Arlene C. Neuman

Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-hearing Children and Adults

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine how combinations of noise levels and reverberation typical of ranges found in current classrooms will affect speech recognition performance of typically developing children with normal speech, language, and hearing and to compare their performance with that of adults with normal hearing. Speech recognition performance was measured using the Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech in Noise test. A virtual test paradigm represented the signal reaching a student seated in the back of a classroom with a volume of 228 m3 and with varied reverberation time (0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 sec). The signal to noise ratios required for 50% performance (SNR-50) and for 95% performance were determined for groups of children aged 6 to 12 yrs and a group of young adults with normal hearing. Design: This is a cross-sectional developmental study incorporating a repeated measures design. Experimental variables included age and reverberation time. A total of 63 children with normal hearing and typically developing speech and language and nine adults with normal hearing were tested. Nine children were included in each age group (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 yrs). Results: The SNR-50 increased significantly with increased reverberation and decreased significantly with increasing age. On average, children required positive SNRs for 50% performance, whereas thresholds for adults were close to 0 dB or <0 dB for the conditions tested. When reverberant SNR-50 was compared with adult SNR-50 without reverberation, adults did not exhibit an SNR loss, but children aged 6 to 8 yrs exhibited a moderate SNR loss and children aged 9 to 12 yrs exhibited a mild SNR loss. To obtain average speech recognition scores of 95% at the back of the classroom, an SNR ≥10 dB is required for all children at the lowest reverberation time, of ≥12 dB for children up to age 11 yrs at the 0.6-sec reverberant condition, and of ≥15 dB for children aged 7 to 11 yrs at the 0.8-sec condition. The youngest children require even higher SNRs in the 0.8-sec condition. Conclusions: Results highlight changes in speech recognition performance with age in elementary school children listening to speech in noisy, reverberant classrooms. The more reverberant the environment, the better the SNR required. The younger the child, the better the SNR required. Results support the importance of attention to classroom acoustics and emphasize the need for maximizing SNR in classrooms, especially in classrooms designed for early childhood grades.

Children’s perception of speech in reverberation

Recordings of nonsense syllables (VCV construction) were presented to groups of children aged 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 years and young adults under monaural (reverberation time = 0.6s) and binaural (reverberation times = 0, 0.4, and 0.6 s) conditions of reverberation. Phoneme identification performance was affected by age, reverberation, and mode of presentation (monaural versus binaural). The major findings were (1) phoneme identification scores in reverberant conditions improved with increasing age and decreased with increased reverberation time; (2) childrens performance in reverberant conditions did not reach asymptote until age 13; (3) binaural performance was consistently better than monaural performance for all age groups, with 5-year-olds showing the largest binaural advantage.

Sound-direction Identification with Bilateral Cochlear Implants

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of sound-direction identification in the horizontal plane by bilateral cochlear implant users when localization was measured with pink noise and with speech stimuli. Design: Eight adults who were bilateral users of Nucleus 24 Contour devices participated in the study. All had received implants in both ears in a single surgery. Sound-direction identification was measured in a large classroom by using a nine-loudspeaker array. Localization was tested in three listening conditions (bilateral cochlear implants, left cochlear implant, and right cochlear implant), using two different stimuli (a speech stimulus and pink noise bursts) in a repeated-measures design. Results: Sound-direction identification accuracy was significantly better when using two implants than when using a single implant. The mean root-mean-square error was 29° for the bilateral condition, 54° for the left cochlear implant, and 46.5° for the right cochlear implant condition. Unilateral accuracy was similar for right cochlear implant and left cochlear implant performance. Sound-direction identification performance was similar for speech and pink noise stimuli. Conclusions: The data obtained in this study add to the growing body of evidence that sound-direction identification with bilateral cochlear implants is better than with a single implant. The similarity in localization performance obtained with the speech and pink noise supports the use of either stimulus for measuring sound-direction identification.

The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality

Two experiments were carried out to determine how manipulating the compression ratio and release time of a single-band wide dynamic range hearing aid affects sound quality. In experiment I, compression ratio was varied over the range from linear to 10:1 (low compression threshold, attack time = 5 ms, release time = 200 ms). In experiment II, compression ratios of 1.5, 2, and 3:1 were combined with release times of 60, 200, and 1000 ms (attack time = 5 ms). Twenty listeners with sensorineural hearing loss rated the clarity, pleasantness, background noise, loudness, and the overall impression of speech-in-noise (Ventilation, Apartment, Cafeteria) processed through a compression hearing aid. Results revealed that increasing compression ratio caused decreases in ratings on all scales. Increasing release time caused ratings of pleasantness to increase, and ratings of background noise and loudness to decrease. At the 3:1 compression ratio, increasing the release time caused increases in ratings of clarity, pleasantness, and overall impression, and a decrease in background noise. Significant correlations were found between scales. Regression analysis revealed that the contributions of the scales of clarity, pleasantness, background noise, and loudness to the prediction of overall impression differed as a function of the competing noise condition.

An evaluation of three adaptive hearing aid selection strategies

Paired-comparison judgments of intelligibility of speech in noise were obtained from eight hearing-impaired subjects on a large number of hearing aids simulated by a digital master hearing aid. The hearing aids which comprised a 5 X 5 matrix differed systematically in the amount of low-frequency and high-frequency gain provided. A comparison of three adaptive strategies for determining optimum hearing aid frequency-gain characteristics (an iterative round robin, a double elimination tournament, and a modified simplex procedure) revealed convergence on the same or similar hearing aids for most subjects. Analysis revealed that subjects for whom all three procedures converged on the same hearing aid showed a single pronounced peak in the response surface, while a broader peak was evident for the subjects for whom the three procedures identified similar hearing aids. The modified simplex procedure was found to be most efficient and the iterative round robin least efficient.

Consonant–vowel intensity ratios for maximizing consonant recognition by hearing-impaired listeners

The effect of adjusting the consonant-vowel (C-V) intensity ratio on consonant recognition in 18 subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment was investigated. C-V intensity ratios in a set of 48 vowel-consonant nonsense syllables were adjusted in steps of 3-6 dB depending on the subjects dynamic range of hearing. An increase in consonant intensity is referred to here as consonant enhancement (CE). The value of CE producing the highest consonant recognition score (CRmax) is defined as CEmax. Both CEmax and CRmax were determined for each subject for each of the 48 nonsense syllables. Consonant type was found to have a highly significant effect on CRmax, the gain in consonant recognition, and CEmax. The effect of vowel environment was also significant, but of much smaller magnitude. Audiogram configuration was found to have a small effect and was only significant for CRmax. The results of the study also showed that individualized adjustment of the C-V intensity ratio for each subject and consonant-vowel combination can produce substantial improvements in consonant recognition. These data can be used to estimate upper bounds of performance that, in principle, can be obtained by appropriate adjustment of the C-V intensity ratio.

Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: Paired‐comparison judgments of quality

Paired-comparison judgments of quality were obtained from 20 hearing-impaired listeners for speech processed through simulated compression hearing aids varying in release time (60, 200, 1000 ms) at three different compression ratios (1.5, 2, 3:1) and for three different background noises (ventilation, apartment, cafeteria). Analysis revealed that the main effect of release time did not have a significant effect on perceived quality. The interaction between release time and noise type was found to be significant. While no significant difference in preference for release times was evident for the ventilation noise, the longer release times (200 and 1000 ms) were preferred for the higher level noises (apartment noise, cafeteria noise). Post hoc testing revealed that the mean preference scores for the 200- and 1000-ms release time were significantly greater than that of the 60-ms release time with the competing cafeteria noise (p < 0.05). Analysis of individual subject data revealed statistically significant preferences that differed from the group mean, suggesting that individualized fitting of this parameter of a compression hearing aid might be warranted.

Effect of compression ratio in a slow‐acting compression hearing aid: Paired‐comparison judgments of quality

Paired-comparison judgments of quality were obtained from 20 hearing-impaired listeners (half with a small dynamic range and half with a large dynamic range) for speech-in-noise (vent, apartment, and cafeteria) processed through a slow-acting compression hearing aid. Compression ratio was varied (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, and 10:1). Compression threshold, attack time, and release time were fixed. Sound quality judgments were significantly affected by compression ratio, noise, and dynamic range. Preference decreased with increasing compression ratio. The selection of compression ratio. The selection of compression ratios < or = 2:1 was significantly higher than of compression ratios > 3:1. Less compression (no compression or 1.5:1) was preferred with the highest level noise (cafeteria noise) than with the lower level noises (vent or apartment). In particular, the small dynamic range group preferred compression with the vent and apartment noises (noise below the compression threshold), but preferred a linear hearing aid with the cafeteria noise (above the compression threshold). The large dynamic range group showed a slightly greater preference for the linear hearing aid for all three noises.

Late-onset Auditory Deprivation: A Review of Past Research and an Assessment of Future Research Needs

&NA; This paper includes an overview of the research on late‐onset auditory deprivation, an evaluation of the evidence from retrospective and prospective studies, recommendations for future research, and a consideration of the theoretical and clinical implications of the research. The studies reviewed offer convincing evidence of the late‐onset auditory deprivation effect both in groups of listeners and in substantial numbers of individual listeners included in the group studies. The effect appears to be reversible in some cases with the use of amplification in the previously unaided ear. This preliminary evidence supports the recommendation of binaural amplification for persons with bilateral symmetric sensorineural hearing loss. There is much that is still unknown about the deprivation effect and recovery from deprivation. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to obtain a better understanding of the role of subject‐related variables and amplification‐related variables on the magnitude and time course of the deprivation effect. Behavioral and electrophysiologic measures of monaural and binaural performance using speech and nonspeech stimuli would also further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying late‐onset auditory deprivation. (Ear & Hearing 1996;17;3S‐13S)

A comparison of response time and word recognition measures using a word-monitoring and closed-set identification task.

OBJECTIVES The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of improving speech recognition testing sensitivity by incorporating response time measures as a metric. Two different techniques for obtaining response time were compared: a word-monitoring task and a closed-set identification task. DESIGN Recordings of the Modified Rhyme Test were used to test 12 listeners with normal hearing. Data were collected using a word-monitoring and a closed-set identification task. Response times and percent correct scores were obtained for each task using signal to noise ratios (SNRs) of -3, 0, +3, +6, +9, and +12 dB. RESULTS Both response time and percent correct measures were sensitive to changes in SNR, but greater sensitivity was found with the percent correct measures. Individual subject data showed that combining response time measures with percent correct scores improved test sensitivity for the monitoring task, but not for the closed-set identification task. CONCLUSIONS The best test sensitivity was obtained by combining percent correct and response time measures for the monitoring task. Such an approach may hold promise for future clinical applications.