Antonio Balzano

Safety and efficacy of anticoagulation therapy with low molecular weight heparin for portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Background Treatment of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in patients with liver cirrhosis is not well established. Aim We intended to assess the safety and efficacy of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to treat PVT in cirrhotic patients. Study All 39 patients diagnosed with non-neoplastic PVT and cirrhosis from June 2005 to December 2006 were evaluated for anticoagulation therapy (AT). PVT was occludent in 15.4%, partial in 64.1%, and portal cavernoma presented in 20.5%. Twenty-eight patients received 200 U/kg/d of enoxaparin for at least 6 months. In 39.3% of patients PVT was an occasional finding, in 10.7% presented with acute abdominal pain, in 50% with bleeding from gastroesophageal varices. In this last group LMWH was started after endoscopic eradication of varices by band ligation. Results Complete recanalization of portal vein occurred in 33.3%, partial recanalization in 50% and no response in 16.7% of patients. Further 12 patients who continued AT obtained complete recanalization at a median time of 11 months (range 7 to 17 mo). Overall, a complete response was obtained in 75% of patients. No significant side effects, particularly bleeding complications, were observed during the treatment. Conclusions LMWH demonstrated safe and effective in the treatment of PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Prognostic factors in noncirrhotic patients with splanchnic vein thromboses.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS:Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), not associated with cancer or liver cirrhosis, is a rare event and scanty data are available on its natural history, long-term prognosis, and treatment. In this study 121 SVT patients consecutively seen from January 1998 to December 2005 were included and 95 of them were followed up for a median time of 41 months. Screening for thrombophilic factors was performed in 104 patients. New thrombotic or bleeding episodes were registered and anticoagulant therapy was performed according to preestablished criteria.RESULTS:SVT was an incidental finding in 34 (28.1%) patients; 34 (28.1%) presented with abdominal infarction; 39 (32.2%) had bowel ischemia or acute portal vein thrombosis; 14 (11.6%) had bleeding from portal hypertensive sources. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 7 yr were 95%, 93.3%, and 89.6%, respectively; 87.5% of deaths occurred at onset of SVT as complications of intestinal infarction. Patients with isolated portal vein thromboses had symptoms and intestinal infarction in 16/41 (39%) and 0/41 (0%) of the cases, respectively, whereas superior mesenteric vein thromboses, isolated or not, were associated with symptoms and intestinal infarction in 69/75 (92%) and 34/75 (45%), respectively.During the follow-up 14 (14.7%) suffered from 39 episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding with no deaths. A previous gastrointestinal bleed was associated with new hemorrhagic events during follow-up.New venous thrombotic episodes occurred in 10 of 95 patients (10.5%), of which 73% were in the splanchnic area. Seven out of these 10 patients had a chronic myeloproliferative disease (MPD) and none was on anticoagulation.CONCLUSIONS:Anticoagulant therapy was effective to obtain recanalization of acute SVT in 45.4% of patients and preserved patients from recurrent thrombosis when given lifelong.

Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment vs. active control for treatment of chronic anal fissure: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

PURPOSE Chronic anal fissure may be treated by chemical or surgical sphincterotomy. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of local application of nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in healing chronic anal fissure. METHODS The study was performed according to a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One hundred ten patients who gave informed consent were recruited. They received a clinical examination, a questionnaire to evaluate symptoms and pain, anorectal manometry, and anoscopy. Healing of anal fissure at Day 42 of therapy was defined as the primary efficacy variable of the study. Patients treated with nifedipine (n = 55) used topical 0.3 percent nifedipine and 1.5 percent lidocaine ointment every 12 hours for 6 weeks. The control group (n = 55) received topical 1.5 percent lidocaine and 1 percent hydrocortisone acetate ointment during therapy. Anal pressures were measured by recording resting and maximal voluntary contraction pressures at baseline and at Day 21. Long-term outcomes were determined after a median follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS Healing of chronic anal fissure was achieved after 6 weeks of therapy in 94.5 percent of the nifedipine-treated patients (P < 0.001) as opposed to 16.4 percent of the controls. Mean anal resting pressure decreased from a mean value ± standard deviation of 47.2 ± 14.6 to 42 ± 12.4 mmHg in the nifedipine group. This represents a mean reduction of 11 percent (P = 0.002). Changes of maximal voluntary contraction in nifedipine-treated patients were not significant. No changes in mean anal resting pressure and maximal voluntary contraction were observed in the control group. We did not observe any systemic side effect in patients treated with nifedipine. After the blinding was removed, recurrence of the fissure was observed in 3 of 52 patients in the nifedipine group within 1 year of treatment, and 2 of these patients healed with an additional course of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment. CONCLUSIONS Our study clearly demonstrates that the therapeutic use of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment should be extended to the conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Increased prevalence of colonic polyps and altered lymphocyte subset pattern in the colonic lamina propria in acromegaly

The balance of evidence suggests that acromegaly is a risk factor for colonic neoplasia. We have evaluated the prevalence of colonic polyps in acromegalics from Southern Italy and characterized the lymphocyte subsets in the colonic lamina propria in order to analyze differences in the colonic immunological environment.

Prophylaxis with meropenem of septic complications in acute pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial versus imipenem.

Objectives Prophylactic antibiotics are helpful in decreasing the incidence of septic complications in acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic, with that of imipenem, which is the standard prophylactic treatment in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Methods One hundred seventy-six patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were prospectively randomized to prophylactic treatment with 0.5 g meropenem t.i.d. intravenously or 0.5 g imipenem q.i.d. intravenously. The occurrence of infection of pancreatic necrosis, rate of extrapancreatic infections, systemic and local complications, need for surgery, mortality rate, and length of hospitalization were recorded for each group. When a septic complication of pancreatic necrosis was suspected, fine needle aspiration with cultures of the sample was performed. Surgery was performed in cases of verified infected necrosis. Conclusion No difference was observed between patients treated with meropenem and those treated with imipenem in terms of incidence of pancreatic infection (11.4% versus 13.6%) and extrapancreatic infections (21.6% versus 23.9%) and clinical outcome. Meropenem is as effective as imipenem in preventing septic complications of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Empirical prescribing for dyspepsia: randomised controlled trial of test and treat versus omeprazole treatment

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of a “Helicobacter pylori test and treat” strategy with that of an empirical trial of omeprazole in the non-endoscopic management by empirical prescribing of young patients with dyspepsia. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Hospital gastroenterology unit. Participants 219 patients under 45 years old presenting with dyspepsia without alarm symptoms. Intervention Patients received treatment with omeprazole 20 mg (group A) or with a urea breath test followed by an eradication treatment in case of H pylori infection or omeprazole alone in non-infected patients (group B). Lack of improvement or recurrence of symptoms prompted endoscopy. Main outcome measures Improvement in symptoms assessed by a dyspepsia severity score every two months; use of medical resources (endoscopic workload and medical consultation); clinical outcome. Results 96/109 (88%) patients in group A and 61/110 (55%) in group B (P < 0.0001) had endoscopy: in 19 patients in group A and 32 in group B (20/67 infected and 12/43 non-infected) because of no improvement; in 77 further patients in group A and 29 in group B (7 infected and 22 non-infected) because of recurrence of symptoms during follow up. Endoscopy showed peptic ulcers only in group A; oesophagitis occurred significantly more often in group B than in group A. About 80% of examinations were normal in both groups, but nine duodenal scars occurred in group A. Conclusions Eradication treatment allows resolution of symptoms in a large number of patients with dyspepsia and reduces the endoscopic workload. After a trial of omeprazole, symptoms recur in nearly every patient. Such treatment is also likely to mask an appreciable number of peptic ulcers and cases of oesophagitis.

Topical Nifedipine With Lidocaine Ointment vs. Active Control for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure

AbstractPURPOSE: Chronic anal fissure may be treated by chemical or surgical sphincterotomy. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of local application of nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in healing chronic anal fissure. METHODS: The study was performed according to a prospective, randomized, double-blind design. One hundred ten patients who gave informed consent were recruited. They received a clinical examination, a questionnaire to evaluate symptoms and pain, anorectal manometry, and anoscopy. Healing of anal fissure at Day 42 of therapy was defined as the primary efficacy variable of the study. Patients treated with nifedipine (n = 55) used topical 0.3 percent nifedipine and 1.5 percent lidocaine ointment every 12 hours for 6 weeks. The control group (n = 55) received topical 1.5 percent lidocaine and 1 percent hydrocortisone acetate ointment during therapy. Anal pressures were measured by recording resting and maximal voluntary contraction pressures at baseline and at Day 21. Long-term outcomes were determined after a median follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS: Healing of chronic anal fissure was achieved after 6 weeks of therapy in 94.5 percent of the nifedipine-treated patients (P < 0.001) as opposed to 16.4 percent of the controls. Mean anal resting pressure decreased from a mean value ± standard deviation of 47.2 ± 14.6 to 42 ± 12.4 mmHg in the nifedipine group. This represents a mean reduction of 11 percent (P = 0.002). Changes of maximal voluntary contraction in nifedipine-treated patients were not significant. No changes in mean anal resting pressure and maximal voluntary contraction were observed in the control group. We did not observe any systemic side effect in patients treated with nifedipine. After the blinding was removed, recurrence of the fissure was observed in 3 of 52 patients in the nifedipine group within 1 year of treatment, and 2 of these patients healed with an additional course of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study clearly demonstrates that the therapeutic use of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment should be extended to the conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure.

Helicobacter pylori infection, pattern of gastritis, and symptoms in erosive and nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and the characteristics of gastritis and symptoms of patients with erosive and nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS We studied 202 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of GERD (symptoms score and endoscopy): group A (n = 110), erosive GERD; group B (n = 92), nonerosive GERD; 200 patients with upper abdominal complaints without abnormalities at endoscopy (functional dyspepsia, group C); and 200 asymptomatic controls tested for H. pylori serum antibody (group D). Antral and body biopsy specimens were taken for histology and the rapid urease test in groups A, B, and C. RESULTS The prevalence of H. pylori infection was higher in groups B and C (62% and 55%, respectively) than in A and D (36% and 40%) (P < 0.05). In positive patients H. pylori colonization and gastritis grade scores in the gastric body were higher in nonerosive than in erosive GERD and functional dyspepsia (P < 0.05). No differences in H. pylori colonization or gastritis grades were found in the antrum. Fifty-nine patients with nonerosive GERD (64%) and 42 with erosive GERD (38%) showed other dyspeptic symptoms associated with reflux symptoms (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS H. pylori prevalence is higher in patients with nonerosive GERD than in normal subjects and in patients with erosive GERD and similar to that of patients with dyspepsia. Patients with nonerosive GERD often show dyspeptic symptoms and higher H. pylori colonization and inflammation grades in the proximal stomach. Our data support the hypothesis that in GERD H. pylori gastritis may, on the one hand, protect against the development of esophageal erosions and, on the other, contribute to the esophageal hypersensitivity to acid which is a feature of GERD.

Flumazenil in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients: a double blind randomized placebo controlled study

AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS . In the double blind randomized, placebo controlled study, 54 patients with hepatic encephalopathy grade III-IV were randomly assigned to receive either flumazenil 2 mg iv (group A) or placebo (group B); conventional treatment with branched-chain amino acid, saline, glucose, and lactulose was administered in both groups. A 24-hour observation period was established. Clinical improvement was defined as a 3 point decrease in the Glasgow coma score at any time within 24 hours. RESULTS Clinical improvement was obtained in 22/28 patients in group A and in 14/26 in group B (p<0.05); improvement was observed within the first six hours in 21/22 patients in group A and only in 3/14 in group B. Mortality rate was not different between group A and B; however, all 6 non-responders in group A and only 5 out of 12 in group B died within 24 hours. Among patients with post-bleeding encephalopathy, 11 out of 17 in group A and only 2 out of 14 in group B improved (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Flumazenil may exert a beneficial effect in a subset of patients with acute hepatic encephalopathy; encephalopathy associated with bleeding is more likely to respond to flumazenil; responders to the treatment usually improve within the first 6 hours while lack of response usually represents a bad prognostic sign.

Acute portal and mesenteric thrombosis: unusual presentation of cytomegalovirus infection.

Cytomegalovirus infection is a benign disease in immunocompetent patients. In-vitro and in-vivo studies show that cytomegalovirus may cause arterial and venous thrombosis through different mechanisms. We describe two cases of acute cytomegalovirus infection complicated by portal and mesenteric vein thrombosis leading to intestinal ischemia. Both patients carried the heterozygous prothrombin G20210A mutation. The presence of this unusual complication should be searched for in patients with acute cytomegalovirus infection and abdominal symptoms in order to start early anticoagulation. The necessity for full thrombophilic screening is also pointed out.