Antonio Llombart

Gemcitabine Plus Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Prior Anthracycline Treatment

PURPOSEnThe objective of this phase III global study was to compare the efficacy of gemcitabine plus paclitaxel (GT) versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer. It was designed as a pivotal study for the approval of G for a breast cancer treatment indication.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients who relapsed after adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to gemcitabine,1,250 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 plus paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) on day 1; or, to paclitaxel at same dose on day 1 (both arms administered every 21 days, unblinded). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and secondary end points were time to progression (TTP), response rate (RR), progression-free survival, response duration, and toxicity. This final OS analysis was planned at 380 deaths.nnnRESULTSnA total of 266 patients were randomly assigned to GT and 263 to paclitaxel. Median survival on GT was 18.6 months versus 15.8 months on paclitaxel (log-rank P = . 0489), with an adjusted Cox hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.96; P = .0187). The TTP was longer (6.14 v 3.98 months; log-rank P = .0002) and the RR was better (41.4% v 26.2%; P = .0002) on GT. There was more grade 3 to 4 neutropenia on GT and grade 2 to 4 fatigue and neuropathy were slightly more prevalent on GT.nnnCONCLUSIONnThis phase III study documents a role for gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer after anthracycline-based adjuvant therapy. The results establish GT as a reasonable choice for women who require cytoreduction with manageable toxicities and validate ongoing testing of GT in the adjuvant setting.

A phase II placebo-controlled trial of neoadjuvant anastrozole alone or with gefitinib in early breast cancer.

PURPOSEnIncreased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression may promote breast cancer resistance to endocrine therapy. We have therefore investigated whether neoadjuvant gefitinib, an EGFR inhibitor, might overcome biologic and clinical resistance to neoadjuvant anastrozole in a phase II placebo-controlled trial.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPostmenopausal women with stage I to IIIB hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer received anastrozole 1 mg daily for 16 weeks and were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:5:5 to receive, in addition, gefitinib 250 mg/d orally for 16 weeks: placebo 1 tablet/d orally for 2 weeks and then gefitinib for 14 weeks or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary end point was biologic change in proliferation as measured by Ki67 at 2 and 16 weeks; the main secondary end point was overall objective response (OR).nnnRESULTSnTwo hundred six women were randomly assigned. Mean changes in Ki67 with anastrozole and gefitinib versus anastrozole alone were -77.4% and -83.6%, respectively, between baseline and 16 weeks (geometric mean ratio = 1.37; 95% CI, 0.79 to 2.39; P = .26), -80.1% and -71.3% between baseline and 2 weeks (geometric mean ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.25; P = .22) and -19.3% and -43% (geometric mean ratio = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.86 to 2.35; P = .16) between 2 and 16 weeks. ORs in the combination and anastrozole alone groups were 48% and 61% (estimated difference = -13.1%; 95% CI, -27.3% to 1.2%), respectively, with a nonsignificant trend against the combination (P = .08) and 48% versus 72% (estimated difference = -24.1%; 95% CI, -45.3% to -2.9%) in the progesterone-receptor-positive subgroup, which was significant (P = .03) and consistent with Ki67 changes. Common treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea, rash, alopecia, dry skin, and nausea. There was no evidence of a pharmacokinetic interaction.nnnCONCLUSIONnAddition of gefitinib to neoadjuvant anastrozole had no additional clinical or biologic effect, failing to support our original hypothesis.

A Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Aromatase Gene Is Associated with the Efficacy of the Aromatase Inhibitor Letrozole in Advanced Breast Carcinoma

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in breast cancer patients segregated with respect to DNA polymorphisms of the aromatase gene CYP19. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal patients (n = 67) with hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer were treated with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole. PCR allelic discrimination was used to examine three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in DNA obtained from breast carcinoma tissue. Two SNPs analyzed (rs10046 and rs4646) were located in the 3′ untranslated region and one (rs727479) was in the intron of the aromatase CYP19 gene. The primary end point of treatment efficacy was time to progression (TTP). Results: Median age was 62 years and median number of metastatic sites was 2. Observed allelic SNP frequencies were rs10046, 71%; rs4646, 46%; and rs727479, 63%. Of the 67 patients, 65 were evaluable for efficacy. Median TTP was 12.1 months. We observed no relationship between TTP and the rs10046 or rs727479 variants. In contrast, we found that TTP was significantly improved in patients with the rs4646 variant, compared with the wild-type gene (17.2 versus 6.4 months; P = 0.02). Conclusion: In patients with hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer treated with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, the presence of a SNP in the 3′ untranslated region of the CYP19 aromatase gene is associated with improved treatment efficacy. Testing for the CYP19 rs4646 SNP as a predictive tool for breast cancer patients on antiaromatase therapy deserves prospective evaluation.

Phase III Study of Gemcitabine Plus Docetaxel Compared With Capecitabine Plus Docetaxel for Anthracycline-Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSEnPatients with metastatic breast cancer who are pretreated with anthracyclines frequently receive taxane-based combinations. This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) with capecitabine-docetaxel (CD) in advanced breast cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients were randomly assigned to GD (G 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) or CD (C 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1 through 14; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 21 days. Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary objective.nnnRESULTSnPatient characteristics were balanced between arms (N = 305). Median PFS was 8.05 months (95% CI, 6.60 to 8.71) for GD and 7.98 (95% CI, 6.93 to 8.77) for CD (log-rank P = .121). Overall response rate (ORR) was 32% in both arms, and overall survival (OS) was not different between arms (P = .983). Time to treatment failure (TTF; defined as discontinuation, progressive disease, death as a result of any cause, or the start of a new anticancer therapy) was superior in the GD arm (P = .059). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms, except for grades 3 to 4 leukopenia (GD, 78%; CD, 66%; P = .025) and transfusions (GD, 17%; CD, 7%; P = .0051). Grades 3 to 4 diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-and-foot syndrome were significantly higher in the CD arm. Fewer patients in the GD arm discontinued because of drug-related adverse events (13% v 27% in CD; P = .002).nnnCONCLUSIONnNo difference was observed between GD and CD arms in PFS, ORR, and OS. TTF was longer in the GD arm. These findings, combined with a nonhematologic toxicity profile that favors GD over approved doses of CD, suggest that gemcitabine may be a better option than capecitabine in combination with docetaxel in this clinical setting.

Treatment of cancer with oral drugs: a position statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM)

Cancer treatment involves the participation of multiple medical specialties and, as our knowledge of the disease increases, this fact becomes even more apparent [1]. The degree of multidisciplinarity is determined by several factors, which include the severity and type of disease, the increasing diversity in the available pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies, and the range of specialists involved in cancer therapy, such as medical oncologists, radiotherapists, gynecologists, gastroenterologists, urologists, surgeons, and pneumologists, among others. Across Europe, the situation of cancer care can be variable due to the diversity of health systems, differences in drug reimbursement, and the degree of establishment of Medical Oncology as a medical specialty in the European Union states [2]. Within this multidisciplinary approach, each of the specialties involved in cancer treatment has a specific role, and according to an international panel of experts, the medical oncologist is the physician who plans global cancer treatment, administers systemic anticancer therapies to the patient, and takes care of the general well-being of the patient [3].

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: past, present and future

Combined treatments together with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy have contributed substantially to the improved survival rate in breast cancer. For more than 2 decades, tamoxifen has been the standard endocrine agent for hormone receptor-positive tumors. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors have, however, now proven to be superior to tamoxifen in the adjuvant and, more recently, the neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal patients. They have especially improved the surgical management of large or inoperable locally advanced breast tumors. Other advantages of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy are just emerging, but there are still many unanswered questions regarding its optimal use in this setting. A need to define how to select the patients who will benefit most from these therapies, the optimal duration of treatment, the best method to evaluate the treatment response achieved, the existence of predictive factors for response, or the superiority of certain endocrine agents over others has been observed. Other questions regarding which complementary local and systemic treatments should be administered after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy or which efficacy endpoints should be evaluated in clinical trials are also of interest. To answer as many of these questions as possible, we have carried out a critical analysis of the current literature on the use of endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer. In this review, we outline the rationale for its use, and consider data published to date to further clarify how to optimize its administration.

Denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer.

In women with advanced breast cancer, approximately three-quarters develop metastases to the bone, with a median survival after diagnosis of 2-3 years. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and RANK ligand (RANKL) belong to a signal pathway highly implicated in the development of bone metastases. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody with high affinity and specificity for RANKL, prevents the RANKL/RANK interaction and inhibits osteoclast formation and function, thereby decreasing bone resorption and increasing bone mass. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid showed superior efficacy in delaying time to first-on study SRE and time to first- and subsequent-on study SREs as well as reduction in bone turnover markers. These results led to the approval of denosumab by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), for the prevention of SREs in adults with bone metastases from solid tumors, including breast cancer.

APC and KRAS mutations in distal colorectal polyps are related to smoking habits in men: results of a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was (a) to evaluate the association between cigarette smoking and the prevalence of distal colorectal polyps and adenocarcinoma and (b) to analyse genetic alterations representing different molecular pathways of the colorectal carcinogenesis.MethodsA total of 623 asymptomatic male (mean age: 53 years; 50–65) car factory workers were included. Information on smoking habits and other lifestyle factors were collected followed by a 60 cm colonoscopy. APC and KRAS mutations and microsatellite status were determined in colorectal lesions (colorectal carcinoma (CRC), hyperplastic (HP) and adenomatous polyps (AP)). Data were analysed using unconditional multiple logistic regression models.ResultsSmokers had a higher prevalence of AP (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2–3.6; p<0.05) and HP (OR 5.4; 95% CI 2.6–11.1; p<0.05). No differences in CRC were observed. There was a dose-response relationship with the number of cigarettes smoked. The risk of developing AP or HP decreased after smoking cessation, even among heavy smokers (≥20 packs/year). KRAS mutations were more prevalent among smokers AP (OR 5.6; 95% CI 1.6–20.4; p=0.007). There was a trend of positive association with APC mutations (OR 3.5; 95% CI 0.9–4.4; p=0.096). APC and KRAS mutations were found in 36% and 61% of the HP of smokers, but were absent in non-smokers (p=0.89 and 0.78, respectively). There were no differences in MSI between smokers and non-smokers.ConclusionsCigarette smoking is associated with a higher risk of developing both HP and AP and a higher prevalence of mutations in APC and KRAS.

Bevacizumab plus preoperative chemotherapy in operable HER2 negative breast cancer: biomarkers and pathologic response

PurposeThe primary aim of this trial was to assess the rate of pathologic complete responses (pCR) of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by bevacizumab/docetaxel (BT), as neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC). Furthermore, the association between biomarkers and the pCR was explored.MethodsPatients with HER-negative operable stage II–III BC ≥2xa0cm were enrolled. Four cycles of AC (A 60xa0mg/m2 and C 600xa0mg/m2, every 3xa0weeks) followed by 4 cycles of BT (B 15xa0mg/kg and T 75xa0mg/m2, every 3xa0weeks), were planned. A core-biopsy was performed for biological markers assessment.ResultsSeventy-two women were included. Forty-three (63xa0%) patients were hormone receptor-positive. Sixty-four (89xa0%) completed the planned treatment, and 66 evaluable patients underwent surgery (92xa0%): a pCR was achieved in 16 of them (24, 95xa0% CI 15–36xa0%). pCR was significantly higher in tumors hormone receptor-negative, and in those with Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1) protein overexpression. The overall clinical response rate was 86xa0% (95xa0% CI 76–93xa0%), including 42 complete responses. No unexpected toxicities or treatment-related deaths were observed.ConclusionThis regimen showed a remarkable clinical and pathological activity: the suggested relation between pCR and AGTR1 overexpression should be confirmed in larger trials.

Recomendación para la determinación de HER2 en cáncer de mama. Consenso nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM)

Breast cancers with HER2 alterations are critical to identify because such tumors require unique treatment, including the use of targeted therapies. HER2 alterations at the DNA (amplification) and protein (overexpression) level usually occur in concert, and both in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry can be accurate methods to assess these alterations. However, recent studies including those conducted by the Association for Quality Assessment of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the experience of several national reference centres for HER2 testing have suggested that serious reproducibility issues exist with both techniques. To address this, a joint committee of both the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology has met to review guidelines for HER2 testing. Consensus recommendation are based not only on panellist’s experience but also in those consensus guidelines previously reported in several countries, such as United Stated, United Kingdom and Canada. n nThese guidelines include minimal requirements that Pathology Department must meet in order to guarantee appropriate HER2 testing in breast cancer. Pathology laboratories that do not meet these standards must put effort to reach them and, in the meantime, send clinical cases to reference centres.