Arezu Aliabadi-Zuckermann

Diminished impact of cytomegalovirus infection on graft vasculopathy development in the antiviral prophylaxis era - a retrospective study

Evidence concerning an association between cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and accelerated cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is inconclusive. Data were analyzed retrospectively from 297 consecutive heart transplants between 1.1.2002 and 31.12.2012. Patients ≤18 years of age, survival, and follow‐up ≤1‐year post‐transplant and patients with early CAV were excluded. CMV‐infection was diagnosed and monitored closely in the first year. CAV was diagnosed by coronary angiography via left heart catheterization, and results were categorized according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) scoring system. Risk factors for CAV were tested in a multivariable model. Median follow‐up was 7.5 years (IQR: 5.6–10.3). CMV infection in the first year after transplantation occurred in 26% of patients (n = 78), CMV disease in 5% (n = 15). CAV ≥1 ISHLT was detected in 36% (n = 108). Incidence of CAV >1 ISHLT and severity of CAV increased over time. No statistically significant association between CMV infection and disease within the first year and risk of CAV after 1‐year post‐HTx was detected in the univariate (P = 0.16) and multivariable [hazard ratio (HR), 1.36; confidence interval (CI), 0.89–2.07; P = 0.16] Cox regression. In the multivariable Cox regression, donor age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.06; P < 0.01) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) ≥2R in the first year after HTx (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06–2.95; P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for CAV development. In our cohort, CMV infection and disease in the first year after transplantation did not significantly influence the risk of CAV in the long‐term follow‐up.

Donor heart selection and outcomes: An analysis of over 2,000 cases

BACKGROUND Decision-making when offered a donor heart for transplantation is complex, and supportive data describing outcomes according to acceptance or non-acceptance choices are sparse. Our aim was to analyze donor heart acceptance decisions and associated outcomes at a single center, and after subsequent acceptance elsewhere. METHODS This investigation was a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the University of Vienna Medical Center and Eurotransplant centers for the period 2001 to 2015. RESULTS Our center accepted 31.8% (699 of 2,199) of donor hearts offered. Unlike other centers, the acceptance rate, with or without transplantation, did not increase over time. Of the donor hearts rejected by our center, 38.1% (572 of 1,500) were later accepted elsewhere. Acceptance rates were twice as high for donor hearts initially rejected for non-quality reasons (339 of 601, 56.4%) compared with initial rejection for quality reasons (233 of 899, 25.9%). Three-year patient survival rate was 79% at Vienna; for donor hearts initially rejected by Vienna for non-quality reasons or quality reasons, it was 73% and 63%, respectively (p < 0.001). Outcomes at other centers after transplantation of grafts rejected by Vienna varied according to the reason for rejection, with good 3-year survival rates for rejection due to positive virology (77%), high catecholamines (68%), long ischemic time (71%), or low ejection fraction (68%), but poor survival was observed for hearts rejected for hypernatremia (46%), cardiac arrest (21%), or valve pathology (50%). CONCLUSIONS A less restrictive policy for accepting donor hearts at our center, particularly regarding rejection for non-quality reasons or for positive virology, high catecholamine levels, longer ischemic time, or low ejection fraction, could expand our donor pool while maintaining good outcomes.

Long-term heart transplant outcomes after lowering fixed pulmonary hypertension using left ventricular assist devices†

OBJECTIVES Fixed pulmonary hypertension (fPH) is a contraindication for heart transplantation (HTX). Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to candidacy can reverse fPH in patients with terminal heart failure by chronic left ventricular unloading. We report our institutional experience with terminal heart failure patients and fPH that were successfully bridged to candidacy and underwent subsequent HTX. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 79 patients with terminal heart failure and fPH who were successfully bridged to candidacy for HTX with 6 different LVAD devices at our centre from October 1998 to September 2016 (Novacor n = 4, MicroMed DeBakey n = 29, DuraHeart n = 2, HeartMate II n = 14, HVAD n = 29 and MVAD n = 1). Median duration of LVAD support was 288 days (range 45-2279 days). Within the same timeframe, a control group of 48 patients underwent HTX after bridge-to-transplant LVAD therapy for reasons other than PH. Study end points were (i) development of fPH after LVAD implantation, (ii) post-transplant outcomes and (iii) incidence of severe adverse events. RESULTS Pulmonary vascular resistance, assessed by vasodynamic catheterization, was 4.3 ± 1.8 WU before LVAD implantation. After a median support period of 89 days (interquartile range 4-156 days), pulmonary vascular resistance decreased to 2.0 ± 0.9 WU (P ≤ 0.001), and patients were listed for HTX. Median duration of LVAD support in the study group was 288 days (45-2279 days). We observed 2 patients (2.5%) with acute right heart failure who required extracorporeal mechanical support after HTX in the study group. Long-term post-transplant survival between the study group (3 years: 83.5%, 5 years: 81.0%) and the control group (3 years: 87.5%, 5 years: 85.4%) was comparable (log-rank: P = 0.585). CONCLUSIONS LVAD implantation as a bridge to candidacy reverses fPH in patients with terminal heart failure. Post-HTX survival is excellent and comparable to results obtained in patients without fPH at the time of HTX listing.

Complications of Cardiac Transplantation

Purpose of ReviewDespite the improvement in medical therapy for heart failure and the advancements in mechanical circulatory support, heart transplantation (HT) still remains the best therapeutic option to improve survival and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. Nevertheless, HT recipients are exposed to the risk of several potential complications that may impair their outcomes. In this article, we aim to provide a practical and scholarly framework for clinicians approaching heart transplant medicine, as well as a concise update for the experienced readers on the most relevant post-HT complications.Recent FindingsWhile recognizing that most of the treatments herein discussed are based more on experience than on solid scientific evidence, significant step forward has been made in particular in the recognition and management of primary graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection, and renal dysfunction.SummaryComplications after HT may vary according to the time from surgery and can be related to graft function and pathology or to diseases and dysfunctions occurring in other organs or systems, mainly as side effects of immunosuppressive drugs and progression of pre-existing conditions. Future research needs to focus on improving precision diagnostics of causes of graft dysfunction and on reaching an optimal and customized balance between efficacy and toxicities of immunosuppressive strategies.

Cardiac Surgery After Heart Transplantation: Elective Operation or Last Exit Strategy?

Background Because of improved long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx), late graft pathologies such as valvular disease or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) might need surgical intervention to enhance longer survival and ensure quality of life. To this date, there exist no guidelines for indication of cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx. Methods In this retrospective, single-center study, we evaluated patients who underwent cardiac surgery after HTx at our institution. Results Between March 1984 and October 2016, 17 (1.16%) of 1466 HTx patients underwent cardiac surgery other than retransplantation after HTx. Indication were valvular disease (n = 7), CAV (n = 6), and other (n = 4). Of these, 29.4% (n = 5) were emergency procedures and 70.6% were elective cases. Median age at time of surgery was 61 years (interquartile range, 52-66 years); 82.4% (n = 14) were male. Median time to surgery after HTx was 9.3 years (2.7-11.1 years). In-hospital, mortality was 11.8% (n = 2); later need of retransplantation was 11.8% (n = 2) due to progressing CAV 3 to 9 months after surgery. One-year survival was 82.35%; overall survival was 47.1% (n = 8) with a median follow-up of 1477 days (416-2135 days). Overall survival after emergency procedures was 209 days (36-1119.5 days) whereas, for elective procedures, it was 1583.5 days (901.5-4319 days). Conclusions Incidence of cardiac surgery after HTx in our cohort was low (1.16%) compared with that of other studies. In elective cases, long-term survival was good.

High dose catecholamine donor support and outcomes following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND Higher dose norepinephrine donor support is a frequent reason for donor heart decline, but its associations with outcomes after heart transplantation are unclear. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 965 patients transplanted between 1992 and 2015 in the Heart Transplant Program Vienna. Stratification was performed according to donor norepinephrine dose administered before organ procurement (Group 0: 0 µg/kg/min; Group 1: 0.01 to 0.1 µg/kg/min; Group 2: >0.1 µg/kg/min). Sub-stratification of Group 2 was performed for comparison of high-dose subgroups (Group HD 1: 0.11 to 0.4 µg/kg/min; Group HD 2: >0.4 µg/kg/min). Associations between groups and outcome variables were investigated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Donor norepinephrine dose groups were not associated with overall mortality (Group 1 vs 0: hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.43; Group 2 vs 0: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.39; p = 0.669). No significant group differences were found for rates of 30-day mortality (p = 0.35), 1-year mortality (p = 0.897), primary graft dysfunction (p = 0.898), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.133) and renal replacement therapy (p = 0.324). Groups 1 and 2 showed higher rates of prolonged intensive care unit stay (18.9% vs 28.5% vs 27.5%, p = 0.005). High-dose subgroups did not differ significantly in 1-year mortality (Group HD 1: 14.3%; Group HD 2: 17.8%; p = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS Acceptance of selected donor hearts supported by higher doses of norepinephrine may be a safe option to increase the donor organ pool.