Arnaud Carayol

The Caucal Hierarchy of Infinite Graphs in Terms of Logic and Higher-Order Pushdown Automata

In this paper we give two equivalent characterizations of the Caucal hierarchy, a hierarchy of infinite graphs with a decidable monadic second-order (MSO) theory. It is obtained by iterating the graph transformations of unfolding and inverse rational mapping. The first characterization sticks to this hierarchical approach, replacing the language-theoretic operation of a rational mapping by an MSO-transduction and the unfolding by the treegraph operation. The second characterization is non-iterative. We show that the family of graphs of the Caucal hierarchy coincides with the family of graphs obtained as the e-closure of configuration graphs of higher-order pushdown automata.

Regular sets of higher-order pushdown stacks

It is a well-known result that the set of reachable stack contents in a pushdown automaton is a regular set of words. We consider the more general case of higher-order pushdown automata and investigate, with a particular stress on effectiveness and complexity, the natural notion of regularity for higher-order stacks: a set of level k stacks is regular if it is obtained by a regular sequence of level k operations. We prove that any regular set of level k stacks admits a normalized representation and we use it to show that the regular sets of a given level form an effective Boolean algebra. In fact, this notion of regularity coincides with the notion of monadic second order definability over the canonical structure associated to level k stacks. Finally, we consider the link between regular sets of stacks and families of infinite graphs defined by higher-order pushdown systems.

A saturation method for collapsible pushdown systems

We introduce a natural extension of collapsible pushdown systems called annotated pushdown systems that replaces collapse links with stack annotations. We believe this new model has many advantages. We present a saturation method for global backwards reachability analysis of these models that can also be used to analyse collapsible pushdown systems. Beginning with an automaton representing a set of configurations, we build an automaton accepting all configurations that can reach this set. We also improve upon previous saturation techniques for higher-order pushdown systems by significantly reducing the size of the automaton constructed and simplifying the algorithm and proofs.

Recursion Schemes and Logical Reflection

Let R be a class of generators of node-labelled infinite trees, and Lbe a logical language for describing correctness properties of the setrees. Given r in R and phi in L, we say that r_phi is aphi-reflection of r just if (i) r and r_phi generate the same underlying tree, and (ii) suppose a node u of the tree t(r) generated by r has label f, then the label of the node u of t(r_phi) is f* if uin t(r) satisfies phi; it is f otherwise. Thus if t(r) is the computation tree of a program r, we may regard r_phi as a transform of R that can internally observe its behaviour against a specification phi. We say that R is (constructively) reflective w.r.t. L just if there is an algorithm that transforms a given pair (r,phi) to r_phi. In this paper, we prove that higher-order recursion schemes are reflective w.r.t. both modal mu-calculus and monadic second order(MSO) logic. To obtain this result, we give the first characterisation of the winning regions of parity games over the transition graphs of collapsible pushdown automata (CPDA): they are regular sets defined by a new class of automata. (Order-n recursion schemes are equi-expressive with order-n CPDA for generating trees.) As a corollary, we show that these schemes are closed under the operation of MSO-interpretation followed by tree unfolding a la Caucal.

Collapsible Pushdown Automata and Labeled Recursion Schemes: Equivalence, Safety and Effective Selection

Higher-order recursion schemes are rewriting systems for simply typed terms and they are known to be equi-expressive with collapsible pushdown automata (CPDA) for generating trees. We argue that CPDA are an essential model when working with recursion schemes. First, we give a new proof of the translation of schemes into CPDA that does not appeal to game semantics. Second, we show that this translation permits to revisit the safety constraint and allows CPDA to be seen as Krivine machines. Finally, we show that CPDA permit one to prove the effective MSO selection property for schemes, subsuming all known decidability results for MSO on schemes.

C-SHORe: a collapsible approach to higher-order verification

Higher-order recursion schemes (HORS) have recently received much attention as a useful abstraction of higher-order functional programs with a number of new verification techniques employing HORS model-checking as their centrepiece. This paper contributes to the ongoing quest for a truly scalable model-checker for HORS by offering a different, automata theoretic perspective. We introduce the first practical model-checking algorithm that acts on a generalisation of pushdown automata equi-expressive with HORS called collapsible pushdown systems (CPDS). At its core is a substantial modification of a recently studied saturation algorithm for CPDS. In particular it is able to use information gathered from an approximate forward reachability analysis to guide its backward search. Moreover, we introduce an algorithm that prunes the CPDS prior to model-checking and a method for extracting counter-examples in negative instances. We compare our tool with the state-of-the-art verification tools for HORS and obtain encouraging results. In contrast to some of the main competition tackling the same problem, our algorithm is fixed-parameter tractable, and we also offer significantly improved performance over the only previously published tool of which we are aware that also enjoys this property. The tool and additional material are available from http://cshore.cs.rhul.ac.uk.

Linear orders in the pushdown hierarchy

We investigate the linear orders belonging to the pushdown hierarchy. Our results are based on the characterization of the pushdown hierarchy by graph transformations due to Caucal and do not make any use of higher-order pushdown automata machinery. Our main results show that ordinals belonging to the n-th level are exactly those strictly smaller than the tower of ω of height n + 1. More generally the Hausdorff rank of scattered linear orders on the n-th level is strictly smaller than the tower of ω of height n. As a corollary the Cantor-Bendixson rank of the tree solutions of safe recursion schemes of order n is smaller than the tower of ω of height n. As a spin-off result, we show that the ω-words belonging to the second level of the pushdown hierarchy are exactly the morphic words.

Context-Sensitive Languages, Rational Graphs and Determinism

We investigate families of infinite automata for context-sensitive languages. An infinite automaton is an infinite labeled graph with two sets of initial and final vertices. Its language is the set of all words labelling a path from an initial vertex to a final vertex. In 2001, Morvan and Stirling proved that rational graphs accept the context-sensitive languages between rational sets of initial and final vertices. This result was later extended to sub-families of rational graphs defined by more restricted classes of transducers. languages. Our contribution is to provide syntactical and self-contained proofs of the above results, when earlier constructions relied on a non-trivial normal form of context-sensitive grammars defined by Penttonen in the 1970s. These new proof techniques enable us to summarize and refine these results by considering several sub-families defined by restrictions on the type of transducers, the degree of the graph or the size of the set of initial vertices.

MSO on the infinite binary tree: choice and order

We give a new proof showing that it is not possible to define in monadic second-order logic (MSO) a choice function on the infinite binary tree. This result was first obtained by Gurevich and Shelah using set theoretical arguments. Our proof is much simpler and only uses basic tools from automata theory. We discuss some applications of the result concerning unambiguous tree automata and definability of winning strategies in infinite games. In a second part we strengthen the result of the non-existence of an MSO-definable well-founded order on the infinite binary tree by showing that every infinite binary tree with a well-founded order has an undecidable MSO-theory.

Choice functions and well-orderings over the infinite binary tree

We give a new proof showing that it is not possible to define in monadic second-order logic (MSO) a choice function on the infinite binary tree. This result was first obtained by Gurevich and Shelah using set theoretical arguments. Our proof is much simpler and only uses basic tools from automata theory. We show how the result can be used to prove the inherent ambiguity of languages of infinite trees. In a second part we strengthen the result of the non-existence of an MSO-definable well-founded order on the infinite binary tree by showing that every infinite binary tree with a well-founded order has an undecidable MSO-theory.