Antonio Mantero

Measurement of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis: Four echocardiographic methods compared with direct measurement of anatomic orifices

OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare the mitral valve areas of patients with rheumatic mitral valve stenoses as determined by means of four echocardiographic and Doppler methods with those obtained by direct anatomic measurements. BACKGROUND There has been no systemic comparison between Doppler-determined valve areas and the true anatomic orifice in a single cohort. METHODS In 30 patients with mitral stenosis, the mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area were compared with the values directly measured on the corresponding excised specimen by means of a custom-built sizer. RESULTS The correlation coefficient was r = 0.95 (SE 0.06, p < 0.0001) for two-dimensional planimetry; r = 0.80 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for pressure half-time; r = 0.87 (SE 0.09, p < 0.0001) for flow convergence region; and r = 0.54 (SD 0.1, p < 0.002) for flow area. Two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry, pressure half-time, flow convergence region and flow area overestimated the actual anatomic orifice by > 0.3 cm2 in 2, 1, 6 and 0 patients, respectively, and underestimated it by > 0.3 cm2 in 0, 4, 1 and 8 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Mitral valve areas determined by two-dimensional planimetry, pressure half-time and proximal flow convergence region reliably correlated with size of the anatomic orifice. The flow area method provided a less reliable correlation.

Effect of Sample Volume Location on Doppler-derived Transmitral Inflow Velocity Values in 288 Normal Subjects 20 to 80 Years Old: An Echocardiographic, Two-Dimensional Color Doppler Cooperative Study

The aims of the study were to evaluate in a population of 288 normal subjects 20 to 80 years old (1) the normal values of the indexes of the mitral flow velocity pattern measured either at the tips of the mitral leaflets or at the annulus; (2) whether there was a significant difference between the values obtained at the tips compared with those measured at the mitral annulus; (3) the correlation with aging between the indexes measured in the two different positions; and (4) whether certain physiological variables have different effects on diastolic function measured in the two different positions. The highest values were always measured at the tips of the mitral leaflets (p < 0.05); only atrial filling fraction, E acceleration time, and E deceleration velocity had higher values when measured at the level of the annulus (p < 0.05). The A-wave peak velocity had the same mean value when measured at both the tips and at the annulus. A significant difference in the correlation between parameters measured at the tips of the mitral leaflets with age and at the annulus (with age) was observed for the following parameters: (1) peak E velocity, E integral, total integral and E acceleration showed better correlation with age when measured at the annulus (p < 0.02); (2) peak A velocity and A integral showed better correlation with age when measured at the tips of the mitral leaflets (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that age was the variable that had the most influence on diastolic function parameters; heart rate had less influence on the diastolic function indexes.

C-reactive protein but not atrial dysfunction predicts recurrences of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion in patients with preserved left ventricular function.

Objectives Maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is a major clinical challenge also in patients with preserved left ventricular function. Subclinical inflammation and atrial strain have been recognized as important contributors to atrial fibrillation onset and perpetuation. Aim of the study was to compare the predictive role of C-reactive protein (CRP) and indices of atrial dysfunction in relation to subacute arrhythmic recurrence rate in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods We studied 53 patients with a mean LVEF of 58.7 ± 6%. Left atrial diameter and area, left atrial auricle emptying velocity, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and CRP levels were determined few hours before electrical cardioversion. NT-proBNP and CRP levels were also measured 1 h and 3 weeks after cardioversion. Results Subacute atrial fibrillation recurrences were documented in 18 (33.9%) patients. Whereas none of the parameters reflecting atrial dysfunction predicted arrhythmic outcome, higher CRP levels (>3.0 mg/l) were significantly associated with atrial fibrillation recurrences [odds ratio (OR): 1.6; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4–2.5; P = 0.031]. No changes in CRP levels were evident after cardioversion independently of underlying rhythm. On the contrary, NT-proBNP levels, which were correlated with left atrial auricle emptying velocity, significantly decreased only in patients who maintained sinus rhythm (from 638 ± 329 to 295 ± 261 pg/ml; P < 0.001). Conclusion The present study demonstrates that in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and preserved LVEF, CRP level is an independent predictor of atrial fibrillation subacute recurrence rate, whereas none of the indices of atrial dysfunction is associated with arrhythmic outcome. NT-proBNP levels reflect, instead, the hemodynamic alterations secondary to arrhythmia presence.

Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging: It is Time to Get on Board! A “Società Italiana di Ecocardiografia e CardioVascular Imaging” Statement

IntroductIon Along with the growth of patients at cardiovascular risk, a new wave is hitting the world of health care. Over the recent decade, noninvasive and invasive imaging technologies have been protagonists of a dramatic evolution. This process, as a Tsunami, may overwhelm the way the physicians were used to work until now [Figure 1]. The greater availability and reliability of current imaging modalities to reveal the details of various cardiac structures and pathophysiology has made the evaluation of cardiovascular disease multimodal. Hence, along with traditional imaging modalities, such as single photon computed emission tomography (SPECT) or tissue Doppler imaging and two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), new technologies emerge in the scene such as deformation/ speckle tracking imaging (strain and strain rate) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE); miniaturized or handheld cardiovascular ultrasound machine; positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as well as the combination of them, resulting in the so-called “fusion imaging.”

Bicuspid aortic valve registry of the Italian society of echocardiography and cardiovascular imaging (REgistro della valvola aortica bicuspide della società italiana di ECocardiografia e CArdiovascular imaging): Rationale and study design

Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease, affecting 0.5%–2% of the general population. It is associated not only with notable valvular risk (aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation, endocarditis) but also with aortopathy with a wide spectrum of unpredictable clinical presentations, including aneurysmal dilation of the aortic root and/or ascending thoracic aorta, isthmic coarctation, aortic dissection, or wall rupture. Methods: The REgistro della Valvola Aortica Bicuspide della Società Italiana di ECocardiografia e CArdiovascular Imaging is a retrospective (from January 1, 2010)/prospective, multicenter, observational registry, expected to enroll 3000 patients with definitive diagnosis of BAV made by transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, or at surgery. Inclusion criteria were definitive diagnosis of BAV. Patients will be enrolled regardless of the presence and severity of aortic valve dysfunction or aortic vessel disease and the coexistence of other congenital cardiovascular malformations. Exclusion criteria were uncertain BAV diagnosis, impossibility of obtaining informed consent, inability to carry out the follow-up. Anamnestic, demographic, clinical, and instrumental data collected both at first evaluation and during follow-up will be integrated into dedicated software. The aim is to derive a data set of unselected BAV patients with the main purpose of assessing the current clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of BAV. Conclusions: A multicenter registry covering a large population of BAV patients could have a profound impact on the understanding of the natural history of this disease and could influence its management.