Antonio Lopez-Pousa

Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil to Paclitaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE To compare the antitumor activity and toxicity of the two induction chemotherapy treatments of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (FU; PCF) versus standard cisplatin and FU (CF), both followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility criteria included biopsy-proven, previously untreated, stage III or IV locally advanced HNC. Patients received either CF (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus FU 1000 [corrected] mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 1 through 5) or PCF (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2, and FU 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion on days 2 through 6); both regimens were administered for three cycles every 21 days. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response of greater than 80% in primary tumor received additional CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 plus 70 Gy). RESULTS A total of 382 eligible patients were randomly assigned to CF (n = 193) or PCF (n = 189). The CR rate was 14% in the CF arm v 33% in the PCF arm (P < .001). Median time to treatment failure was 12 months in the CF arm compared with 20 months in the PCF arm (log-rank test, P = .006; Tarone-Ware, P = .003). PCF patients had a trend to longer overall survival (OS; 37 months in CF arm v 43 months in PCF arm; log-rank test, P = .06; Tarone-Ware, P = .03). This difference was more evident in patients with unresectable disease (OS: 26 months in CF arm v 36 months in PCF arm; log-rank test, P = .04; Tarone-Ware, P = .03). CF patients had a higher occurrence of grade 2 to 4 mucositis than PCF patients (53% v 16%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSION Induction chemotherapy with PCF was better tolerated and resulted in a higher CR rate than CF. However, new trials that compare induction chemotherapy plus CRT versus CRT alone are needed to better define the role of neoadjuvant treatment.

Second neoplasm in patients with head and neck cancer

The improvement in locoregional control of head and neck carcinomas over the last decades does not appear to modify the final survival of these patients, mainly due to the appearance of distant metastases and second neoplasms. We ran a study to evaluate the incidence of second neoplasms and their characteristics in patients with head and neck carcinoma treated in our hospital.

Phase I/II Study of Cetuximab in Combination With Cisplatin or Carboplatin and Fluorouracil in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

PURPOSE This was an open, randomized, multicenter, phase I/II study to investigate the safety and tolerability of cetuximab in the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS Treatment comprised cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 with subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2) in combination with 3-week cycles of either cisplatin (100 mg/m2) or carboplatin (area under the curve, 5), each in combination with a 5-day infusion of fluorouracil (FU) at escalating doses of 600, 800, and 1,000 mg/m2/d. The study was divided into two phases: A, the first two cycles (6 weeks) focusing on the safety and tolerability of combination therapy; and B, the remaining time for those benefiting from therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were enrolled onto the study. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicities in phase A was acceptable. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in both groups were leucopenia (38%), asthenia (25%), vomiting (14%), and thrombocytopenia (15%), which are consistent with the known safety profiles of cetuximab, cisplatin/carboplatin, and FU. The overall response rate among patients was 36%, with no clear trend toward an increased efficacy at the highest dose of FU, and no impact of the concomitant chemotherapy regimens on cetuximab pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSION The combination of cetuximab, cisplatin/carboplatin, and FU was reasonably well tolerated and active in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN, and merits additional investigation. An FU dose of 1,000 mg/m2/d in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin can be recommended for additional studies.

Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Gemcitabine Plus Dacarbazine Versus Dacarbazine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas Study

PURPOSE To assess the activity and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine plus dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in a randomized, multicenter, phase II study using DTIC alone as a control arm. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously treated advanced STS were randomly assigned to receive either fixed-dose rate gemcitabine (10 mg/m2/min) at 1800 mg/m2 followed by DTIC at 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks, or DTIC alone at 1200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point of the study was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 months. RESULTS From November 2005 to September 2008, 113 patients were included. PFR at 3 months was 56% for gemcitabine plus DTIC versus 37% for DTIC alone (P = .001). Median progression-free survival was 4.2 months versus 2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.86; P = .005), and median overall survival was 16.8 months versus 8.2 months (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.90; P = .014); both favored the arm of gemcitabine plus DTIC. Gemcitabine plus DTIC was also associated with a higher objective response or higher stable disease rate than was DTIC alone (49% v 25%; P = .009). Severe toxicities were uncommon, and treatment discontinuation for toxicity was rare. Granulocytopenia was the more common serious adverse event, but febrile neutropenia was uncommon. Asthenia, emesis, and stomatitis were the most frequent nonhematologic effects. CONCLUSION The combination of gemcitabine and DTIC is active and well tolerated in patients with STS, providing in this phase II randomized trial superior progression-free survival and overall survival than DTIC alone. This regimen constitutes a valuable therapeutic alternative for these patients.

Short, full-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk adult soft tissue sarcomas: A randomized clinical trial from the Italian Sarcoma Group and the Spanish Sarcoma Group

PURPOSE A previous randomized clinical trial by the Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG) had shown a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in high-risk extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, the dose-intensity of the last two cycles was suboptimal. We then undertook a multicentric international phase III study to compare three and five cycles of the same CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomly assigned either to receive three cycles of preoperative CT with epirubicin 120 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 9 g/m(2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (arm A) or to receive the same three cycles of preoperative CT followed by two further cycles of postoperative CT (arm B). Noninferiority of the primary end point, overall survival (OS), was assessed by the CI of the hazard ratio (HR; arm A/arm B) obtained from the Cox model. RESULTS Between January 2002 and April 2007, 328 patients were recruited (164 patients in each arm). At a median follow-up of 63 months (interquartile range, 49 to 77 months), 100 deaths were recorded, 49 in arm A and 51 in arm B. Five-year OS probability was 0.70 for the entire group of patients (0.68 in arm A and 0.71 in arm B). The HR of arm A versus arm B was 1.00 (90% CI, 0.72 to 1.39). CONCLUSION In this population of patients with high-risk localized STS, three cycles of full-dose preoperative CT were not inferior to five cycles. The outcome compares favorably with the expected survival of patients with high-risk STS and was superimposable on the CT arm of the previous ISG trial.

Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil versus carboplatin and fluorouracil in patients with stage IV-M0 head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE A randomized trial was designed to compare cisplatin (CDDP) and fluorouracil (FU) versus carboplatin (CBDCA) and FU as neoadjuvant treatment in stage IV-M0 head and neck cancer to assess whether CBDCA-FU is better than CDDP-FU with regard to response and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive CDDP 100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 and FU 5,000 mg/m2 over a 120-hour continuous infusion, or CBDCA 400 mg/m2 over a 24-hour continuous infusion on day 1 and FU with the same schedule. Both regimens were repeated every 21 days. The patients received three courses of chemotherapy, excluding those who failed to achieve a partial response (PR) after the second course. Complete responders were treated with radiotherapy. The remaining patients underwent surgery if the tumor was resectable. RESULTS Interim analysis was performed when 95 patients were included. The trial was stopped due to significantly better results in the control arm. Differences in response (P = .04) were favorable to CDDP-FU. Hematologic toxicity predominated in the CBDCA-FU arm (P < .001). Mucositis and vomiting predominated in the CDDP-FU arm (P = .03, P < .001, respectively). Favorable outcomes (complete response [CR] plus any grade of toxicity and PR plus grade 0 to 3 toxicity) predominated in the CDDP-FU arm (P = .02). Only the treatment assigned was associated with response (P = .02) and favorable outcomes (P = .009) in the logistic regression analysis. In the CDDP-FU arm, disease-free and overall survival were significantly better. Cox regression analysis showed that only treatment association with disease-free survival remains significant. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that CDDP-FU is more effective than CBDCA-FU as neoadjuvant treatment in stage IV-M0 head and neck cancer.

A phase II trial of temozolomide as a 6-week, continuous, oral schedule in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a study by the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of temozolomide given as an extended schedule in patients with advanced sarcoma.

Efficacy of Sequential High-Dose Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide Compared With Standard-Dose Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: An Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas

PURPOSE To assess the progression-free survival (PFS) and antitumor response to standard-dose doxorubicin compared with sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable advanced soft tissue sarcoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) < 2, between the ages 18 and 65 years, and with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered in the study. The stratifications were: ECOG PS (0 v 1), location of metastases, and potentially resectable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to either doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks for 6 cycles (arm A) or doxorubicin at 30 mg/m(2) per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by ifosfamide at 12.5 g/m(2) delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles with filgastrim or pegfilgastrim support (arm B). RESULTS Between December 2003 and September 2007, 132 patients were entered onto the study. Febrile neutropenia, asthenia, and mucositis were more frequent in the arm B. The interim preplanned analysis for futility allowed the premature closure. Objective responses were observed in 23.4% of assessable patients in arm A and 24.1% in arm B. PFS was 26 weeks in the arm A and 24 weeks in arm B (P = .88). Overall survival did not differ between the two therapeutic arms (P = .14). CONCLUSION Single-agent doxorubicin remains the standard treatment in fit patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Phase II trial of first-line high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult: A study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

BACKGROUND The agent Ifosfamide (IFOS) is active against soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and patients who progress to IFOS at doses < or = 10 g/m2 show remissions when exposed to high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) (i.e., doses > 10 g/m2), which supports a dose-response relationship for this drug. Because of a lack of first-line studies in adult STS patients, we decided to test the activity and toxicity of HDI in a phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. IFOS was administered at a dose of 14 g/m2 by continuous infusion over six days every four weeks. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms/kg/day for 10 consecutive days was systematically administered after an episode of neutropenic fever or a delay in hematologic recovery. Patients were treated until progression or the occurrence of severe toxicity, and surgical rescue was attempted when possible. RESULTS Six pathology-established complete remissions and 11 partial remissions were observed in 45 assessable patients with a response rate of 37.7% (95% CI: 25.5%-50%). Grade 3-4 toxicity (% of cycles) was noted by hemoglobin (17%), leukocyte (75%), granulocyte (75%) and platelet (13%) counts in 158 evaluable cycles. GM-CSF was administered to 28 patients, and 25 suffered one or more episodes of neutropenic fever. Renal toxicity was mild and reversible with some degree of tubular and glomerular dysfunction detected in up to 60% of patients. Grade 3 CNS toxicity was observed in 32% of patients but only one required interruption of therapy. Sixty-four per cent of the patients had asthenia grade 2-3 and 20% were excluded from the study due to excessive toxicity. There was one treatment-related death. CONCLUSIONS HDI is an active drug in first-line therapy against adult STS. Different administration schedules should be evaluated in an attempt to improve its therapeutic index.

Assessment of anthracycline-induced myocardial damage by quantitative indium 111 myosin-specific monoclonal antibody studies

To assess chemotherapeutically induced myocardial damage, myosin-specific antibody scans and ejection fraction measurements were performed in 32 patients with breast cancer and in 9 patients with other tumours. All patients had received chemotherapy including anthracyclines. The ejection fraction decreased by ≥ 10% in 14 of 41 (34%) patients after chemotherapy. Antimyosin uptake in the myocardium was observed in 38 of 41 (92%) patients after chemotherapy. Antimyosin uptake was quantified by means of a heart-to-lung ratio, revealing a correlation between the degree of antimyosin uptake in the myocardium and the cumulative dose of anthracycline. Patients with a decreased ejection fraction showed more intense antimyosin uptake, indicating more severe myocardial damage. A higher degree of antimyosin uptake was found in 17 breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin compared with 15 patients treated with mitoxantrone. We conclude that antimyosin studies provide a sensitive, non-invasive method to monitor myocardial damage in patients treated with anthracyclines. Antimyosin uptake in the myocardium precedes ejection fraction deterioration. This technique may be helpful in the early identification of patients at risk of congestive heart failure during chemotherapy including anthracyclines.