Antonio Lombardi

Effect of Oral Alendronate on Bone Mineral Density and the Incidence of Fractures in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND Postmenopausal osteoporosis is a serious health problem, and additional treatments are needed. METHODS We studied the effects of oral alendronate, an aminobisphosphonate, on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures and height loss in 994 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The women were treated with placebo or alendronate (5 or 10 mg daily for three years, or 20 mg for two years followed by 5 mg for one year); all the women received 500 mg of calcium daily. Bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The occurrence of new vertebral fractures and the progression of vertebral deformities were determined by an analysis of digitized radiographs, and loss of height was determined by sequential height measurements. RESULTS The women receiving alendronate had significant, progressive increases in bone mineral density at all skeletal sites, whereas those receiving placebo had decreases in bone mineral density. At three years, the mean (+/- SE) differences in bone mineral density between the women receiving 10 mg of alendronate daily and those receiving placebo were 8.8 +/- 0.4 percent in the spine, 5.9 +/- 0.5 percent in the femoral neck, 7.8 +/- 0.6 percent in the trochanter, and 2.5 +/- 0.3 percent in the total body (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The 5-mg dose was less effective than the 10-mg dose, and the regimen of 20 mg followed by 5 mg was similar in efficacy to the 10-mg dose. Overall, treatment with alendronate was associated with a 48 percent reduction in the proportion of women with new vertebral fractures (3.2 percent, vs. 6.2 percent in the placebo group; P = 0.03), a decreased progression of vertebral deformities (33 percent, vs. 41 percent in the placebo group; P = 0.028), and a reduced loss of height (P = 0.005) and was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS Daily treatment with alendronate progressively increases the bone mass in the spine, hip, and total body and reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures, the progression of vertebral deformities, and height loss in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men

BACKGROUND Despite its association with disability, death, and increased medical costs, osteoporosis in men has been relatively neglected as a subject of study. There have been no large, controlled trials of treatment in men. METHODS In a two-year double-blind trial, we studied the effect of 10 mg of alendronate or placebo, given daily, on bone mineral density in 241 men (age, 31 to 87 years; mean, 63) with osteoporosis. Approximately one third had low serum free testosterone concentrations at base line; the rest had normal concentrations. Men with other secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded. All the men received calcium and vitamin D supplements. The main outcome measures were the percent changes in lumbar-spine, hip, and total-body bone mineral density. RESULTS The men who received alendronate had a mean (+/-SE) increase in bone mineral density of 7.1+/-0.3 percent at the lumbar spine, 2.5+/-0.4 percent at the femoral neck, and 2.0+/-0.2 percent for the total body (P<0.001 for all comparisons with base line). In contrast, men who received placebo had an increase in lumbar-spine bone mineral density of 1.8+/-0.5 percent (P<0.001 for the comparison with base line) and no significant changes in femoral-neck or total-body bone mineral density. The increase in bone mineral density in the alendronate group was greater than that in the placebo group at all measurement sites (P<0.001). The incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in the alendronate group than in the placebo group (0.8 percent vs. 7.1 percent, P=0.02). Men in the placebo group had a 2.4-mm decrease in height, as compared with a decrease of 0.6 mm in the alendronate group (P=0.02). Alendronate was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS In men with osteoporosis, alendronate significantly increases spine, hip, and total-body bone mineral density and helps prevent vertebral fractures and decreases in height.

Randomized Trial of Effect of Alendronate Continuation Versus Discontinuation in Women With Low BMD: Results From the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-Term Extension

To determine the effects of continuation versus discontinuation of alendronate on BMD and markers of bone turnover, we conducted an extension trial in which 1099 older women who received alendronate in the FIT were re‐randomized to alendronate or placebo. Compared with women who stopped alendronate, those continuing alendronate for 3 years maintained a higher BMD and greater reduction of bone turnover, showing benefit of continued treatment. However, among women who discontinued alendronate and took placebo in the extension, BMD remained higher, and reduction in bone turnover was greater than values at FIT baseline, showing persistence of alendronates effects on bone.

Odanacatib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: Three-year continued therapy and resolution of effect

The selective cathepsin K inhibitor odanacatib (ODN) progressively increased bone mineral density (BMD) and decreased bone‐resorption markers during 2 years of treatment in postmenopausal women with low BMD. A 1‐year extension study further assessed ODN efficacy and safety and the effects of discontinuing therapy. In the base study, postmenopausal women with BMD T‐scores between −2.0 and −3.5 at the lumbar spine or femur received placebo or ODN 3, 10, 25, or 50 mg weekly. After 2 years, patients (n = 189) were rerandomized to ODN 50 mg weekly or placebo for an additional year. Endpoints included BMD at the lumbar spine (primary), total hip, and hip subregions; levels of bone turnover markers; and safety assessments. Continued treatment with 50 mg of ODN for 3 years produced significant increases from baseline and from year 2 in BMD at the spine (7.9% and 2.3%) and total hip (5.8% and 2.4%). Urine cross‐linked N‐telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) remained suppressed at year 3 (−50.5%), but bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) was relatively unchanged from baseline. Treatment discontinuation resulted in bone loss at all sites, but BMD remained at or above baseline. After ODN discontinuation at month 24, bone turnover markers increased transiently above baseline, but this increase largely resolved by month 36. There were similar overall adverse‐event rates in both treatment groups. It is concluded that 3 years of ODN treatment resulted in progressive increases in BMD and was generally well tolerated. Bone‐resorption markers remained suppressed, whereas bone‐formation markers returned to near baseline. ODN effects were reversible: bone resorption increased transiently and BMD decreased following treatment discontinuation.

Efficacy of continued alendronate for fractures in women with and without prevalent vertebral fracture: The FLEX Trial

In the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long Term Extension (FLEX) Trial, 10 years of alendronate (ALN) did not significantly reduce the risk of nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) compared with 5 years of ALN. Continuing ALN reduced the risk of clinical but not morphometric vertebral fractures regardless of baseline vertebral fracture status. In previous studies, ALN efficacy for NVF prevention in women without prevalent vertebral fracture was limited to those with femoral neck (FN) T‐scores of −2.5 or less. To determine whether the effect of long‐term ALN on fracture differs by vertebral fracture status and femoral neck (FN) T‐score, we performed a post hoc analysis using FLEX data, a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial among 1099 postmenopausal women originally randomized to ALN in the FIT with mean ALN use of 5 years. In the FLEX Trial, women were randomized to placebo (40%) or ALN 5 mg/day (30%) or ALN 10 mg/day (30%) for an additional 5 years. Among women without vertebral fracture at FLEX baseline (n = 720), continuation of ALN reduced NVF in women with FLEX baseline FN T‐scores of −2.5 or less [relative risk (RR) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26–0.96] but not with T‐scores of greater than −2.5 and −2 or less (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37–1.66) or with T‐scores of greater than −2 (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.75–2.66; p for interaction = .019). Continuing ALN for 10 years instead of stopping after 5 years reduces NVF risk in women without prevalent vertebral fracture whose FN T‐scores, achieved after 5 years of ALN, are −2.5 or less but does not reduce risk of NVF in women whose T‐scores are greater than −2.

Significant Differential Effects of Alendronate, Estrogen, or Combination Therapy on the Rate of Bone Loss after Discontinuation of Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Context Alendronate and conjugated estrogen therapy both increase bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, but is the rate of bone loss greater when alendronate or estrogen therapy is discontinued? Contribution The discontinuation phase of this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial showed loss of spine and trochanter bone mass in postmenopausal women 1 year after withdrawal of estrogen and no such loss after withdrawal of either alendronate or combination therapy with alendronate and estrogen therapy. Cautions The study was not large or long enough to show whether discontinuation of estrogen therapy is associated with more fractures than discontinuation of either alendronate or combination therapy. The Editors Several antiresorptive agents have been shown to increase bone mass and reduce osteoporotic fractures (1-3). Because greater improvements in bone mass in women using therapy are associated with greater reductions in fracture (4, 5), investigators have begun to examine combinations of antiresorptive therapies to achieve more substantial gains in bone mass. Lindsay and colleagues demonstrated that addition of alendronate to hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women resulted in greater increases in bone mass than did maintenance of estrogen therapy alone (6). We previously showed that administration of alendronate and estrogen for 2 years in postmenopausal women with low bone mass resulted in statistically significantly greater increases in bone mass at the lumbar spine and femoral neck than those seen in women taking either agent alone (7). Furthermore, combination therapy was safe and resulted in normal findings on histologic examination of bone. In clinical practice, a key concern is the potential for accelerated bone loss when antiresorptive therapy is discontinued. Approximately one third of women discontinue hormone replacement therapy within 1 year of initiation (8). Older studies have demonstrated significant losses in bone mass after discontinuation of hormone replacement therapy (9-11). In contrast, when therapy with oral alendronate, 10 mg/d, is discontinued after osteoporosis treatment, bone mass at the hip and spine are maintained for 1 year (12). However, no head-to-head comparison of hormone replacement therapy and alendronate or the combination of antiresorptive therapy after discontinuation has been done. In addition, future losses in bone mass when patients discontinue therapy must be considered in management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. We therefore sought to examine the rate of bone loss after discontinuation of 2 years of alendronate therapy, hormone replacement therapy, or combination therapy. A subset of participants continued to take combination therapy for a third year to determine whether prolonged therapy remained beneficial. Methods Study Participants Four hundred twenty-five postmenopausal women 42 to 82 years of age who had low bone mass were enrolled in a 2-year randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 18 centers in the United States (7). Participants were recruited from clinics, private practices, newspaper advertisements, and targeted mailings. All participants who completed the initial study were asked to enroll in the 1-year extension. Participants were told that if they were taking active treatment, they might be randomly allocated to receive placebo or treatment for the third year and that if they were taking placebo, they would continue to do so. Entry criteria for the initial study are described elsewhere (7). All women had had hysterectomy and had a bone mineral density at the lumbar spine that was less than or equal to a T score of 2.0 SDs below the peak bone mass in young adults. Data on presence or absence of ovaries were not collected. Exclusion criteria were metabolic bone disease, a low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level, use of medications known to affect bone turnover, renal insufficiency, severe cardiac disease, and recent major upper gastrointestinal disease. The institutional review board at each clinical site approved the extension protocol. After signing the extension consent form and undergoing baseline evaluation for the extension, participants were allocated to blinded treatment on the basis of their original treatment in the first 2 years of the study. The randomization process was centrally determined by a statistician; as in the initial study, treatment allocation was concealed. Design As described for the initial study at each center, patients were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: placebo (n = 50); alendronate, 10 mg/d (n = 92); conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg/d (n = 143); or alendronate, 10 mg/d, plus conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg/d (n = 140) (Figure 1). The conjugated estrogen used was Premarin (Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). All women received calcium carbonate to provide 500 mg of elemental calcium daily. Figure 1. Design of original 2-year study and reallocation to extension phase for year 3. At the end of the second year, 244 of the 425 women (57%) continued in a 1-year extension of the study (Figure 1). Of these women, 28 who previously received placebo continued to do so. Women who were taking combination therapy were reallocated to continue taking combination therapy (n = 44) or switch to placebo (n = 41). In addition, 50 participants taking alendronate alone and 81 participants taking conjugated estrogen alone for the first 2 years were assigned to placebo for the third year. All patients and investigators remained blinded to medication allocation. Patients continued to receive calcium supplementation during the third year. Outcome Measures Women were examined at month 24 (baseline of the 1-year extension), month 30, and month 36. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, hip (femoral neck, trochanter, total hip), and total body were assessed by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry with QDR-1000W, QDR-1500, or QDR-2000 series bone densitometers (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, Massachusetts). A standard phantom was used for cross-calibration at all sites. Serum and urine samples were also obtained at months 24, 30, and 36 for assessment of biochemical markers of bone turnover, namely bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary N-telopeptide cross-links of collagen type I, corrected for creatinine. Statistical Analysis We used SAS software, version 6.12, TSLevel 0060, PROCedureGLM (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) to analyze the data. The primary efficacy end point was the mean difference between groups in the percentage change in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine from month 24 to month 36. Secondary efficacy end points were the mean percentage changes in bone mineral density of the hip and total body and biochemical markers of bone turnover. Overall percentage changes from month 0 to 36 in spine, hip, and total-body bone mineral density were also analyzed. The prespecified analysis was based on an intention-to-treat approach. At study design, we prespecified that all patients who had a baseline measurement and at least one measurement during treatment would be included in the analysis according to the group to which they were randomly allocated. The missing data were approximated by carrying forward the last available value on treatment forward to the missing time point. No data from the original 2-year study were carried forward to the extension period for any assessment of change. Women who violated the protocol were excluded from analysis of biochemical markers, as previously reported (7). Between-group comparisons of bone mineral density and biochemical measures were made by using analysis of variance techniques, with treatment, center, and treatment-by-center as factors. The assumption of homoscedasticity for the analysis of variance model was assessed by using the Levene test, and the normality assumption was assessed by using the ShapiroWilk test (13). If the assumptions were violated, a nonparametric method was used to corroborate the parametric results. The Fisher exact test was used to compare treatment groups for the proportion of participants who exceeded predefined limits of change in laboratory safety variables (13). Power calculations based on estimated sample sizes of 56 and 84 participants in the alendronate/placebo and estrogen/placebo treatment groups, respectively, yielded an estimate of 92% power to detect a 1.5% difference between mean percentage changes from month 24 to month 36 in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine ( = 0.05, two-tailed test). As requested by the journal editors, data on bone mineral density were also analyzed by using a mixed-model analysis, and results of this analysis are presented. An appropriate curvilinear function was fitted to the actual data, and the function was estimated by using all data available across time points for each participant. A model that regressed bone mineral density versus log (month + 1) provided the appropriate fit for the 3-year data and was used to analyze these data. The variable log (month + 1) was used because log (month) is undefined when month is 0, and log (month + 1) yields the value 0 at baseline. The fitted values from the model were used to obtain the percentage change during the period of interest. Data on bone mineral density from the mixed-model analyses are presented unless otherwise specified. Role of the Funding Source Data were collected by investigators at each study site with the support of Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey. Analyses were performed by statisticians at Merck & Co., Inc. Data were interpreted by the authors, who submitted the manuscript for publication. Results Patient Characteristics and Retention Baseline randomization characteristics did not differ between participants who entered the extension phase and those who did not. Baseline demographic characteristics of the 244 women who entered the extension phase were s

Oral alendronate induces progressive increases in bone mass of the spine, hip, and total body over 3 years in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

To determine the effects of long-term daily oral alendronate sodium (ALN) on bone mass in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, 19 centers enrolled 516 postmenopausal women aged 45-80 years with spine bone mineral density (BMD) at least 2.5 SD below the mean for young premenopausal women in a 3-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups: placebo; alendronate, 5 or 10 mg/day for 3 years; or alendronate, 20 mg/day for 2 years followed by 5 mg/day for the 3rd year. All patients received 500 mg/day of supplemental calcium to ensure adequate calcium intake. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at several skeletal sites. Nonsignificant mean decreases in BMD of the spine, femoral neck, and trochanter of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.4%, respectively, occurred in the placebo group at 3 years. Relative to placebo-treated patients, spine BMD increased by 5.4%, 7.4%, and 8.4% in the 5, 10, and 20/5 mg ALN groups, respectively. Increases at the femoral neck were 3.5%, 5.5%, and 4.3%, and those at the trochanter were 5.1%, 7.2%, and 7.2%, respectively. Thus, efficacy of 10 and 20/5 mg ALN was similar, whereas the 5 mg dose was less effective. BMD continued to increase over the entire 3-year study duration in the ALN-treated groups and, compared with the other dosage groups, 10 mg ALN produced the largest gains in BMD during the 3rd year. Changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and mineral homeostasis confirmed the effect of ALN to decrease bone turnover to a new steady-state level. The safety and tolerability of ALN were comparable with those of placebo. In summary, 10 mg daily oral ALN given for 3 years significantly and progressively increases bone mass and is a generally well-tolerated treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Biochemical and radiologic improvement in Paget's disease of bone treated with alendronate: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE The potent bisphosphonates offer great promise in the management of Pagets disease of bone, but are currently available only as parenteral preparations in most countries. There is a need for a well-tolerated, oral therapy. Furthermore, none of the currently available therapies have been rigorously demonstrated to heal the lytic bone lesions characteristic of this condition. Alendronate is a potent new oral aminobisphosphonate that has shown promising effects on Pagets disease in preliminary studies. METHODS We report a double-blind, randomized comparison of oral alendronate 40 mg/day and placebo over 6 months in 55 patients with Pagets disease. Efficacy was determined from measurements of biochemical indices of bone turnover (serum alkaline phosphatase and urine N-telopeptide) and blinded radiologic assessment of lytic bone lesions. RESULTS N-telopeptide excretion declined by 86% and serum alkaline phosphatase by 73% in patients receiving alendronate, but remained stable in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 between groups for both indices). Responses were similar whether or not patients had previously received bisphosphonate treatment. Alendronate treatment normalized alkaline phosphatase in 48% of patients. Forty-eight percent of alendronate-treated patients showed radiologic improvement in osteolysis whereas in the placebo group only 4% improved (P = 0.02 for between-groups comparison). No patient in either group showed worsening of osteolysis. Bone histomorphometry indicated that alendronate tended to normalize turnover indices. There was no evidence of abnormal mineralization in bone biopsies taken from 12 alendronate-treated subjects. The treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION Oral alendronate appears to be a safe and effective therapy for Pagets disease and results in healing of lytic bone lesions.

Odanacatib in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: five years of continued therapy in a phase 2 study.

Odanacatib (ODN) is a selective inhibitor of the collagenase cathepsin K that is highly expressed by osteoclasts. In this 2‐year, phase 2, dose‐ranging trial, postmenopausal women with bone mineral density (BMD) T‐scores −2.0 to −3.5 at spine or hip were randomized to weekly placebo or ODN 3, 10, 25, or 50 mg plus vitamin D3 and calcium. Prespecified trial‐extensions continued through 5 years. In year 3, all women were re‐randomized to ODN 50 mg or placebo. For years 4 and 5, women who received placebo or ODN 3 mg in years 1 and 2 and placebo in year 3 received ODN 50 mg; others continued year 3 treatments. Endpoints included lumbar spine (primary), hip, 1/3 radius, and total body BMD; markers of bone metabolism; and safety. Women in the year 4 to 5 extension receiving placebo (n = 41) or ODN 50 mg (n = 100) had similar baseline characteristics. For women who received ODN (10–50 mg) for 5 years, spine and hip BMD increased over time. With ODN 50 mg continually for 5 years (n = 13), mean lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 11.9% (7.2% to 16.5%) versus −0.4% (−3.1% to 2.3%) for women who were switched from ODN 50 mg to placebo after 2 years (n = 14). In pooled results of women receiving continuous ODN (10–50 mg, n = 26–29), year 5 geometric mean percent changes from baseline in bone resorption markers cross‐linked N‐telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX)/creatinine and cross‐linked C‐telopeptide (CTX) were approximately −55%, but near baseline for bone formation markers bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and amino‐terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (P1NP). In women switched from ODN 10 to 50 mg to placebo after 2 years (n = 25), bone turnover markers were near baseline. In summary, women receiving combinations of ODN (10–50 mg) for 5 years had gains in spine and hip BMD and showed larger reductions in bone resorption than bone formation markers. Discontinuation of ODN resulted in reversal of treatment effects. Treatment with ODN for up to 5 years was generally well‐tolerated.

Effects of oral alendronate and intranasal salmon calcitonin on bone mass and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of daily oral alendronate treatment on bone mass in postmenopausal women affected by osteoporosis. The efficacy of intranasal salmon calcitonin was also examined. Nine centers in Italy enrolled 286 postmenopausal women between the ages of 48 and 76 with spinal bone mineral density > or = 2 SD below adult mean peak in the two-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to one of four treatment arms: double-blind placebo, alendronate 10 mg/day, alendronate 20 mg/day, or open-label intranasal salmon calcitonin 100 IU/day; all patients received 500 mg Ca++ supplements. Bone mass was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry every six months for two years. Patients who received alendronate 10 or 20 mg experienced significant increases in bone mass at all sites measured. At the end of the second year, the mean percent changes, for alendronate 10 and 20 mg relative to placebo, were 5.2% and 7.3% at the lumbar spine, 3.8% and 4.6% at the femoral neck, and 7.1% and 7.5% at the trochanter, respectively. In contrast, intranasal salmon calcitonin failed to increase bone mineral mass significantly at any site. Both alendronate doses significantly decreased serum alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, and urinary pyridinolines, markers of bone turnover, whereas placebo and intranasal calcitonin did not. Alendronate was generally well tolerated and no serious adverse events were attributed to its use.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)