Antonio Testa

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Compared With Single-Agent Gemcitabine As First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: The GIP-1 Study

PURPOSE Single-agent gemcitabine became standard first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer after demonstration of superiority compared with fluorouracil. The Gruppo Italiano Pancreas 1 randomized phase III trial aimed to compare gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00813696). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50, were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (arm A) or gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B). Arm A: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks, and, after a 1-week rest, on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Arm B: cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) added weekly to gemcitabine, except cycle 1 day 22. Primary end point was overall survival. To have 8% power of detecting a 0.74 hazard ratio (HR) of death, with bilateral alpha .05, 355 events were needed and 400 patients planned. RESULTS Four hundred patients were enrolled (arm A: 199; arm B: 201). Median age was 63, 59% were male, 84% had stage IV, and 83% had KPS > or = 80. Median overall survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.35; P = .38). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months versus 3.8 months in arm A and B, respectively (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.19; P = .80). The objective response rate was 10.1% in A and 12.9% in B (P = .37). Clinical benefit was experienced by 23.0% in A and 15.1% in B (P = .057). Combination therapy produced more hematologic toxicity, without relevant differences in nonhematologic toxicity. CONCLUSION The addition of weekly cisplatin to gemcitabine failed to demonstrate any improvement as first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

Factorial phase III randomised trial of rofecoxib and prolonged constant infusion of gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the GEmcitabine-COxib in NSCLC (GECO) study

BACKGROUND The addition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and prolonged constant infusion (PCI) of gemcitabine to treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might improve treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess whether the addition of rofecoxib or PCI gemcitabine could improve overall survival compared with first-line treatment with cisplatin plus gemcitabine given by standard infusion. METHODS Patients with stage IV or IIIb (with supraclavicular nodes or pleural effusion) NSCLC who were under 70 years of age and who had performance status 0 or 1 were eligible for this multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised phase III trial with 2 x 2 factorial design. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: group A, gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) in a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group B, the same treatments as group A plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression; group C, intravenous PCI gemcitabine 1200 mg/m(2) in a 120-min infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group D, the same drugs as group C plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response rate, quality of life, and toxicity. Analyses were intention-to-treat. This trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the US National Institutes of Health website http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00385606. FINDINGS Between Jan 30, 2003, and May 3, 2005, 400 patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years (range 29-71). PCI gemcitabine did not improve overall survival (median 47 weeks [95% CI 40-55] vs 44 [36-52], with standard gemcitabine infusion, hazard ratio (HR) of death 0.93 [0.74-1.17], p=0.41), progression-free survival, nor any other secondary endpoint. Vomiting and fatigue were significantly worse with PCI gemcitabine. The two rofecoxib groups were closed early (on Oct 1, 2004) due to withdrawal of the drug because of safety issues. With intention-to-treat statistical analyses limited to 240 patients (ie, those randomised before July 1, 2004) who had at least 3 months of treatment, rofecoxib did not prolong overall survival (median 44 weeks [CI 36-55] vs 44 [40-54] without rofecoxib, and HR of death 1.00 [0.75-1.34], p=0.85), or progression-free survival, but did improve response rate (41%vs 26%, p=0.02), global quality of life, physical, emotional and role functioning, fatigue, and sleeping. Rofecoxib significantly increased the incidence of diarrhoea and decreased constipation, fatigue, fever, weight loss, and pain, and analgesic consumption. Severe cardiac ischaemia was more frequent with rofecoxib than without; however, the difference was not statistically significant in the primary analysis (p=0.06) and became significant when patients who were randomised between July 1, 2004, and Sept 30, 2004, were included in the analysis (p=0.03). INTERPRETATION Neither PCI gemcitabine nor rofecoxib prolonged survival in the patients in this study. Rofecoxib improved response rate and several quality-of-life items, including pain-related items and global quality of life. Further studies with less cardiotoxic COX-2 inhibitors are needed in NSCLC.

Subcutaneous octreotide versus oral loperamide in the treatment of diarrhea following chemotherapy.

Forty patients with chemotherapy-related diarrhea were randomized to receive (i) octreotide 0.5 mg three times per day s.c. or (ii) loperamide 4 mg three times per day p.o. until complete remission of diarrhea was achieved. In the octreotide group 80% of patients showed complete resolution of loose bowel movements within 4 days of therapy, while in the loperamide group this goal was obtained in only 30% of cases (p < 0.001). If after 4 days no benefit was seen, patients were considered to have failed antidiarrheal therapy. Failure was recorded in only one case (5%) treated with s.c. octreotide and in five patients (25%) who received loperamide. The mean duration of antidiarrheal therapy necessary to achieve remission was 3.4 days in the octreotide group and 6.1 days in the lorepamide group (p < 0.001). Treatment with octreotide was very well tolerated with mild abdominal pain in 15% of cases and pain in the injection site in 15% of patients. Subcutaneous octreotide is highly effective in the management of chemotherapy-related diarrhea in cancer patients.

A pilot study of vinorelbine on a weekly schedule in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Vinorelbine (VNR), 5′-nor-anhydrovinblastine, is a new semi-synthetic vinka alkaloid with selective affinity for mitotic microtubules, which has been shown to be active against several non small cell lung cancer lines in vitro [1]. VNR has been reported to yield a 34.7 % and 20 % overall response rate in patients with squamous cell lung carcinoma and bronchial adenocarcinoma respectively [2]. Moreover, VNR has been shown to be active in advanced breast carcinoma where it may induce a 30–50 % response rate depending on the extent of pretreatment [3]. We tested the activity and toxicity of single agent VNR given on a weekly schedule in a series of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC).

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with vinorelbine in metastatic breast carcinoma : A phase I-II clinical investigation

A multicenter phase I-II trial was carried out with the aim of identifying the dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (VNR) in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 20 mg/m2 every 15 days in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. In the phase I part of the trial, VNR was given at a dose of 20 mg/m2 every 15 days to a group of 3 patients. In absence of unacceptable toxicity, VNR was escalated to 25, 30, and 35 mg/m2 for subsequent groups of 3 patients, until the dose-limiting toxicity was reached. No case of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was recorded in these patients. Grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 mucositis were the dose-limiting toxicities recorded in patients treated with VNR 35 mg/m2. These side effects caused a substantial decrease in programmed dose intensity. Therefore 30 mg/m2 was considered the maximum tolerated dose of VNR in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2, both given every 15 days. These dosages were employed for the treatment of further 18 patients included in phase II of the study. The overall response rate, calculated according to an intention to treat analysis, was 63% (95% CI: 44–80%), with 2 patients achieving a complete response. The median time to progression was 7.0 months or more (range 2–14 months). Median duration of objective responses was 8.4 months or more. The duration of the 2 complete responses was 9 and 14 months, respectively. Median duration of survival was 16.0 months or more (range from 4.0 to ≧24.0). Toxicity was generally mild and easily manageable. Neutropenia and mucositis were the most frequently recorded side effects. A case of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was recorded in phase II of the study. In conclusion, the maximum tolerated dose of VNR in association with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is 30 mg/m2 on a bimonthly schedule. Moreover, the combination of VNR and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is active against metastatic breast carcinoma and is associated with a good toxicity profile. Further studies with this combination regimen are warranted.

Oral granisetron with or without methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the management of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. A prospective randomized trial

Background. A single‐institution, randomized open trial was prospectively performed to compare orally administered granisetron with or without intramuscularly administered methylprednisolone to metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the prevention of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. The effects of antiemetic treatments were evaluated from days 2 to 5 of the first cycle after cisplatin administration among patients who had never before received chemotherapy.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: A new highly active chemotherapeutic regimen

PURPOSE To date the systemic treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (EAC), using both chemotherapy and hormonotherapy (HT), is far from satisfactory. The significant activity of vinorelbine (VNR), a relatively new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, demonstrated in advanced breast cancer, bronchial adenocarcinoma, and in head and neck cancer, prompted us to carry out a phase II trial employing the combination of cisplatin and VNR in a pluri-institutional series of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic EAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-five patients affected by recurrent and/or metastatic EAC have been treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 21 days. After three cycles patients were restaged for objective response. Analysis of response rate and duration, overall survival, and toxicity pattern were the main aims of the study. RESULTS Twenty out of thirty-five patients achieved a major objective response for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence limits (CL): 39%-74%). Four patients had a complete response (11%; 95% CL: 3%-27%) with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of eight hundred fourteen days, while sixteen patients had a partial response (46%; 95% CL: 29%-63%) with a median PFS of one hundred eighty-four days. Six patients had stable disease and nine progressed. All patients who achieved a clinical complete response had only a single site of disease at entry, but no association was noted between number of involved sites and likehood of achieving PR. Median overall survival was 240 days, while that of patients with complete and partial response was 855 and 300 days, respectively. Treatment was quite well tolerated with few cases of grade 3-4 myelosuppression. Alopecia was virtually absent and neurotoxicity was mild. One patient complained of an acute pain syndrome at the tumor site. CONCLUSIONS The CDDP + VNR regimen is quite active against recurrent and/or metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma, at least in terms of objective response rate which is among the highest ever reported in medical literature. However. duration of objective response and median overall survival are in the disappointing range reported for other regimens. In our opinion the CDDP plus VNR regimen is good enough to be compared to the anthracycline-based regimens and may represent the basis for future development of newer active polychemotherapeutic schedules.

A prospective evaluation of the activity of human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on the prevention of chemotherapy-related neutropenia in patients with advanced carcinoma

After informed consent, 86 patients with advanced cancer undergoing potentially myelosuppressive cytotoxic chemotherapy were randomized to receive placebo or subcutaneous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms/Kg/day in order to prevent severe neutropenia and its related morbidity. The incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < 1,000/mm3) was significantly reduced in patients receiving G-CSF than in controls (18% versus 42%; P < 0.05). The duration of neutropenia was also shortened by the administration of G-CSF (4.8 versus 8.2 days; P < 0.05). Therapy with G-CSF has also a positive impact on the dose-intensity of employed regimens. Patients treated with G-CSF showed oral fungal disease in 9% of cases, while control patients had a 21% incidence (NS). Patients treated with G-CSF received 91% of the programmed dose-intensity as compared to 71% of control patients (P < 0.05). These data strengthen the clinical usefulness of G-CSF in the prevention of chemotherapy-related neutropenia, infections, and reduction in dose-intensity. Further studies are required to establish if the increase in dose-intensity allowed by G-CSF treatment may positively influence the outcome of cancer patients.

Cisplatin and epirubicin plus oral lonidamine as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).

Lonidamine (LND) is a unique antineoplastic drug derived from indazole-3-carboxylic acid which inhibits oxygen consumption and aerobic glycolysis, interfering with energy metabolism of neoplastic cells. LND has been experimentally shown to potentiate the cytotoxic effects of epirubicin (EPI) in human breast cancer cell lines, cisplatin activity in both platinum-sensitive and -resistant human ovarian carcinoma cell lines, and EPI antineoplastic activity in some recent phase III trials carried out in advanced breast cancer. A multicenter phase II trial was carried out with the combination of cisplatin 60 mg/m2, EPI 100 mg/m2 and LND 450 mg/day p.o. in three refracted doses/day starting 2 days before cisplatin and EPI (day -2 and -1), stopping 2 days after chemotherapy (day 0, +1 and +2). Thirty patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled into the study. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for objective response. The overall response rate accordingly to an intent-to-treat analysis was 73% (95% CL 54-88%). Four patients achieved complete response (13%; 95% CL 4-31%) with a median duration of 9.5 months (range 4-16) and 18 patients had partial response (60%; 95% CL 41-77%) with a median duration of 9.8 months. Stable disease was obtained in five cases (17%) and progressive disease was recorded in three patients. One patient died of progressive cancer before restaging. The overall median survival of the whole series of patients was 14+ months. The most frequent toxicities were represented by gastrointestinal and hematological side effects. The combination of cisplatin + EPI plus oral LND is active against metastatic breast carcinoma. The antineoplastic activity of the cisplatin + EPI + LND regimen is as high as that reported for more aggressive regimens such as the fluorouracil + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide combinations without an increase in toxic effects.

Neo-adjuvant chemo-(immuno-)therapy of advanced squamous-cell head and neck carcinoma: a multicenter, phase III, randomized study comparing cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with cisplatin + 5-FU + recombinant interleukin 2

Abstract We carried out an open, randomized, phase III, multicenter clinical trial to compare, in neo-adjuvant setting, the clinical response and toxicity of the combination chemotherapy cisplatin + 5-FU with the same combination plus s.c. recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in patients with advanced (stage III–IV) head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Regimen A was the classical Al Sarraf treatment: 100 mg/m2 cisplatin i.v. on day 1 plus 1000 mg m−2 day−1 5-FU on days 1–5 as a continuous infusion. Regimen B was the same as regimen A plus 4.5 MIU/day rIL-2 s.c. on days 8–12 and 15–19. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for three cycles. A total of 33 patients were enrolled in the study; 30 were evaluable for toxicity and 28 for response. Seventeen patients were assigned to group A and 16 were assigned to group B. Three patients (20%) of group A and 4 (31%) of group B had a complete response, 9 patients (60%) of group A and 6 (46%) of group B had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 12 patients (80%) for group A and 10 patients (77%) for group B. Two patients (13%) of group A and 3 patients (23%) group B had stable disease; 1 patient (7%) of group A had progressive disease. Thus, there was not a statistically significant difference in response rate between the two groups and therefore there was no benefit from the addition of immunotherapy with rIL-2 to the standard chemotherapy. Both regimens were well tolerated. There were 2 toxic deaths (6.7%), 1 from hematological causes in group A and 1 from cardiac causes in group B. Myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity, mainly nausea/vomiting and stomatitis, were the most frequent toxicities. The calculated number of patients for the sample has not yet been reached; however, the projection of our present results suggests that it is highly improbable that a clinically significant difference between the two treatment groups will be observed even if the calculated patient sample size is achieved.