Ari Berkowitz

Roles for multifunctional and specialized spinal interneurons during motor pattern generation in tadpoles, zebrafish larvae, and turtles.

The hindbrain and spinal cord can produce multiple forms of locomotion, escape, and withdrawal behaviors and (in limbed vertebrates) site-specific scratching. Until recently, the prevailing view was that the same classes of central nervous system neurons generate multiple kinds of movements, either through reconfiguration of a single, shared network or through an increase in the number of neurons recruited within each class. The mechanisms involved in selecting and generating different motor patterns have recently been explored in detail in some non-mammalian, vertebrate model systems. Work on the hatchling Xenopus tadpole, the larval zebrafish, and the adult turtle has now revealed that distinct kinds of motor patterns are actually selected and generated by combinations of multifunctional and specialized spinal interneurons. Multifunctional interneurons may form a core, multipurpose circuit that generates elements of coordinated motor output utilized in multiple behaviors, such as left-right alternation. But, in addition, specialized spinal interneurons including separate glutamatergic and glycinergic classes are selectively activated during specific patterns: escape-withdrawal, swimming and struggling in tadpoles and zebrafish, and limb withdrawal and scratching in turtles. These specialized neurons can contribute by changing the way central pattern generator (CPG) activity is initiated and by altering CPG composition and operation. The combined use of multifunctional and specialized neurons is now established as a principle of organization across a range of vertebrates. Future research may reveal common patterns of multifunctionality and specialization among interneurons controlling diverse movements and whether similar mechanisms exist in higher-order brain circuits that select among a wider array of complex movements.

Both shared and specialized spinal circuitry for scratching and swimming in turtles.

Abstract. In principle, nervous systems could generate a behavior either via neurons that are relatively specialized for producing one behavior or via multifunctional neurons that are shared among multiple, diverse behaviors. I recorded extracellularly from individual turtle spinal cord neurons while evoking hindlimb scratching, swimming, and withdrawal motor patterns. The majority of spinal neurons recorded were activated during both scratching and swimming motor patterns, consistent with the existence of shared circuitry for these types of limb movements. These neurons tended to have a similar degree of rhythmic modulation of their firing rate and a similar phase preference within the hip flexor activity cycle during scratching and swimming motor patterns. In addition, a substantial minority of neurons were activated during scratching motor patterns but silenced during swimming motor patterns. This raises the possibility that inhibitory interactions between some scratching and swimming neural circuitry play a role in motor pattern selection. These scratch-specialized neurons were also less likely than the putative shared neurons to be activated during withdrawal motor patterns. Thus, these neurons may represent two separate classes, one of which is used generally for hindlimb motor control and the other of which is relatively specialized for a subset of hindlimb movement types.

Spinal interneurons that are selectively activated during fictive flexion reflex.

Behavioral choices in invertebrates are mediated by a combination of shared and specialized circuitry, including neurons that are inhibited during competing behaviors. Less is known, however, about the neural mechanisms of behavioral choice in vertebrates. The spinal cord can appropriately select among several types of limb movements, including limb withdrawal (flexion reflex), scratching, and locomotion, and thus is conducive to examination of vertebrate mechanisms of behavioral choice. Flexion reflex can interrupt and reset the rhythm of scratching and locomotion, suggesting that a combination of shared and specialized circuitry contributes to these behaviors, but little is known about the interneurons involved. Here, I used in vivo intracellular recording and dye injection to identify a group of spinal interneurons that are strongly activated during fictive flexion reflex but inhibited during fictive scratching and fictive swimming. These flexion-selective interneurons are typically rhythmically hyperpolarized during fictive scratching and fictive swimming. This hyperpolarization can be maximal during the ipsilateral hip flexor bursts of rhythmic limb motor patterns, although these cells are strongly activated during the ipsilateral hip flexor bursts of fictive flexion reflex. Thus, these interneurons are relatively specialized for fictive limb withdrawal, rather than contributing to the hip flexor phase of multiple types of limb movements. These flexion-selective cells are physiologically and morphologically distinguishable from a recently described group of spinal interneurons (transverse interneurons) that are strongly activated during both fictive flexion reflex and fictive scratching. Thus, spinal interneurons with distinct behavioral roles may to some extent be morphologically distinguishable.

Multifunctional and specialized spinal interneurons for turtle limb movements

The turtle spinal cord can help reveal how vertebrate central nervous system (CNS) circuits select and generate an appropriate limb movement in each circumstance. Both multifunctional and specialized spinal interneurons contribute to the motor patterns for the three forms of scratching, forward swimming, and flexion reflex. Multifunctional interneurons, activated during all of these motor patterns, can have axon terminal arborizations in the ventral horn, where they likely contribute to limb motor output. Specialized interneurons can be specialized for a behavior, as opposed to a phase or motor synergy. Interneurons specialized for scratching can be hyperpolarized throughout swimming. Interneurons specialized for flexion reflex can be hyperpolarized throughout scratching and swimming. Some structure–function correlations have been revealed: flexion reflex‐selective interneurons had somata exclusively in the dorsal horn, in contrast to scratch‐activated interneurons. Transverse interneurons, defined by quantitative morphological criteria, had higher peak firing rates, narrower action potentials, briefer afterhyperpolarizations, and larger membrane potential oscillations than scratch‐activated interneurons with different dendritic morphologies. Future investigations will focus on how multifunctional and specialized spinal interneurons interact to generate each motor output.

Strong interactions between spinal cord networks for locomotion and scratching

Distinct rhythmic behaviors involving a common set of motoneurons and muscles can be generated by separate central nervous system (CNS) networks, a single network, or partly overlapping networks in invertebrates. Less is known for vertebrates. Simultaneous activation of two networks can reveal overlap or interactions between them. The turtle spinal cord contains networks that generate locomotion and three forms of scratching (rostral, pocket, and caudal), having different knee-hip synergies. Here, we report that in immobilized spinal turtles, simultaneous delivery of types of stimulation, which individually evoked forward swimming and one form of scratching, could 1) increase the rhythm frequency; 2) evoke switches, hybrids, and intermediate motor patterns; 3) recruit a swim motor pattern even when the swim stimulation was reduced to subthreshold intensity; and 4) disrupt rhythm generation entirely. The strength of swim stimulation could influence the result. Thus even pocket scratching and caudal scratching, which do not share a knee-hip synergy with forward swimming, can interact with swim stimulation to alter both rhythm and pattern generation. Model simulations were used to explore the compatibility of our experimental results with hypothetical network architectures for rhythm generation. Models could reproduce experimental observations only if they included interactions between neurons involved in swim and scratch rhythm generation, with maximal consistency between simulations and experiments attained using a model architecture in which certain neurons participated actively in both swim and scratch rhythmogenesis. Collectively, these findings suggest that the spinal cord networks that generate locomotion and scratching have important shared components or strong interactions between them.

Distributions of active spinal cord neurons during swimming and scratching motor patterns

The spinal cord can generate motor patterns underlying several kinds of limb movements. Many spinal interneurons are multifunctional, contributing to multiple limb movements, but others are specialized. It is unclear whether anatomical distributions of activated neurons differ for different limb movements. We examined distributions of activated neurons for locomotion and scratching using an activity-dependent dye. Adult turtles were stimulated to generate repeatedly forward swimming, rostral scratching, pocket scratching, or caudal scratching motor patterns, while sulforhodamine 101 was applied to the spinal cord. Sulforhodamine-labeled neurons were widely distributed rostrocaudally, dorsoventrally, and mediolaterally after each motor pattern, concentrated bilaterally in the deep dorsal horn, the lateral intermediate zone, and the dorsal to middle ventral horn. Labeled neurons were common in all hindlimb enlargement segments and the pre-enlargement segment following swimming and scratching, but a significantly higher percentage were in the rostral segments following swimming than rostral scratching. These findings suggest that largely the same spinal regions are activated during swimming and scratching, but there are some differences that may indicate locations of behaviorally specialized neurons. Finally, the substantial inter-animal variability following a single kind of motor pattern may indicate that essentially the same motor output is generated by anatomically variable networks.

Propriospinal projections to the ventral horn of the rostral and caudal hindlimb enlargement in turtles

In limbed vertebrates, the capacity to generate rhythmic motor patterns for locomotion and scratching is distributed over spinal cord segments of the limb enlargement (e.g., lumbosacral segments), but within this region, rostral segments are more rhythmogenic than caudal segments. The underlying reasons for this rostrocaudal asymmetry are not clear. One possibility is that rostral and caudal segments receive distinct sets of propriospinal projections. To test this hypothesis, I injected horseradish peroxidase (HRP) into the ventral horn unilaterally in a rostral or caudal segment of the turtle hindlimb enlargement. I quantitatively assessed the distributions of retrogradely labeled neurons in six hindlimb enlargement and pre-enlargement segments. The cross-sectional distribution did not depend on which segment was injected. Ipsilateral labeling occurred predominantly in the deep dorsal horn, the lateral part of the intermediate zone, and the dorsal two-thirds of the ventral horn, while contralateral labeling occurred mainly in the medial part of the ventral horn and the lateral part of the intermediate zone. This cross-sectional distribution is similar to what has been seen in mammals. The rostrocaudal distribution of labeled cells, however, depended on which segment was injected. Rostral injections gave rise to rostrally skewed distributions, dominated by descending propriospinal neurons. Caudal injections gave rise to caudally skewed distributions, dominated by ascending propriospinal neurons. Thus, rostral segments of the hindlimb enlargement received more propriospinal inputs from immediately rostral than immediately caudal segments, while the reverse was true for inputs to caudal segments. This anatomical asymmetry may contribute to known functional asymmetries within the enlargement.

Partly Shared Spinal Cord Networks for Locomotion and Scratching

Animals produce a variety of behaviors using a limited number of muscles and motor neurons. Rhythmic behaviors are often generated in basic form by networks of neurons within the central nervous system, or central pattern generators (CPGs). It is known from several invertebrates that different rhythmic behaviors involving the same muscles and motor neurons can be generated by a single CPG, multiple separate CPGs, or partly overlapping CPGs. Much less is known about how vertebrates generate multiple, rhythmic behaviors involving the same muscles. The spinal cord of limbed vertebrates contains CPGs for locomotion and multiple forms of scratching. We investigated the extent of sharing of CPGs for hind limb locomotion and for scratching. We used the spinal cord of adult red-eared turtles. Animals were immobilized to remove movement-related sensory feedback and were spinally transected to remove input from the brain. We took two approaches. First, we monitored individual spinal cord interneurons (i.e., neurons that are in between sensory neurons and motor neurons) during generation of each kind of rhythmic output of motor neurons (i.e., each motor pattern). Many spinal cord interneurons were rhythmically activated during the motor patterns for forward swimming and all three forms of scratching. Some of these scratch/swim interneurons had physiological and morphological properties consistent with their playing a role in the generation of motor patterns for all of these rhythmic behaviors. Other spinal cord interneurons, however, were rhythmically activated during scratching motor patterns but inhibited during swimming motor patterns. Thus, locomotion and scratching may be generated by partly shared spinal cord CPGs. Second, we delivered swim-evoking and scratch-evoking stimuli simultaneously and monitored the resulting motor patterns. Simultaneous stimulation could cause interactions of scratch inputs with subthreshold swim inputs to produce normal swimming, acceleration of the swimming rhythm, scratch-swim hybrid cycles, or complete cessation of the rhythm. The type of effect obtained depended on the level of swim-evoking stimulation. These effects suggest that swim-evoking and scratch-evoking inputs can interact strongly in the spinal cord to modify the rhythm and pattern of motor output. Collectively, the single-neuron recordings and the results of simultaneous stimulation suggest that important elements of the generation of rhythms and patterns are shared between locomotion and scratching in limbed vertebrates.

Rostral spinal cord segments are sufficient to generate a rhythm for both locomotion and scratching but affect their hip extensor phases differently

Rostral segments of the spinal cord hindlimb enlargement are more important than caudal segments for generating locomotion and scratching rhythms in limbed vertebrates, but the adequacy of rostral segments has not been directly compared between locomotion and scratching. We separated caudal segments from immobilized low-spinal turtles by sequential spinal cord transections. After separation of the caudal four segments of the five-segment hindlimb enlargement, the remaining enlargement segment and five preenlargement segments still produced rhythms for forward swimming and both rostral and pocket scratching. The swimming rhythm frequency was usually maintained. Some animals continued to generate swimming and scratching rhythms even with no enlargement segments remaining, using only preenlargement segments. The preenlargement segments and rostral-most enlargement segment were also sufficient to maintain hip flexor (HF) motoneuron quiescence between HF bursts [which normally occurs during each hip extensor (HE) phase] during swimming. In contrast, the HF-quiescent phase was increasingly absent (i.e., HE-phase deletions) during rostral and pocket scratching. Moreover, respiratory motoneurons that normally burst during HE bursts continued to burst during the HF quiescence of swimming even with the caudal segments separated. Thus the same segments are sufficient to generate the basic rhythms for both locomotion and scratching. These segments are also sufficient to produce a reliable HE phase during locomotion but not during rostral or pocket scratching. We hypothesize that the rostral HE-phase interneurons that rhythmically inhibit HF motoneurons and interneurons are sufficient to generate HF quiescence during HE-biased swimming but not during the more HF-biased rostral and pocket scratching.

Endogenous biotin staining in a subset of spinal neuronal cell bodies: a potential confounding factor for neuroanatomical studies.

Biotinylated compounds are commonly used to label neuronal cell bodies via intracellular filling or retrograde tracing. Endogenous concentrations of biotin within a subset of neuronal cell bodies would pose a problem for interpreting such experiments. Here I report that a subset of turtle spinal cord neuronal cell bodies strongly stains for biotin, using the avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase (ABC) reaction, in the absence of any exogenous biotinylated compound.