Arie R. Hoeksema

Influence of Age on Clinical Performance of Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 10-Year Prospective Comparative Study.

PURPOSE The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess whether age has influence on peri-implant health in patients treated with mandibular two-implant overdentures during a 10-year evaluation period. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective study was carried out with two groups of edentulous patients, viz a younger (n = 52; mean age 45 years, 35-50 years) and an older (n = 53; mean age 68 years, 60-80 years) group. In all patients, two dental implants were placed in the interforaminal region of the mandible and after a 3-month healing period overdentures were fabricated. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment, and after 1, 5 and 10 years. Implant loss, plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, and probing depth were assessed as clinical parameters. Peri-implant bone loss was assessed on dental radiographs made with a standardized long-cone technique with a direction device. RESULTS Implant survival after 10 years was 97.1% and 93.4% in the younger and older group, respectively. Ten-year scores of plaque, gingiva, and bleeding were between 0 and 1 for both groups (possible scores 0-3), and mean probing depth was 3 mm in both groups. Mean peri-implant bone loss after 10 years was 1.2 and 1.4 mm in the younger and older patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION Clinical performance of mandibular two-implant overdentures is equally successful in younger and older patients.

Patients With Transmandibular Implants Are at Risk for Severe Complications When Becoming Frail

Early in the implant era, transmandibular implant systems were used for retention of implant-retained mandibular overdentures in the severely resorbed mandible. These transmandibular systems require very thorough aftercare, especially when patients become frail and dependent on care. As a result, oral care often receives less attention in frail elderly patients or the patient cannot maintain the needed level of oral care. Care providers often are unfamiliar with the level of oral care needed to preserve transmandibular implants in good condition. This case series describes the risk for severe complications, including chronic pain and fracture of the mandible, in frail elderly patients who were unable to maintain oral care at the desired level and whose caregivers did not provide the needed level of oral care.

Peri-implant health in people aged 75 and over with an implant-retained overdenture in the mandibula

The number of elderly patients with an implant-retained overdenture in the mandibula is increasing. There is, however, insufficient information on how these elderly people are functioning with their overdenture and on their peri--implant health. Therefore, a study was carried out among a group of people aged 75 and over who had been provided with an implant-retained overdenture in a general dental office, measuring their ability to manage independently, their general health and peri-implant health. The study revealed a high degree of ability to manage independently, despite the health problems affecting many over 75. The patients rated their prosthetic overdentures with an average grade of 8.9 ± 1.1. Plaque around the implant (73%) and bleeding on probing (68%) were frequently seen. However, progressive peri-implant bone loss was seldom seen. No relationship was evident between plaque-scores and the ability to manage independently. Except for oral hygiene instruction and/or professional cleaning of peri-implants, no serious interventions were necessary. It was concluded that this group of elderly people, provided with an implant-retained mandibular overdenture, are functioning well. Plaque around the implant and bleeding on probing are often present but progressive peri-implant bone loss is rare.

Influence of Age on Clinical Performance of Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 10-Year Prospective Comparative Study: Age and Dental Implant Treatment

PURPOSE The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess whether age has influence on peri-implant health in patients treated with mandibular two-implant overdentures during a 10-year evaluation period. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective study was carried out with two groups of edentulous patients, viz a younger (n = 52; mean age 45 years, 35-50 years) and an older (n = 53; mean age 68 years, 60-80 years) group. In all patients, two dental implants were placed in the interforaminal region of the mandible and after a 3-month healing period overdentures were fabricated. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment, and after 1, 5 and 10 years. Implant loss, plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, and probing depth were assessed as clinical parameters. Peri-implant bone loss was assessed on dental radiographs made with a standardized long-cone technique with a direction device. RESULTS Implant survival after 10 years was 97.1% and 93.4% in the younger and older group, respectively. Ten-year scores of plaque, gingiva, and bleeding were between 0 and 1 for both groups (possible scores 0-3), and mean probing depth was 3 mm in both groups. Mean peri-implant bone loss after 10 years was 1.2 and 1.4 mm in the younger and older patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION Clinical performance of mandibular two-implant overdentures is equally successful in younger and older patients.

Influence of Age on Clinical Performance of Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures

PURPOSE The aim of this prospective comparative study was to assess whether age has influence on peri-implant health in patients treated with mandibular two-implant overdentures during a 10-year evaluation period. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective study was carried out with two groups of edentulous patients, viz a younger (n = 52; mean age 45 years, 35-50 years) and an older (n = 53; mean age 68 years, 60-80 years) group. In all patients, two dental implants were placed in the interforaminal region of the mandible and after a 3-month healing period overdentures were fabricated. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated immediately after completion of the prosthetic treatment, and after 1, 5 and 10 years. Implant loss, plaque index, gingival index, bleeding index, and probing depth were assessed as clinical parameters. Peri-implant bone loss was assessed on dental radiographs made with a standardized long-cone technique with a direction device. RESULTS Implant survival after 10 years was 97.1% and 93.4% in the younger and older group, respectively. Ten-year scores of plaque, gingiva, and bleeding were between 0 and 1 for both groups (possible scores 0-3), and mean probing depth was 3 mm in both groups. Mean peri-implant bone loss after 10 years was 1.2 and 1.4 mm in the younger and older patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. CONCLUSION Clinical performance of mandibular two-implant overdentures is equally successful in younger and older patients.