Antonio Amodio

Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Differences Between the Focal and Diffuse Forms in 87 Patients

OBJECTIVES:Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a particular type of chronic pancreatitis that can be classified into diffuse and focal forms. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and instrumental features of patients suffering from the diffuse and focal forms of AIP.METHODS:AIP patients diagnosed between 1995–2008 were studied.RESULTS:A total of 87 AIP patients (54 male and 33 female patients, mean age 43.4±15.3 years) were studied. Focal-type AIP was diagnosed in 63% and diffuse-type in 37%. Association with autoimmune diseases was observed in 53% of cases, the most common being ulcerative colitis (30%). Serum levels of IgG4 exceeded the upper normal limits (135 mg/dl) in 66% of focal AIP and in 27% of diffuse AIP (P=0.006). All patients responded to steroids. At recurrence non-steroid immunosuppressive drugs were successfully used in six patients. Recurrences were observed in 25% of cases, and were more frequent in focal AIP (33%) than in diffuse AIP (12%) (P=0.043), in smokers than in non-smokers (41% vs. 15%; P=0.011), and in patients with pathological serum levels of IgG4 compared to those with normal serum levels (50% vs. 12%; P=0.009). In all, 23% of the patients underwent pancreatic resections. Among patients with focal AIP, recurrences were observed in 30% of operated and in 34% of not operated patients.CONCLUSIONS:Focal-type and diffuse-type AIP differ as regards clinical symptoms and signs. Recurrences occur more frequently in focal AIP than in diffuse AIP. The use of non-steroid immunosuppressants may be a therapeutic option in relapsing AIP.

Italian consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis

This paper gives practical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Statements have been elaborated by working teams of experts, by searching for and analysing the literature, and submitted to a consensus process by using a Delphi modified procedure. The statements report recommendations on clinical and nutritional approach, assessment of pancreatic function, treatment of exocrine pancreatic failure and of secondary diabetes, treatment of pain and prevention of painful relapses. Moreover, the role of endoscopy in approaching pancreatic pain, pancreatic stones, duct narrowing and dilation, and complications was considered. Recommendations for most appropriate use of various imaging techniques and of ultrasound endoscopy are reported. Finally, a group of recommendations are addressed to the surgical treatment, with definition of right indications, timing, most appropriate procedures and techniques in different clinical conditions and targets, and clinical and functional outcomes following surgery.

Fecal Elastase-1 Is Useful in the Detection of Steatorrhea in Patients with Pancreatic Diseases But Not After Pancreatic Resection

BACKGROUND Fecal elastase-1(FE-1) has been suggested as an alternative to steatorrhea quantification to evaluate pancreatic insufficiency, but its diagnostic performance has not been compared with steatorrhea in chronic pancreatitis or after pancreatic resection. METHODS The relationship between steatorrhea and FE-1 was studied in patients with chronic pancreatic disorders or pancreatic resection. Students t test and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis, accepting 0.05 as limit for significance. RESULTS Eighty-two patients were studied (42 non-operated; 40 previously submitted to pancreatic resection). Fat output was higher in operated than non-operated patients (29.2 ± 3.1 vs 9.9 ± 2.2 g/day, p < 0.001) FE-1 was more severely reduced in operated patients (202 ± 32.3 μg/g in non operated vs 68.6 ± 18.2 in operated patients; p < 0.001). Steatorrhea was significantly more severe in operated patients across different levels of FE-1. The relationship between FE-1 and steatorrhea was described by a power regression model, with a regression line significantly different in operated and non-operated patients (p < 0.001). A steatorrhea of 7 g (upper limit of normal range) was calculated by this regression line when FE-1 is 15 μg/g in non-operated, but as high as 225 μg/g in operated patients. CONCLUSION FE-1 is useful to identify pancreatic insufficiency. Steatorrhea is anticipated in non-operated patients only when FE-1 is below the limit for a confident measurement of our assay. In operated patients, steatorrhea may be present even if FE-1 is only slightly reduced, that suggests a role for non pancreatic factors. FE1 is not useful to identify operated patients at risk of malabsorption.

A practical approach to the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is a disease characterized by specific pathological features, different from those of other forms of pancreatitis, that responds dramatically to steroid therapy. The pancreatic parenchyma may be diffusely or focally involved with the possibility of a low-density mass being present at imaging, mimicking pancreatic cancer. Clinically, the most relevant problems lie in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis and in distinguishing autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. Since in the presence of a pancreatic mass the probability of tumour is much higher than that of pancreatitis, the physician should be aware that in focal autoimmune pancreatitis the first step before using steroids is to exclude pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In this review, we briefly analyse the strategies to be followed for a correct diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis.

Exocrine and Endocrine Pancreatic Function in 21 Patients Suffering from Autoimmune Pancreatitis before and after Steroid Treatment

Background/Aim: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) responds rapidly and dramatically to steroid therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate pancreatic exocrine and endocrine function in patients suffering from AIP both before and after steroid therapy. Patients andMethods: Fecal elastase 1 and diabetes were evaluated before steroid therapy and within 1 month of its suspension in 21 patients (13 males and 8 females, mean age 43 ± 16.5 years) diagnosed as having AIP between 2006 and 2008. Results: At clinical onset, fecal elastase 1 was 107 ± 126 µg/g stool. Thirteen patients (62%) showed severe pancreatic insufficiency (<100 µg/g stool), 4 (19%) had mild insufficiency (100–200 µg/g stool), while 4 (19%) had normal pancreatic function (>200 µg/g stool). Before steroids, diabetes was diagnosed in 5 patients (24%), all of whom had very low levels of fecal elastase 1 (<19 µg/g stool). Following steroids, fecal elastase 1 increased in all patients (237 ± 193 µg/g stool) and observed levels were significantly higher than those seen before steroids (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Patients suffering from AIP display exocrine and/or endocrine pancreatic insufficiency at clinical onset. These insufficiencies improve after steroid therapy.

Application of international consensus diagnostic criteria to an Italian series of autoimmune pancreatitis

Background International consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) have been proposed to classify autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in type 1, type 2, or not otherwise specified. Objective Aim was to apply the ICDC to an Italian series of patients to evaluate the incidence and clinical profiles among different subtypes of AIP. Methods we re-evaluated and classified 92 patients diagnosed by Verona criteria, according to the ICDC. Results Out of 92 patients, 59 (64%) were diagnosed as type 1, 17 (18%) as type 2, and 15 (16%) as not otherwise specified according to the ICDC. A significant difference between type 1 and type 2 were found for age (54.5 ± 14.5 vs. 34.4 ± 13.9 respectively; p < 0.0001), male sex (76 vs. 47%; p = 0.007), jaundice (66 vs. 18%; p = 0.002) and acute pancreatitis (9 vs. 47%; p < 0.0001), elevated serum IgG4 levels (85 vs. 7%; p < 0.0001), inflammatory bowel disease (8 vs. 82%; < 0.0001), and relapse of the disease (34 vs. 6%; p = 0.058). Imaging and response to steroids in the not-otherwise-specified group were similar to type 1 and 2. Conclusions Type 1 has a different clinical profile from type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. The not-otherwise-specified group has peculiar clinical features which are shared both with type 1 or type 2 groups.

Prospective evaluation of subjects with chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia.

OBJECTIVES:Chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia (CAPH) has been described since 1996 as a benign disease. Recent studies described pathological findings at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation (s-MRCP) in more than half of the CAPH subjects. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and clinical relevance of s-MRCP findings in patients with CAPH.METHODS:Subjects prospectively enrolled from January 2005 to December 2010 underwent s-MRCP and biochemical tests routinely performed.RESULTS:Data relative to 160 subjects (94 males, 66 females, age 49.6±13.6 years) were analyzed. In all, 51 (32%) subjects had hyperamylasemia, 9 (6%) hyperlipasemia, and 100 (62%) an increase in both enzyme levels. The time between the first increased dosage of serum pancreatic enzymes and our observation was 3.3±3.9 years (range: 1–15). Familial pancreatic hyperenzymemia was observed in 26 out of 133 subjects (19.5%). Anatomic abnormalities of the pancreatic duct system at s-MRCP were found in 24 out of 160 subjects (15%). Pathological MRCP findings were present in 44 subjects (27.5%) before and in 80 subjects (50%) after secretin administration (P<0.0001). Five subjects (3.1%) underwent surgery, 3 for pancreatic endocrine tumor, 1 for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 1 for intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) involving the main pancreatic duct, and 18 patients (11.3%) needed a follow-up (17 for IPMN and 1 for endocrine tumor).CONCLUSIONS:Alterations of the pancreatic duct system at s-MRCP in subjects with CAPH can be observed in 50% of the subjects and are clinically relevant in 14.4% of cases.

Retrospective comparison between preoperative diagnosis by International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria and histological diagnosis in patients with focal autoimmune pancreatitis who underwent surgery with suspicion of cancer

Objective The objective of this study was to compare the preoperative diagnosis by International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) with histological diagnosis in patients with focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) who underwent surgery. Methods Thirty patients (type 1 AIP in 23 and type 2 AIP in 7) with a diagnosis of AIP based on histology of surgical specimens were classified according to ICDC based on their preoperative data. Results Pancreatic core biopsies and diagnostic steroid trial were not preoperatively performed in any of the patients. Based on preoperative data, ICDC diagnosed 6 patients (20%) as having type 1 AIP and 24 (80%) as probable AIP. Assuming all patients had responded to a steroid trial preoperatively, ICDC would have diagnosed 8 patients (27%) as having type 1 AIP, 4 (13%) as type 2 AIP, 10 as AIP–not otherwise specified (33%), and 8 (27%) as probable AIP. In the hypothetical situation, 7 of 8 type 1 AIP patients and 3 of 3 type 2 AIP patients would have been classified into the correct subtype of AIP. Conclusions A steroid trial enhances the possibility of correctly diagnosing AIP by ICDC despite the lack of histology. However, some patients cannot be diagnosed as having AIP or be classified into the correct subtype without histology.

Frequency and characterization of benign lesions in patients undergoing surgery for the suspicion of solid pancreatic neoplasm.

Objectives A diagnosis of benign lesions (BLs) is reported in 5% to 21% of pancreatoduodenectomies performed for neoplasms; no data for body-tail resections are available. The aims were to investigate the frequency and characterize the BLs mimicking cancer in the head and the body-tail of the pancreas. Methods This study is a retrospective review of pancreatic specimenscollected from 2005 to 2011 in the pathology database of Mainz (Germany). Patients with final diagnosis excluding malignancy were analyzed by histology, imaging, and clinical aspects. Results Among 373 patients, 33 patients (8.8%) were diagnosed with a benign disease: 25 (8.4%) of 298 in the pancreatic head and 8 (10.7%) of 75 in the body-tail resections. Paraduodenal pancreatitis was diagnosed in 13 (3.5%) of 373 patients; autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), in 11 (2.9%); “ordinary” chronic pancreatitis, in 6 (1.6%); and accessory spleen, in 3 (0.8%). In pancreatic head resections, the most frequent diagnoses were paraduodenal pancreatitis (13/298, 4.4%) and AIP (9/298, 3%), whereas in the body-tail, the most frequent diagnoses were accessory spleen (3/75, 4%), chronic pancreatitis (3/75, 4%), and AIP (2/75, 2.7%). Conclusions Benign lesions are observed with the same frequency inspecimens of the head or the body-tail of the pancreas.

Azathioprine maintenance therapy to prevent relapses in autoimmune pancreatitis

Objectives:Steroids are used to induce remission in autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). Low-dosage steroid therapy or immunosuppressant (IMs) has been proposed as maintenance therapy to prevent AIP relapse. Few and conflicting data have been published on the efficacy of azathioprine (AZA) in preventing AIP relapse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indication and efficacy of AZA as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse in AIP.Methods:Patients suffering from AIP diagnosed according to the ICDC in type 1, type 2, and not otherwise specified (NOS) were divided in those treated with AZA (AZA+ group) as maintenance therapy and not treated with maintenance therapy (AZA− group). Exclusion criteria were: previous pancreatic surgery, other autoimmune diseases as indication for AZA treatment, and use of IMs different from AZA. Drug safety, clinical and instrumental outcome of AZA+ patients were evaluated.Results:A total of 23 patients (18 Males and 5 Females, mean age 54±11 years) in AZA+ group and 97 (58 Males and 39 Females, mean age 45±18 years) in AZA− group were compared. In AZA+ group, patients were significantly older (P=0.043), type 1 AIP was more frequently diagnosed (87 vs. 51%, P=0.006), sIgG4 higher (758±625 vs. 311±409 mg/dl, P<0.001), other organ involvement (OOI) more frequently observed (83 vs. 48%, P=0.002), with higher frequency of relapse before AZA treatment (78 vs. 14%, P<0.001). Three patients in AZA+ group required drug discontinuation because of adverse events. Twenty patients were therefore evaluated for outcome. Six out of 20 patients (30%) relapsed after 24±15 months (5 in pancreas and 1 on biliary tract). They were retreated with steroids and continued AZA. Two out of 6 patients (33%) had a second relapse,after respectively 11 months (in pancreas and kidney) and 22 months (in kidney).Conclusions:AZA is an effective and safe treatment to prevent AIP relapses.