Arne M. van Heusden

The ovarian response as a predictor for successful in vitro fertilization treatment after the age of 40 years

OBJECTIVE To determine whether age or response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is a better predictor of IVF outcome in women > or = 40 years. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTING A transport IVF program. PATIENT(S) For patients undergoing IVF treatment the correlation between treatment outcome and age and response to COH was analyzed using the data of 2,588 consecutive cycles. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Pregnancy. RESULT(S) The incidence of poor ovarian response rises significantly with increasing age. Analysis of all cycles showed a significant decrease in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate for women > or = 40 years. Analysis of cycles with a good ovarian response showed no statistically significant differences for these parameters between women > or = 40 years and those younger. A logistic regression analysis on pregnancy showed that ovarian response contributes more to the prediction of pregnancy than age. CONCLUSION(S) Patients aged > or = 40 years with a good response to COH have a good prognosis for IVF treatment. The age limit for acceptance of patients should not be set at 40 years. Instead, the response to COH can be used to predict candidates likely to have a successful IVF outcome.

The OPTIMIST study: optimisation of cost effectiveness through individualised FSH stimulation dosages for IVF treatment. A randomised controlled trial

BackgroundCosts of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) are high, which is partly due to the use of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). FSH is usually administered in a standard dose. However, due to differences in ovarian reserve between women, ovarian response also differs with potential negative consequences on pregnancy rates. A Markov decision-analytic model showed that FSH dose individualisation according to ovarian reserve is likely to be cost-effective in women who are eligible for IVF. However, this has never been confirmed in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT). The aim of the present study is to assess whether an individualised FSH dose regime based on an ovarian reserve test (ORT) is more cost-effective than a standard dose regime.Methods/DesignMulticentre RCT in subfertile women indicated for a first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle, who are aged < 44 years, have a regular menstrual cycle and no major abnormalities at transvaginal sonography. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome, endocrine or metabolic abnormalities and women undergoing IVF with oocyte donation, will not be included. Ovarian reserve will be assessed by measuring the antral follicle count. Women with a predicted poor response or hyperresponse will be randomised for a standard versus an individualised FSH regime (150 IU/day, 225-450 IU/day and 100 IU/day, respectively). Participants will undergo a maximum of three stimulation cycles during maximally 18 months. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are parameters for ovarian response, multiple pregnancies, number of cycles needed per live birth, total IU of FSH per stimulation cycle, and costs. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to assess whether the health and associated economic benefits of individualised treatment of subfertile women outweigh the additional costs of an ORT.DiscussionThe results of this study will be integrated into a decision model that compares cost-effectiveness of the three dose-adjustment strategies to a standard dose strategy. The study outcomes will provide scientific foundation for national and international guidelines.Trial registrationNTR2657

Treatment policy after poor fertilization in the first IVF cycle.

Purpose:The chance of recurrence of poor fertilization in a second in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle was assessed.Methods:Total fertilization failure was defined, and the relationship between the fertilization rate and the number of motile sperm cells per milliliter of semen was assessed. Patients with a total fertilization failure or poor fertilization (20% or less of the oocytes fertilized) were divided into three subgroups with different chances of fertilization and were followed in a subsequent IVF cycle.Results:The recurrence rate of total fertilization failure was high in all three groups (45–70%), and poor fertilization frequently occurred in the second cycle (50–75%).Conclusions:Poor fertilization frequently recurs in the second IVF cycle. The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection could be considered after fertilization of 20% or less of oocytes in the first cycle, irrespective of the number of motile sperm cells per milliliter of semen.

Hysteroscopy before in-vitro fertilisation (inSIGHT): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Hysteroscopy is often done in infertile women starting in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) to improve their chance of having a baby. However, no data are available from randomised controlled trials to support this practice. We aimed to assess whether routine hysteroscopy before the first IVF treatment cycle increases the rate of livebirths. METHODS We did a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in seven university hospitals and 15 large general hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and no previous hysteroscopy who were scheduled for their first IVF treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to either hysteroscopy with treatment of detected intracavitary abnormalities before starting IVF (hysteroscopy group) or immediate start of the IVF treatment (immediate IVF group). Randomisation was done with web-based concealed allocation and was stratified by centre with variable block sizes. Participants, doctors, and outcome assessors were not masked to the assigned group. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy (detection of a fetal heartbeat at >12 weeks of gestation) within 18 months of randomisation and resulting in livebirth. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01242852. FINDINGS Between May 25, 2011, and Aug 27, 2013, we randomly assigned 750 women to receive either hysteroscopy (n=373) or immediate IVF (n=377). 209 (57%) of 369 women eligible for assessment in the hysteroscopy group and 200 (54%) of 373 in the immediate IVF group had a livebirth from a pregnancy during the trial period (relative risk 1·06, 95% CI 0·93-1·20; p=0·41). One (<1%) woman in the hysteroscopy group developed endometritis after hysteroscopy. INTERPRETATION Routine hysteroscopy does not improve livebirth rates in infertile women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity scheduled for a first IVF treatment. Women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound should not be offered routine hysteroscopy. FUNDING The Dutch Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW).

The inSIGHT study : costs and effects of routine hysteroscopy prior to a first IVF treatment cycle. A randomised controlled trial

BackgroundIn in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment a large drop is present between embryo transfer and occurrence of pregnancy. The implantation rate per embryo transferred is only 30%. Studies have shown that minor intrauterine abnormalities can be found in 11–45% of infertile women with a normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography. Two randomised controlled trials have indicated that detection and treatment of these abnormalities by office hysteroscopy after two failed IVF cycles leads to a 9–13% increase in pregnancy rate. Therefore, screening of all infertile women for intracavitary pathology prior to the start of IVF/ICSI is increasingly advocated. In absence of a scientific basis for such a policy, this study will assess the effects and costs of screening for and treatment of unsuspected intrauterine abnormalities by routine office hysteroscopy, with or without saline infusion sonography (SIS), prior to a first IVF/ICSI cycle.Methods/designMulticenter randomised controlled trial in asymptomatic subfertile women, indicated for a first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle, with normal findings at transvaginal sonography. Women with recurrent miscarriages, prior hysteroscopy treatment and intermenstrual blood loss will not be included. Participants will be randomised for a routine fertility work-up with additional (SIS and) hysteroscopy with on-the-spot-treatment of predefined intrauterine abnormalities versus the regular fertility work-up without additional diagnostic tests. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months of IVF/ICSI treatment after randomisation. Secondary study outcome parameters are the cumulative implantation rate; cumulative miscarriage rate; patient preference and patient tolerance of a SIS and hysteroscopy procedure. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and cox regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the costs of the additional tests as routine procedure. In total 700 patients will be included in this study.DiscussionThe results of this study will help to clarify the significance of hysteroscopy prior to IVF treatment.Trial registrationNCT01242852

Minimal monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation: a useful simplification of the clinical phase of in vitro fertilization treatment

OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility of IVF treatment with minimal monitoring during ovarian hyperstimulation. DESIGN Retrospective analysis and prospective study with real-time control group. SETTING Transport IVF program with transport clinic and satellite clinics. PATIENTS One hundred consecutive IVF cycles monitored at a transport clinic and 100 concurrent consecutive cycles monitored at satellite clinics, using the same stimulation-monitoring protocol and resulting in oocyte aspiration, are compared retrospectively for the number of ultrasound (US) measurements carried out during monitoring and for results of IVF treatment. No patient selection took place. After introduction of a minimal monitoring protocol at a transport clinic, a prospective study was started comparing 100 minimal monitoring cycles at a transport clinic with 100 concurrent conventional monitoring cycles at satellite clinics, all resulting in oocyte aspiration. Patients entered the retrospective or prospective study only once. In all cases the same laboratory facility was used. Monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation was done with US measurements only. Cycles were canceled for impending ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) when > 35 follicles were seen to develop during hyperstimulation. RESULTS Retrospective analysis shows no difference for the average number of US measurements at transport and satellite clinics (2.8 +/- 0.9 and 3.0 +/- 1.0; mean +/- SD). No differences were found in the number of ongoing pregnancies obtained in the two groups: 22 and 18, respectively. One case of severe OHSS occurred in the satellite clinic group. Introduction of minimal monitoring at the transport clinic gives a significant reduction of the average number of US measurements at the transport clinic compared with satellite clinics, where conventional monitoring continued to be used (1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 2.8 +/- 0.9). Ongoing pregnancies at transport and satellite clinics numbered 33 and 26, respectively. In both groups one patient developed severe OHSS. Sixty-two percent of cycles at the transport clinic were monitored with one US measurement only. No cancellations for impending OHSS occurred during the study period. CONCLUSION A large group of patients need only one US measurement during monitoring of ovarian hyperstimulation. Minimal monitoring gives a useful further simplification of the clinical phase of IVF treatment, without adverse effects on treatment outcome and incidence of OHSS.

Hysteroscopy before In-Vitro Fertilisation (inSIGHT): A Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial

Since the first successful live birth after in vitro fertilization (IVF) was reported in 1978, more than 5 million children have been born with the help of this and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures. However, only approximately 25% to 30% of cycles of IVF and ICSI lead to the birth of a child. The reasons for implantation failure are poorly understood. One major cause of implantation failure is abnormalities of the uterine cavity such as polyps, myoma, and adhesions. Hysteroscopy has been generally regarded as the standard procedure to detect these uterine abnormalities. It is thought to improve pregnancy rates in women scheduled for IVF by detection and surgical removal of uterine cavity abnormalities, dilatation of the cervical canal, or induction of inflammatory reactions in the endometriumby the procedure itself. Hysteroscopy is often performed routinely in infertile women scheduled for their first IVF cycle. However, there are no data from well-designed randomized controlled trials to support this practice. The inSIGHT trial is a pragmatic multicenter randomized clinical trial designed to determine whether routine hysteroscopy before the first IVF treatment cycle increases the live birth rate. The trial was conducted in 7 university hospitals and 15 large general hospitals in the Netherlands. Women eligible for the trial were infertile, scheduled to start their first IVF or ICSI treatment, had no previous hysteroscopy, and had a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity. Subjects were randomly assigned in a 1: 1 ratio to hysteroscopy with treatment of detected intracavitary abnormalities before starting IVF followed by IVF (hysteroscopy group) or to immediate start of IVF treatment (immediate IVF group). Web-based randomization was done with a variable block size to allocate patients to groups and was stratified by center. The doctors, outcome assessors, and participants were not masked to the assigned group. The primary study outcome was an ongoing pregnancy (detection of a fetal heartbeat at > 12weeks of gestation) within 18 months of randomization and a live birth. Analysis was done according to intention to treat. Between May 25, 2011, and August 27, 2013, 750 women were randomized: 373 to the hysteroscopy group and 377 to the immediate IVF group. A live birth occurred during the trial period in 209 (57%) of 369 women in the hysteroscopy group and 200 (54%) of 373 in the immediate IVF group; the relative riskwas 1.06, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.93 to 1.20; P = 0.41. These findings demonstrate that hysteroscopy does not improve live birth rates in infertile women scheduled for their first IVF cycle, who have a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity. Therefore, routine hysteroscopy should not be performed in women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound.

A randomized, comparative study of a single oral dose of fluconazole versus a single topical dose of clotrimazole in the treatment of vaginal candidosis among general practitioners and gynaecologists

OBJECTIVES To compare efficacy, acceptability and patient preference of a single oral dose of fluconazole with a single intravaginal dose of 500 mg clotrimazole (medication groups) in women with vaginal candidosis visiting gynaecologists or general practitioners (study groups). DESIGN A comparative, randomized multicenter study. EVENTS: Baseline visit and treatment, short-term follow-up after 1 week and long-term follow-up after 4 weeks. At each visit, symptoms were graded and cultures were obtained. RESULTS Symptomatic and mycological efficacy did not differ statistical significant in the medication groups or study groups. A complicated history regarding vaginal candidosis was more often found among gynaecologists, yielding poorer results of treatment. Patients preferred oral treatment over intra-vaginal treatment. CONCLUSIONS No differences were found in the clinical and mycological efficacy of both drugs. Clinical results were related to parameters originating from the patients history, resulting in less favourable results in the study group of gynaecologists.

Pregnancy and protein C deficiency

This report examines a patient with recurrent attacks of thrombo-embolism due to a protein C deficiency. Alterations in the coagulation during pregnancy and the possible consequences of an altered coagulation during pregnancy will be discussed.