 normotensive subjects with one parent hypertensive (FH(+)-) we found no evidence of a hyperreactivity to stress as compared to the responses of 15 normotensive subjects with no parental hypertension (FH--). On the contrary FH++ subjects were characterized by a significant although mild increase in their blood pressure values recorded either at rest and in ambulatory conditions over the 24 hours, including night sleep. FH++ and FH(+)- subjects also showed a greater left ventricular mass thickness and a greater minimal forearm vascular resistance than FH-- subjects. Thus, the elevation in blood pressure found in the pre-hypertensive stage in subjects with positive family history for hypertension does not reflect a hyperreactivity to the stress associated with physicians visit but indicates an early and persistent blood pressure elevation. This blood pressure elevation is accompanied by early cardiovascular structural changes which may indicate that these subjects are exposed to a higher risk even before developing overt hypertension.

Lack of effect of percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty on nocturnal hypotension in renovascular hypertensive patients

Objective To investigate whether nocturnal blood pressure fall is blunted in renovascular hypertension and can therefore be used as a diagnostic criterion for this condition. Methods In 14 renovascular hypertensive patients (age 43.8±2.1 years, mean±SEM, clinic blood pressure 173.6±3.7mmHg systolic and 109.0±2.0mmHg diastolic) and in 14 age- and blood pressure-matched essential hypertensive controls 24 h ambulatory blood pressure was measured after washout from drug treatment, during angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and, in renovascular hypertension, also after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. Results The 24 h average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 146.4±5.7 and 97.5±3.6mmHg in renovascular and 144.3±1.2 and 98.0±2.2mmHg in essential hypertensive patients. The angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment reduced 24 h average systolic and diastolic blood pressures by 8.5% and 9.7% in the renovascular and by 8.3% and 10.8% in the essential hypertensive group. Greater systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions (-18.2% and −18.1%) were observed in renovascular hypertensive patients after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. Blood pressure fell by about 10% during the night and the fall was similar in renovascular and in essential hypertensive patients. In the former group, nocturnal hypotension was similar after washout, during angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and after percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. Similar results were obtained for nocturnal bradycardla. Conclusions Nocturnal blood pressure fall is equally manifest in renovascular and essential hypertension. The removal of the renal artery stenosis and blood pressure normalization do not enhance this phenomenon. Nocturnal hypotension seems therefore to be unaffected by renovascular hypertension.

Permanent blood pressure control over the 24 h by trandolapril

Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has proved to be an innovative tool for the assessment of the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs. It enables evaluation of the magnitude of the drug-related blood pressure fall and also of the duration of this effect throughout 24 h. Moreover, ambulatory blood pressures have advantages compared to office blood pressure: they are not affected by the white coat effect occurring at the time of the doctors visit, are devoid of a placebo effect, are more reproducible than occasional clinic measurements, and may yield important information on the prognosis of hypertensive patients. Ambulatory blood pressure recordings were used to test the antihypertensive effect of a novel angiotensin converting enzyme, trandolapril, in 62 mild to moderate essential hypertensive outpatients. After a 4 week wash-out, period, patients were randomized to 2 mg trandolapril or placebo for 6 weeks. A 4-week wash-out period was scheduled at the end of the treatment period. Ambulatory blood pressure recordings were performed at the end of each period, starting in the morning. Trandolapril (n = 31) significantly reduced 24 h systolic and diastolic blood pressure as compared to pre- and posttreatment periods and to placebo (n = 17). The reduction involved both the daytime and nighttime blood pressure values and was evident also in the last hours of the recording, the trough-to-peak ratio being 0.6 for systolic and 0.7 for diastolic blood pressure. Thus, trandolapril at a dose of 2 mg once daily is an effective long-lasting antihypertensive drug.