Arjun S. Sebastian

Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior cervical spine surgery: an analysis of 5,441 patients from the ACS NSQIP 2005–2012

BACKGROUND CONTEXT The incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior cervical surgery has been reported as high as 18% in the literature. Few large studies have specifically examined posterior cervical procedures. PURPOSE The study aims to examine the incidence, timing, and risk factors for SSI following posterior cervical surgery. DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data in a national surgical outcomes database. PATIENT SAMPLE The sample includes patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery between 2005 and 2012 identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use Data File. OUTCOME MEASURES The 30-day rate of postoperative SSI, timing of diagnosis, and associated risk factors were determined. METHODS The ACS NSQIP was used to identify 5,441 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery by Current Procedural Terminology codes from 2005 to 2012. Thirty-day readmission data were obtained for 2011-2012. The incidence and timing of SSI were determined. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify significant risk factors. RESULTS Of the 5,441 patients identified as having undergone posterior cervical surgery, 3,724 had a posterior cervical decompression, 1,310 had a posterior cervical fusion, and 407 underwent cervical laminoplasty. Surgical site infection within 30 days was identified in 160 patients (2.94%), with 80 of those cases being superficial SSI. There was no significant difference in SSI rate among the three procedure groups. The average time for diagnosis of SSI was over 2 weeks. In 2011-2012, 36.9% of patients with SSI were readmitted within 30 days. Several significant predictors of SSI were identified in univariate analysis, including body mass index (BMI) >35, chronic steroid use, albumin <3, hematocrit <33, platelets <100, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, longer operative time, and longer hospital admission. Independent risk factors, including BMI >35 (odds ratio [OR]=1.78, p=.003), chronic steroid use (OR=1.73, p=.049), and operative time >197 minutes (OR=2.08, p=.005), were identified in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of preoperative nutritional status, serum blood cell counts, and operative efficiency may lead to a reduction in SSI rates. Obese patients and patients on chronic steroid therapy should be counseled on elevated SSI risk.

Sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters after lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative scoliosis: A case-control study

Study Design. Retrospective matched-cohort analysis. Objective. To evaluate the change in radiographical parameters in patients undergoing interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation compared with posterior spine fusion (PSF) alone for degenerative scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Little is known about the effect of lateral interbody fusion (LIF) on sagittal plane correction in the setting of degenerative scoliosis. We performed a retrospective study to investigate these changes compared with PSF. Methods. Between 1997 and 2011, 33 patients had LIF at 181 levels between T8 and L5 vertebrae for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis (mean; 5 ± 2 levels). Of those, 23 patients had additional anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at 37 levels between L4 and S1 vertebrae (mean; 1.6 ± 0.5 levels). A 1:1 matched control of patients who underwent PSF was performed. Patients were matched by age, sex, and diagnosis. Clinical and radiographical data were collected and compared between the matched cohorts. Results. Lumbar lordosis (LL) was significantly restored in the LIF ± ALIF compared with PSF cohort (44° ± 14° vs. 36° ± 15°, P = 0.02). The segmental LL over the 102 LIF levels significantly improved from 12°± 10° to 21°± 13° postoperatively (P < 0.0001). However, the change over the 37 ALIF levels was not significant (from 30° ± 15° to 29° ± 9°, P = 0.8). Sagittal plane alignment was improved in the LIF ± ALIF compared with PSF cohort and trended toward but did not reach significance (3.8 ± 3.2 cm vs. 6.2 ± 5.7 cm, P = 0.09). Sacral slope was significantly higher in the LIF ± ALIF compared with PSF cohort (33° ± 11° vs. 28° ± 10°, P = 0.03). Pelvic tilt was lower in the LIF ± ALIF compared with PSF cohort and trended toward but did not reach significance (22° ± 10° vs. 26° ± 10°, P = 0.08). Conclusion. LL and sacral slope had mildly but statistically improved in the interbody fusion cohort compared with PSF cohort. Sagittal alignment and pelvic tilt trended toward but did not reach statistical significance. Segmental LL was improved at LIF levels more than at ALIF levels. Level of Evidence: 3

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism following Thoracolumbar Surgery: Analysis of 43,777 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012

Study Design Retrospective clinical study of a prospectively collected, national database. Objective Determine the 30-day incidence, timing, and risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Methods The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File identified 43,777 patients who underwent thoracolumbar surgery from 2005 to 2012. Multiple patient characteristics were identified. The incidence and timing (in days) of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE) were determined. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify significant risk factors. Results Of the 43,777 patients identified as having had thoracolumbar surgery, 202 cases of PE (0.5%) and 311 cases of DVT (0.7%) were identified. VTE rates were highest in patients undergoing corpectomy, with a 1.7% PE rate and a 3.8% DVT rate. Independent risk factors for VTE included length of stay (LOS) ≥ 6 days (odds ratio [OR] 4.07), disseminated cancer (OR 1.77), white blood cell count > 12 (OR 1.76), paraplegia (OR 1.75), albumin < 3 (OR 1.73), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or greater (OR 1.54), body mass index > 40 (OR 1.49), and operative time > 193 minutes (OR 1.43). LOS < 3 days was protective (OR 0.427). Conclusions We report an overall 30-day PE rate of 0.5% and DVT rate of 0.7% following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Patients undergoing corpectomy were at highest risk for VTE. Multiple VTE risk factors were identified. Further studies are needed to develop algorithms to stratify VTE risk and direct prophylaxis accordingly.

Risk factors for nonorganic low back pain in patients with worker's compensation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Nonorganic low back pain (NOLBP) is common in the workers compensation (WC) population. Consults with specialists constitute an unnecessary cost to the system, and a means of screening for these patients is necessary. PURPOSE To design easily identifiable criteria to help identify which WC patients are likely to have nonorganic pain. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective chart review of WC patients with low back pain (LBP) seen in consultation by a single spine surgeon over a 2-year period at a university medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE One hundred twenty-seven WC patients with LBP were seen in consultation by a single spine surgeon over a 2-year period. All were referred for surgical evaluation. Potential risk factors for nonorganic pain were identified, which included alleged injury in multiple bodily areas, presence of concomitant cervical and/or thoracic complaints, initial presentation to chiropractor, mechanism of injury including slip and fall or lifting of a patient, number of previous independent medical examinations performed, presence of psychiatric diagnosis, areas of pain different from first report of injury, greater than 13 months between evaluations, occupation as a health-care employee, presence of legal representation, amount of time off work, present work status (working or disabled), and number of previous WC claims. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included the number of Waddells signs and additional nonorganic/inconsistent pain behaviors noted during the examination by the spine specialist. Nonorganic low back pain was defined as four or more Waddells signs or three Waddells signs plus one additional inconsistent behavior. METHODS A stepwise logistic regression was used to determine which of the risk factors were significantly associated with nonorganic pain, correcting for age and sex. We then used an analysis of deviance to determine which combination of factors could best differentiate patients with nonorganic findings. RESULTS Factors that were significantly associated with nonorganic pain included mechanism of injury including slip and fall or lifting of a patient (odds ratio [OR]=5.7, p=.03), alleged injury in greater than two bodily areas (OR=4.2, p=.02), presence of concomitant cervical and thoracic complaints (OR=2.9, p=.04), initial presentation to chiropractor (OR=7.7, p=.01), and back pain not listed on first report of injury (OR=3.3, p=.04). Patients with three or more of these findings were found to be at a very high risk of having nonorganic pain (greater than 95%). CONCLUSIONS We found a significant association between certain easily identifiable criteria and NOLBP in a cohort of WC patients. These criteria included mechanism of injury including slip and fall or lifting of a patient, alleged injury in greater than two bodily areas, presence of concomitant cervical and/or thoracic complaints, initial presentation to chiropractor, and areas of pain different from first report of injury. More than 95% of patients with three or more of the aforementioned criteria were found to have nonorganic pain. This information may help the specialist and the WC provider identify patients at a high risk for nonorganic pain, thereby reducing unnecessary costs.

Femoral Bow Predicts Postoperative Malalignment in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Diaphyseal bowing may compromise axial alignment in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 277 patients undergoing revision TKA were evaluated for coronal bowing and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis. The mean femoral bow was 1.52° ± 0.18° varus (-10.1° to +8.4°). The mean tibial bow was 1.25° ± 0.13° valgus (-5.9° to +10°). HKA axis averaged 3.08° ± 0.35° varus preoperatively compared to 0.86° ± 0.25° varus postoperatively. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability was high. Femoral bow greater than 4° significantly correlated with postoperative HKA axis malalignment (r = 0.402, P = 0.008). 39.7% of patients deviated 3° or greater from a neutral mechanical axis with a significant difference in femoral bow (0.94° ± 0.31°, P = 0.003). Diaphyseal bowing clearly has an important effect on postoperative limb alignment in revision TKA.

Minimally invasive treatment of a painful osteolytic lumbar lesion secondary to epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Study Design Case report. Objective Multifocal epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) of the spine is a rare disorder. We describe a novel, multimodal treatment of a painful osteolytic lumbar lesion secondary to EHE. The minimally invasive treatment results in an excellent patient outcome with decreased morbidity compared to traditional techniques. Methods A previously healthy young adult presented with a painful osteolytic lesion at the L2 vertebrae. Imaging revealed multifocal spinal lesions consistent with a history of EHE. Core needle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Preoperative cryoablation of L2 was followed by a staged surgery, which included a partial L2 corpectomy, tumor resection, bone grafting, and vertebral reconstruction using a minimally invasive technique. This treatment was followed by prolonged therapy with interferon and bisphosphonate. Results At 3.5 years’ follow-up, the patient has maintained his vertebral body height, has not required a fusion, and has had no recurrence of disease. Conclusion Multimodal treatment consisting of tumor cryoablation, partial corpectomy, allograft reconstruction of the vertebrae, and adjuvant interferon and bisphosphonate can result in good outcomes for well-contained EHE tumors of the spine.

Evaluation of Adverse Events in Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data:

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: The safety of new technology such as cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is of paramount importance and is best evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCT). We compared complication risks of TDR to fusion using data from Investigational Device Exemptions. Methods: A systematic review of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness reports of the 8 approved cervical TDRs was performed. These were all randomized controlled trials comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to TDR. Important outcome variables were dysphagia, wound infection, neurologic injuries, heterotopic ossification, death, and secondary surgeries. A random effects model was selected a priori. Data on adverse events was abstracted and analyzed by calculating relative risk of ACDF to TDR by meta-analysis techniques. Results: The study included 3027 patients with 1377 randomized to ACDF and 1652 to TDR. No statistical differences were present between the 2 groups in dysphagia/dysphonia, hardware related, heterotopic ossification, death, and overall neurologic adverse events and incidence of neurologic deterioration. The relative risk of wound-related problems ACDF to TDR was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59, 0.98) favoring ACDF, which was statistically significant, but these were minor and never required a second surgical procedure for deep wound infection. The relative risk of ACDF to TDR in surgical-related neurologic events and secondary surgeries was 1.62 (95% CI = 1.04, 2.53) and 1.79 (95% CI = 1.17, 2.74), both favoring TDR. Conclusions: Cervical TDR appears to be as safe as or safer than ACDF at 2-year follow-up.

Iatrogenic Spinal Cord Injury Resulting From Cervical Spine Surgery

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Objective: To examine the incidence of iatrogenic spinal cord injury following elective cervical spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective multicenter case series study involving 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network was conducted. Medical records for 17 625 patients who received cervical spine surgery (levels from C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, were reviewed to identify occurrence of iatrogenic spinal cord injury. Results: In total, 3 cases of iatrogenic spinal cord injury following cervical spine surgery were identified. Institutional incidence rates ranged from 0.0% to 0.24%. Of the 3 patients with quadriplegia, one underwent anterior-only surgery with 2-level cervical corpectomy, one underwent anterior surgery with corpectomy in addition to posterior surgery, and one underwent posterior decompression and fusion surgery alone. One patient had complete neurologic recovery, one partially recovered, and one did not recover motor function. Conclusion: Iatrogenic spinal cord injury following cervical spine surgery is a rare and devastating adverse event. No standard protocol exists that can guarantee prevention of this complication, and there is a lack of consensus regarding evaluation and treatment when it does occur. Emergent imaging with magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelography to evaluate for compressive etiology or malpositioned instrumentation and avoidance of hypotension should be performed in cases of intraoperative and postoperative spinal cord injury.

Thromboembolic Disease after Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of 5,405 Surgical Procedures and Matched Cohort Analysis

Study Design Retrospective matched cohort analysis. Objective The majority of the literature on venous thromboembolism (VTE) after spine surgery is limited to studies of thoracolumbar surgery. Less is known regarding the incidence of VTE and associated risk factors following cervical spine surgery. Methods A total of 5,405 patients at our institution underwent cervical diskectomy, laminectomy, corpectomy, laminoplasty, or fusion between 1995 and 2012; 85 of the 5,405 patients (1.57%) suffered either a DVT (55) or pulmonary embolus (51) within 30 days postoperatively. The cases were matched 1:2 to controls based on age, sex, and date of surgery. Data regarding multiple perioperative factors, demographics, and comorbidities was collected. Results Several risk factors were identified for VTE. Significant medical comorbidities included chronic venous insufficiency (odds ratio [OR] = 3.40), atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.69), obesity (OR = 2.67), and ischemic heart disease (OR = 2.18). Staged surgery (OR = 28.0), paralysis (OR = 19.0), combined approach (OR = 7.46), surgery for infection (OR = 18.5), surgery for trauma (OR = 11.1), comorbid traumatic injuries (OR > 10), oncologic procedures (OR = 5.2), use of iliac crest autograft (OR = 4.16), two or more surgical levels (OR = 3.48), blood loss > 300 mL (OR = 1.66), and length of stay 5 days or greater (OR = 3.47) were all found to be risk factors for VTE (p < 0.05) in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis found staged surgery (OR = 35.7), paralysis (OR = 7.86), and nonelective surgery (OR = 6.29) to be independent risk factors for VTE. Conclusions Although the incidence of VTE following cervical spine surgery is low, we identified several risk factors that may be predictive. More aggressive approaches to prophylaxis and surveillance in certain patient populations may be warranted.

Intraoperative pedicle screw navigation does not significantly affect complication rates after spine surgery

Various forms of intraoperative computer-assisted navigation technologies exist, and have consistently been shown to improve pedicle screw accuracy. However, the overall clinical effects of inaccurate pedicle screw placement have been debated. We examined the clinical effects of improved pedicle screw accuracy with computer navigation technology in reducing complication rates in patients undergoing multi-level spinal fusion. We retrospectively reviewed the ACS-NSQIP registry utilizing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 22843 + 22844 to identify patients undergoing spinal instrumentation of greater than 7 levels, as well as the CPT code 61783 to denote the use of intraoperative computer-assisted navigation. The data were then subdivided to into cohorts consisting of instrumentation cases with and without navigation. Demographic information, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications, were compared between groups. A total of 3168 patients met our inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative population data. Surgical time was significantly longer in the navigation group (391.41 versus 350.3 min), but there were no significant improvements in complication rates with the use of navigation. We found that the mean operative time was significantly increased for patients undergoing spinal instrumentation with computer navigation. This increase in operative time was not associated with any increase in surgical or medical complications. However, in this large series, we were unable to show any clinical benefit to intraoperative navigation, and no reductions in short term complications or rates of return to surgery were observed.