Aref Al-Kali

Mayo prognostic model for WHO-defined chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: ASXL1 and spliceosome component mutations and outcomes

We evaluated the prognostic relevance of several clinical and laboratory parameters in 226 Mayo Clinic patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML): 152 (67%) males and median age 71 years. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 166 (73%) deaths and 33 (14.5%) leukemic transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, significant risk factors for survival included anemia, thrombocytopenia, increased levels of white blood cells, absolute neutrophils, absolute monocyte count (AMC), absolute lymphocytes, peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts, and presence of circulating immature myeloid cells (IMCs). Spliceosome component (P=0.4) and ASXL1 mutations (P=0.37) had no impact survival. On multivariable analysis, increased AMC (>10 × 109/l, relative risk (RR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–3.8), presence of circulating IMC (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.7), decreased hemoglobin (<10 g/dl, RR 1.6, 99% CI 1.2–2.2) and decreased platelet count (<100 × 109/l, RR 1.4, 99% CI 1.0–1.9) remained significant. Using these four risk factors, a new prognostic model for overall (high risk, RR 4.4, 95% CI 2.9–6.7; intermediate risk, RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4–2.9) and leukemia-free survival (high risk, RR 4.9, 95% CI 1.9–12.8; intermediate risk, RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1–5.9) performed better than other conventional risk models and was validated in an independent cohort of 268 CMML patients.

One thousand patients with primary myelofibrosis: the mayo clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE To share our decades of experience with primary myelofibrosis and underscore the importance of outcomes research studies in designing clinical trials and interpreting their results. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand consecutive patients with primary myelofibrosis seen at Mayo Clinic between November 4, 1977, and September 1, 2011, were considered. The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), dynamic IPSS (DIPSS), and DIPSS-plus were applied for risk stratification. Separate analyses were included for patients seen at time of referral (N=1000), at initial diagnosis (N=340), and within or after 1 year of diagnosis (N=660). RESULTS To date, 592 deaths and 68 leukemic transformations have been documented. Parameters at initial diagnosis vs time of referral included median age (66 vs 65 years), male sex (61% vs 62%), red cell transfusion need (24% vs 38%), hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL (38% vs 54%), platelet count less than 100 × 10(9)/L (18% vs 26%), leukocyte count more than 25 × 10(9)/L (13% vs 16%), marked splenomegaly (21% vs 31%), constitutional symptoms (29% vs 34%), and abnormal karyotype (31% vs 41%). Mutational frequencies were 61% for JAK2V617F, 8% for MPLW515, and 4% for IDH1/2. DIPSS-plus risk distributions at time of referral were 10% low, 15% intermediate-1, 37% intermediate-2, and 37% high. The corresponding median survivals were 17.5, 7.8, 3.6, and 1.8 years vs 20.0, 14.3, 5.3, and 1.7 years for patients younger than 60 years of age. Compared with both DIPSS and IPSS, DIPSS-plus showed better discrimination among risk groups. Five-year leukemic transformation rates were 6% and 21% in low- and high-risk patients, respectively. CONCLUSION The current document should serve as a valuable resource for patients and physicians and provides context for the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Hypomethylating drugs are the standard treatment for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Survival is poor after failure of these drugs; there is no approved second-line therapy. We compared the overall survival of patients receiving rigosertib and best supportive care with that of patients receiving best supportive care only in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts after failure of azacitidine or decitabine treatment. METHODS We did this randomised controlled trial at 74 hospitals and university medical centres in the USA and Europe. We enrolled patients with diagnosis of refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB)-1, RAEB-2, RAEB-t, or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia based on local site assessment, and treatment failure with a hypomethylating drug in the past 2 years. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive rigosertib 1800 mg per 24 h via 72-h continuous intravenous infusion administered every other week or best supportive care with or without low-dose cytarabine. Randomisation was stratified by pretreatment bone marrow blast percentage. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01241500. FINDINGS From Dec 13, 2010, to Aug 15, 2013, we enrolled 299 patients: 199 assigned to rigosertib, 100 assigned to best supportive care. Median follow-up was 19·5 months (IQR 11·9-27·3). As of Feb 1, 2014, median overall survival was 8·2 months (95% CI 6·1-10·1) in the rigosertib group and 5·9 months (4·1-9·3) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio 0·87, 95% CI 0·67-1·14; p=0·33). The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were anaemia (34 [18%] of 184 patients in the rigosertib group vs seven [8%] of 91 patients in the best supportive care group), thrombocytopenia (35 [19%] vs six [7%]), neutropenia (31 [17%] vs seven [8%]), febrile neutropenia (22 [12%] vs ten [11%]), and pneumonia (22 [12%] vs ten [11%]). 41 (22%) of 184 patients in the rigosertib group and 30 (33%) of 91 patients in the best supportive care group died due to adverse events and three deaths were attributed to rigosertib treatment. INTERPRETATION Rigosertib did not significantly improve overall survival compared with best supportive care. A randomised phase 3 trial of rigosertib (NCT 02562443) is underway in specific subgroups of patients deemed to be at high risk, including patients with very high risk per the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System criteria. FUNDING Onconova Therapeutics, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society.

Momelotinib treatment-emergent neuropathy: Prevalence, risk factors and outcome in 100 patients with myelofibrosis

Momelotinib (a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor) induces both anaemia and spleen responses in myelofibrosis (MF). Momelotinib treatment‐emergent peripheral neuropathy (TE‐PN) was documented in 44 (44%) of 100 MF patients treated at our institution; median time of TE‐PN onset was 32 weeks and duration 11 months. Improvement after drug dose reduction or discontinuation was documented in only two patients. TE‐PN was significantly associated with treatment response (P = 0·02) and longer survival (P = 0·048) but significance was lost during multivariate analysis that included treatment duration. TE‐PN did not correlate with initial or maximum momelotinib dose or previous treatment with JAK inhibitor or thalidomide.

IPSS-independent prognostic value of plasma CXCL10, IL-7 and IL-6 levels in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Recent studies suggest a powerful prognostic value for plasma cytokine levels in primary myelofibrosis (interleukin (IL)-2R, IL-8, IL-12, IL-15 and C–X–C motif chemokine 10 (CXCL10)) and large-cell lymphoma (IL-2R, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, CXCL9 and CXCL10). To examine the possibility of a similar phenomenon in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), we used multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure 30 plasma cytokines in 78 patients with primary MDS. Compared with normal controls (n=35), the levels of 19 cytokines were significantly altered. Multivariable analysis identified increased levels of CXCL10 (P<0.01), IL-7 (P=0.02) and IL-6 (P=0.07) as predictors of shortened survival; the survival association remained significant when the Cox model was adjusted for the International Prognostic Scoring System, age, transfusion-need or thrombocytopenia. MDS patients with normal plasma levels of CXCL10, IL-7 and IL-6 lived significantly longer (median survival 76 months) than those with elevated levels of at least one of the three cytokines (median survival 25 months) (P<0.01). Increased levels of IL-6 were associated with inferior leukemia-free survival, independent of other prognostic factors (P=0.01). Comparison of plasma cytokines between MDS (n=78) and primary myelofibrosis (n=127) revealed a significantly different pattern of abnormalities. These observations reinforce the concept of distinct and prognostically relevant plasma cytokine signatures in hematological malignancies.

Activity of the oral mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor trametinib in RAS-mutant relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies.

RAS/RAF/mitogen‐activated protein kinase activation is common in myeloid malignancies. Trametinib, a mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEK1)/MEK2 inhibitor with activity against multiple myeloid cell lines at low nanomolar concentrations, was evaluated for safety and clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemias.

Genetic determinants of response and survival in momelotinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis.

Somatic mutations (for example, CALR, ASXL1) and karyotype have been shown to independently influence survival in patients with myelofibrosis (MF).1, 2 The objectives of the current study were to determine if such genetic markers also influence treatment response in MF patients receiving single agent momelotinib and whether such therapy overcomes the detrimental effect of prognostically relevant mutations in MF. Momelotinib is a Janus kinase (JAK)-1/2 inhibitor currently being evaluated in phase-3MF clinical trials (NCT01969838, NCT02101268). In an earlier phase-1/2 study (n=166), the drug was shown to improve anemia (53% response rate), reduce spleen size (39% response rate) and alleviate constitutional symptoms (>50% response rate) in MF patients.3 The current study considers 100 consecutive patients, who were part of the aforementioned phase-1/2 study and received momelotinib therapy at the Mayo Clinic.

Comparison of complication rates of Hickman® catheters versus peripherally inserted central catheters in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy

Abstract Central venous access devices (CVADs) are used for intravenous therapy in patients with hematological malignancies. There are limited data comparing catheter outcomes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy. A retrospective review comparing the incidence of early and late CVAD-associated complications and their effect on CVAD removal was performed in patients with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy between 2007 and 2011. Overall, 64 Hickman® catheters and 84 peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) were inserted. There was a trend toward increasing use of PICCs. The rate of CVAD occlusion was higher in PICCs compared to Hickman catheters (48.2% vs. 3.2%), for a rate of 20.43 vs. 1.25 per 1000 CVAD-days (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the rates of CVAD-associated thrombosis, premature removal, blood stream infection (BSI) and CVAD-related BSI. Importantly, there was no significant difference in the rate of CVAD removal between Hickman catheters and PICCs for the duration that the CVADs were in place. The choice of type of CVAD inserted into patients with newly diagnosed AML will depend on ease of catheter placement, cost, perception of frequency and severity of complications, and clinician preference.

Current Event-Free Survival After Sequential Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Imatinib is an effective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). Although some patients may fail on therapy with imatinib, effective salvage therapy is available with second‐generation TKIs. Current measurement of efficacy for each therapy is judged by its individual impact on overall survival and event‐free survival (EFS).

Therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia: Observations relating to APL pathogenesis and therapy

Therapy‐related acute promyelocytic leukemia (t‐APL) is a well‐recognized form of APL for which the underlying etiology has been well characterized. The pathogenesis of de novo (dn‐APL) remains unknown; but epidemiologic studies have consistently identified increased body mass index (BMI), younger age, and ethnicity as possible risk factors. We analyzed demographics, clinical features, and treatment responses in a contemporary series of 64 patients treated with all‐trans‐retinoic acid and anthracycline‐based therapy to assess for differences in these two etiologically distinct patient groups. Compared with patients with t‐APL (n = 11), those with dn‐APL (n = 53) had a greater median BMI (31.33 vs. 28.48), incidence of obesity (60.4% vs. 27.3%) (P = 0.04), and history of hyperlipidemia (45.3% vs. 18.2%) (P = 0.01). Fewer t‐APL than dn‐APL patients achieved complete remission at 63.6% vs. 92.5% respectively (P = 0.008). This was the result of a higher induction mortality rate of 36.4% vs. 7.5% respectively (P = 0.008). No cases of leukemic resistance were seen in either group. Overall survival (OS) was inferior in t‐APL compared with dn‐APL at 51% vs. 84%, respectively (P < 0.005), primarily as a result of higher induction mortality. Relapse occurred in nine patients (16.1%) overall, but no relapses occurred in the t‐APL cohort. Our observations provide further support for the hypothesis that abnormalities in lipid homeostasis may in some way be of pathogenic importance in dn‐APL. Therapy‐related APL is sensitive to standard therapy with no cases of resistance or relapse seen. The inferior OS of the t‐APL was due to induction mortality, possibly reflecting prior therapy.