Antonio Antela

Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: the SPIRAL study

Background:Switching to raltegravir in selected patients treated with ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may result in similar efficacy and lower plasma lipids. Methods:SPIRAL is a 48-week multicentre, open-label trial in which HIV-infected adults with less than 50 copies/ml of plasma HIV RNA for at least the previous 6 months on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy were randomized (1: 1) to switch from the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir or to continue on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients free of treatment failure (noncompleter = failure) at 48 weeks. SPIRAL study was powered to show noninferior efficacy of raltegravir-based therapy with a margin of −12.5%. Results:Two hundred and seventy-three patients assigned to switch to raltegravir (n = 139) or to continue ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (n = 134) were included in the efficacy analysis. At 48 weeks, 89.2% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 86.6% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of treatment failure [difference 2.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.2 to 10.6]. A total of 96.9% (raltegravir-based therapy) and 95.1% (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy) of the patients remained free of virological failure (difference 1.8%; 95% CI −3.5 to 7.5). Switching to raltegravir was associated with significant decreases in plasma lipids and total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio relative to continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor. Severe adverse events and study drug discontinuations due to any adverse event occurred in 4 and 2% of the patients in each group. Conclusion:In patients with sustained virological suppression on ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based therapy, switching from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to raltegravir demonstrated noninferior efficacy and resulted in a better lipid profile at 48 weeks than continuing ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.

Influence of Liver Fibrosis on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy—Associated Hepatotoxicity in Patients with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection

BACKGROUND Coinfection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a known risk factor for hepatotoxicity in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of HCV-related liver fibrosis in HAART-associated hepatotoxicity. METHODS In a prospective study involving 107 patients who underwent liver biopsy, fibrosis was graded according 5 stages, from F0 (no fibrosis) to F4 (cirrhosis). Hepatotoxicity was defined as an increase in levels of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase to >5 times the upper limit of normal, or a >3.5-fold increase if baseline levels were abnormal. The incidence of hepatotoxicity was compared with liver fibrosis stage and with time and composition of HAART. RESULTS Overall, 27 patients (25%) had hepatotoxic events (5.1 events/100 person-years of therapy). The incidence was greater for patients with stage F3 or F4 fibrosis (38%) than for those with stage F1 or F2 fibrosis (15%; 7.6 vs. 3 events/100 person-years; relative risk, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-6.97; P=.013). Duration of HCV infection, duration of HAART, diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HCV load, HCV genotype, and nadir CD4(+) cell count did not affect the risk of hepatotoxicity. Of the 86 patients who received nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 11 (13%) developed liver toxicity. In these patients, fibrosis stages F1 and F2 were associated with similar rates of toxicity (3 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, 3.3 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz, and 3.4 events/100 person-years for those who received non-NNRTIs). There was a greater incidence among patients with F3 or F4 fibrosis who received NNRTIs (11.7 events/100 person-years for patients who received nevirapine, and 8.6 events/100 person-years for those who received efavirenz), compared with those who received non-NNRTIs (4 events/100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS HAART-associated hepatotoxicity correlates with liver histological stage in patients coinfected with HIV and HCV. There was no difference in hepatotoxicity risk for different antiretroviral therapies in patients with mild-to-moderate fibrosis.

Sustained improvement of dyslipidaemia in HAART-treated patients replacing stavudine with tenofovir.

Objective:To describe the 12-month evolution of lipid profile in HIV-infected virologically suppressed patients substituting tenofovir for stavudine. Design and methods:‘Recover’ was a prospective, multicenter, switch study conducted at 120 HIV units across Spain designed to identify single nucleoside analogue substitution due to adverse events in real practice. Tenofovir substituted stavudine in 873 adult patients. No other substitutions were allowed. This lipid sub-study included 352 randomly recruited patients with complete follow-up and lipid parameters. Main outcome measures:Changes in fasting levels of total cholesterol (TC), high and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C and LDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) at 48 weeks, and their cardiovascular risk (CVR) translation. Results:At 48 weeks, there was a sustained reduction in median TC (−17.5 mg/dl; P < 0.001), LDL-C (−8.1 mg/dl; P < 0.001), and TG (−35 mg/dl; P < 0.001). HDL-C remained roughly unchanged (−0.8 mg/dl). Patients with baseline hyperlipidaemia showed greater reductions in LDL-C (−29 mg/dl; P < 0.001) and TG (−76 mg/dl; P < 0.001). The greatest TG reduction was observed in patients with severe hyper-TG (−266 mg/dl; P < 0.001). The estimated 10-year CVR decreased in all patients (P < 0.001), and to a higher extent in patients with baseline hyperlipidaemia. There was a trend towards reduction according to the use of lipid-lowering agents (11.6% to 9,9%; P = non-significant). Conclusions:The substitution of tenofovir for stavudine causes a sustained improvement of dyslipidaemia. The reduction, although modest, is robust and sustained over time, and significantly reduces the CVR. This switch strategy is safe and contributes to an improvement in the lipid profile, especially TG, in HAART-treated patients.

Long-Term Outcomes among Antiretroviral-Naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Patients with Small Increases in CD4+ Cell Counts after Successful Virologic Suppression

To evaluate the frequency and predictive factors of discordant immune response, we performed a prospective cohort study of 288 antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients who initiated highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and maintained complete virus suppression for > or =24 months. The median CD4+ cell count was 186x10(6) cells/L, and the median HIV RNA level was 5 log(10) copies/mL. After 24 months of therapy, 42 (16.5%) of 255 patients had a median CD4+ cell count increase of <100x10(6) cells/L. By logistic regression analysis, previous injection drug use was associated with a CD4+ cell count increase of <100x10(6) cells/L (risk ratio [RR], 2.326; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.077-5.023; P=.032); inclusion of a protease inhibitor (PI) in the HAART regimen reduced the risk of poor immunologic recovery (RR, 0.160; 95% CI, 0.061-0.417; P<.001). Failure of the CD4+ cell count to increase was relatively common among antiretroviral-naive patients in the year after the initiation of HAART and the achievement of complete virus suppression. PI-containing regimens provided better immunologic response.

Recomendaciones de GESIDA/Plan Nacional sobre el Sida respecto al tratamiento antirretroviral en pacientes adultos infectados por el VIH (octubre 2004)

Objetivo Efectuar una puesta al dia de las recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) para los adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Metodos Estas recomendaciones se han consensuado por un comite del Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA) y del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS). Para ello se han revisado los avances en la fisiopatologia del VIH, los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de ensayos clinicos, estudios de cohortes y de farmacocinetica, publicados en revistas biomedicas o presentados en congresos en los ultimos anos. Se han definido tres niveles de evidencia segun la procedencia de los datos: estudios aleatorizados (nivel A), de cohortes o de caso-control (nivel B), u opinion de expertos (nivel C). En cada una de las situaciones se ha establecido recomendar, considerar o no recomendar el TAR. Resultados En el momento actual, el TAR con combinaciones de al menos tres farmacos constituye el tratamiento de inicio de eleccion de la infeccion cronica por el VIH. Estas pautas deben incluir dos inhibidores de la transcriptasa inversa analogos de nucleosidos (ITIAN) mas un no nucleosido (ITINN) o dos ITIAN mas un inhibidor de la proteasa (IP). En los pacientes con una infeccion por VIH sintomatica se recomienda iniciar TAR. En los pacientes asintomaticos el inicio de TAR se basara en la cifra de linfocitos CD4+/μl y en la carga viral plasmatica (CVP): a) en pacientes con linfocitos CD4+ 350 cel./μl se puede diferir el inicio del TAR. El objetivo del TAR inicial es lograr una CVP indetectable. La adherencia al TAR tiene un papel fundamental en la duracion de la respuesta antiviral. Las opciones terapeuticas en los fracasos del TAR son limitadas por la aparicion de resistencias cruzadas. Los estudios genotipicos en estos casos son de utilidad. La toxicidad es un factor limitante del TAR, aunque los beneficios superan los posibles perjuicios. Tambien se discuten los criterios de TAR de la infeccion aguda, embarazo y profilaxis postexposicion, y el manejo de la coinfeccion por el VIH y los virus de la hepatitis C y B (VHC y VHB). Conclusiones La cifra de linfocitos CD4+ es el factor de referencia mas importante para iniciar el TAR en pacientes asintomaticos. Por otra parte, el numero considerable de farmacos disponibles, los metodos de monitorizacion mas sensibles (CVP), y la posibilidad de determinar las resistencias hacen que las estrategias terapeuticas sean mucho mas individualizadas.

Changes in cardiovascular biomarkers in HIV-infected patients switching from ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to raltegravir.

Background:Switching from boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r) to raltegravir (RAL) results in a better plasma lipid profile than continuing PI/r. Whether this strategy affects plasma biomarkers associated with atherosclerosis is unknown. Methods:We assessed 48-week changes in fasting lipids and several biomarkers including serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), osteoprotegerin, interleukin (IL) 6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-&agr;), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), E-selectin and P-selectin, adiponectin, insulin, and D-dimer in otherwise healthy, virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients treated with PI/r who randomly switched from PI/r to RAL or continued with PI/r in the SPIRAL trial. Biomarkers and lipids at baseline and 48-week changes between both study arms were compared. Correlations between changes in biomarkers and changes in lipids were also evaluated. Results:Of 273 patients initiating study drugs in the SPIRAL trial, 233 (119 RAL, 114 PI/r) remained on allocated therapy for 48 weeks and had sera available for the purpose of this substudy. Triglycerides (−28%, P < 0.0001), total (−14%, P < 0.0001), low-density lipoprotein (−9%, P = 0.0069), and high-density lipoprotein (−10%, P = 0.0017) cholesterol decreased in RAL relative to the PI/r group. Among biomarkers, hsCRP (−40%, P < 0.0001), MCP-1 (−20%, P = 0.0003), osteoprotegerin (−13%, P = 0.0024), IL-6 (−46%,P < 0.0001), TNF-&agr; (−27%, P = 0.0011), insulin (−26%, P < 0.0001), and D-dimer (−8%, P = 0.0187) decreased in RAL relative to PI/r group, whereas IL-10 (+1%, P = 0.7773), ICAM-1 (−6%, P = 0.1255), VCAM-1(0%, P = 0.8671), E-selectin (−9%, P = 0.2174), P-selectin (−6%, P = 0.3865), and adiponectin (+8%, P = 0.2028) remained unchanged. Biomarkers and lipids changes at 48 weeks were weakly correlated. Conclusion:Switching from PI/r to RAL induced significant changes in several cardiovascular biomarkers that were not completely explained by lipid changes.

Dual treatment with atazanavir–ritonavir plus lamivudine versus triple treatment with atazanavir–ritonavir plus two nucleos(t)ides in virologically stable patients with HIV-1 (SALT): 48 week results from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND Problems associated with lifelong antiretroviral therapy, such as need for strict adherence, drug-related toxic effects, difficulties with treatment schedules, and cost, mean that simplification strategies should be sought. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of dual treatment with atazanavir-ritonavir plus lamivudine as an option to switch to from standard combination antiretroviral therapy in patients with an HIV-1 infection who are virologically suppressed. METHODS In this randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with chronic HIV-1 infection and no previous treatment failure or resistance, and with HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months, negative hepatitis B virus surface antigen, and good general health, from 30 hospitals in Spain. Exclusion criteria were switch in antiretroviral therapy during the previous 4 months, previous virological failure, pregnancy or breastfeeding, Gilberts syndrome, use of contraindicated drugs, grade 4 laboratory abnormalities, and previous intolerance to any of the study drugs. We randomly assigned patients (1:1; stratified by active hepatitis C virus infection and previous treatment; computer-generated random number sequence) to dual treatment with oral atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and ritonavir (100 mg once daily) plus lamivudine (300 mg once daily) or triple treatment with oral atazanavir (300 mg once daily) and ritonavir (100 mg once daily) plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors at the discretion of the investigators. The primary endpoint was virological response, defined as HIV-1 RNA of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, in the per-protocol population, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. We included patients who received at least one dose of the study drug in the safety analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01307488. FINDINGS Between Sept 29, 2011, and May 2, 2013, we randomly assigned 286 patients (143 [50%] to each group). At week 48 in the per-protocol population, 112 (84%) of 133 patients had virological response in the dual-treatment group versus 105 (78%) of 135 in the triple-treatment group (difference 6% [95% CI -5 to 16%), showing non-inferiority at the prespecified level. 14 (5%) patients developed severe adverse events (dual treatment six [4%]; triple treatment eight [6%]), none of which we deemed related to the study drug. Grade 3-4 adverse events were similar between groups (dual treatment 77 [55%] of 140; triple treatment 78 [55%] of 141). Treatment discontinuations were less frequent in the dual-treatment group (three [2%]) than in the triple-treatment group (ten [7%]; p=0·047). INTERPRETATION In our trial, dual treatment was effective, safe, and non-inferior to triple treatment in patients with an HIV-1 infection who are virologically suppressed who switch antiretroviral therapy because of toxic effects, intolerance, or simplification. This combination has the potential to suppress some of the long-term toxic effects associated with nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, preserve future treatment options, and reduce the cost of antiretroviral therapy. FUNDING Bristol Myers-Squibb and Fundación SEIMC-GESIDA.

Switching to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus continuation of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with emtricitabine and tenofovir in virologically suppressed adults with HIV (STRATEGY-NNRTI): 48 week results of a randomised, open-label, phase 3b non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir) might be a safe and efficacious switch option for virologically suppressed patients with HIV who have neuropsychiatric side-effects on a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or who are on a multitablet NNRTI-containing regimen and want a regimen simplification. We assessed the non-inferiority of such a switch compared with continuation of an NNRTI-containing regimen. METHODS STRATEGY-NNRTI is a 96 week, international, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority trial enrolling adults (≥18 years) with HIV-1 and plasma HIV RNA viral load below 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months on an NNRTI plus emtricitabine and tenofovir regimen. With a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated participants (2:1; blocks of six, stratified by efavirenz use at screening) to switch to coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir (switch group) or continue the NNRTI plus emtricitabine and tenofovir regimen (no-switch group). Key eligibility criteria included no history of virological failure and an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 70 mL per min or greater. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with plasma viral loads below 50 copies per mL at week 48 based on a snapshot algorithm with a non-inferiority margin of 12% (assessed by modified intention to treat). This trial is ongoing and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01495702. FINDINGS Between Dec 29, 2011, and Dec 13, 2012, we randomly allocated 439 participants to treatment: 290 participants in the switch group and 143 participants in the no-switch group received treatment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. At week 48, 271 (93%) of 290 participants in the switch group and 126 (88%) of 143 participants in the no-switch group maintained plasma viral loads below 50 copies per mL (difference 5·3%, 95% CI -0·5 to 12·0; p=0·066). We detected no treatment-emergent resistance in either group. Safety events leading to discontinuation were uncommon in both groups: six (2%) of 291 participants in the switch group and one (1%) of 143 in the no-switch group. INTERPRETATION Coformulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir seems to be efficacious and well tolerated in virologically suppressed adults with HIV and might be a suitable alternative for patients on an NNRTI with emtricitabine and tenofovir regimen considering a regimen modification or simplification. FUNDING Gilead Sciences.

Recomendaciones de GESIDA/Plan Nacional sobre el Sida respecto al tratamiento antirretroviral en pacientes adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en el año 2002

Objetivo Efectuar una puesta al dia de las recomendaciones sobre el tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR) para los adultos infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH). Metodos Estas recomendaciones se han consensuado por un comite del Grupo de Estudio de Sida (GESIDA) y del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS). Para ello, se han revisado los avances en la fisiopatologia del VIH, los resultados de eficacia y seguridad de ensayos clinicos, estudios de cohortes y de farmacocinetica, publicados en revistas biomedicas o presentados en congresos en los ultimos anos. Se han definido tres niveles de evidencia segun la procedencia de los datos: estudios aleatorizados (nivel A), de cohortes o de caso-control (nivel B) u opinion de expertos (nivel C). En cada una de las situaciones se ha establecido recomendar, considerar o no recomendar el TAR. Resultados En el momento actual, el TAR con combinaciones de al menos 3 farmacos constituye el tratamiento de eleccion de la infeccion cronica por el VIH. En los pacientes con una infeccion por VIH sintomatica se recomienda iniciar el TAR. En los pacientes asintomaticos el inicio de TAR se basara en la cifra de linfocitos CD4+/μl y en la carga viral plasmatica (CVP): a) en pacientes con linfocitos CD4+ 350 cel./μl se puede diferir el inicio del TAR. El objetivo del TAR es lograr una CVP indetectable. La adherencia al TAR tiene un papel en la durabilidad de la respuesta antiviral. Las opciones terapeuticas en los fracasos del TAR son limitadas por la aparicion de resistencias cruzadas. Los estudios genotipicos en estos casos son de utilidad. La toxicidad es un factor limitante del TAR. Tambien se discuten los criterios de TAR de la infeccion aguda, embarazo y profilaxis postexposicion, y el manejo de la coinfeccion por el VIH y los virus de las hepatitis B y C (VHC y VHB). Conclusiones En la actualidad existe una actitud mas conservadora para iniciar el TAR que en recomendaciones previas. La cifra de linfocitos CD4+ es el factor de referencia mas importante para iniciar el TAR en pacientes asintomaticos. Por otra parte, el numero considerable de farmacos disponibles, los metodos de monitorizacion mas sensibles (CVP) y la posibilidad de determinar las resistencias hacen que las estrategias terapeuticas sean mucho mas individualizadas.

Pegylated interferon α2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV coinfection constitutes an important epidemiological and clinical problem. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of Pegylated interferon α2b (Peg-IFN) and a fixed dose of ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV coinfection. Methods: Open, prospective study in HCV–HIV coinfected patients with persistently elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and a liver biopsy showing either portal or bridging fibrosis. Therapy included Peg-IFN (50 μg weekly) with ribavirin 800 mg for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors associated with response. Results: By intent-to-treat analysis, 11 of 35 patients (31%) reached SVR. SVR was significantly better for genotypes 2/3 than for genotype 1 (54% versus 21%; P < 0.05). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, only a non-1 genotype was an independent factor for SVR [odds ratio (OR), 6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1–31.7; P < 0.005]. A decrease of at least 1.5 log10 HCV RNA at week 12 of therapy was highly predictive of SVR (OR, 49.9; 95% CI, 4.9–508.2; P < 0.001). Most patients developed adverse events, although only six patients (17%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Conclusions: The combination of low doses of Peg-IFN plus a fixed dose of ribavirin resulted in a rate of SVR similar to that obtained with higher doses of the drugs in HIV-infected patients and lower than those obtained in non-HIV patients. Response at week 12 may be useful to help guide therapy in HCV–HIV co-infected patients.