Antonio Scafuri

Long-Term Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a well-accepted therapeutic strategy for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. The aim of the study was to evaluate long-term results after CABG in patients with preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 0.35 or less. METHODS Data from 302 consecutive patients (mean age, 62 +/- 8.7 years) with LVEF of 0.35 or less who had undergone CABG were analyzed. Epinephrine and enoximone with or without norepinephrine were used to increase cardiac index. Intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist devices, or both, were used in case of postoperative low output syndrome. RESULTS Complete revascularization was achieved in 298 of 302 patients (98.7%); internal thoracic artery was used in 294 (97.4%). Operative mortality was 5.3%; independent predictors of operative mortality were emergency CABG (p = 0.005), history of ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.007), and previous anterior myocardial infarction (p = 0.05). At follow-up, all-cause mortality was 30.8%, and 10-year survival was 63% +/- 4%; independent predictors of late all-cause mortality were history of ventricular arrhythmias (p < 0.0001), chronic renal dysfunction (p = 0.0004), and diabetes mellitus (p = 0.04). Cardiac death was 20.4%, and 10-year freedom from cardiac death was 73% +/- 3.3%; independent predictors of cardiac death were history of ventricular arrhythmias (p = 0.004), chronic renal dysfunction (p = 0.03), and more than one previous anterior myocardial infarction (p = 0.004). At 80 +/- 44 months of follow-up, echocardiography showed significant LVEF improvement (0.43 +/- 0.09 versus 0.28 +/- 0.06, p < 0.0001). Ten-year freedom from myocardial infarction was 87% +/- 3%. CONCLUSIONS Excellent long-term results after CABG can be expected for patients with LVEF of 0.35 or less. Complete revascularization and internal thoracic artery grafting are associated with high freedom from myocardial infarction. Careful treatment of arrhythmias, diabetes, and renal dysfunction is necessary to improve long-term survival.

Permanent pacemaker implantation after isolated aortic valve replacement: incidence, risk factors and surgical technical aspects.

Objectives Conducting system defects are common in patients with aortic valve disease. Aortic valve replacement may result in further conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. The aim of our study was to identify the incidence and predictors for postoperative 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement, and the effect of an accurate surgical technique in order to prevent permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods Data from 261 consecutive patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years, 136 men) undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement from January 2004 to January 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Indications for aortic valve replacement were aortic valve stenosis (n = 156), stenoinsufficiency (n = 63), regurgitation (n = 42). Aortic bicuspid valve was present in 25% of cases (n = 64), redo operation was the indication in 7% (n = 18). Preoperative conducting system disease, defined as first-degree atrioventricular block, left or right bundle-branch block or left anterior hemiblock, was present in 25.6% (n = 67) of patients. An accurate surgical technique for debridement of calcific material was performed. Results In-hospital mortality was 0.8% (2 out of 261 patients). Postoperatively, 8 out of 261 patients (3%) required permanent pacemaker implantation, for second-degree (n = 1) or complete atrioventricular block (n = 7). Incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation was similar for patients either with or without preoperative conducting system disease (25 vs. 25.7%, P = NS). Independent predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation were greater preoperative end-systolic diameter (P = 0.026) and left ventricular septum hypertrophy (P = 0.041). Conclusions Need of permanent pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement seems to be related more to preoperative advanced aortic valve disease rather than pre-existing conducting system abnormalities. An accurate surgical technique for aortic valve replacement probably helps to prevent further impairment of conducting system function requiring early postoperative permanent pacemaker implantation.

Cardiac Surgery in Moderate to End-Stage Renal Failure: Analysis of Risk Factors

BACKGROUND The incremental surgical risk caused by different categories of renal failure is not well defined. METHODS Data from 159 patients with moderate to end-stage renal dysfunction, who had consecutive operations using cardiopulmonary bypass, were included in a multivariate analysis of morbidity and survival. Ninety-nine patients had preoperative serum creatinine levels (PSCL) of 1.9 to 2.5 mg/dL (moderate), 36 had PSCL higher than 2.5 mg/dL and were not dialysis dependent (severe), and 24 required chronic dialysis (end-stage dysfunction). RESULTS Operative mortality was 4% with moderate dysfunction and compared favorably with 16.7% in severe and 8% in end-stage dysfunction (p < 0.05). Independent predictors of death were severe non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction (p < 0.05), diabetes (p < 0.05), and cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.01). Severe renal dysfunction (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0.01) also predicted pulmonary and neurologic morbidity. Freedom from late death at 4 years was 82% +/- 5% with moderate, 49% +/- 10% with severe, and 60% +/- 10% with end-stage dysfunction (p < 0.01). Time to late death was adversely affected by severe (p < 0.05) and end-stage dysfunction (p < 0.01). Persistent improvement of symptoms was observed in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Satisfactory early and late surgical outcomes may be expected in patients with moderate renal failure, but outcomes are often poor with severe non-dialysis-dependent and end-stage renal dysfunction.

Survival and Durability of Mitral Valve Repair Surgery for Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease

Abstract  Aim of the study: To evaluate the results after standardized techniques of mitral valve repair (MVr) for treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and to analyze risk factors for late outcomes. Methods: Two hundred and sixty‐one patients (mean age 63 ± 12 years) underwent MVr between January 1999 and January 2010 for degenerative MR. In the last five years, all repair techniques were performed routinely using annuloplasty prosthetic ring, with or without quadrangular or triangular resection of posterior leaflet and/or edge‐to‐edge technique as always indicated by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. Mean follow‐up (99% complete) was 54 ± 38 (range, 6 to 137) months. Results: Operative mortality was 0.8% (2/261), 10‐year actuarial survival 89%± 3%. At 10 years of follow‐up freedom from cardiac death was 94%± 2.6%, from reoperation 95%± 2.4%, from thromboembolism 96%± 2.1%, and from endocarditis 100%. Independent predictor of late all‐causes mortality was advanced age at operation (71 ± 10 years vs. 62 ± 12 years, p = 0.0068). Late progression to moderate or severe MR was observed in 12/256 patients (4.7%). Independent predictor of late progression to moderate or severe MR was annuloplasty without the use of prosthetic ring (p = 0.04). Reoperation was required in six patients (2.3%). Follow‐up echocardiography showed improvement of MR, left ventricular end‐diastolic and end‐systolic diameters, left atrial diameter, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons with preoperative values). Conclusions: MVr is a low‐risk, durable surgical procedure. Standardized techniques, with the routine use of prosthetic ring, improve late results. (J Card Surg 2011;26:360‐366)

Long-term outcomes after surgical ventricular restoration and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with postinfarction left ventricular anterior aneurysm.

Objective Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) for postinfarction left ventricular anterior aneurysm improves left ventricular function. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether concomitant multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) can affect long-term outcome. Thus, long-term results of SVR associated with multiple coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for MVCAD (group 1) were compared with SVR with or without CABG to left anterior descending artery and/or its diagonal branch for single-vessel coronary artery disease (group 2). Methods Data from 104 consecutive patients (age 64 ± 8 years) with left ventricular anterior aneurysm, subjected to SVR from January 1994 to December 2004 and divided into group 1 (n = 79) and group 2 (n = 25), were analyzed. Results In group 1 vs. group 2, number of grafts/patient (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 0.6 ± 0.6, P < 0.0001) was higher, cardiopulmonary bypass (109 ± 30 vs. 65 ± 28 min, P < 0.0001) and aortic cross-clamp times (65 ± 18 vs. 44 ± 23 min, P < 0.0001) were longer, resected aneurysmatic area (12 ± 8 vs. 17 ± 11 cm2, P < 0.05) was smaller. Operative mortality was 3.7 vs. 4% (P = not significant). At 12 years, survival (85 ± 5 vs. 80 ± 16%) and freedom from cardiac events (70 ± 7 vs. 75 ± 16%) were not statistically different in both groups. Follow-up echocardiography showed significant left ventricular ejection fraction improvement in group 1 (0.45 ± 0.07 vs. 0.34 ± 0.10 preoperatively, P < 0.0001) and group 2 (0.47 ± 0.09 vs. 0.36 ± 0.12, P = 0.001). Independent predictors of late death were preoperative history of ventricular arrhythmias (P < 0.001) and hypo/akinesia of proximal myocardial anterior wall (P < 0.05). Conclusion Late survival and freedom from cardiac events are excellent after SVR, also when concomitant MVCAD requires complete revascularization. Ventricular arrhythmias and impaired left ventricular anterior wall function are predictors of worse outcome.

Can Perceval sutureless valve reduce the rate of patient-prosthesis mismatch?†

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to compare the theoretical incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients undergoing a sutureless or a sutured aortic valve replacement using an exact statistical matching. METHODS Between May 2012 and March 2016, 65 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent a sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Perceval bioprosthesis in 2 centres. Moreover, 177 aortic valve replacements with conventional sutured bioprosthesis were performed between August 2003 and September 2015. Perceval and sutured patients were 1:1 exactly matched for sex and body surface area (BSA), resulting in 62 couples (sutureless: BSA 1.77 ± 0.16 m 2 , female 62.9% vs sutured: BSA 1.77 ± 0.15 m 2 , female 62.9%). RESULTS After matching, the indexed effective orifice area was 1.50 ± 0.18 cm 2 /m 2 and 0.81 ± 0.19 cm 2 /m 2 in the sutureless and the sutured group, respectively ( P  < 0.001). No PPM occurred in patients who received a Perceval bioprosthesis ( n  = 62). In the sutured group ( n  = 62), 38 patients (61.3%) developed a PPM, which was moderate in 41.9% ( n  = 26) and severe in 19.4% ( n  = 12) ( P  < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The indexed effective orifice area of the sutureless group was significantly larger than in the sutured one. The incidence of PPM with the conventional sutured biprosthesis was 61.3%, while it decreases to 0% in the sutureless group. No PPM was reported in the sutureless valve group. Therefore, the Perceval sutureless valve provides larger effective orifice areas compared to the sutured conventional bioprosthesis and could be considered as a good option to reduce the risk of a PPM.

Single versus double antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with coronary endarterectomy: mid-term results and clinical implications

Objectives Coronary endarterectomy (CE) represents a useful adjunctive technique to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the presence of diffuse coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, the long-term patency of the graft remains unclear, and no standard anticoagulation and antiplatelet protocols exist for use after CE. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and possibly to clarify the role of single (SAT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) at mid-term follow-up. Methods Between January 2006 and December 2013, CE was performed in 90 patients (mean age 67 ± 8.2 years) who also underwent isolated CABG. After surgery, 20 patients received aspirin 100 mg daily (SAT group), and 52 patients received aspirin plus clopidogrel 75 mg daily (DAT group). Clopidogrel was discontinued in the DAT group 12 months after the operation. Results The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 2.7% (SAT 0% vs DAT 3.8%; P = ns). Perioperative myocardial infarction was 12.3% (SAT 15.0% vs DAT 11.5%; P = ns), and major bleeding requiring surgical re-exploration was 4.1% (SAT 10.0% vs DAT 1.9%; P = ns). Mean follow-up duration was 71.3 ± 32.7 months (median 79 months), and was 100% complete (5208/5208 pt-months). At 7 years of follow-up, freedom from cardiac death was 84 ± 9% in group SAT versus 85 ± 5% in group DAT (P = ns); freedom from new percutaneous coronary intervention was 93 ± 6% versus 100% (P = ns), and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 73 ± 10% versus 75 ± 6% (P = ns). Conclusions In patients with diffuse coronary disease, CE is a safe and feasible technique with acceptable mid-term results. No differences were observed in terms of major clinical outcomes between patients treated with single versus dual antiplatelet therapy at least in a mid-term period of follow-up.

Left atrial radiofrequency ablation associated with valve surgery: midterm outcomes.

BACKGROUND Left atrial ablation is a surgical standard technique for the treatment of persistent or chronic atrial fibrillation (p-AF and c-AF, respectively).Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate midterm results of left atrial ablation according to modified Maze procedure in patients affected by p-AF or c-AF and concomitant mitral or aortic valve disease requiring surgical treatment. METHODS A total of 108 patients (age, mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 66 ± 8.5 years) underwent left atrial ablation by means of unipolar (n = 62) or bipolar (n = 66) radiofrequency for p-AF (n = 28) or c-AF (n = 100) in association with mitral (n = 93) or mitral and aortic valve (n = 35) surgery. RESULTS In-hospital mortality was 0.8%. Patients with preoperative c-AF had preoperative greater value of left atrial diameter (56.7 ± 7.4 vs. 52 ± 9 mm, p = 0.05) than those with p-AF. At 9 years after Maze procedure, 86% (n = 24/28) of patients with preoperative p-AF were in sinus rhythm versus 28% (n = 27/95) with c-AF (p < 0.0001). Preoperative c-AF and left atrial diameter of 75 mm or more predicted atrial fibrillation recurrence. In patients in sinus rhythm compared with those in residual atrial fibrillation, survival was 100 versus 86% ± 6.4%, New York Heart Association class was 1.3 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.6, and need of lifelong anticoagulation therapy was 43 versus 91% (p < 0.05, for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS Left atrial Maze procedure for p-AF offers better chances to conversion in sinus rhythm as compared with long-standing c-AF. Survival, functional status, and quality of life are superior in patients who benefit from sinus rhythm.

Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results

BACKGROUND Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy is well known in literature even if only few data exist regarding isolated supra-coronary aneurysm with normally functioning valve and root. Aim of this study is to clarify the long-term fate of bicuspid aortic root spared at the time of ascending aorta surgery. METHODS We identified forty-seven patients (mean age, 57±11 y; range, 35-81 y, 31 males) who were treated by means of supracoronary aortic replacement in presence of normally functioning BAV and not significantly enlarged sinues of Valsalva. Clinical follow-up (mean 93±50 months; range, 21-207) was 98.9% complete. RESULTS Freedom from cardiac death at 5- and 10-year was 95%±5% and 83%±16%. Three surviving patients required reoperation for the development of aortic insufficiency [2 cases treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR)] or for progression of aortic stenosis (AS) [1 case treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)]. Freedom from new procedure on aortic valve was 100% and 94.4%±5.6% at 5- and 10-year. Composite event-free survival at 5- and 9-year was 82%±18% and 69%±30%. CONCLUSIONS Although in the setting of a BAV, aortic root integrity seems to remain stable during long term follow up with low rate of reoperation and occurrence of new adverse event.

Total Arch versus Hemiarch Replacement for Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center Experience

We retrospectively evaluated early and intermediate outcomes of aortic arch surgery in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAD), investigating the effect of arch surgery extension on postoperative results. From January 2006 through July 2013, 201 patients with type A AAD underwent urgent corrective surgery at our institution. Of the 92 patients chosen for this study, 59 underwent hemiarch replacement (hemiarch group), and 33 underwent total arch replacement (total arch group) in conjunction with ascending aorta replacement. The operative mortality rate was 22%. Total arch replacement was associated with a 33% risk of operative death, versus 15% for hemiarch (P=0.044). Multivariable analysis found these independent predictors of operative death: age (odds ratio [OR]=1.13/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.23; P=0.002), body mass index >30 kg/m2 (OR=9.9; 95% CI, 1.28-19; P=0.028), postoperative low cardiac output (OR=10.6; 95% CI, 1.18-25; P=0.035), and total arch replacement (OR=8.8; 95% CI, 1.39-15; P=0.021) The mean overall 5-year survival rate was 59.3% ± 5.5%, and mean 5-year freedom from distal reintervention was 95.4% ± 3.2% (P=NS). In type A AAD, aortic arch surgery is still associated with high operative mortality rates; hemiarch replacement can be performed more safely than total arch replacement. Rates of distal aortic reoperation were not different between the 2 surgical strategies.