Antoni Payeras

Randomized trial comparing pegylated interferon α‐2b versus pegylated interferon α‐2a, both plus ribavirin, to treat chronic hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus patients

Although two pegylated interferons (Peg‐IFN) are available to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, no head‐to‐head comparative studies have been published. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of PEG IFN alfa‐2b (PEG 2b) versus PEG IFN alfa‐2a (PEG 2a), plus ribavirin (RBV). A prospective, randomized, multi‐center, open‐label clinical trial including 182 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients naïve for HCV therapy was performed. Patients were assigned to PEG 2b (80‐150 μg/week; n = 96) or PEG 2a (180 μg/week; n = 86), plus RBV (800‐1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR: negative HCV‐RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment). At baseline, both groups were well balanced: 73% male; 63% HCV genotype 1 through 4; 29% had fibrosis index of 3 or greater. The overall SVR was 44% (42% PEG 2b versus 46% PEG 2a, P = 0.65). Among genotypes 1 through 4, SVRs were 28% versus 32% (P = 0.67) and 62% versus 71% (P = 0.6) in genotypes 2 through 3 for PEG 2b and PEG 2a, respectively. Early virological response (EVR; ≥2 log reduction from baseline or negative HCV‐RNA at week 12) was 70% in the PEG 2b group and 80% in the PEG 2a group (P = 0.13), reaching a positive predictive value of SVR of 64% and a negative predictive value of 100% in both arms. Side effects were present in 96% of patients but led to treatment discontinuation in 10% of patients (8% on PEG 2b and 13% on PEG 2a, P = 0.47). Conclusion: In patients with HIV, HCV therapy with PEG 2b or PEG 2a plus RBV had no significant differences in efficacy and safety. (HEPATOLOGY 2009;49:22‐31.)

Timing of Oseltamivir Administration and Outcomes in Hospitalized Adults With Pandemic 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Virus Infection

BACKGROUND Data on the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir in patients with pandemic 2009 influenza A(H1N1) (A[H1N1]) virus infection are scarce. We aimed to determine the effect of timing of oseltamivir administration on outcomes in hospitalized adults with A(H1N1). METHODS Observational analysis of a prospective cohort of adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed A(H1N1) was performed at 13 Spanish hospitals. Time from onset of symptoms to oseltamivir administration was the independent variable. Outcomes were duration of fever, hospital length of stay (LOS), need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality during hospitalization. Multivariate logistic regression was used to describe the association between the independent variable and the outcomes. RESULTS Five hundred thirty-eight hospitalized patients with A(H1N1) were studied. The median time from onset of symptoms to oseltamivir administration was 3 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5 days). With regard to outcomes, the median duration of fever was 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days), the median LOS was 5 days (IQR, 3-8 days), 49 patients (9.1%) underwent mechanical ventilation, and 11 patients (2%) died during hospitalization. In univariate analysis, prolonged duration of fever (above the median), prolonged LOS (above the median), need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality all increased with time to oseltamivir administration (χ(2) test for trend P = .001, P ≤ .001, P = .008, and P = .001, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, time from onset of symptoms to oseltamivir administration (+ 1-day increase) was associated with a prolonged duration of fever (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19), prolonged LOS (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.15), and higher mortality (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06-1.35). CONCLUSIONS Timely oseltamivir administration has a beneficial effect on outcomes in hospitalized adults with A(H1N1), even in those who are admitted beyond 48 h after onset of symptoms.

Clinical presentation and prognosis of the 2009 H1N1 influenza A infection in HIV-1-infected patients: a Spanish multicenter study.

Objective:The aim of the study was to describe the clinical presentation and prognosis in HIV-1-infected patients with hospital admission and pandemic influenza A 2009 (H1N1) confirmed, and compare this data with those of a general population. Design:This is a prospective study in nature. Methods:All adult patients admitted to 13 hospitals in Spain with confirmed influenza A 2009(H1N1) virus infection by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay or culture from June 12 to November 10, 2009 were recruited and followed up until 1 month after discharge. In the HIV group risk factors for HIV infection, AIDS criteria, last CD4 cell count and viral load, and antiretroviral therapy and pneumococcal vaccines were collected. Results:Five hundred and eighty-five patients were recruited, 26 with HIV-1 infection and 559 non-HIV. The HIV patients had a long-term well controlled infection with a median CD4 cell count 503 cells/μl and 84% with undetectable viral load, although more frequently they had chronic liver and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. No significant differences were observed about reported symptoms and physical findings on hospital admission. About 50% of patients in both groups present radiological infiltrates and 30% present respiratory failures. Practically all the patients in both groups received influenza antiviral therapy and in each group 80% received antibacterial therapy. No differences were observed in clinical outcomes. Conclusion:In HIV patients, well controlled on HAART, the pandemic influenza virus AH1N1 had a similar clinical outcome and prognosis to that of non-HIV patients.

Changes in epidemiology, clinical features and severity of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pneumonia in the first post‐pandemic influenza season

Although the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus is expected to circulate as a seasonal virus for some years after the pandemic period, its behaviour cannot be predicted. We analysed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized adults with influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pneumonia at 14 teaching hospitals in Spain to compare the epidemiology, clinical features and outcomes of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pneumonia between the pandemic period and the first post-pandemic influenza season. A total of 348 patients were included: 234 during the pandemic period and 114 during the first post-pandemic influenza season. Patients during the post-pandemic period were older and more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and cancer than the others. Septic shock, altered mental status and respiratory failure on arrival at hospital were significantly more common during the post-pandemic period. Time from illness onset to receipt of antiviral therapy was also longer during this period. Early antiviral therapy was less frequently administered to patients during the post-pandemic period (22.9% versus 10.9%; p 0.009). In addition, length of stay was longer, and need for mechanical ventilation and intensive-care unit admission were significantly higher during the post-pandemic period. In-hospital mortality (5.1% versus 21.2%; p <0.001) was also greater during this period. In conclusion, significant epidemiological changes and an increased severity of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pneumonia were found in the first post-pandemic influenza season. Physicians should consider influenza A (H1N1) 2009 when selecting microbiological testing and treatment in patients with pneumonia in the upcoming influenza season.

Conjugate and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines do not improve initial response of the polysaccharide vaccine in HIV-infected adults.

This is a randomized trial to compare the immunoglobulin G response and the antibody avidity after two pneumococcal vaccinations, conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (CPV) and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) 4 weeks after vs. PPV alone in 202 HIV-infected adults. There were no differences in the two strategies, either in the percentage of immunoglobulin G two-fold increase for the CPV included serotypes or immunoglobulin G two-fold increase, reaching the level of 1 μg/ml except for serotype 23F (26% responded after conjugated pneumococcal vaccine + PPV vs. 14% after PPV). No avidity increases were seen in any strategy.

Pneumonia complicating pandemic (H1N1) 2009: risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes.

We performed an observational analysis of a prospective cohort of adults hospitalized for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 at 13 Spanish hospitals, from June to November 2009, to determine the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of pneumonia. Of 585 patients requiring hospitalization, chest radiography was obtained in 542. A total of 234 (43.1%) patients had pneumonia, of whom 210 underwent bacterial microbiologic studies. Of these patients, 174 (82.8%) had primary viral pneumonia and 36 (17.2%) had concomitant/secondary bacterial pneumonia. Bilateral pneumonia occurred in 48.3% of patients. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most frequent pathogen among patients with bacterial pneumonia (26 of 36 patients). None of them had received pneumococcal vaccine. Compared with patients without pneumonia, those with pneumonia more frequently had shock during hospitalization (9.8% vs. 1%; p < 0.001), required intensive care unit admission (22.6% vs. 5.8%; p < 0.001), underwent mechanical ventilation (17.9% vs. 3.2%; p < 0.001), and had longer length of hospital stay (median, 7 d vs. 5 d; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with pneumonia than in the others (5.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). Absence of comorbid conditions (odds ratio [OR], 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-3.24) was found to be an independent risk factor for pneumonia, whereas early (≤48 h) oseltamivir therapy (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46) was a protective factor. In conclusion, pneumonia is a frequent complication among adults hospitalized for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and causes significant morbidity. Mortality in pandemic (H1N1) 2009 is low, but occurs mainly in patients with pneumonia. Early oseltamivir therapy is a protective factor for this complication.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, CAP = community-acquired pneumonia, CI = confidence interval, CURB-65 = confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years, ICU = intensive care unit, OR = odds ratio, PSI = pneumonia severity index, ROC = receiver operating characteristic, RT-PCR = reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Immunosuppressed patients with pandemic influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus infection.

The purpose of this paper was to prospectively characterize the clinical manifestations and outcomes of confirmed influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus infection in immunosuppressed patients with hospital admission and compare them with those of a general population. A multicenter prospective cohort study was carried out. All adult patients admitted to 13 hospitals in Spain with confirmed influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus infection from June 12, 2009 to November 11, 2009 were included. Risk factors for complicated influenza infection were studied in immunosuppressed patients. Overall, 559 patients were included, of which 56 were immunosuppressed, nine with solid or hematological malignancies, 18 with solid-organ transplant recipients, 13 with corticosteroid therapy, and six with other types of immunosuppression. Clinical findings at diagnosis were similar in both groups. Nineteen immunosuppressed patients had pneumonia (33.9%). Immunosuppressed patients with pandemic influenza had bacterial co-infection more frequently (17.9% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.02), specifically, gram-negative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus infections. Mortality was higher in immunosuppressed patients (7.1% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.05). The only modifiable risk factor of complicated influenza A 2009 (H1N1) was delayed antiviral therapy. In immunosuppressed patients, influenza A 2009 (H1N1) virus infection has higher mortality than in non-immunosuppressed individuals. Bacterial co-infection is common in complicated cases.

Bacteriemia en pacientes muy ancianos: factores de riesgo, características clínicas y mortalidad

Introduccion Existe poca informacion sobre bacteriemias en pacientes muy ancianos. El objetivo del trabajo fue describir las caracteristicas de estas en esta poblacion. Metodos Estudio prospectivo de las bacteriemias en pacientes mayores de 80 anos y comparacion con pacientes de 18-64 y de 65-79 anos. Resultados Se analizaron 146 bacteriemias en pacientes mayores de 80 anos. En el 66,4% hubo alguna comorbilidad y en el 6,8%, alguna causa de inmunodeficiencia. El 82,2% no tenia enfermedad de base o esta no fue fatal. El origen fue comunitario en 80 casos. Los principales focos fueron: primario (25,3%) y urinario (20,5%); y los aislamientos mas frecuentes: Escherichia coli (28,2%), Staphylococcus coagulasa negativos (14,7%) y Staphylococcus aureus (13,6%). Presentaron sepsis o shock septico el 55,5%, y fallecieron 31 en relacion con la bacteriemia. Los pacientes mayores de 80 anos tuvieron menos frecuencia de inmunodeficiencia y mayor proporcion de infecciones comunitarias y por gramnegativos. La mortalidad relacionada con la bacteriemia fue mayor en el grupo de mas edad y se asocio con la presencia de una enfermedad de base fatal o finalmente fatal, la bacteriemia por S. aureus y con el inicio de un tratamiento empirico inapropiado. Un indice de gravedad de Pitt mas bajo se mostro como una variable protectora. Conclusiones Los pacientes muy ancianos con bacteriemia tienden a presentar menos causas de inmunodeficiencia, mayor frecuencia de infecciones comunitarias y por germenes gramnegativos. Existe mayor riesgo de mortalidad relacionada, sobre todo en presencia de enfermedad de base, bacteriemia por S. aureus o tras un tratamiento empirico inapropiado.

Invasive pneumococcal disease in HIV-infected adults: clinical changes after the introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children.

BackgroundFew data exist on the implications of widespread use of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children in the invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in HIV-infected adults. We conducted a multicenter study to analyze differences in clinical presentation of IPD between HIV-infected and non–HIV-infected adults in the prevaccine and postvaccine era. MethodsStudy of all cases of IPD in HIV-infected adults diagnosed since 1996 to 2010. Episodes were classified into prevaccine (1996–2001), early postvaccine (2002–2004), and late postvaccine period (2005–2010). For each case, we identified an HIV-negative control patient with IPD matched by hospital, age, and vaccine period. ResultsTwo hundred twenty-one episodes of IPD in HIV-infected patients were diagnosed. The incidence of IPD decreased from 7.81 to 3.69 episodes per 1000 patient-years (−53%; 95% confidence interval: −65% to −36%, P < 0.001) between prevaccine and late postvaccine period. There was an 81% (95% confidence interval: −88% to −69%, P < 0.001) decrease of IPD caused by vaccine serotypes. In late postvaccine period IPD in HIV-infected patients was associated to higher rates of respiratory failure (28.4% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.011), greater intensive care unit admission (8.2% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.02) and a higher need for mechanical ventilation (5.9% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.033). In the prevaccine period, non–HIV-infected patients had a more severe illness than in those with HIV infection; however, these differences disappeared in the late postvaccine period. ConclusionsIn the late postvaccine era, the incidence of IPD in HIV-infected patients has decreased, however, clinical presentation seems to have changed to a more severe illness. The widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, polyssacharide vaccine, and 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has contributed to these changes.

Indinavir Crystallization and Urolithiasis

The crystallization of indinavir in synthetic urine at different pH values and indinavir concentrations was kinetically studied. It was found that precipitation time notably decreases at urinary pH values above 6.0. The effects of some products as potential crystallization inhibitors were studied. Some natural saponins such as escin and glycyrrhizic acid provoked a notable increase in the precipitation time of indinavir, this pointing out their possible use to prevent renal tubular solid deposition.