Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Armando Riccardi is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Armando Riccardi.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003

Adaptive secondary mirrors for the Large Binocular Telescope

Armando Riccardi; Guido Brusa; Piero Salinari; Daniele Gallieni; Roberto Biasi; Mario Andrighettoni; Hubert M. Martin

The two adaptive secondary (AS) mirrors for LBT (LBT672) represent the new generation of the AS technology. Their design is based on the experience earned during the extensive tests of the previous generation unit (the MMT AS mirror). Both the mechanics and the electronics have been revised, improving the stability, reliability, maintenance and computational power of the system. The deformable mirror of each unit consists of a 1.6mm-thick Zerodur shell having a diameter of 911mm. The front surface is concave to match the Gregorian design of the telescope. Its figure is controlled by 672 electro-magnetic force actuators that are supported and cooled by an aluminum plate. The actuator forces are controlled using a combination of feed-forward and de-centralized closed loop compensation, thanks to the feedback signals from the 672 co-located capacitive position sensors. The surface reference for the capacitive sensors is a 50mm-thick Zerodur shell faced to the back surface of the thin mirror and rigidly connected to the support plate of the actuators. Digital real-time control and unit monitoring is obtained using new custom-made on-board electronics based on new generation 32bit floating-point DSPs. The total computational power (121 Gflop/s) of the LBT672 units allows using the control electronics as wave-front computer without any reduction of the actuator control capability. We report the details of the new features introduced in the LBT672 design and the preliminary laboratory results obtained on a prototype used to test them. Finally the facility in Arcetri to test the final LBT672 units is presented.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2011

Large Binocular Telescope Adaptive Optics System: new achievements and perspectives in adaptive optics

Simone Esposito; Armando Riccardi; Enrico Pinna; Alfio Puglisi; Fernando Quiros-Pacheco; Carmelo Arcidiacono; Marco Xompero; Runa Briguglio; Guido Agapito; Lorenzo Busoni; Luca Fini; Javier Argomedo; Alessandro Gherardi; Guido Brusa; Douglas L. Miller; Juan Carlos Guerra; Paolo Stefanini; Piero Salinari

The Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) is a unique telescope featuring two co-mounted optical trains with 8.4m primary mirrors. The telescope Adaptive Optics (AO) system uses two innovative key components, namely an adaptive secondary mirror with 672 actuators and a high-order pyramid wave-front sensor. During the on-sky commissioning such a system reached performances never achieved before on large ground-based optical telescopes. Images with 40mas resolution and Strehl Ratios higher than 80% have been acquired in H band (1.6 μm). Such images showed a contrast as high as 10-4. Based on these results, we compare the performances offered by a Natural Guide Star (NGS) system upgraded with the state-of-the-art technology and those delivered by existing Laser Guide Star (LGS) systems. The comparison, in terms of sky coverage and performances, suggests rethinking the current role ascribed to NGS and LGS in the next generation of AO systems for the 8-10 meter class telescopes and Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs).


The Astrophysical Journal | 2015

MAGELLAN ADAPTIVE OPTICS FIRST-LIGHT OBSERVATIONS of the EXOPLANET β PIC b. II. 3-5 μm DIRECT IMAGING with MagAO+Clio, and the EMPIRICAL BOLOMETRIC LUMINOSITY of A SELF-LUMINOUS GIANT PLANET

Katie M. Morzinski; Jared R. Males; A. Skemer; Laird M. Close; Phil Hinz; Timothy J. Rodigas; Alfio Puglisi; Simone Esposito; Armando Riccardi; Enrico Pinna; Marco Xompero; Runa Briguglio; Vanessa P. Bailey; Katherine B. Follette; Derek Kopon; Alycia J. Weinberger; Ya Lin Wu

We thank the Magellan and Las Campanas Observatory staff for making this well-engineered, smoothly operated telescope and site possible. We would especially like to thank Povilas Palunas for help over the entire MagAO commissioning run. Juan Gallardo, Patricio Jones, Emilio Cerda, Felipe Sanchez, Gabriel Martin, Maurico Navarrete, Jorge Bravo, Victor Merino, Patricio Pinto, Gabriel Prieto, Mauricio Martinez, Alberto Pasten, Jorge Araya, Hugo Rivera, and the whole team of technical experts helped perform many exacting tasks in a very professional manner. Glenn Eychaner, David Osip, and Frank Perez all gave expert support which was fantastic. The entire logistics, dining, housekeeping, and hospitality staff provide for an excellent, healthy environment that ensured the wellness of our team throughout the commissioning runs. It is a privilege to be able to commission an AO system with such a fine staff and site. The MagAO system was developed with support from the NSF, MRI and TSIP programs. The VisAO camera was developed with help from the NSF ATI program. K.M.M. and J.R.M. were supported under contract with the California Institute of Technology, funded by NASA through the Sagan Fellowship Program. J.R.M. is grateful for the generous support of the Phoenix ARCS Foundation. L.M.C.s and Y.-L.W.s research were supported by NSF AAG and NASA Origins of Solar Systems grants. V.B. was supported in part by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE-1143953). We thank the anonymous referee for a careful, timely review that significantly improved the manuscript. Facility: Magellan:Clay (MagAO+Clio) .


Proceedings of SPIE | 2010

The adaptive secondary mirror for the Large Binocular Telescope: optical acceptance test and preliminary on-sky commissioning results

Armando Riccardi; Marco Xompero; Runa Briguglio; Fernando Quiros-Pacheco; Lorenzo Busoni; Luca Fini; Alfio Puglisi; Simone Esposito; Carmelo Arcidiacono; Enrico Pinna; Piero Ranfagni; Piero Salinari; Guido Brusa; Richard A. Demers; Roberto Biasi; Daniele Gallieni

The Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) has two adaptive secondary mirrors based on 672 voice-coil force actuators. The shape of the mirror is controlled using internal metrology based on co-located capacitive sensors. The first mirror unit is currently mounted on LBT for on-sky commissioning as part of the First Light Adaptive Optics System (FLAO). During spring-time 2009 the optical acceptance test was performed using the 14-m optical test tower at the Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri (INAF) showing the capability of flattening the shell at the level of 14nm rms residual surface error. This paper reports the optical layout, calibration procedures and results of the optical acceptance test. Moreover we report the first results obtained during the early runs of FLAO commissioning showing the ability of the mirror to compensate for atmospheric turbulence with extremely high Strehl ratio values (better than 80% in H-band) as permitted by the largest number of correcting degrees of freedom currently available on-sky for astronomical telescopes.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2012

The Giant Magellan Telescope adaptive optics program

Antonin H. Bouchez; D. Scott Acton; Guido Agapito; Carmelo Arcidiacono; Francis Bennet; Valdemaro Biliotti; Marco Bonaglia; Runa Briguglio; Guido Brusa-Zappellini; Lorenzo Busoni; Luca Carbonaro; Johanan L. Codona; Rodolphe Conan; Thomas Connors; Oliver Durney; Brady Espeland; Simone Esposito; Luca Fini; Rusty Gardhouse; Thomas Gauron; Michael Hart; Philip M. Hinz; Srikrishna Kanneganti; Edward J. Kibblewhite; Russell P. Knox; Brian A. McLeod; T. McMahon; M. Montoya; Timothy J. Norton; Mark P. Ordway

The Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT) adaptive optics (AO) system will be an integral part of the telescope, providing laser guidestar generation, wavefront sensing, and wavefront correction to every instrument currently planned on the 25.4 m diameter GMT. There will be three first generation AO observing modes: Natural Guidestar, Laser Tomography, and Ground Layer AO. All three will use a segmented adaptive secondary mirror to deliver a corrected beam directly to the instruments. The Natural Guidestar mode will provide extreme AO performance, with a total wavefront error less than 185 nm RMS using bright guidestars. The Laser Tomography mode uses 6 lasers and a single off-axis natural guidestar to deliver better than 290 nm RMS wavefront error at the science target, over 50% of the sky at the galactic pole. The Ground Layer mode uses 4 natural guidestars on the periphery of the science field to tomographically reconstruct and correct the ground layer AO turbulence, improving the image quality for wide-field instruments. A phasing system maintains the relative alignment of the primary and secondary segments using edge sensors and continuous feedback from an off-axis guidestar. We describe the AO system preliminary design, predicted performance, and the remaining technical challenges as we move towards the start of construction.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2012

Natural guide star adaptive optics systems at LBT: FLAO commissioning and science operations status

Simone Esposito; Armando Riccardi; Enrico Pinna; Alfio Puglisi; Fernando Quiros-Pacheco; Carmelo Arcidiacono; Marco Xompero; Runa Briguglio; Lorenzo Busoni; Luca Fini; Javier Argomedo; Alessandro Gherardi; Guido Agapito; Guido Brusa; Doug Miller; J. C. Guerra Ramon; Konstantina Boutsia; Paolo Stefanini

This paper summarizes the activities and the principal results achieved during the commissioning of the two Natural Guide Star (NGS) AO systems called FLAO#1 & 2 installed at the bent Gregorian focal stations of the 2x8.4m Large Binocular Telescope (LBT). The commissioning activities of FLAO#1 took place in the period February 2010 - October 2011, while FLAO#2 commissioning started in December 2011 and should be completed by November 2012. The main results of the commissioning campaign are presented in terms of the H-band Strehl Ratio values achieved under different observing conditions. We will also describe the automatic procedures to configure and set-up the FLAO systems, and in particular the modal gain optimization procedure, which has been proven to be a very important one in achieving the nominal performance. Finally, some of the results achieved in two science runs using the near infra-red camera PISCES are briefly highlighted.


Optical Science and Technology, SPIE's 48th Annual Meeting | 2003

MMT adaptive secondary: first AO closed-loop results

Guido Brusa; Armando Riccardi; F. Wildi; Michael Lloyd-Hart; Hubert M. Martin; R. G. Allen; Donald L. Fisher; Douglas L. Miller; Roberto Biasi; Daniele Gallieni; Fabio Zocchi

The adaptive secondary for the MMT is the first mirror of its kind. It was designed to allow the application of wavefront corrections (including tip-tilt) directly at the secondary mirror location. Among the advantages of such a choice for adaptive optics operation are higher throughput, lower emissivity, and simpler optical setup. Furthermore, this specific implementation provides capabilities that are not found in most correctors including internal position feedback, large stroke (to allow chopping) and provision for absolute position calibration. The mirror has now been used at the MMT during several runs where it has performed reliably. In this paper we discuss the mirror operation and AO performance achieved during these runs in which the adaptive secondary has been operating in conjunction with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor as part of the MMT adaptive optics system. In particular we mention a residual mirror position error due to wind buffeting and other errors of ≈ 15 nm rms surface and a stable closed loop operation with a 0dB point of the error transfer function in the range 20-30 Hz limited mainly by the wavefront sensor maximum frame rate. Because of the location of the adaptive secondary with respect to the wavefront sensor camera, reimaging optics are required in order to perform the optical interaction matrix measurements needed to run the AO loop. This optical setup has been used in the lab but not replicated at the telescope so far. We will discuss the effects of the lack of such an internal calibration on the AO loop performances and a possible alternative to the lab calibration technique that uses directly light from sky objects.


SPIE's International Symposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation | 1999

Adaptive secondary mirror for the 6.5-m conversion of the Multiple Mirror Telescope: first laboratory testing results

Guido Brusa-Zappellini; Armando Riccardi; Valdemaro Biliotti; Ciro Del Vecchio; Piero Salinari; Paolo Stefanini; Paolo Mantegazza; Roberto Biasi; Mario Andrighettoni; Claudio Franchini; Daniele Gallieni

We present the first results of test performed on a reduced size adaptive secondary prototype named P36. The full size unit, named MMT336, is ready to be assembled and it is planned to install it at the 6.5m conversion of the Multiple Mirror Telescope by the end of this year. The design of the final unit consists of: a convex thin deformable mirror whose figure is controlled by 336 electro-magnetic force actuators, a thick reference shell and a third aluminum shell used for actuator support and cooling. The force actuator response function is adjusted using both open and closed loop compensation to obtain an equivalent position actuator thanks to nearly co-located capacitive position sensors. The digital real-time control and the unit monitoring is done using custom-made electronics based on DSPs. The preliminary dynamical test aimed at identifying the P36 mirror response function to obtain a proper dynamics compensation were successful. In fact two main results have been obtained: 1) an accurate identification of the feedforward matrix used to control the mirror 2) settling time of approximately 0.5 ms, well within the specifications. We also complement these lab results with results obtained from simulations of the full size mirror dynamics.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 1998

Adaptive secondary P30 prototype: laboratory results

Guido Brusa-Zappellini; Armando Riccardi; S. Ragland; Simone Esposito; Ciro Del Vecchio; Luca Fini; Paolo Stefanini; Valdemaro Biliotti; Piero Ranfagni; Piero Salinari; Daniele Gallieni; Roberto Biasi; Paolo Mantegazza; G. Sciocco; G. Noviello; S. Invernizzi

We present the result of electrical and optical measurements performed on a reduced size adaptive secondary prototype named P30. The design of this concave deformable mirror consists of a thin deformable glass shell whose figure is controlled by electromagnetic actuators and capacitive position senors. Static measurements of the mirror optical figure, performed with a commercial interferometer, have provided the calibration of the internal position sensor. Dynamic test were performed to experimentally derive the mechanical response of the mirror to the electromagnetic actuators in order to design the mirror closed loop control law. The test, although performed on a reduced scale, are representative of the complexity and capabilities of the full size mirror. In fact, all the key-elements of the full size mirror, i.e. central supporting membrane, actuator spacing closed loop control of the device, have been implemented on the prototype.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2006

Deformable secondary mirrors for the LBT adaptive optics system

Hubert M. Martin; G. Brusa Zappellini; Brian Cuerden; S. M. Miller; Armando Riccardi; Bryan Smith

We describe the manufacture of thin shells for the deformable secondary mirrors of the LBT adaptive optics system. The secondary mirrors are thin shells, 910 mm in diameter and 1.6 mm thick. Each mirror will have its shape controlled by 672 voice-coil actuators. The main requirement for manufacture of the shell is smoothness on scales too small to be adjusted by the actuators. An additional requirement is that the rear surface match the reference body within 30 μm peak-to-valley. A technique was developed for producing smooth surfaces on the very aspheric surfaces of the shells. We figure the optical surfaces on a thick disk of Zerodur, then turn the disk over and thin it to 1.6 mm from the rear surface. Figuring is done primarily with a 30 cm diameter stressed lap, which bends actively to match the local curvature of the aspheric surface. For the thinning operation, the mirror is blocked with pitch, optical surface down, onto a granite disk with a matching convex surface. Because the shell may bend during the blocking operation and as its thickness is reduced to 1.6 mm, figuring of the rear surface is guided by precise thickness measurements over the surface of the shell. This method guarantees that both surfaces of the finished shell will satisfy their requirements when corrected with small actuator forces. Following the thinning operation, we edge the shell to its final dimensions, remove it from the blocking body, and coat the rear surface with aluminum to provide a set of conductive plates for capacitive sensors.

Collaboration


Dive into the Armando Riccardi's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge