Antonis Argyris

Left-ventricular hypertrophy is associated better with 24-h aortic pressure than 24-h brachial pressure in hypertensive patients: the SAFAR study.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is better associated with aortic, than brachial, 24-h average blood pressure (BP) in individuals with hypertension. Background: The office aortic BP is associated better with organ damage, such as LVH, than the office brachial BP; whether the 24-h average aortic BP associates better with LVH, than the 24-h average brachial BP, has never been tested. Methods: Aortic ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed with a novel validated oscillometric cuff-based BP recording device, also used for simultaneous brachial ABPM, and the application of pulse wave analysis method. Office brachial and aortic BP were assessed with validated oscillometric recording device and pulse wave analysis, respectively; left-ventricular mass was measured by ultrasound. Results: Regression analysis performed in 229 individuals (aged 54.3 ± 14.6 years; 56% men; 75% hypertensive patients) showed that the 24-h average aortic SBP was significantly better associated with left-ventricular mass index and LVH than the 24-h average brachial, as well as, office (brachial or aortic) SBP, independently of age, sex, obesity or treatment. Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis showed a higher discriminatory ability of 24-h average aortic than brachial SBP to detect the presence of LVH (area under the curve: 0.73 versus 0.69; P = 0.007). A high degree of interindividual overlap regarding aortic 24-h average SBP level was found in individuals in whom the corresponding brachial measurements denoted different hypertension levels. Conclusion: These data suggest that aortic ABPM, when compared to brachial ABPM, improves the individualized assessment of the BP-associated heart damage.

Feasibility and Reproducibility of Noninvasive 24-h Ambulatory Aortic Blood Pressure Monitoring With a Brachial Cuff-Based Oscillometric Device

BACKGROUND Accumulating evidence suggests the potential superiority of office aortic blood pressure (BP) over brachial in the management of arterial hypertension. The noninvasive aortic 24-h ambulatory brachial BP monitoring (ABPM) is potentially the optimal method for assessing BP profile. The objective of the present study was to investigate the feasibility and reproducibility to perform noninvasively 24-h aortic ABPM with a novel validated brachial cuff-based automatic oscillometric device (Mobilo-O-Graph) which records brachial BP and waveforms and assesses aortic BP via mathematical transformation. METHODS Thirty consecutive subjects (mean age: 53.6 ± 11.6 years, 17 men) had a test-retest ABPM with at least 1-week interval. No modification of vasoactive drug treatment during the interval was allowed while similar 24-h activity during both recording days was recommended. RESULTS The average number of valid readings for brachial vs. aortic BP were 69.9 ± 10.4 vs. 58.0 ± 13.3 in the initial 24-h assessment (P < 0.001) and 68.3 ± 10.8 vs. 56.4 ± 13.6 in the repeat assessment (P < 0.001). No differences in average 24 h aortic BP values were observed between the two assessments (systolic blood pressure (SBP) 115.9 ± 7.7 vs. 115.1 ± 6.0 mm Hg, respectively, P = 0.48, and diastolic 79.7 ± 7.4 vs. 79.2 ± 8.7, P = 0.54). Reproducibility indices of aortic pressure including, intraclass coefficient of variation (SBP: 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.58-0.90); diastolic: 0.92 (0.83-0.96)) and s.d. of differences (SBP/diastolic: 6.0/4.5 mm Hg) indicated acceptable reproducibility. The Bland-Altman plots indicated no evidence of systemic bias. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, these data suggest that noninvasive 24-h ABPM is feasible and provides reproducible values. Future studies should validate the prognostic ability of 24-h aortic hemodynamics.

Mean arterial pressure values calculated using seven different methods and their associations with target organ deterioration in a single-center study of 1878 individuals.

To assess the differences among seven different methods for the calculation of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and to identify the formula that provides MAP values that are more closely associated with target organ deterioration as expressed by the carotid cross-sectional area (CSA), carotid-to-femoral pulse-wave velocity (cf-PWV) and left ventricular mass (LVM). The study population consisted of 1878 subjects who underwent noninvasive cardiovascular risk assessment. Blood pressure (BP) was assessed in all subjects, and MAP was calculated by direct oscillometry and six different formulas. Carotid artery ultrasound imaging was performed in 1628 subjects. The CSA of the right and left common carotid artery (CCA) were calculated and used as surrogates of arterial wall mass and hypertrophy. Aortic stiffness was evaluated in 1763 subjects by measuring the cf-PWV. Finally, 218 subjects underwent echocardiographic examination for the assessment of LVM. Among the examined methods of MAP calculation, the formula MAP1=[diastolic BP]+0.412 × [pulse pressure] yielded the strongest correlations with the LVM, cf-PWV and CSA of the right and left CCA, even after adjusting for age and gender. The MAP calculation using the 0.412 was superior compared with the traditional formula that uses the 0.33 for the discrimination of subjects with left ventricular and carotid wall hypertrophy, as well as subjects with increased aortic stiffness. MAP estimated with the 0.412 is better correlated with target organ deterioration compared with other formulas. Future studies are needed to explore the accuracy of these formulas for MAP estimation compared with direct intra-arterial BP measurement.

The Additive Value of Femoral Ultrasound for Subclinical Atherosclerosis Assessment in a Single Center Cohort of 962 Adults, Including High Risk Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background Presence of femoral atheromatic plaques, an emerging cardiovascular disease (CVD) biomarker additional to carotid plaques, is poorly investigated in conditions associating with accelerated atherosclerosis such as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Objective/Methods To assess the frequency of femoral/carotid subclinical atheromatosis phenotypes in RA, HIV and T2DM and search for each disease-specific probability of either femoral and/or carotid subclinical atheromatosis, we examined by ultrasound a single-center cohort of CVD-free individuals comprised of consecutive non-diabetic patients with RA (n=226) and HIV (n=133), T2DM patients (n=109) and non-diabetic individuals with suspected/known hypertension (n=494) who served as reference group. Results Subclinical atheromatosis - defined as local plaque presence in at least on arterial bed - was diagnosed in 50% of the overall population. Among them, femoral plaques only were found in 25% of either RA or HIV patients, as well as in 16% of T2DM patients and 35% of reference subjects. After adjusting for all classical CVD risk factors, RA and HIV patients had comparable probability to reference group of having femoral plaques, but higher probability (1.75; 1.17 - 2.63 (odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals), 2.04; 1.14 - 3.64, respectively) of having carotid plaques, whereas T2DM patients had higher probability to have femoral and carotid plaques, albeit, due to their pronounced dyslipidemic profile. Conclusion RA and HIV accelerate predominantly carotid than femoral. A “two windows” carotid/femoral, rather than carotid alone ultrasound, screening improves substantially subclinical atheromatosis detection in patients at high CVD risk.

Total arterial compliance, estimated by a novel method, is better related to left ventricular mass compared to aortic pulse wave velocity: The SAFAR study

ABSTRACT Aim: The investigation of the association between total arterial compliance (CT)—estimated by a novel technique—with left ventricular mass (LVM) and hypertrophy (LVH). Our hypothesis was that CT may be better related to LVM compared to the gold-standard regional aortic stiffness. Within the frame of the ongoing cross-sectional study “SAFAR,” 226 subjects with established hypertension or with suspected hypertension underwent blood pressure (BP) assessment, carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV), and echocardiographic measurement of LVM. LVM index (LVMI) was calculated by the ratio of LVM to body surface area. CT was estimated by a previously proposed and validated formula: CT = 36.7 /cf-PWV2 [ml/mmHg]. LVMI was related to age (r = 0.207, p = 0.002), systolic BP (r = 0.248, p < 0.001), diastolic BP (r = 0.139, p = 0.04), mean BP (r = 0.212, p = 0.002), pulse pressure (r = 0.212, p = 0.002), heart rate (r = −0.172, p = 0.011), cf-PWV (r = 0.268, p < 0.001), and CT (r = −0.317, p < 0.001). The highest correlation was observed for CT that was significantly stronger than the respective correlation of cf-PWV (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CT was a stronger determinant, compared to cf-PWV, of LVMI and LVH. It remains to be further explored whether CT has also a superior prognostic value beyond and above local or regional (segmental) estimates of pulse wave velocity.

Phenotypes of office systolic blood pressure according to both brachial and aortic measurements: frequencies and associations with carotid hypertrophy in 1861 adults.

Background/aim: Aortic SBP (aSBP) associates with arterial damage more consistently than brachial SBP (bSBP). However, it is unknown how often aSBP is normal in the presence of elevated bSBP, and vice versa; if SBP phenotyping on the basis of bSBP and aSBP cut-off values improves cardiovascular risk stratification. We tested the frequency of four office SBP phenotypes: type I (both normal bSBP and aSBP); type II (high bSBP but normal aSBP); type III (normal bSBP but high aSBP), and type IV (both high bSBP and aSBP), the probability of each phenotype to be associated with increased arterial damage, using type Ia (i.e. normal bSBP and low-normal aSBP) as reference. Methods: In 1861 participants (age: 54 years, 49.1% men), we measured simultaneously bSBP, aSBP, and carotid cross-sectional wall area with ultrasound. Results: Depending on the applied cut-off values, type II and type III phenotypes represented together 5–11% of the population (0.9–3.4 and 1.8–10.3%, respectively) and type IV around 20%. Subgroups with phenotypes, Ib (i.e. normal bSBP and high-normal aSBP), II, III, and IV had gradually significantly higher probability (by 1.37–1.91, 2.3–3.3, 3.3–8.9 times, and 4.18–6.25, respectively) to present elevated carotid artery cross-sectional wall area compared with the reference group, even after adjustment for DBP and other confounders. Conclusions: Type II (i.e. isolated high bSBP) and type III (i.e. isolated high aSBP) office SBP phenotypes were common and had intermediate level (between types I and IV) of arterial damage.

Extensive phenotyping of vascular damage in non-infectious primary vasculitides with the use of non-invasive vascular biomarkers: prevalence, pathogenesis and response to treatment

Non-Infectious Primary systemic vasculitides (NIPSV) encompass a subset of autoimmune diseases, characterized mainly by intramural inflammation of the vascular wall. The increased mortality that some exhibit is partially attributed to vascular complications involving both micro- and macro- circulation. Beyond the disease specific pathways of vascular damage, emerging evidence suggest that the classical pathways of arterial damage, namely, atheromatosis, inappropriate arterial remodeling and arteriosclerosis are accelerated in several NIPSV; thus participating in the development of vascular complications in NIPSV patients. The aim of the current research protocol is to optimize the understanding of vascular pathology in NIPSV and to identify useful, easy to measure, non-invasive vascular tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of NIPSV patients. Moreover, the study aims to generate hypothesis regarding the molecular basis of the association of inflammation with classical vascular pathology.

PULSE PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION DIPPING PATTERN DURING SLEEP TIME: THE SAFAR STUDY

Objective: The difference in pulse pressure (PP) between peripheral arteries and the aorta, called pulse pressure amplification (PPamp), is a well-described physiological phenomenon which is independently associated with cardiovascular events. Recent studies suggest that it exhibits circadian variability. Our aim was to evaluate the 24 hour profile of peripheral and central hemodynamics and detect the factors associated with the circadian variability of PPamp. Design and method: In 497 consecutive subjects (aged 54 years, 56.7% male, 79.7% hypertensives) we assessed the circadian pattern of peripheral and central arterial hemodynamics by 24-hour evaluation of brachial and aortic blood pressure (BP), augmentation index (AI) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) using a validated brachial-cuff based oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). Results: All parameters exhibited a circadian variation. Sleep dipping (decrease) pattern was observed for PPamp (Figure 1), brachial and aortic systolic BP, mean BP (Figure 2) and PWV (Figure 3), whereas a rising pattern (higher sleep than wake values) was observed for brachial PP, aortic PP (Figure 4) and AI (Figure 5). The factors independently associated with the less sleep-dipping in PPamp were: older age, lower height, the use of antihypertensive medication, sleep decrease in arterial stiffness (PWV); whereas female gender, the presence of hypertension, sleep increase of pressure wave reflections (AI), sleep decrease in heart rate and mean BP were associated with a greater sleep-dipping in PPamp (Table 1). Figure. No caption available. Conclusions: These data provide further pathophysiological understanding of the mechanisms leading to PPamp dipping. Several implications regarding the clinical use of the aortic and brachial BP, especially during sleep time, are raised that should be addressed in future research.

24-hour aortic blood pressure variability showed a stronger association with carotid damage than 24-hour brachial blood pressure variability: The SAFAR study

We aim to compare 24‐hour aortic blood pressure variability (BPV) with brachial BPV in relation to carotid damage as estimated by carotid intima‐media thickness (CIMT) and cross‐sectional area (CCSA). Four hundred and forty five individuals received brachial and aortic 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring with a validated device (Mobil‐O‐Graph). Systolic BPV was estimated by average real variability (ARV) and time‐weighted standard deviation (wSD). In multiple logistic regression analysis, CIMT > 900 μm was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.04‐1.84), aortic wSD (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.19‐2.29) and brachial ARV (OR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.18), but not with brachial wSD. CCSA > 90th percentile was significantly and independently associated with aortic ARV (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.07‐2.10) and wSD (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.12‐2.56), but not with brachial BPVs. In receiver operator characteristics curve analysis, aortic wSD identified CCSA > 90th percentile better than brachial wSD (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.68, P < .01). In conclusion, aortic 24‐hour systolic BPV showed a slightly stronger association with carotid damage than brachial BPV.

Prevalence, Incidence, and Contributors of Subclinical Atheromatosis, Arteriosclerosis, and Arterial Hypertrophy in HIV-Infected Individuals: A Single-Center, 3-Year Prospective Study

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important comorbidity for people living with HIV infection (PLWH) in the combined antiretroviral therapy era. We prospectively examined the presence of subclinical arterial disease in 138 consecutive CVD-free, HIV-infected individuals compared to 664 HIV-negative individuals. We studied 10 arterial sites in 4 beds using 5 distinct biomarkers of subclinical atheromatosis, arteriosclerosis, and hypertrophy and evaluated the association of subclinical arterial damage with CVD-related and HIV-related factors at baseline and at 3-year follow-up. Atheromatosis, arteriosclerosis, and arterial hypertrophy were present in 36.1%, 59.7%, and 34.3% of HIV-infected individuals, respectively, at baseline. HIV infection was independently associated with carotid atheromatosis and hypertrophy. The presence of carotid atheromatosis was independently associated with age, years of smoking, and exposure to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). The annual incidence of atheromatosis, arteriosclerosis, and arterial hypertrophy was 5.5, 18.6, and 12.5 cases/100 patients, respectively. Carotid atheromatosis progression was significantly associated with NNRTI exposure. People living with HIV infection exhibited high prevalence and incidence of subclinical arterial damage and site-specific predilection for the carotids. These investigations may help optimize HIV-specific CVD prediction models. The NNRTIs may contribute to atheromatosis, emphasizing the need to consider the atherogenic potential of antiretroviral drugs in management strategies.