Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Arianna Bassan.
Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research | 2007
Andrew Worth; Arianna Bassan; J. de Bruijn; A. Gallegos Saliner; Tatiana I. Netzeva; Manuela Pavan; Grace Patlewicz; Ivanka Tsakovska; S. Eisenreich
Under the proposed REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of CHemicals) legislation, (Q)SAR models and grouping methods (chemical categories and read across approaches) are expected to play a significant role in prioritising industrial chemicals for further assessment, and for filling information gaps for the purposes of classification and labelling, risk assessment and the assessment of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) chemicals. The European Chemicals Bureau (ECB), which is part of the European Commissions Joint Research Centre (JRC), has a well-established role in providing independent scientific and technical advice to European policy makers. The ECB also promotes consensus and capacity building on scientific and technical matters among stakeholders in the Member State authorities and industry. To promote the availability and use of (Q)SARs and related estimation methods, the ECB is carrying out a range of activities, including applied research in computational toxicology, the assessment of (Q)SAR models and methods, the development of technical guidance documents and computational tools, and the organisation of training courses. This article provides an overview of ECB activities on computational toxicology, which are intended to promote the development, validation, acceptance and use of (Q)SARs and related estimation methods, both at the European and international levels. †Presented at the 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental Toxicology (QSAR2006), 8–12 May 2006, Lyon, France.
Sar and Qsar in Environmental Research | 2012
E. Fioravanzo; Arianna Bassan; Manuela Pavan; Aleksandra Mostrag-Szlichtyng; Andrew Worth
The toxicological assessment of genotoxic impurities is important in the regulatory framework for pharmaceuticals. In this context, the application of promising computational methods (e.g. Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationships (QSARs), Structure–Activity Relationships (SARs) and/or expert systems) for the evaluation of genotoxicity is needed, especially when very limited information on impurities is available. To gain an overview of how computational methods are used internationally in the regulatory assessment of pharmaceutical impurities, the current regulatory documents were reviewed. The software recommended in the guidelines (e.g. MCASE, MC4PC, Derek for Windows) or used practically by various regulatory agencies (e.g. US Food and Drug Administration, US and Danish Environmental Protection Agencies), as well as other existing programs were analysed. Both statistically based and knowledge-based (expert system) tools were analysed. The overall conclusions on the available in silico tools for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity prediction are quite optimistic, and the regulatory application of QSAR methods is constantly growing. For regulatory purposes, it is recommended that predictions of genotoxicity/carcinogenicity should be based on a battery of models, combining high-sensitivity models (low rate of false negatives) with high-specificity ones (low rate of false positives) and in vitro assays in an integrated manner.
Toxicology | 2017
Merilin Al Sharif; Ivanka Tsakovska; Ilza Pajeva; Petko Alov; Elena Fioravanzo; Arianna Bassan; Simona Kovarich; Chihae Yang; Aleksandra Mostrag-Szlichtyng; Vessela Vitcheva; Andrew Worth; Andrea-N. Richarz; Mark T. D. Cronin
The aim of this paper was to provide a proof of concept demonstrating that molecular modelling methodologies can be employed as a part of an integrated strategy to support toxicity prediction consistent with the mode of action/adverse outcome pathway (MoA/AOP) framework. To illustrate the role of molecular modelling in predictive toxicology, a case study was undertaken in which molecular modelling methodologies were employed to predict the activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor γ (PPARγ) as a potential molecular initiating event (MIE) for liver steatosis. A stepwise procedure combining different in silico approaches (virtual screening based on docking and pharmacophore filtering, and molecular field analysis) was developed to screen for PPARγ full agonists and to predict their transactivation activity (EC50). The performance metrics of the classification model to predict PPARγ full agonists were balanced accuracy=81%, sensitivity=85% and specificity=76%. The 3D QSAR model developed to predict EC50 of PPARγ full agonists had the following statistical parameters: q2cv=0.610, Nopt=7, SEPcv=0.505, r2pr=0.552. To support the linkage of PPARγ agonism predictions to prosteatotic potential, molecular modelling was combined with independently performed mechanistic mining of available in vivo toxicity data followed by ToxPrint chemotypes analysis. The approaches investigated demonstrated a potential to predict the MIE, to facilitate the process of MoA/AOP elaboration, to increase the scientific confidence in AOP, and to become a basis for 3D chemotype development.
Methods of Molecular Biology | 2016
Manuela Pavan; Simona Kovarich; Arianna Bassan; Lorenza Broccardo; Chihae Yang; Elena Fioravanzo
The toxicological assessment of DNA-reactive/mutagenic or clastogenic impurities plays an important role in the regulatory process for pharmaceuticals; in this context, in silico structure-based approaches are applied as primary tools for the evaluation of the mutagenic potential of the drug impurities. The general recommendations regarding such use of in silico methods are provided in the recent ICH M7 guideline stating that computational (in silico) toxicology assessment should be performed using two (Q)SAR prediction methodologies complementing each other: a statistical-based method and an expert rule-based method.Based on our consultant experience, we describe here a framework for in silico assessment of mutagenic potential of drug impurities. Two main applications of in silico methods are presented: (1) support and optimization of drug synthesis processes by providing early indication of potential genotoxic impurities and (2) regulatory evaluation of genotoxic potential of impurities in compliance with the ICH M7 guideline. Some critical case studies are also discussed.
Archive | 2005
Andrew Worth; Arianna Bassan; Gallegos A; Tatiana I. Netzeva; Grace Patlewicz; Manuela Pavan; Ivanka Tsakovska; Marjan Vračko
Qsar & Combinatorial Science | 2008
Arianna Bassan; Andrew Worth
EFSA Supporting Publications | 2011
Arianna Bassan; Elena Fioravanzo; Manuela Pavan; Matteo Stocchero
Archive | 2006
Arianna Bassan; Andrew Worth
EFSA Supporting Publications | 2015
Beatrice Barbaro; Rossella Baldin; Simona Kovarich; Manuela Pavan; Elena Fioravanzo; Arianna Bassan
Toxicology Letters | 2013
Elena Fioravanzo; Arianna Bassan; Mark T. D. Cronin; Simona Kovarich; C. Manelfi; Andrea-Nicole Richarz; Ivanka Tsakovska; Andrew Worth