Antonio Gil-Núñez

Relevance of Stroke Code, Stroke Unit and Stroke Networks in Organization of Acute Stroke Care – The Madrid Acute Stroke Care Program

Stroke is a neurological emergency. The early administration of specific treatment improves the prognosis of the patients. Emergency care systems with early warning for the hospital regarding patients who are candidates for this treatment (stroke code) increases the number of patients treated. Currently, reperfusion via thrombolysis for ischemic stroke and attention in stroke units are the bases of treatment. Healthcare professionals and health provision authorities need to work together to organize systems that ensure continuous quality care for the patients during the whole process of their disease. To implement this, there needs to be an appropriate analysis of the requirements and resources with the objective of their adjustment for efficient use. It is necessary to provide adequate information and continuous training for all professionals who are involved in stroke care, including primary care physicians, extrahospital emergency teams and all physicians involved in the care of stroke patients within the hospital. The neurologist has the function of coordinating the protocols of intrahospital care. These organizational plans should also take into account the process beyond the acute phase, to ensure the appropriate application of measures of secondary prevention, rehabilitation, and chronic care of the patients that remain in a dependent state. We describe here the stroke care program in the Community of Madrid (Spain).

Futile Interhospital Transfer for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke The Madrid Stroke Network Experience

Background and Purpose— The complexity of endovascular revascularization treatment (ERT) in acute ischemic stroke and the small number of patients eligible for treatment justify the development of stroke center networks with interhospital patient transfers. However, this approach might result in futile transfers (ie, the transfer of patients who ultimately do not undergo ERT). Our aim was to analyze the frequency of these futile transfers and the reasons for discarding ERT and to identify the possible associated factors. Methods— We analyzed an observational prospective ERT registry from a stroke collaboration ERT network consisting of 3 hospitals. There were interhospital transfers from the first attending hospital to the on-call ERT center for the patients for whom this therapy was indicated, either primarily or after intravenous thrombolysis (drip and shift). Results— The ERT protocol was activated for 199 patients, 129 of whom underwent ERT (64.8%). A total of 120 (60.3%) patients required a hospital transfer, 50 of whom (41%) ultimately did not undergo ERT. There were no differences in their baseline characteristics, the times from stroke onset, or in the delays in interhospital transfers between the transferred patients who were treated and those who were not treated. The main reasons for rejecting ERT after the interhospital transfer were clinical improvement/arterial recanalization (48%) and neuroimaging criteria (32%). Conclusions— Forty-one percent of the ERT transfers were futile, but none of the baseline patient characteristics predicted this result. Futility could be reduced if repetition of unnecessary diagnostic tests was avoided.

Blood pressure as a risk factor for stroke and the impact of antihypertensive treatment.

We review hypertension and blood pressure levels as risk factors for stroke and the impact of antihypertensive treatment on the prevention of first stroke event and of recurrent stroke, not only with respect to the prevention of vascular events but also the prevention of cognitive deterioration, dementia, and physical disability. We review whether pharmacological blockage of the renin-angiotensin system has additional long-term effects over that of control of blood pressure levels alone, and the benefit of treatment with antihypertensive drugs in normotensive patients. Therapeutic objectives for blood pressure levels after stroke are defined together with recommendations of drugs and doses which have been demonstrated to have the greatest benefit in the prevention of stroke.

Lipids and Stroke: The Opportunity of Lipid-Lowering Treatment

Dyslipemia is a clear risk factor (RF) for ischemic heart disease and peripheral artery disease, but its relation with ischemic stroke (IS) is not so clear. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor drugs or statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin) reduce the relative risk of IS by between 18 and 51% in patients with IHD, in patients with high vascular disease risk and in hypertensive patients with other RFs, acute coronary syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. According to the guidelines for use, statins are indicated in the majority of patients with IS since the risk is equivalent to that of IHD or high vascular disease risk. In view of the existing clinical evidence of benefit, it would not seem unreasonable to proceed with treatment of patients using statins while awaiting specific studies justifying their use. The non-lipid-lowering mechanisms of the statins and results of studies, such as the Heart Protection Study, provide evidence for widening the indications of statins beyond the prevention of dyslipemia, as a new therapeutic approach in the prevention of IS in patients with plasma levels of total cholesterol or low density lipoproteins currently considered within the normal distribution. The neuroprotective role, which these drugs may play in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia, remains to be clarified, but very recent evidence suggests that such patients may also benefit.

Diagnóstico y prevención secundaria del infarto cerebral en España. Estudio DIAPRESIC

Fundamento y objetivo Los datos sobre el seguimiento de las guias de practica clinica para el ictus son escasos en Espana. Por ello, determinamos la calidad del diagnostico y de las medidas de prevencion al alta en pacientes hospitalizados por infarto cerebral agudo (ICA) en Espana. Pacientes y metodo Se procedio a realizar, en una muestra aleatoria y estratificada de 30 hospitales publicos espanoles, una revision independiente de las historias clinicas de 1.448 pacientes consecutivos hospitalizados por ICA. La informacion recogida incluia los datos demograficos, factores de riesgo cerebrovascular (FRC), historia personal y familiar de enfermedad cerebrovascular, discapacidad cognitiva previa, subtipo de infarto, uso de escalas funcionales y cognitivas, pruebas complementarias realizadas durante la estancia hospitalaria, recomendaciones y tratamientos prescritos al alta. Resultados No se encontro ninguna informacion sobre la etiologia del ICA en el 46% de las historias clinicas. Se registro informacion sobre enfermedades vasculares previas en el 69%, e informacion sobre la preexistencia de discapacidad cognitiva unicamente en el 27%. El uso de escalas neurologicas se documento solo en el 21,1% de los casos. La informacion de FRC se recogio en el 99,2% de los casos. Se prescribio tratamiento con antihipertensivos y antidiabeticos en el 73,2 y el 70% de los pacientes hipertensos y diabeticos, respectivamente. Los farmacos hipolipemiantes se prescribieron en el 57,3% de los pacientes con dislipemia. Se administraron tratamientos antitromboticos al 82% de los pacientes (antiplaquetarios en el 77,5%, anticoagulantes orales en el 18,4% y tratamiento combinado en el 4,1%). No obstante, apenas se registro informacion acerca de los objetivos terapeuticos establecidos sobre los FRC. Conclusiones El seguimiento de las recomendaciones que recogen las guias de practica clinica, tanto por lo que se refiere al diagnostico como a la prevencion del ICA, es inadecuado en Espana. Particularmente deberia mejorarse la informacion incluida en la historia clinica sobre enfermedad cerebrovascular, evaluacion cognitiva, caracterizacion del infarto cerebral y tratamiento y control de los FRC.

Benefits of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke related to extra cranial internal carotid dissection. Dream or reality

Background Small clinical series have reported the safety of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke related to extracranial internal carotid dissection. However, no studies specifically analyzing the effects on stroke outcome are available. Aims Our goal was to evaluate whether patients with ischemic stroke related to extracranial internal carotid dissection obtain any benefit from intravenous thrombolysis. Methods Multicenter, prospective and observational study conducted in four university hospitals from the Madrid Stroke Network. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis were included, as well as patients with extracranial internal carotid dissection regardless of intravenous thrombolysis treatment. Stroke severity (NIHSS) and three-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale) were compared between the following groups: (1) intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients with ischemic stroke related to extracranial internal carotid dissection vs. other causes of stroke; (2) intravenous thrombolysis-treated extracranial internal carotid dissection patients vs. nonintravenous thrombolysis treated. Outcome was rated at three-months using the modified Rankin Scale. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Results A total of 625 intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients were included; 16 (2·56%) had extracranial internal carotid dissection. Besides, 27 patients with extracranial internal carotid dissection and ischemic stroke who did not receive intravenous thrombolysis were also included. As compared with other etiologies, patients with extracranial internal carotid dissection were younger, had similar stroke severity and showed less improvement in their NIHSS score at Day 7 (1·38; (95% CI −3·77 to 6·54) vs. 6·81; (95% CI −5·99 to 7·63) P=0·004), but without differences in good outcomes at three-months (43·8% vs. 58·2%; NS). Extracranial internal carotid dissection intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients had more severe strokes at admission than those who were nonintravenous thrombolysis treated (median NIHSS: 15 vs. 7; P=0·031). Intravenous thrombolysis was safe in extracranial internal carotid dissection with no symptomatic hemorrhagic events; however, without differences in good outcome compared with the natural course of extracranial internal carotid dissection (nonintravenous thrombolysis treated) after adjustment for stroke severity (46·7% vs. 64·3%; NS). Conclusions As compared with other etiologies, stroke due to extracranial internal carotid dissection seems to obtain similar benefits from intravenous thrombolysis in outcome at three-months. Although intravenous thrombolysis is safe in stroke attributable to extracranial internal carotid dissection, no differences in outcome were found when comparing intravenous thrombolysis treated with nonintravenous thrombolysis-treated patients, even after adjustment for stroke severity.

Risk Stratification for Recurrence and Mortality in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Background and Purpose— The risk of stroke recurrence in patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) is high, and the optimal antithrombotic strategy for secondary prevention is unclear. We investigated whether congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, and stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA; CHADS2) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores can stratify the long-term risk of ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence and death in ESUS. Methods— We pooled data sets of 11 stroke registries from Europe and America. ESUS was defined according to the Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate if prestroke CHADS2 and congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or TIA, vascular disease, age 65–74 years, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) scores were independently associated with the risk of ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence or death. The Kaplan–Meier product limit method was used to estimate the cumulative probability of ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence and death in different strata of the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Results— One hundred fifty-nine (5.6% per year) ischemic stroke/TIA recurrences and 148 (5.2% per year) deaths occurred in 1095 patients (median age, 68 years) followed-up for a median of 31 months. Compared with CHADS2 score 0, patients with CHADS2 score 1 and CHADS2 score >1 had higher risk of ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41–4.00 and HR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68–4.40, respectively) and death (HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 1.80–7.12, and HR, 5.45; 95% CI, 2.86–10.40, respectively). Compared with low-risk CHA2DS2-VASc score, patients with high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc score had higher risk of ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence (HR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.94–5.80) and death (HR, 13.0; 95% CI, 4.7–35.4). Conclusions— The risk of recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA and death in ESUS is reliably stratified by CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Compared with the low-risk group, patients in the high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc group have much higher risk of ischemic stroke recurrence/TIA and death, approximately 3-fold and 13-fold, respectively.

A collaborative system for endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: the Madrid Stroke Network experience.

The complexity and expense of endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) can present difficulties in bringing this approach closer to the patients. A collaborative node was implemented involving three stroke centres (SCs) within the Madrid Stroke Network to provide round‐the‐clock access to EVT for AIS.

Age- and sex-specific analysis of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source

Objective: To investigate whether the correlation of age and sex with the risk of recurrence and death seen in patients with previous ischemic stroke is also evident in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Methods: We pooled datasets of 11 stroke registries from Europe and America. ESUS was defined according to the Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. We performed Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier product limit analyses to investigate whether age (<60, 60–80, >80 years) and sex were independently associated with the risk for ischemic stroke/TIA recurrence or death. Results: Ischemic stroke/TIA recurrences and deaths per 100 patient-years were 2.46 and 1.01 in patients <60 years old, 5.76 and 5.23 in patients 60 to 80 years old, 7.88 and 11.58 in those >80 years old, 3.53 and 3.48 in women, and 4.49 and 3.98 in men, respectively. Female sex was not associated with increased risk for recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–1.58) or death (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.97–1.86). Compared with the group <60 years old, the 60- to 80- and >80-year groups had higher 10-year cumulative probability of recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA (14.0%, 47.9%, and 37.0%, respectively, p < 0.001) and death (6.4%, 40.6%, and 100%, respectively, p < 0.001) and higher risk for recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.21–2.98 and HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.57–4.70, respectively) and death (HR 4.43, 95% CI 2.32–8.44 and HR 8.01, 95% CI 3.98–16.10, respectively). Conclusions: Age, but not sex, is a strong predictor of stroke recurrence and death in ESUS. The risk is ≈3- and 8-fold higher in patients >80 years compared with those <60 years of age, respectively. The age distribution in the ongoing ESUS trials may potentially influence their power to detect a significant treatment association.

The metabolic syndrome and cerebrovascular disease: suspicion and evidence.

The metabolic syndrome (MS) is the combination of factors which, when occurring in an individual, can result in an increased risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and of episodes of vascular disease. We present a systematic review of the diagnostic criteria, pathology, prevalence and risk of vascular disease (including stroke) associated with the MS and, if the patients have already suffered cerebral ischemia and have the MS and/or DM, the appropriate therapies from which they could benefit.