Arkan S. Sayed-Noor

Case reports: two femoral insufficiency fractures after long-term alendronate therapy.

Bisphosphonates are widely used for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although short-term safety and efficacy of these drugs have been investigated and documented, an increasing number of recent reports draw attention to the possible correlation between long-term alendronate therapy and the occurrence of insufficiency fractures in the proximal femur owing to what is known as severely suppressed bone turnover. We describe two femoral insufficiency fractures in two women receiving long-term alendronate therapy. The first woman sustained a periprosthetic fracture at the tip of the femoral stem whereas the other woman had a fracture in the subtrochanteric region. We analyze the characteristics and natural course of these two unique fractures, and emphasize the importance of being aware of the possible correlation between long-term alendronate therapy and insufficiency femoral fractures.

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial to compare operative with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures. METHODS Eighty-two patients who presented to five trauma centers from 1994 to 1998 with an intra-articular calcaneal fracture with ≥2 mm of displacement (as verified by computed tomography) were randomized to operative or nonoperative treatment. Independent observers followed the two groups radiographically and clinically at one year and eight to twelve years. The primary outcome measures were a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and function and the self-administrated Short Form (SF)-36 general health outcome questionnaire. The secondary outcome measures were residual pain evaluated with a VAS, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, and the Olerud-Molander (OM) scale. RESULTS Forty-two patients in the operative treatment group and forty in the nonoperative group were included. The two groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, and fracture types. Seventy-six patients were available for follow-up at one year and fifty-eight at eight to twelve years. The primary and secondary outcome measures did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups at one year of follow-up. At eight to twelve years of follow-up, there was a trend toward better scores on the patient-reported primary VAS score for pain and function (p = 0.07) and the physical component of the SF-36 (p = 0.06) in the operative group. The prevalence of radiographically evident posttraumatic subtalar arthritis was lower in the operative group (risk reduction, 41%). CONCLUSIONS Operative treatment was not superior in managing displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures at one year of follow-up but appeared to have some benefits at eight to twelve years. Operative treatment was associated with a higher risk of complications but a reduced prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis evident on follow-up radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic level II. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Subtrochanteric displaced insufficiency fracture after long‐term alendronate therapy—a case report

Copyright

Factors affecting long-term treatment results of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial

Objectives: To study the factors affecting long-term treatment results of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs). Design: A post hoc analysis. Settings: Tertiary care teaching hospitals. Patients: Eight to twelve years of results from a randomized controlled multicenter trial of operative versus nonoperative treatment (n = 56) were divided into 2 groups: the superior 50% results (n = 28) and the inferior 50% results (n = 28), regardless of the treatment given. The determinant of this division was a visual analog score for pain and function. Interventions: The operative treatment consists of open reduction and internal fixation, whereas the nonoperative treatment consists of nonweight bearing and early range of motion exercise. Main Outcome Measurements: A visual analog score for pain and function, the short-form 36 (SF-36) general health outcome questionnaire, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, and Olerud-Molander score. We compared age, sex, fracture type (Sanders classification), treatment given, Böhler angle, residual articular surface step-off at healing, type of occupation, and injury insurance between the 2 groups. Results: Patients of the superior group had higher physical SF-36, AOFAS, and Olerud-Molander score than in the inferior group. Operative treatment, better Böhler angle and articular surface restoration, light labor/retirement, and absence of injury insurance were more common in the superior group. Age, sex, pretreatment Böhler angle, and fracture type were comparable in the superior and inferior groups. Conclusions: The decision making for definitive treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures is multifactorial with a spectrum of results and trends such as patient demographic features that should be considered in choosing the best treatment option. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pressure-pain threshold algometric measurement in patients with greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty.

BackgroundThe evaluation of tenderness associated with greater trochanteric pain (GTP) syndrome is amenable to bias and depends on the examiners experience. In this study, we tested whether the use of an electronic pressure algometer enhanced the reliability of this evaluation. Patients and MethodsPressure-pain threshold (PPT) was measured with an electronic algometer in 18 patients who developed GTP after total hip arthroplasty and in matched controls. Both groups were evaluated with visual analog scale. ResultsThe PPT measurements showed large interindividual variability across patients. The correspondence of the PPT measurements in asymptomatic patients was good. We found good validity for the algometer used. The PPT ratio of 0.8 (affected vs. unaffected side) can be used as a cut-off ratio. The PPT measurements at the greater trochanter (local pain) were significantly lower than at the ilio-tibial band (radiated pain). There was no correlation between PPT measurements and visual analog scales. Despite the acceptable sensitivity and specificity of pressure algometer, because of low positive predictive value and large interindividual variability, pressure algometer has a limited value as a screening test. ConclusionsThe examination of tenderness associated with GTP is facilitated by the used algometer. It is the intraindividual body-side PPT differences that yield the most sensitive measurement for the assessment of deep pain. A cut-off value of 0.8 can be used for diagnostic purposes. Interindividual differences might be considerable and could mask pathologic diagnostic findings.

Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of Three Radiological Classification Systems for Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures:

Background: The management of intra-articular calcaneal fractures is difficult. One aspect for successful management is the use of a reliable and reproducible fracture classification system (FCS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interob-server reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Letournel, Sanders, and Zwipp classification systems on CT scan and the Böhlers angle measurement on plain X-ray. Furthermore, we studied if the addition of a CT scan to the plain X-ray influenced the evaluation of fracture extension to the calcaneocuboid joint. Methods: The CT scan and plain X-ray images of 51 intra-articular calcaneal fractures were evaluated two times by three observers (two radiologists and one orthopedic surgeon) within a 5-month interval. The interobserver reliability was measured using the Fleiss kappa while the intraobserver reproducibility was measured using the Cohens kappa. Results: The mean kappa values for the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Sanders classification were 0.25 and 0.39, respectively, of Zwipp classification were 0.24 and 0.16, respectively, while those of the Letournel classification were 0.50 and 0.42, respectively. For the Böhlers angle, the mean kappa values for the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were 0.34 and 0.32, respectively. The addition of CT scan images to plain X-ray found a higher incidence of calcaneocuboid joint involvement. Conclusion: Clinicians should be aware of the limitation regarding the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Letournel, Sanders and Zwipp classification systems for calcaneal fractures. Future studies should attempt to improve the present classification systems.

Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength : A prospective cohort study of 222 patients

Background and purpose — There is no consensus on the association between global femoral offset (FO) and outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We assessed the association between FO and patients’ reported hip function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. Patients and methods — We included 250 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis who underwent a THA. Before the operation, the patient’s reported hip function was evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index and quality of life was evaluated with EQ-5D. At 1-year follow-up, the same scores and also hip abductor muscle strength were measured. 222 patients were available for follow-up. These patients were divided into 3 groups according to the postoperative global FO of the operated hip compared to the contralateral hip, as measured on plain radiographs: the decreased FO group (more than 5 mm reduction), the restored FO group (within 5 mm restoration), and the increased FO group (more than 5 mm increment). Results — All 3 groups improved (p < 0.001). The crude results showed that the decreased FO group had a worse WOMAC index, less abductor muscle strength, and more use of walking aids. When we adjusted these results with possible confounding factors, only global FO reduction was statistically significantly associated with reduced abductor muscle strength. The incidence of residual hip pain and analgesics use was similar in the 3 groups. Interpretation — A reduction in global FO of more than 5 mm after THA appears to have a negative association with abductor muscle strength of the operated hip, and should therefore be avoided.

The Influence of Leg Length Discrepancy after Total Hip Arthroplasty on Function and Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study

We investigated whether patients with lengthening (> 9 mm), restoration (between 9 mm lengthening and 5 mm shortening) or shortening (> 5 mm) of the operated leg after total hip arthroplasty (THA) had different function (WOMAC score), quality of life (EQ-5D), residual hip pain, use of shoe lift and walking aid and leg length discrepancy (LLD) awareness, 12-15 months postoperatively. All patients had a significant postoperative improvement in WOMAC and EQ-5D regardless the LLD. However, the lengthening group showed less improvement in WOMAC, more use of shoe lift, residual hip pain and LLD awareness compared with the other two groups. No differences in EQ-5D were found. In spite of the improvement in function and quality of life, lengthening had adverse effects and should therefore be avoided.

Dual mobility cups for preventing early hip arthroplasty dislocation in patients at risk: experience in a county hospital

Dislocation remains a major concern after hip arthroplasty. We asked whether dual mobility cups (DMC) would improve early hip stability in patients with high risk of dislocation. We followed 34 patients (21 females, 13 males) treated between 2009 and 2012 with cemented DMC for hip revisions caused recurrent hip prosthetic dislocation or as a primary procedure in patients with high risk of instability. Functional outcome and quality of life were evaluated using Harris Hip Score and EQ-5D respectively. We found that the cemented DMC gave stability in 94%. Seven patients (20%) were re-operated due to infection. One patient sustained a periprosthetic fracture. At follow-up (6 to 36 months, mean 18), the mean Harris hip score was 67 (standard deviation: 14) and mean EQ-5D was 0.76 (standard deviation: 0.12). We concluded that treating patients with high risk of dislocation with DMC can give good stability. However, complications such as postoperative infection can be frequent and should be managed carefully.

Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system

ObjectivesTo evaluate the validity, interobserver reliability, and intraobserver reproducibility of a digital templating system, the Mdesk™ in preoperative templating in cemented and reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA).Materials and methodsValidity was evaluated by comparing the planned cup size, stem size, CCD angles, and neck length with the components used in 129 patients operated with cemented and reverse hybrid THA. The reliability was measured by comparing the templating results of two surgeons with each other (interobserver) and the results of two templatings carried out by first surgeon (intraobserver). The leg length discrepancy was measured before and after the operation to assess the templating ability to correct it.ResultsThe Mdesk™ system showed good validity (kappa value ranged from 0.64 to 0.96), especially when one size over and under the planned size were included. No difference between cemented and cementless stems was found. The interobserver reliability ranged from fair (kappa 0.23) to substantial (kappa 0.61) while the intraobserver reproducibility ranged from substantial (kappa 0.70) to excellent (kappa 0.82). Templating and intraoperative measures succeeded to restore the leg length.ConclusionsThe Mdesk™ system has comparable validity and reliability with other templating systems used in clinical practice. We recommend that the same surgeon who does the preoperative radiographic templating to also perform the operation. Further studies are required to evaluate the results of succeeded templating in the long run.