Antonio M. Ballesta

c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value.

The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the sera of 50 healthy subjects, 58 patients with benign breast diseases, and 413 patients with breast cancer (186 locoregional, 185 with advanced disease, and 42 with no evidence of disease). Using 15 U/ml as the cut-off, no healthy subjects or patients with benign diseases and only 2.4% of no evidence of disease patients had elevated serum levels. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 29% (101/370) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional 9%, metastases 45.4%). CEA (cut-off 5 U/ml) and CA 15.3 (cut-off 35 U/ml) sensitivity was 18% and 16% in patients with locoregional disease and 61% and 70% in those patients with advanced disease, respectively. A trend toward higher serum levels of all three tumor markers in patients with nodal involvement or greater tumor size was found, but was statistically significant only with CEA (p < 0.01). By contrast, c-erbB-2 was related to steroid receptors, in both locoregional and metastatic tumors. When the prognostic value of these markers was evaluated, patients with abnormally high presurgical CEA and c-erbB-2 had a worse prognosis than those patients with normal values, in both node-negative (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) and node-positive patients (p < 0.556 and p < 0.001, respectively). By contrast, no relationship was found between CA 15.3 values and prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that CEA and c-erbB-2 were also prognostic factors. The correlation between serum and tissue levels of c-erbB-2 was studied in the tumors of 161 patients. Significantly higher c-erbB-2 serum levels were found in patients with overexpression in tissue by immunohistochemistry, in both locoregional and advanced disease (p=0.0001). Serum concentrations in patients with advanced disease were related to the site of recurrence, with significantly higher values in patients with metastases (mainly in those with liver metastases) than in those with locoregional recurrence. In summary, c-erbB-2 serum levels seem to be a useful tumor marker in the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Using all three tumor markers, sensitivity was 35% in patients with locoregional breast cancer and 88% in patients with recurrence.

Use of serial carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15.3 assays in detecting relapses in breast cancer patients

SummaryTo evaluate the utility of CEA and CA 15.3 for early diagnosis of recurrence, serial serum determinations of both antigens were performed in 1023 patients (follow-up: 1–10 years, mean 6.2 years) with primary breast cancer (CA 15.3 in 533 cases) and no evidence of residual disease (NED) after radical treatment (radical mastectomy or simple mastectomy and radiotherapy). 246 patients developed metastases during follow-up.Results: CEA and CA 15.3 were elevated (> 10 ng/ml or > 60 U/ml, respectively) prior to diagnosis in 40% (98/246) and 41% (37/91) of the patients with recurrence, with a lead time of 4.9 ± 2.2 and 4.2 ± 2.3 months, respectively. When patients with locoregional recurrences were excluded, sensitivity improved to 46% (CEA) and 54% (CA 15.3), and to 64% with both tumor markers (CEA and/or CA 15.3). Higher levels of both CEA and CA 15.3 at diagnosis of recurrence, higher sensitivity in early diagnosis of relapse, and a higher lead time were found in ER+ (CEA) or PgR+ patients (CA 15.3) than in those that were negative for these receptors in the primary tumor (p < 0.001). Specificity of the tumor markers was 99% for both CEA (777 NED patients) and for CA 15.3 (444 NED patients), respectively. In conclusion, CEA and CA 15.3 are useful tools for early diagnosis of metastases, mainly in those patients with ER+ or PR+ tumors.

Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors.

The presence of a tumor antigen in human colonic carcinomas and their metastases was described about 25 years ago. This antigen, called carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), is one of the first known tumor markers. Since then, many more have been described, but CEA, determined alone or in combination with others, is still one of the most used. CEA is not organ specific and abnormal values may be found in a wide range of carcinomas, especially those with gastrointestinal involvement. CEA assay should not be used for cancer diagnosis because its sensitivity in patients without cancer metastases is low. In addition, abnormal CEA values may be found in patients with benign diseases. However, the probability of malignancy increases directly with CEA concentration. Its main clinical applications are prognosis, early diagnosis of recurrence and follow-up of patients with carcinomas. In a wide range of malignancies, CEA serum levels are clearly related to tumor stage. Presurgical CEA serum levels are a well-established prognostic factor in colorectal, breast and lung cancer. Patients presenting with increased preoperative CEA serum levels have both a shorter disease-free interval and lower survival than those with normal CEA levels. In the early diagnosis of recurrence, CEA also plays an important role: in about 70-85% of patients with colorectal tumors and in 40-50% with breast cancer, CEA serial increase is the first sign of tumor recurrence. In patients with disseminated tumors, serial determinations are also a useful tool for therapy monitoring: CEA values decrease with effective treatment while stable or increasing values are observed when treatment is not effective.

Collagen‐Related Markers of Bone Turnover Reflect the Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

The influence of a nonskeletal disease with increased connective tissue synthesis or degradation in the collagen‐related markers of bone turnover has been evaluated in 34 women with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC; age range 41–81 years), a disease with increased hepatic fibrosis, often associated with osteoporosis. Serum osteocalcin (BGP), and carboxy‐terminal (PICP) and amino‐terminal (PINP) propeptides of type I collagen were assessed as indexes of bone formation, whereas serum tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), and cross‐linked carboxy‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP), and urinary hydroxyproline (HYP), pyridinoline (PYR), deoxypyridinoline (DPYR), and type I collagen cross‐linked N‐ (NTX) and C‐telopeptide (CTX) were measured as markers of bone resorption. The histologic stage of the disease and serum amino‐terminal propeptide of type III collagen (PIIINP) as an index of liver fibrogenesis were also evaluated. BGP levels were significantly lower, whereas PICP and PINP levels were higher in patients than in controls. Among the bone resorption markers, serum ICTP and urinary PYR, DPYR, HYP, NTX, and CTX levels were significantly higher in patients than in controls. Serum PIIINP levels were also increased in PBC patients. BGP did not correlate with PICP and PINP, but these markers of bone formation as well as ICTP, PYR, DPYR, and NTX correlated with serum PIIINP levels. Serum TRAP did not correlate with collagen‐related markers of bone resorption. Moreover, patients with PIIINP and bilirubin above normal levels had higher PICP, PINP, ICTP PYR, DPYR, CTX, and NTX. These markers correlated with the histologic stage of the disease, but not with osteopenia measured by densitometric procedures in 22 patients. In conclusion, collagen‐related markers of bone turnover do not reflect bone remodeling in PBC. The close association of these markers with PIIINP and the clinical and histologic stage of the liver disease suggests that they are influenced by liver collagen metabolism.

Usefulness of biochemical markers of bone turnover in assessing response to the treatment of paget’s disease

The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of biochemical markers of bone turnover for monitoring treatment efficacy of Pagets disease of bone, and also to evaluate the utility of biological variation data in choosing the best markers for assessment of biochemical response to therapy. Thirty-eight patients with Pagets disease were included in a prospective study. All received 400 mg/day of oral tiludronate for 3 months. In 31 patients that completed treatment, biochemical markers were measured at baseline and at 1 and 6 months after treatment ended. In serum we determined the levels of total alkaline phosphatase (tAP), bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTx). Urine samples were analyzed for hydroxyproline (Hyp) and for C- and N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx and NTx, respectively). Quantitative bone scintigraphy was performed at baseline and at 6 months after discontinuation of therapy. A ratio for monitoring response to treatment was obtained for each marker. This ratio reflected the size of treatment response of the marker in relation to the value of its critical difference. Thus, ratio values of >1 indicated a significant decrease of the marker after therapy. In addition, response to therapy was evaluated according to disease activity. Mean values of all markers of bone turnover decreased significantly after therapy. Serum bAP and PINP and urinary NTx showed the highest percentage reduction (between 58% and 68%). Furthermore, serum bAP and PINP showed the highest ratios for monitoring changes induced by treatment, followed by serum tAP and urinary NTx. sCTx and urinary CTx as well as Hyp showed mean ratios for monitoring changes of <1, indicating a low sensitivity for monitoring treatment. Patients with polyostotic disease showed a continuous decrease in mean values for all markers at 6 months from the end of therapy, whereas, in monostotic patients, there was a trend toward increased levels at this timepoint. In conclusion, serum bAP and PINP were the most sensitive markers for monitoring treatment efficacy in Pagets disease, although serum tAP and urinary NTx were also sensitive markers for monitoring changes. Data on biological variation are useful for assessing actual changes induced by treatment.

Serum Levels of C-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) in Patients with Malignant and Non-Malignant Diseases

The diagnostic value of a new tumor marker, c-erbB-2, was studied in the sera of 50 controls, 112 patients with benign diseases and 534 patients with malignancies. Using 15 U/ml as the cutoff, no healthy subjects, patients with benign diseases (excluding liver cirrhosis) or patients with no evidence of disease (45 patients) had serum levels higher than this limit. Abnormal c-erbB-2 levels were found in 38.5% (10 of 26) of the patients with liver cirrhosis and in 26.7% (8 of 30) of those patients with primary liver cancer. No differences were found between the c-erbB-2 serum concentrations in liver cirrhosis or primary liver cancer, suggesting the possible catabolism of this antigen in the liver. Abnormal levels of this antigen were found in 20% (56 of 278) of the patients with breast carcinoma (locoregional 7%, metastases 41.5%), in 21% (6 of 28) of ovarian carcinomas (stage I-II 0%, stage III-IV 42.8%), in 21% (3 of 14) of the colorectal tumors (locoregional 0%, metastases 30%), and in 13.3% (11 of 83) of the patients with lung cancer (locoregional 11.5%, metastases 16%). C-erbB-2 sensitivity in other patients with advanced disease was: 25% (9 of 36) in prostatic cancer, 22% (2 of 9) in gastric cancer, and 11% (1 of 9) in vesical tumors. When patients with liver metastases were excluded abnormal c-erbB-2 serum levels were only found in breast, lung, prostatic and ovarian carcinomas. C-erbB-2 sensitivity in patients with lung cancer was related to tumor histology with significantly higher value in non-small cell lung cancer (mainly adenocarcinomas) than in patients with small cell lung cancer (p < 0.013). C-erbB-2 concentrations in patients with breast cancer were significantly higher in patients with recurrence (mainly bone and liver metastases) and in patients with progesterone receptor-negative (< 15 fmol/mg) tumors (p < 0.01). In conclusion, c-erbB-2 is not a specific tumor marker and abnormal serum levels may be found in patients with liver pathologies. Its sensitivity suggests its possible application as a tumor marker in breast, ovarian, lung (mainly adenocarcinomas) and prostatic tumors.

Lack of interaction of apolipoprotein E phenotype with the lipoprotein response to lovastatin or gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

The magnitude of serum lipid changes in response to hypolipidemic drugs varies considerably between individuals. These differences may be due to interactions between genetic and environmental factors that effect drug bioavailability or the capacity of the lipid-regulating enzyme and receptor targets to be affected. The apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene locus has been examined in this regard, but reports are conflicting on the effect of its variability on the response to hypolipidemic drugs. We investigated the effect of apoE polymorphism on the serum lipid response to the hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor lovastatin and the fibric acid derivative gemfibrozil. Lipoprotein changes were assessed after 12 weeks of therapy in 106 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia treated with lovastastin and in 63 given gemfibrozil therapy. No significant effect of the apoE phenotypes E3/2, E3/3, or E4/3 on the heterogeneity of lipid responses to either drug was found.

S-100 Protein Serum Levels in Patients with Benign and Malignant Diseases: False-Positive Results Related to Liver and Renal Function

S-100 serum concentrations were analyzed in 39 healthy people, 130 patients with benign diseases and 304 patients with malignancies, including 49 patients with locoregional diseases and 255 with advanced diseases. S-100 was determined by a commercial immunoluminometric assay, and 0.20 ng/ml was considered to be the upper limit of normality. In none of the healthy people was S-100 higher than 0.2 ng/ml. Slightly high S-100 concentrations were found in 33 out of 130 patients (25%) with benign diseases (mean 0.21 ± 0.45 ng/ml). Significantly higher S-100 serum levels were found in patients with liver cirrhosis (63%, 10/16) (p = 0.024) or renal failure (45%, 8/18) (p = 0.03) than in patients with other benign diseases or in healthy people. Abnormal S-100 serum levels were found in 68 of the patients (22.5%) with malignancy (mean 1.01 ± 5.9 ng/ml). The highest S-100 concentrations were found in patients with malignant melanomas (p = 0.001). Excluding melanoma patients, the S-100 serum levels in patients with malignancies were not related to tumor origin or stage but were clearly related to the site of metastasis, with patients with liver metastases showing higher values than patients with metastases without liver involvement (p = 0.02). No statistical differences were found among patients with liver cirrhosis, primary liver cancer or liver metastases. In conclusion, S-100 is a useful marker for melanoma, but abnormal levels of this tumor marker may be found in benign and malignant diseases associated with liver or renal injury.

Components of Biological Variation of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Paget's Bone Disease

The aims of this study were to evaluate the components of biological variation of the new markers of bone turnover in patients with Pagets bone disease and to compare the results with data obtained in healthy subjects. Fifteen patients with Pagets disease in a stable period of the disease and 12 healthy premenopausal women were included for a 1 year follow-up study. Within- and between-subject biological variation, indices of individuality, and critical differences were evaluated for the following biochemical markers: in serum, total (tAP), and bone (bAP) alkaline phosphatases, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and beta-carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen (sCTx); in urine, hydroxyproline (Hyp), and amino (NTx) and beta-carboxyterminal (CTx) telopeptides of collagen type I. Serum markers of bone turnover showed lower biological variability than urinary markers. Within-subject biological variation was higher in pagetic patients than in healthy subjects for all serum markers. In both groups, bAP presented the lowest within-subject biological variation. In pagetic patients, all markers presented indices of individuality of <0.6, indicating their usefulness for patient monitoring. Critical differences were lower for serum markers than for urinary markers. Among pagetic patients, serum bAP and PINP showed the lowest critical differences with values close to 30%, whereas urinary CTx presented the highest critical differences (near 70%). Conversely, in healthy subjects, tAP was the marker with the lowest critical differences, being two-fold higher in pagetic patients. This study confirms the lower sensitivity of urinary markers to detect significant changes and indicates that data obtained on biological variations from healthy populations cannot always be extrapolated to pathological conditions. In addition, serum bAP and PINP seem to be the markers that best reflect a significant change in activity of Pagets disease.

Analysis of type T1 and T2 cytokines in patients with prostate cancer.

It has been proposed that a dysregulation in the balance between type T1 (IL‐2, IFN‐γ) and type T2 (IL‐4, IL‐10) cytokines may be implicated in the development of cancer.