Ariella Jakobson-Setton

Effect of treatment delay on survival in patients with cervical cancer: a historical cohort study.

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of treatment delay on prognosis in patients with cervical cancer. Methods The study group of this historic cohort study comprised 321 patients newly diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1999 and 2010. Time from diagnosis to treatment was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as a categorical variable in 3 groups that differed in waiting time between diagnosis and treatment initiation: 30 days or less (group 1, n = 134), 30 to 45 days (group 2, n = 86), and more than 45 days (group 3, n = 101). Associations between waiting time group, patients’ characteristics, and disease outcome were investigated using t tests, analyses of variance and Cox regression analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) tests. Results Time from diagnosis to treatment initiation, when analyzed as a continuous variable, was not a significant factor in survival. There were no between-group differences in age, smoking rate, marital status, gravidity, parity, tumor histology, or lymph node involvement. Early-stage disease and small tumor diameter were diagnosed most frequently in group 3. However, there was no significant between-group difference in 3-year survival rates (74.6%, 82.2%, and 80.8% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P = 0.38). On multivariate analysis, only stage, histology, and lymph node involvement were significant prognostic factors for survival. Before starting treatment, 28 patients underwent ovarian preservation procedures. Conclusions Longer waiting time from diagnosis to treatment was not associated with worse survival. Our findings imply that if patients desire fertility or ovarian preservation procedures before starting treatment, it is acceptable to allow time for them.

Safety of ovarian conservation and fertility preservation in advanced borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of a fertility-sparing approach on disease recurrence in women with advanced borderline ovarian tumors. DESIGN Historic cohort study. SETTING A tertiary referral center for gynecological oncology patients and a university teaching hospital. PATIENT(S) Consecutive patients with advanced borderline ovarian tumors defined as stage IC and above, treated at a single institution during a span of 30 years. INTERVENTION(S) Data on surgical approach (e.g., fertility sparing, ovarian conserving) as well as histopathology, disease stage, CA-125 level, and use of chemotherapy were collected from the medical records, and their impact on disease recurrence was assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Recurrence-free interval. Its association with the type of surgery and with other clinical and pathological features was assessed using the Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULT(S) Fifty-nine patients with advanced disease were identified. Median follow-up was 55.3 months. Mean age at diagnosis was 35 years. Most of the tumors (51, 84.4%) had serous histology. Twenty-seven patients (45.8%) developed recurrences and 6 (10%) died of their disease. Mean time to recurrence was 30.6 months. Of 44 women ≤40 years, 33 (75%) had a fertility-sparing procedure. Fertility preservation was not associated with disease recurrence. A total of 34 pregnancies and 26 live births were documented among 21 patients attempting conception. CONCLUSION(S) Borderline ovarian tumors carry a favorable prognosis, even at an advanced stage. Fertility preservation was not found to be associated with an increased risk of relapse in young patients with advanced disease, and may be reasonably considered.

Treating gynecologic malignancies in elderly patients.

Aim:To determine the relative benefits of full and partial treatment for gynecologic malignancies in elderly patients. Methods:A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients (n=169) aged 79 and older (median age 82 y; range, 79 to 94 y), diagnosed between 1971 and 2007 with various types of gynecologic malignancies (endometrial, 52%; ovarian, 26%; vulvar, 11%; cervical, 5%; other, 6%) was conducted. Stages were I to II (47%), III to IV (35.5%), and unknown (17.5%). Major comorbidities were hypertension (51%), diabetes (17%), cardiac diseases (34%), and other malignancy (12%). Regardless of age or chronic illnesses, patients were grouped on the basis of having been treated optimally (100 patients; 59.2%), defined as the accepted standard for each diagnosis and stage including surgery and adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy as indicated; or suboptimally (69 patients; 40.8%), that is, no or only partial treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models, univariate and multivariable were conducted. Results:For all patients with suboptimal treatment, the age-and-stage–adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.203-2.570; P=0.004) compared with optimal treatment. Age-adjusted hazard ratio was 2.15 (95% CI, 1.127-4.114; P=0.02) and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.415-3.779; P=0.001) for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients, respectively. Age-adjusted and stage-adjusted hazard ratio was 2.8 (95% CI, 1.099-5.157; P=0.028) and 1.53 (95% CI, 0.867-2.702; P=0.1420) for ovarian and endometrial cancer patients, respectively. Conclusions:Optimal treatment in patients with gynecologic malignancies evidently improves survival in elderly patients at any age, and in patients with ovarian cancer at any stage. Regardless of chronological age, the aim should be to deliver optimal treatment.

Hysteroscopically guided transvaginal ultrasound tubal catheterization—a novel office procedure

OBJECTIVE Investigate a novel office hysteroscopic tubal catheterization therapeutic method for proximal tubal occlusion. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study in a tertiary referral center. We evaluated the procedure on a group of 27 patients that were referred to our unit for proximal tubal occlusion demonstrated by hysterosalpingography, 9 (33.3%) of them with primary infertility and 18 of them (66.6%) with secondary infertility. The intervention included the usage of the modified Novy cornual cannulation set which was inserted through a 5F working cannel during an office operative hysteroscopy, followed by fallopian tube irrigation with saline-air mixture under ultrasonographic imaging. RESULTS Our series revealed no complication during or after the procedure; anesthesia was not required. One patient lost from follow-up. Of the remaining 26, 10 patients (38.4%) conceived either spontaneously or with treatment by clomiphene or gonadotropine associated with intrauterine insemination. The median time to conception was 5 months (range 4-17). CONCLUSION We therefore concluded that office hysteroscopic tubal catheterization is a simple (without anesthesia required) option for the treatment of patients suffering from proximal tubal occlusion. Fertility outcomes in our series are comparable to other treatments options for tubal catheterization. Therefore, tubal catheterization should not delay the assisted reproducted techniques if indicated but we propose to include it in a global integrated approach.

Use of titanium spiral tacks for long-term oophoropexy before pelvic irradiation.

Background Ovarian transposition before planned pelvic irradiation can preserve ovarian function in young patients with pelvic malignancies. The transposed ovaries are fixed to the posterolateral abdominal wall. We described the use of a titanium spiral tack as a fixation device and compared it with other methods of oophoropexy. Methods Medical and surgical records of all consecutive patients who underwent oophoropexy in our institution between 2007 and 2013 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were summarized; follicle-stimulating hormone values, recorded; and imaging scans, reviewed. Results Oophoropexy was performed in 30 patients: 28 with cervical carcinomas and 2 with pelvic sarcomas. The procedure was done through laparoscopy in 13 patients and through laparotomy in 17. Titanium spiral tack was used for ovarian fixation in 14 patients, Vicryl suturing in 14, and in 2 cases the ovaries were pulled up through a retroperitoneal tunnel and fixed to the peritoneum with sutures. Titanium spiral tack fixation took a few seconds to perform. There were no immediate intraoperative or postoperative complications. Ovarian function was preserved in 15 patients (7/14 with spiral tack, 6/14 with sutures, and in both patients with retroperitoneal tunneling). Postoperative imaging results showed that all ovaries retained their extrapelvic location for a median period of 11.6 months (range, 2.3–63 months). Conclusions Spiral tack is a simple, reliable method for oophoropexy before pelvic irradiation. Its efficacy is comparable with that of suture fixation, with the added advantage of ultrashort operative time. It is therefore worth considering as an alternative to suturing.

Fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian tumors – how does it impact disease outcome? A cohort study

Borderline ovarian tumors are typically indolent neoplasms. Since many are diagnosed in younger women, fertility conservation is an important consideration and has been advocated based on retrospective data. The objective of this study was to identify features impacting on recurrence and survival in a series of borderline ovarian tumors, and to assess the safety of a fertility‐sparing approach.

Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer and CIN3 in Jewish Women in Israel - Two Case Control Studies.

PURPOSE The aim of the study was to identify risk and protective factors/markers for cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3) in Israeli Jewish women in order to settle the discrepancy of low incidence rate of cervical cancer and relatively high incidence rate of CIN3. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted two case control studies, which examined the association between potential risk and protective factors/markers for cervical cancer or CIN3 using self administered detailed questionnaires. RESULTS For studying cervical cancer, 40 cases and 40 matched controls were interviewed. In the univariable and multivariable analyses older age, depression or anxiety and ever smoking seemed to act as independent risk factors/markers, while older age at first intercourse was protective. For studying CIN3, 99 cases and 79 controls were interviewed. Multivariable analysis has demonstrated that being born in Israel, depression or anxiety and ever smoking were independent risk factors/markers for CIN3. CONCLUSIONS The risk factors/markers studied, that were associated with cervical cancer or CIN3 among Jewish women in Israel, are similar to those reported in other parts of the world, and do not explain the observed discrepancy of high in-situ cervical cancer rates and low invasive cervical cancer incidence in Israel.