Antonio Passaro

Bone and brain metastasis in lung cancer: recent advances in therapeutic strategies

Bone and brain metastases are a very common secondary localization of disease in patients with lung cancer. The prognosis of these patients is still poor with a median survival of less than 1 year. Current therapeutic approaches include palliative radiotherapy and systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents. For bone metastasis, zoledronic acid is the most commonly used bisphosphonate to prevent, reduce the incidence and delay the onset of skeletal-related events (SREs). Recently, denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB (RANK) ligand inhibiting the maturation of pre-osteoclasts into osteoclasts, showed increased time to SREs and overall survival compared with zoledronic acid. The treatment of brain metastasis is still controversial. Available standard therapeutic options, such as whole brain radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy, provide a slight improvement in local control, overall survival and symptom relief. More recently, novel target agents such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib have shown activity in patients with brain metastasis. Inter alia, in patients harboring EGFR mutations, the administration of EGFR TKIs is followed by a response rate of 70–80%, and a longer progression-free and overall survival than those obtained with standard chemotherapeutic regimens. This review is focused on the evidence for therapeutic strategies in bone and brain metastases due to lung cancer.

Management of Nonhematologic Toxicities Associated With Different EGFR-TKIs in Advanced NSCLC: A Comparison Analysis

INTRODUCTION Nonhematologic toxicities are frequently observed in patients receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS For the 2010-2013 period, the authors evaluated 158 patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated in first-, second-, or third-line with the EGFR-TKIs afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib. The study assessed the incidence of cutaneous rash, diarrhea, and mucositis/stomatitis by grade at initial assessment (< 30 days) compared with last assessment after correct management, and the authors developed a proposal for a new modality of evaluation and management of adverse events. RESULTS The incidence of adverse events (cutaneous rash, diarrhea, and mucositis/stomatitis), classified by grade at the initial assessment and the reevaluation after management, demonstrated a reduction of about 95% from the starting toxicity grade for diarrhea, 65% for cutaneous rash, and approximately 70% for mucositis/stomatitis. CONCLUSION These results suggest that the safety profiles regarding cutaneous rash, diarrhea, and mucositis after afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib treatment become similar after prompt and correct management. This analysis suggests that immediate therapeutic approaches and continuous management are required to ensure treatments without severe adverse events that could adversely affect survival and the quality of life.

Targeting EGFR T790M mutation in NSCLC: from biology to evaluation and treatment.

Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. Abstract The identification of EGFR mutations and their respectively tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), changed dramatically treatment and survival of patients with EGFR‐positive lung cancer. Nowadays, different EGFR TKIs as afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib are approved worldwide for the treatment of NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations, in particular exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (Leu858Arg) substitution EGFR mutations. In first‐line setting, when comparing with platinum‐based chemotherapy, these target drugs improves progression‐free survival, response rate and quality of life. Unfortunately, the development of different mechanism of resistance, limits the long term efficacy of these agents. The most clear mechanism of resistance is the development of EGFR Thr790Met mutation. Against this new target, different third‐generation EGFR‐mutant‐selective TKIs, such as osimertinib, rociletinib and olmutinib, showed a great activity. In this review, we summarize the scientific evidences about biology, evaluation and treatment on NSCLC with EGFR T790M mutation.

Second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors?

After first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients remain candidates for a second-line treatment. Docetaxel, pemetrexed and erlotinib are currently approved in the USA and Europe as second-line therapy for NSCLC, while gefitinib is approved and licensed in Europe, but not in the USA, for EGF receptor-mutated patients in the same setting. Results of the registration trials for these four agents show similar efficacy in terms of objective response rate and survival, but significantly different toxicity and tolerability. Therefore, at the time of failure of first-line treatment, it is crucial to evaluate different clinical factors that could help choose the second-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC, as performance status and comorbidities; new predictive biomarkers will be validated in future trials. Considering the different predictive and prognostic factors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors could be a valid option for second-line treatment of NSCLC.

Afatinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations: focus on LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 phase III trials

In patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive mutations, the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showed to improve survival and safety profile, when compare with standard chemotherapy. These results were reported in different randomized clinical trials with erlotinib as EURTAC and OPTIMAL (1-3), and with gefitinib IPASS, NEJ002, First-SIGNAL and the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study (3-6). In these studies the median progression-free survival was around 10-12 months. After the results of the IPASS trial, gefitinib was approved for advanced NSCLC with EGFR positive mutation in all setting of treatment in Europa and Asia; while erlotinib that received in 2005 the indication in second- and third-line treatment in patients unselected for EGFR mutations after the Br.21 trial, recently was approved by FDA for the first-line treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, based on the results of the EURTAC trial in Europe, Asia and USA.

Personalized treatment in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: from bench to clinical practice

The discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements and the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that target them have achieved unprecedented success in the management of patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the high efficacy of crizotinib, the first oral ALK TKI approved for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC, almost all patients inevitably develop acquired resistance, showing disease progression in the brain or in other parenchymal sites. Second- or third-generation ALK TKIs have shown to be active in crizotinib-pretreated or crizotinib-naïve ALK-positive patients, even in those with brain metastases. In this review, the current knowledge regarding ALK-positive NSCLC, focusing on the biology of the disease and the available therapeutic options are discussed.

Isolation and Characterization of Circulating Tumor Cells in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung Using a Non-EpCAM-Based Capture Method.

Introduction The exclusion of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that have lost epithelial antigens during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process by using Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) based capture methods is still a matter of debate. In this study, cells obtained after depletion procedure from blood samples of squamous cell lung cancer (SQCLC) patients were identified based on morphology and characterized with the combination of FISH assessment and immunophenotypic profile. Materials and Methods Five mL blood samples, collected from 55 advanced SQCLC patients, were analyzed by a non-EpCAM-based capture method. After depletion of leukocytes and erythroid cells, the negative fraction was characterized by both FISH using a fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) probe and by immunocytochemistry. Thirty healthy donors were also tested. Results Based on morphology (nuclear dimension ≥10 μm, shape and hypercromatic aspect) suspicious circulating cells clearly distinguishable from contaminant leukocytes were observed in 49/55 (89%) SQCLC patients. Thirty-four of the 44 (77%) samples evaluable for FGFR1 FISH showed ≥ 6 FGFR1 gene copy number on average per cell. Vimentin expression involved 43% (18/42) of pooled circulating SQCLC cells, whereas only 29% (14/48) were EpCAM positive. Confocal microscopy confirmed the localization of FGFR1 probe in suspicious circulating cells. Suspicious circulating elements were also observed in healthy donors and did not show any epithelial associated antigens. A significantly lower number of suspicious circulating cells in healthy donors compared to SQCLC patients was found. Conclusions Among the heterogeneous cell population isolated by depletion procedure, the coexistence of cells with epithelial and/or mesenchymal phenotype suggests that EMT may participate to transendothelial invasion and migration of tumor cells in advanced SQCLC. The finding of cells with neither EpCAM or EMT phenotype, retrieved after non-EpCAM-based systems, underlines the presence of suspicious elements in the blood of both SQCLC patients and healthy donors. Further phenotyping and molecular analyses are necessary to fully characterize these circulating elements.

Combination immunotherapy strategies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Does biological rationale meet clinical needs?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as one of the main new therapeutic options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Even though they demonstrated superiority towards standard chemotherapy in different disease settings, the response rates do not exceed 45% in highly molecularly selected patients. This is related to known limitations of the available biomarkers, as well to the complex and dynamic nature of tumor microenvironment. The study of the different strategies adopted by tumor cells to escape the immune system lays the basis of the new combination strategies. This review focuses on analyzing the biological rationale and early clinical data available concerning therapeutic strategies combining ICIs together, ICIs with different regimens and schedules of standard chemotherapy, ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ICIs with antiangiogenic agents and ICs with radiotherapy.

Afatinib in first-line setting for NSCLC harbouring common EGFR mutations: New light after the preliminary results of LUX-Lung 7?

The development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) changed dramatically the history of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR sensitive mutations. Several randomized prospective trials confirmed the superiority of these target agents about survival and response rate when comparing with platinum-based chemotherapy. Knowledge about EGFR mutations increased gradually during the development of target agents and different clinical trials. EGFR mutations cannot be considered all equal, but different entities should be considered in our clinical practice: exon 19 deletions, exon 21 mutation (L858R) and uncommon mutation (exon 20, exon 18 and double mutation). Nowadays, we dispose of three different EGFR TKIs (afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib) approved for the treatment for first-line treatment of patients di NSCLC carrying EGFR, that was compared only by indirect analysis, producing data not always clear and convincing. This research highlight is an overview of data about EGFR TKIs in first-line setting, focusing on differences about exon 19 deletions and L585R mutation in patients treated with different TKIs. In addition, we report the preliminary results of the first head-to-head randomized clinical trial between two different EGFR TKIs, the LUX-Lung 7 (LL7) that compared afatinib and gefitinib showing interesting results.

Erlotinib and gefitinib for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Erlotinib and gefitinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) associated with the EGFR, which is involved in cell proliferation, growth, migration, invasion and survival, and has been found to be overexpressed in non-small-cell lung cancer. Erlotinib was the first target agent approved for the treatment of NSCLC in second- and third line, in patients unselected for EGFR mutations; gefitinib was the first EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of NSCLC in all lines of setting in patients harbouring EGFR mutations. In elderly patients, with a poor prognosis, and different co-morbidities, erlotinib and gefitinib could be considered as valid therapeutic options. This paper reviews the role of both drugs, in the management of elderly patients affected by advanced NSCLC based on an update analysis of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials.