Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Antònia Domingo-Salvany is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Antònia Domingo-Salvany.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2004

Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

J. Alonso; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Ronny Bruffaerts; T Brugha; H Bryson; de Girolamo G; Ron de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Isabelle Gasquet; Josep Maria Haro; Steven J. Katz; Ronald C. Kessler; Kovess; Jp Lépine; Johan Ormel; G Polidori; Leo Russo; Gemma Vilagut; Josué Almansa; S Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Autonell J; M Bernal; Ma Buist-Bouwman; Miquel Codony; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Montserrat Ferrer; Ss Joo; M Martínez-Alonso; Herbert Matschinger

Objective:  To describe the 12‐month and lifetime prevalence rates of mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders in six European countries.


Gaceta Sanitaria | 2005

El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos

Gemma Vilagut; Montse Ferrer; Luis Rajmil; Pablo Rebollo; Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda; José M. Quintana; Rosalía Santed; Jose M. Valderas; Aida Ribera; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Jordi Alonso

Objetivo: El Cuestionario SF-36 es uno de los instrumentos de Calidad de Vida Relacionada con la Salud (CVRS) mas utilizados y evaluados. Tras una decada de uso este articulo revisa criticamente el contenido, propiedades metricas y nuevos desarrollos de la version espanola. Metodos: Revision de los articulos indizados en Medline (PubMed) y en las bases de datos IBECS e IME que han utilizado la version espanola del cuestionario. Se seleccionaron los articulos con informacion sobre modelo de medida, fiabilidad, validez y sensibilidad al cambio del instrumento. Resultados: Se encontraron 79 articulos, 17 de los cuales describian caracteristicas metricas del cuestionario. En el 96% las escalas superaron el estandar propuesto de fiabilidad (α de Cronbach) de 0,7. Las estimaciones agrupadas obtenidas por metaanalisis fueron superiores a 0,7 en todos los casos. El SF-36 mostro buena discriminacion entre grupos de gravedad, correlacion moderada con indicadores clinicos y alta con otros instrumentos de CVRS. El SF-36 predijo mortalidad y detecto mejoria tras la angioplastia coronaria, la cirugia de hipertrofia prostatica benigna o la ventilacion domiciliaria no invasiva. Los nuevos desarrollos descritos (puntuaciones basadas en normas, la version 2, el SF-12 y el SF-8) mejoraron sus propiedades metricas y su interpretacion. Conclusiones: El SF-36, conjuntamente con las nuevas versiones desarrolladas, es un instrumento muy adecuado para su uso en investigacion y en la practica clinica.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2004

Disability and quality of life impact of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

J. Alonso; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Ronny Bruffaerts; T Brugha; H Bryson; G. de Girolamo; R. de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Isabelle Gasquet; J. M. Haro; Steven J. Katz; Ronald C. Kessler; V. Kovess; Jp Lépine; Johan Ormel; G Polidori; Leo Russo; Gemma Vilagut; Josué Almansa; S Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Jaume Autonell; M Bernal; Ma Buist-Bouwman; Miquel Codony; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Montserrat Ferrer; Ss Joo; M Martínez-Alonso; Herbert Matschinger

Objective:  This manuscript examines the impact of mental health state and specific mental and physical disorders on work role disability and quality of life in six European countries.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2004

Use of mental health services in Europe : results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

Jordi Alonso; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Ronny Bruffaerts; Traolach S. Brugha; H Bryson; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Isabelle Gasquet; Josep Maria Haro; Steven J. Katz; Ronald C. Kessler; Viviane Kovess; Jean Pierre Lepine; Johan Ormel; G Polidori; Leo Russo; Gemma Vilagut; Josué Almansa; S Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Jaume Autonell; M Bernal; Ma Buist-Bouwman; Miquel Codony; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Montserrat Ferrer; Ss Joo; M Martínez-Alonso; Herbert Matschinger

Objective:  Comprehensive information about access and patterns of use of mental health services in Europe is lacking. We present the first results of the use of health services for mental disorders in six European countries as part of the ESEMeD project.


BMJ | 2005

Validity of composite end points in clinical trials

Victor M. Montori; Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda; Ignacio Ferreira-González; Jason W. Busse; Valeria Pacheco-Huergo; Dianne Bryant; Jordi Alonso; Elie A. Akl; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Edward J Mills; Ping Wu; Holger J. Schünemann; Roman Jaeschke; Gordon H. Guyatt

Use of composite end points as the main outcome in randomised trials can hide wide differences in the individual measures. How should you apply the results to clinical practice? Improvements in medical care over the past two decades have decreased the frequency with which patients with common conditions such as myocardial infarction develop subsequent adverse events. Although welcome for patients, low event rates provide challenges for clinical investigators, who consequently require large sample sizes and long follow up to test the incremental benefits of new treatments. Clinical trialists have responded to these challenges by relying increasingly on composite end points, which capture the number of patients experiencing any one of several adverse events—for example, death, myocardial infarction, or hospital admission.1 Use of composite end points is usually justified by the assumption that the effect on each of the components will be similar and that patients will attach similar importance to each component.1 But this is not always the case. In this article we provide a strategy to interpret the results of clinical trials when investigators measure the effect of treatment on an aggregate of end points of varying importance. Consider a 76 year old man who has disabling angina despite taking β blockers, nitrates, aspirin, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and a statin. His doctor suggests cardiac catheterisation and possible revascularisation. The patient is reluctant to have invasive management, and wonders how much benefit he might expect from surgery. The trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients (TIME) is relevant.2 The study randomised 301 patients aged 75 years or older with resistant angina to optimised drug treatment or cardiac catheterisation and possible revascularisation. Although the groups showed no difference in quality of life at 12 months, the frequency of a composite end point (death, non-fatal …


BMJ | 2007

Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Ignacio Ferreira-González; Gaiet Permanyer-Miralda; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Jason W. Busse; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Victor M. Montori; Elie A. Akl; Dianne Bryant; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Jordi Alonso; Andrew Worster; Suneel Upadhye; Roman Jaeschke; Holger J. Schünemann; Valeria Pacheco-Huergo; Ping Wu; Edward J Mills; Gordon H. Guyatt

Objective To explore the extent to which components of composite end points in randomised controlled trials vary in importance to patients, the frequency of events in the more and less important components, and the extent of variability in the relative risk reductions across components. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Data sources Cardiovascular randomised controlled trials published in the Lancet, Annals of Internal Medicine, Circulation, European Heart Journal, JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine, from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2003. Component end points of composite end points were categorised according to importance to patients as fatal, critical, major, moderate, or minor. Results Of 114 identified randomised controlled trials that included a composite end point of importance to patients, 68% (n=77) reported complete component data for the primary composite end point; almost all (98%; n=112) primary composite end points included a fatal end point. Of 84 composite end points for which component data were available, 54% (n=45) showed large or moderate gradients in both importance to patients and magnitude of effect across components. When analysed by categories of importance to patients, the most important components were associated with lower event rates in the control group (medians of 3.3-3.7% for fatal, critical, and major outcomes; 12.3% for moderate outcomes; and 8.0% for minor outcomes). Components of greater importance to patients were associated with smaller treatment effects than less important ones (relative risk reduction of 8% for death and 33% for components of minor importance to patients). Conclusion The use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials is frequently complicated by large gradients in importance to patients and in magnitude of the effect of treatment across component end points. Higher event rates and larger treatment effects associated with less important components may result in misleading impressions of the impact of treatment.


PubMed | 2004

Prevalence of mental disorders in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project.

J. Alonso; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Ronny Bruffaerts; T Brugha; H Bryson; de Girolamo G; Ron de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Isabelle Gasquet; J. M. Haro; Steven J. Katz; Ronald C. Kessler; Kovess; Jp Lépine; Johan Ormel; G Polidori; Leo Russo; Gemma Vilagut; Josué Almansa; S Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Jaume Autonell; M Bernal; Ma Buist-Bouwman; Miquel Codony; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Montserrat Ferrer; Ss Joo; M Martínez-Alonso; Herbert Matschinger

Objective:  To describe the 12‐month and lifetime prevalence rates of mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders in six European countries.


Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica | 2004

12-Month comorbidity patterns and associated factors in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project

Jordi Alonso; Matthias C. Angermeyer; Sebastian Bernert; Ronny Bruffaerts; Traolach S. Brugha; H Bryson; Giovanni de Girolamo; Ron de Graaf; Koen Demyttenaere; Isabelle Gasquet; Josep Maria Haro; Steven J. Katz; Ronald C. Kessler; Viviane Kovess; Jean Pierre Lepine; Johan Ormel; G Polidori; Leo Russo; Gemma Vilagut; Josué Almansa; S Arbabzadeh-Bouchez; Jaume Autonell; M Bernal; Ma Buist-Bouwman; Miquel Codony; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Montserrat Ferrer; Ss Joo; M Martínez-Alonso; Herbert Matschinger

Objective:  Comorbidity patterns of 12‐month mood, anxiety and alcohol disorders and socio‐demographic factors associated with comorbidity were studied among the general population of six European countries.


Gaceta Sanitaria | 2005

The Spanish version of the Short Form 36 Health Survey: a decade of experience and new developments

Gemma Vilagut; Montse Ferrer; Luis Rajmil; Pablo Rebollo; Gaietà Permanyer-Miralda; José M. Quintana; Rosalía Santed; Jose M. Valderas; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Jordi Alonso

OBJECTIVE The Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) is one of the most widely used and evaluated generic health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires. After almost a decade of use in Spain, the present article critically reviews the content and metric properties of the Spanish version, as well as its new developments. METHODS A review of indexed articles that used the Spanish version of the SF-36 was performed in Medline (PubMed), the Spanish bibliographic databases IBECS and IME. Articles that provided information on the measurement model, reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change of the instrument were selected. RESULTS Seventy-nine articles were found, of which 17 evaluated the metric characteristics of the questionnaire. The reliability of the SF-36 scales was higher than the suggested standard (Cronbachs alpha) of 0.7 in 96% of the evaluations. Grouped evaluations obtained by meta-analysis were higher than 0.7 in all cases. The SF-36 showed good discrimination among severity groups, moderate correlations with clinical indicators, and high correlations with other HRQL instruments. Moreover, questionnaire scores predicted mortality and were able to detect improvement due to therapeutic interventions such as coronary angioplasty, benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery, and non-invasive positive pressure home ventilation. The new developments (norm-based scoring, version 2, the SF-12 and SF-8) improved both the metric properties and interpretation of the questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS The Spanish version of the SF-36 and its recently developed versions is a suitable instrument for use in medical research, as well as in clinical practice.


Drug and Alcohol Dependence | 2011

Psychiatric comorbidity in illicit drug users: substance-induced versus independent disorders

Marta Torrens; Gail Gilchrist; Antònia Domingo-Salvany

BACKGROUND Few studies have differentiated between independent and substance-induced psychiatric disorders. In this study we determine the risks associated with independent and substance-induced psychiatric disorders among a sample of 629 illicit drug users recruited from treatment and out of treatment settings. METHODS Secondary analysis of five cross-sectional studies conducted during 2000-2006. Independent and substance-induced DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses were assessed using the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders. RESULTS Lifetime prevalence of Axis I disorders other than substance use disorder (SUD) was 41.8%, with independent major depression being the most prevalent (17%). Lifetime prevalence of antisocial or borderline personality disorders was 22.9%. In multinominal logistic regression analysis (SUD only as the reference group), being female (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.59, 3.77) and having lifetime borderline personality disorder (OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.31, 4.59) remained significant variables in the group with independent disorders. In the group with substance-induced disorders, being recruited from an out of treatment setting (OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.54, 7.97), being female (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.24, 4.59) and the number of SUD (OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.10, 1.57) remained significant in the model. These variables were also significant in the group with both substance-induced and independent disorders, together with borderline personality disorder (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.03, 6.27). CONCLUSIONS Illicit drug users show high prevalence of co-occurrence of mainly independent mood and anxiety psychiatric disorders. Being female, recruited from an out of treatment setting and the number of SUD, are risk factors for substance-induced disorders.

Collaboration


Dive into the Antònia Domingo-Salvany's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marta Torrens

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordi Alonso

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luis de la Fuente

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gregorio Barrio

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

María J. Bravo

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert Espelt

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge